Full text
6,069 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Cauchy--Schwarz inequality predicts biomass allocation and tree size-shape allometry | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 25 November 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Cauchy--Schwarz inequality predicts biomass allocation and tree size-shape allometry Author : Dimitris ZIANIS 0000-0002-6005-4129 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176405243.35631960/v1 120 views 56 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Biomass scaling with size and partitioning of organic matter among tree components, are critical to linking plant form, function, and carbon dynamics. Here, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality—a fundamental relation in mathematics— is introduced as a general geometrical framework for predicting biomass allocation and size–shape allometry in trees. Using two independent datasets (288 trees from the BAAD database (Falster et al ., 2015) and 1,430 diameter–biomass pairs from 35 studies), the hypothesis that this inequality captures universal constraints governing biomass distribution, was tested. The inequality-based model explained 75% of the variance in root biomass and reproduced empirical diameter–biomass scaling with accuracy comparable to classical allometries, despite requiring only two trees for calibration. These findings reveal that the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality provides a simple yet powerful expression of proportionality and constraint in living systems, offering a unifying bridge between mathematical symmetry and biological organization across forest ecosystems. Supplementary Material File (ms_16_mathmeth.docx) Download 189.79 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 25 November 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords allometry biomass allocation carbon estimation cauchy–schwarz inequality scaling size–shape relationships trees Authors Affiliations Dimitris ZIANIS 0000-0002-6005-4129 [email protected] Agricultural University of Athens View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 120 views 56 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Dimitris ZIANIS. Cauchy--Schwarz inequality predicts biomass allocation and tree size-shape allometry. Authorea . 25 November 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176405243.35631960/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176405243.35631960/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a005c24328fd58f4',t:'MTc3OTU1NzExNQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.