Semantics or more than semantics? Reply of the author:
article
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This author's reply argues that their previous semantic analysis, not just semantic differences, provided the core findings of their research.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities 1997
- Pathophysiology of adenomyosis 1998
- Recto vaginal septum adenomyotic nodules: a series of 500 cases 1997
- Stereometric evaluation of peritoneal endometriosis and endometriotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum 1996
Cited by (1)
References (7)
- Pathophysiology of adenomyosis via openalex
- Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities via openalex
- Recto vaginal septum adenomyotic nodules: a series of 500 cases via openalex
- Stereometric evaluation of peritoneal endometriosis and endometriotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum via openalex
- W1987810120 via openalex
- W1754070801 via openalex
- W4245281104 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK