Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model 

Impact of high wind speed on blooming... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459" }, "headline": "Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model ", "datePublished": "2025-12-26T04:59:22", "dateModified": "2026-04-29T09:42:09", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Shireen Jawad" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Zainab Hayder Abid AL-Aali" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background Local ecosystems and global agriculture are contingent upon the mutualistic relationship between pollinators and floral plants. In symbiosis, pollinators increase agricultural production by improving plant cross-pollination, genetic variety, crop quality, and yield. The potential impact on plant reproduction is particularly alarming due to the decline of pollinating insects. Habitat loss, diseases, climate change, pesticides, and predation have all contributed to the decline of pollinator species. High-speed wind is a significant factor that impacts the mutualistic relationship between plants and pollinators. Methods Studying the dynamics of interactions between blooming plants and honeybee populations is crucial for addressing honeybee decline and ensuring sustainable ecosystems. This work employs mathematical modeling to analyze the dynamics of a blooming plant, honeybee population, and honey production symbiosis, with a special emphasis on the effect of high-speed wind flow. Results The stability of various ecological equilibria has been investigated using dynamical system theory. Bifurcation phenomena, such as transcritical and Hopf bifurcations, have been discovered using bifurcation theory. Furthermore, the numerical results show that high wind flow can cause the extinction of the honeybee population and honey production. Conclusions Due to the rapid depletion of flowering plants and the high rate of wind speed, the populations of honeybees and blossoming plants are at risk of becoming unsustainable. However, the combination of reduced wind flow and increased symbiotic strengths can bolster the stability and sustainability of blooming plant-honeybee-honey production ecosystems. These findings inform conservation policies targeted toward protecting honeybees and increasing biodiversity. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1", "name": "Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production..." } } ] } Home Browse Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Jawad S and AL-Aali ZHA. Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172134.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] Shireen Jawad https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-8357 1 , Zainab Hayder Abid AL-Aali 1 Shireen Jawad https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-8357 1 , Zainab Hayder Abid AL-Aali 1 PUBLISHED 26 Dec 2025 Author details Author details 1 Mathematics, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Baghdad Governorate, Iraq Shireen Jawad Roles: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Zainab Hayder Abid AL-Aali Roles: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Fallujah Multidisciplinary Science and Innovation gateway. Abstract Background Local ecosystems and global agriculture are contingent upon the mutualistic relationship between pollinators and floral plants. In symbiosis, pollinators increase agricultural production by improving plant cross-pollination, genetic variety, crop quality, and yield. The potential impact on plant reproduction is particularly alarming due to the decline of pollinating insects. Habitat loss, diseases, climate change, pesticides, and predation have all contributed to the decline of pollinator species. High-speed wind is a significant factor that impacts the mutualistic relationship between plants and pollinators. Methods Studying the dynamics of interactions between blooming plants and honeybee populations is crucial for addressing honeybee decline and ensuring sustainable ecosystems. This work employs mathematical modeling to analyze the dynamics of a blooming plant, honeybee population, and honey production symbiosis, with a special emphasis on the effect of high-speed wind flow. Results The stability of various ecological equilibria has been investigated using dynamical system theory. Bifurcation phenomena, such as transcritical and Hopf bifurcations, have been discovered using bifurcation theory. Furthermore, the numerical results show that high wind flow can cause the extinction of the honeybee population and honey production. Conclusions Due to the rapid depletion of flowering plants and the high rate of wind speed, the populations of honeybees and blossoming plants are at risk of becoming unsustainable. However, the combination of reduced wind flow and increased symbiotic strengths can bolster the stability and sustainability of blooming plant-honeybee-honey production ecosystems. These findings inform conservation policies targeted toward protecting honeybees and increasing biodiversity. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Wind speed, blooming plants-honeybees model, mutualistic relationship, Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, dynamical systems, stability analysis, bifurcation. Corresponding Author(s) Shireen Jawad ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Shireen Jawad Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2025 Jawad S and AL-Aali ZHA. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Jawad S and AL-Aali ZHA. Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172134.1 ) First published: 26 Dec 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172134.1 ) Latest published: 29 Apr 2026, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172134.2 )  There is a newer version of this article available. Suppress this message for one day. Introduction The mutualistic relationship between blooming plants and honeybee populations is a crucial ecological interaction for the sustainability of both local ecosystems and global agricultural systems. 1 Animal pollinators, including honeybees, provide pollination services through symbiosis, which is essential for the successful reproduction of approximately 300,000 plant species worldwide. In symbiosis, pollinators are vital for promoting plant cross-pollination, genetic diversity, and crop quality and yield, substantially contributing to agricultural productivity. 2 Consequently, this is a critical research area in conservation biology and ecology. A significant number of studies have been undertaken regarding the symbiotic relationships between plants and pollinator systems. 3 Hadani 4 suggested that the symbiosis can be characterized by the Beddington-DeAngelis response function, which incorporates competition for resource exploitation among pollinators and the obligatory relationship between the plant and the pollinator. This relationship has been observed to maintain a steady state, provided that the initial population level is sufficiently substantial. 5 Biswas et al. examined a plant–pollinator model to investigate the impact of predation on pollinator species. They conclude that the pollinator is at risk of extinction if the predation rate cannot be controlled. Moreover, this hypothesis has prompted the advancement of extensive studies examining the impacts of nectar theft and ants on the plant-pollinator system. 6 The reduction of biodiversity is a widespread issue, although the decrease of pollinating insects is especially alarming due to its possible effects on plant reproduction. 7 A recent report on the global reduction of honeybee and bumblebee populations has highlighted pollination’s ecological and economic significance. 8 The reduction of pollinator species can be ascribed to various ecological and environmental reasons, including habitat loss, illnesses, climate change, pesticides, and predation. 9 – 12 Invasive predators can significantly affect pollinators by diminishing their quantity, altering plant reproductive success, and undermining the plant-pollinator relationship. 13 One factor that negatively affects the mutualism in plant-pollinator systems is high-speed wind. 5 , 14 – 17 High winds disrupt flower fragrance messages, reducing honeybee attraction. Strong winds quickly distribute flowers’ aromatic chemicals in different directions, reducing their “scent signal”. As aroma dispersion reduces, honeybees’ ability to discover food sources decreases, resulting in fewer trips to flowers. 18 In addition, flying in severe winds demands more energy for balance and advancement. Honeybees may stay in the hive or fly less to preserve energy. Pollination opportunities decrease as fewer flowers are visited. Strong winds can break flowers’ petals or open their parts abnormally, decreasing honeybees’ access to their reproductive organs. This temporal shift may diminish pollination when flowers are most pollinating. High winds can cause honeybees to crash, fall, or be blown off course, destroying the colony. Lost workers or persistent stress can harm the colony and its capacity to provide enough workers for visits. 19 In this study, we discuss the effect of high wind speed on a three-dimensional blooming plant–honeybee–honey production mathematical model ( phn model) that takes into account saturated mutualism between blooming plants and honeybees by the Beddington–DeAngelis response function. The primary focus is to investigate the dynamics of the plant–pollinator system while considering the impacts of wind speed on the mutualism between blooming plants and honeybees. The study aims to understand the interactions between mutualism and wind speed, and how these interactions affect the overall ecological balance and sustainability of the blooming plant–honeybee–honey production system. Methods Assumptions of the model In this section, a phn model is formulated to describe the interaction among blooming plants p ( t ) , honey honeybees h ( t ) and the production of honey n ( t ) at time t . Then the blooming plant, the honey honeybees, and the production of honey system can be depicted by (1) dp dt = r 1 p ( 1 − p k 1 ) + α 1 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 1 p , dh dt = r 2 h ( 1 − h k 2 ) + α 2 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 2 h , dn dt = α 3 h 1 + w + ch − βnh − γ 3 n . 1. The blooming plants are assumed to grow in the absence of honeybees at the intrinsic growth rate r 1 , depletion rate γ 1 and carrying capacity k 1 . Since blooming plants provide nutrients for honeybees, honeybees offer pollination services to blooming plants; hence, their relationship is mutualistic. Beddington-DeAngelis functional response ( α 1 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) ) can be used to express the mutualistic relationship, where α 1 denotes the positive effect of honeybees (a kind of pollinator) on plants, a refers to the undepleted equilibrium rate for the blooming plant–honeybee interaction, which incorporates travel and unloading durations at a central location along with individual-level blooming plant–honeybee interactions, and b indicates the intensity of competition among honeybees for floral resources. 2. High winds break plants’ stems and branches, causing flowers to collapse and damage their petals. This damage reduces the flowers’ attractiveness to pollinating insects. Also, wind speeds reduce the honeybees’ ability to search in a windy environment. Let ϑ ( w ) = 1 1 + w be the efficiency of wind, which satisfied the following • ϑ ( 0 ) = 1 means in the absence of wind, the mutualistic interaction between blooming plants and honeybees remains as before, i.e., ( α 1 hp 1 + ( ah + bp ) ) . • ϑ ( w ) > 1 means the efficiency of mutualistic interaction decreases in a high, windy environment. 3. The honeybee population are expected to grow from external resources at the intrinsic growth rate r 2 , depletion rate γ 2 and carrying capacity k 2 . ( α 2 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) ) represents the nutrients that blooming plants provide to honeybees, where α 2 stands for the corresponding value of honeybee nutrients from blooming plants. 4. The term ( α 3 h 1 + w + ch ) represents the honey production in the colonies where α 3 is the rate of production that is contingent upon the quantity of honeybees, and c is the half-saturation rate. Wind speed negatively affects the amount of honey produced since it diminishes the honeybees’ capacity to search for nutrition. 5. During winter or drought, honeybees rely on their stored honey to survive. This represents a natural consumption process but diminishes the quantity available for harvest. Therefore, β signifies the rate at which honeybees consume honey to survive. 6. The amount of honey produced decreases due to many factors, such as absorbing moisture from the atmosphere. In humid environments, honey absorbs moisture, which reduces its concentration and makes it susceptible to fermentation and spoilage. High temperatures cause the honey content to evaporate. Therefore, γ 3 denotes the rate of natural causes of honey loss. Further, the schematic sketch of phn system is illustrated in Figure 1 . Figure 1. Flowchart of the phn model. Model analysis Before analyzing our model, it is pertinent to invoke the following lemmas, the demonstration of which is available in Refs. 20 - 22 . Lemma 1. If H , ℊ > 0 and H ̇ ⩾ ( ⩽ ) H ( H − ℊ H α ) , where a is a positive constant, when t ⩾ 0 and H ( 0 ) > 0 , then H ( t ) ⩾ ( ⩽ ) ( H ℊ ) 1 / α [ 1 + ( H H − a ( 0 ) ℊ − 1 ) e − H αt ] − 1 / α Lemma 2. (Comparison lemma) Suppose that H , ℊ > 0 , with Ρ ( 0 ) > 0 . Then for dΡ dt ≤ Ρ ( t ) [ H − ℊ Ρ ( t ) ] , then lim t → ∞ sup P ( t ) ≤ H ℊ , and if d Ρ dt ≥ Ρ ( t ) [ H − ℊ Ρ ( t ) ] , then lim t → ∞ inf P ( t ) ≥ H ℊ . Uniqueness. Since the right side of the phn model C 1 ( R + 3 ) , so they satisfy the Lipschitz condition. Therefore, the solution to phn model that starts in R + 3 exists and is unique. Positivity Theorem 1. The solution ( p ( t ) , h ( t ) , n ( t ) ) of phn system with the initial condition ( p 0 , h 0 , n 0 ) is positive. Proof. According to the blooming plants and honeybees’ equations of phn system, we get p ( t ) = p 0 e ∫ 0 t ( r 1 ( 1 − p ( τ ) k 1 ) + α 1 h ( τ ) 1 + w + ( ah ( τ ) + bp ( τ ) ) − γ 1 ) dτ ≥ 0 h ( t ) = h 0 e ∫ 0 t ( r 2 ( 1 − h ( τ ) k 2 ) + α 2 p ( τ ) 1 + w + ( ah ( τ ) + bp ( τ ) ) − γ 2 ) dτ ≥ 0 From the equation for honey production, we attain dn dt ≥ − n ( β h 0 e ∫ 0 t ( r 2 ( 1 − h ( τ ) k 2 ) + α 2 p ( τ ) 1 + w + ( ah ( τ ) + bp ( τ ) ) − γ 2 ) dτ + γ 3 ) , which implies that n ( t ) ≥ n 0 e ∫ 0 t ( β h 0 e ∫ 0 t ( r 2 ( 1 − h ( τ ) k 2 ) + α 2 p ( τ ) 1 + w + ( ah ( τ ) + bp ( τ ) ) − γ 2 ) dτ + γ 3 ) dτ ≥ 0 Therefore, the solution ( p ( t ) , h ( t ) , n ( t ) ) will remain positive for all t ≥ 0 . Boundedness Theorem 2. All solutions of phn system are uniformly bounded. Proof. From the blooming plants equation of the phn system, we obtain dp dt = r 1 p ( 1 − p k 1 ) + α 1 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 1 p ≤ p [ ( r 1 − γ 1 ) − ( r 1 p k 1 ) + α 1 h ] . After using the honeybees’ carrying capacity, we get dp dt ≤ p [ ( r 1 + α 1 k 2 − γ 1 ) − ( r 1 p k 1 ) ] Using Lemma 1 , we deduced that. p ( t ) ≤ [ ( r 1 + α 1 k 2 − γ 1 ) k 1 r 1 ] 1 2 ( 1 + [ ( r 1 + α 1 k 2 − γ 1 ) k 1 p − 2 ( 0 ) r 1 − 1 ] e − 2 ( r 1 + α 1 k 2 − γ 1 ) t ) − 1 2 It is obtained after taking t → ∞ p ( t ) ≤ [ ( r 1 + α 1 k 2 − γ 1 ) k 1 r 1 ] 1 2 = p m Similarly, for the honey honeybee equation of the phn system, we find h ( t ) ≤ [ k 1 ( r 2 + α 2 p m − γ 2 ) r 2 ] 1 2 = h m Finally, from the amount of honey produced equation, we attain dn dt = α 3 h 1 + w + ch − βnh − γ 3 n ≤ α 3 h m − γ 3 n Then, by Lemma 2 , we get 0 ≤ lim t → ∞ sup [ n ( t ) ] ≤ α 3 h m γ 3 = n m Therefore, any solutions of phn system will be attracted to Σ = { ( h , p , n ) ∈ R + 3 : p ( t ) ≤ p m , h ( t ) ≤ h m , n ( t ) ≤ n m } . Persistence The phn system is said to be persistent if all its components survive in future times. Theorem 3. All phn system components are persistent if (2) r 1 > γ 1 , (3) r 2 > γ 2 . Proof: First, to prove that p ( t ) If it is persistent, we have to show that lim t → ∞ inf p ( t ) > 0 i.e. p ( t ) will not decay to zero. From the blooming plants equation, we get dp dt = r 1 p ( 1 − p k 1 ) + α 1 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 1 p ≥ p [ ( r 1 − γ 1 ) − ( r 1 k 1 ) p ] . By Lemma 2 , we have lim t → ∞ inf p ( t ) ≥ L 1 , where L 1 = k 1 ( r 1 − γ 1 ) r 1 provided r 1 > γ 1 . Thus, for a small E 1 > 0 , ∃ a positive number t 1 > 0 such that p ( t ) ≥ L 1 − E 1 ∀ t > t 1 Applying the same strategy for the honeybee equation, we get h ( t ) ≥ L 2 − E 2 ∀ t > t 2 , where L 2 = k 2 ( r 2 − γ 2 ) r 2 provided r 2 > γ 2 . From the honey production equation, we attain dn dt = α 3 h 1 + w + ch − βnh − γ 3 n ≥ α 3 ( L 2 − E 2 ) 1 + w + c ( L 2 − E 2 ) − n ( β h m − γ 3 ) Since • g ( h ) = α 3 h 1 + w + ch is an increasing function, which means if h ( t ) ≥ L 2 − E 2 , then g ( h ) ≥ g ( L 2 − E 2 ) • h ( t ) ≤ h m Then, by Lemma 2 , lim t → ∞ inf n ( t ) ≥ α 3 ( L 2 − E 2 ) [ 1 + w + c ( L 2 − E 2 ) ] ( β h m − γ 3 ) , where L 3 = α 3 ( L 2 − E 2 ) [ 1 + w + c ( L 2 − E 2 ) ] ( β h m − γ 3 ) Thus, for a small E 3 > 0 , ∃ a positive number t 3 > 0 such that n ( t ) ≥ L 3 − E 3 ∀ t > t 3 Therefore, phn system is uniformly persistent. Remark 1: Conditions 2 and 3 indicate that all phn system components will survive in the future times if the intrinsic growth rates of the blooming plants and honeybees exceed their depletion rates. Equilibrium analysis The possible equilibria of phn system are 1) The extinction point S 1 = ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) . 2) The blooming plants point S 2 = ( p 1 , 0 , 0 ) , where p 1 = k 1 ( r 1 − γ 1 ) r 1 . For p 1 to be positive, condition (2) must be satisfied. 3) The honeybee point S 3 = ( 0 , h 2 , 0 ) , where h 2 = k 2 ( r 2 − γ 2 ) r 2 . Clearly h 2 > 0 if condition (3) is satisfied. 4) The blooming plants free point S 4 = ( 0 , h 3 , n 3 ) , where h 3 = k 2 ( r 2 − γ 2 ) r 2 and n 3 = α 3 h 3 ( 1 + w + c h 3 ) ( β h 3 + γ 3 ) > 0 . Clearly h 3 > 0 if the condition (3) is satisfied. 5) The coexistence point S 5 = ( p 4 , h 4 , n 4 ) , here n 4 = α 3 h 4 ( 1 + w + c h 4 ) ( β h 4 + γ 3 ) , h 4 = r 1 b p 4 2 + z 1 p 4 + z 2 z 3 − a r 1 p 4 where, z 1 = r 1 ( 1 + w − k 1 b ) + γ 1 k 1 b , z 2 = k 1 ( γ 1 ( 1 + w ) − ( r 1 + w ) ) , z 3 = k 1 ( α 1 + a ( r 1 − γ 1 − p ) ) , and p 4 is the root of the following equation (4) A 0 p 3 + A 1 P 2 + A 2 P + A 3 = 0 , where, A 0 = r 1 [ r 1 a ( r 2 b + r 2 bw + α 2 a k 2 ) − r 2 b ( b z 3 + a z 1 ) ] , A 1 = ( r 2 − γ 2 ) [ r 1 ( ak 2 ( r 1 + wa r 1 − b z 3 − a z 1 ) ] + r 2 ( a z 1 + aw z 1 − bw − bw z 3 − ab z 2 ) − r 2 b z 1 z 3 − r 2 a z 1 2 − a r 1 α 2 z 3 k 2 − a α 2 r 1 z 3 k 2 , A 2 = ( r 2 − γ 2 ) [ z 3 k 2 ( z 3 b − r 1 − 2 r 1 aw + a z 1 − r 1 a ) − k 2 r 1 a 2 z 2 ] + r 2 ( z 2 ( a ( r 1 − 2 z 1 + w r 1 ) − b z 3 ) + z 3 ( k 2 α 2 − r 1 − z 1 w ) ) , A 3 = ( r 2 − γ 2 ) [ z 3 ( z 3 − k 2 ( w z 3 − a z 2 ) ) ] − r 2 z 2 ( z 3 + w z 3 + a z 2 ) . By Descartes’s rule of signs, Equation (4) has a unique positive root p 4 , if one of the following conditions holds: A 0 > 0 , and A 2 , A 3 0 , and A 3 < 0 , A 0 0 , A 0 , A 1 0 . Further, h 4 > 0 if one of the following conditions holds: r 1 b p 4 2 + z 1 p 4 + z 2 > 0 and z 3 > a r 1 p 4 r 1 b p 4 2 + z 1 p 4 + z 2 < 0 and z 3 < a r 1 p 4 Local stability of equilibrium points To investigate the local stability, one needs to determine the Jacobian matrix at any point. Thus, the Jacobian matrix at any point ( p , h , n ) is J ( p , h , n ) = [ a 11 α 1 p ( 1 + w + bp ) ( 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) ) 2 0 α 2 h ( 1 + w + ah ) ( 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) ) 2 a 22 0 0 α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( 1 + w + ch ) 2 − βn − βh − γ 3 ] , where a 11 = − 2 r 1 p k 1 + α 1 h ( 1 + w + ah ) ( 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) ) 2 + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) , and a 22 = − 2 r 2 h k 2 + α 2 p ( 1 + w + bp ) ( 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) ) 2 + ( r 2 − γ 2 ) . Theorem 4. The extinction point S 1 = ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) is locally asymptotically stable if (5) γ 1 > r 1 , (6) γ 2 > r 2 . Proof: The Jacobian matrix at S 1 = ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) is (7) J ( S 1 ) = [ r 1 − γ 1 0 0 0 r 2 − γ 2 0 0 ∝ 3 1 + w − γ 3 ] , Then, the eigenvalues of J ( S 1 ) are λ 11 = r 1 − γ 1 , λ 12 = r 2 − γ 2 and λ 13 = − γ 3 < 0 . Therefore, S 1 is asymptotically stable under conditions 5 and 6 . Remark 2: The biological interpretation of conditions 5 and 6 indicates phn system reaches asymptotically the extinction point when the depletion rates of the blooming plants and honeybees exceed their intrinsic growth rates. Theorem 5. The blooming plants point S 2 = ( p 1 , 0 , 0 ) is locally asymptotically stable if (8) r 2 + α 2 p 1 ( 1 + w + b p 1 ) < γ 2 , Proof: J ( S 2 ) = J ( p 1 , 0 , 0 ) is given by (9) J ( S 2 ) = [ − ( r 1 − γ 1 ) α 1 p 1 ( 1 + w + b p 1 ) 0 0 α 2 p 1 ( 1 + w + b p 1 ) + ( r 2 − γ 2 ) 0 0 α 3 1 + w − γ 3 ] . So, the eigenvalues of S 2 are λ 21 = − ( r 1 − γ 1 ) < 0 , under the existence condition of the blooming plants point. λ 22 = α 2 p 1 ( 1 + w + b p 1 ) + ( r 2 − γ 2 ) , and λ 23 = − γ 3 < 0 . Thus, S 2 is asymptotically stable if condition 8 is satisfied . Theorem 5. The honeybee point S 3 = ( 0 , h 2 , 0 ) is locally asymptotically stable if (10) r 1 + α 1 h 2 ( 1 + w + a h 2 ) < γ 1 , (11) ( r 2 − γ 2 ) < 2 r 2 h 2 k 2 Proof: J ( S 3 ) = J ( 0 , h 2 , 0 ) is given by (12) J ( S 3 ) = [ α 1 h 2 ( 1 + w + a h 2 ) + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) 0 0 α 2 h 2 1 + w + a h 2 ( r 2 − γ 2 ) − 2 r 2 h 2 k 2 0 0 α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( 1 + w + c h 2 ) 2 − β h 2 − γ 3 ] . So, the eigenvalues of J ( S 3 ) are λ 31 = α 1 h 2 ( 1 + w + a h 2 ) + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) , λ 32 = ( r 2 − γ 2 ) − 2 r 2 h 2 k 2 , and λ 33 = − β h 2 − γ 3 < 0 . Thus, S 3 is asymptotically stable if the conditions 10 and 11 are satisfied. Theorem 6. The blooming plants free point S 4 = ( 0 , h 3 , n 3 ) is locally asymptotically stable if (13) r 1 + α 1 h 3 ( 1 + w + a h 3 ) < γ 1 , (14) ( r 2 − γ 2 ) < r 2 h 3 k 2 Proof: J ( S 4 ) = J ( 0 , h 3 , n 3 ) is given by (15) J ( S 4 ) = [ α 1 h 3 ( 1 + w + a h 3 ) + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) 0 0 α 2 h 3 ( 1 + w + a h 3 ) ( r 2 − γ 2 ) − 2 r 2 h 3 k 2 0 0 α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( 1 + w + c h 3 ) − β n 3 − β h 3 − γ 3 ] . The eigenvalues of J ( S 4 ) are λ 41 = α 1 h 3 ( 1 + w + a h 3 ) + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) , λ 42 = ( r 2 − γ 2 ) − 2 r 2 h 3 k 2 , and λ 43 = − β h 3 − γ 3 < 0 . So, S 4 is asymptotically stable if conditions 13 and 14 are satisfied. Theorem 7. The coexistence point S 5 = ( p 4 , h 4 , n 4 ) is locally asymptotically stable if (16) a ii [ α 1 α 2 p 4 h 4 ( 1 + w + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w + a h 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 4 ] . Proof: J ( S 5 ) = J ( p 4 , h 4 , n 4 ) is given by (18) J ( S 5 ) = [ a 11 α 1 p 4 ( 1 + w + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 0 α 2 h 4 ( 1 + w + a h 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 a 22 0 0 α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( 1 + w + c h 4 ) 2 − β n 4 − β h 4 − γ 3 ] , where a 11 = ( r 1 − γ 1 ) − 2 r 1 p 4 k 1 + α 1 h 4 ( 1 + w + a h 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 , and a 22 = ( r 2 − γ 2 ) − 2 r 2 h 4 k 2 + α 2 p 4 ( 1 + w + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 . Then, the characteristic equation of J ( S 5 ) is given by: (19) ( − β h 4 − γ 3 − λ ) [ λ 2 − Trλ + Det ] = 0 , where, λ 51 = − β h 4 − γ 3 , Tr = a 11 + a 22 = ( r 1 − γ 1 ) − 2 r 1 p 4 k 1 + α 1 h 4 ( 1 + w + a h 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 − 2 r 2 h 4 k 2 + α 2 p 4 ( 1 + w + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 + ( r 2 − γ 2 ) , Det = a 11 a 22 − [ α 1 α 2 p 4 h 4 ( 1 + w + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w + a h 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 4 ] = ( ( r 1 − γ 1 ) − 2 r 1 p 4 k 1 + α 1 h 4 ( 1 + w + a h 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 ) ( ( r 2 − γ 2 ) − 2 r 2 h 4 k 2 + α 2 p 4 ( 1 + w + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 ) − [ α 1 α 2 p 4 h 4 ( 1 + w + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w + a h 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 4 ] . Thus, S 5 exhibits local stability if conditions 16 and 17 are fulfilled. Global stability In this section, the Lyapunov method is used to illustrate the global stability of the previous points, as shown in the following theorems. Theorem 8. The extinction point S 1 = ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) is a global asymptotic stability (GAS) if the following conditions are met. (20) r 1 + h m ( α 1 + α 2 ) 1 + w < γ 1 (21) r 2 + α 3 1 + w 0 for all ( p , h , n ) ∈ R + 3 with ( p , h , n ) ≠ ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) . Then d E 1 dt = dp dt + dh dt + dn dt = ( r 1 p ( 1 − p k 1 ) + α 1 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 1 p ) + ( r 2 h ( 1 − h k 2 ) + α 2 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 2 h ) + ( α 3 h 1 + w + ch ) − βnh − γ 3 n ) = r 1 p − r 1 p 2 k 1 + hp ( α 1 + α 2 ) 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 1 p + r 2 h − r 2 h 2 k 2 − γ 2 h + α 3 h 1 + w + ch ) − βnh − γ 3 n Then, by using the upper bound of the honeybees’ population, we get d E 1 dt ≤ p ( r 1 − γ 1 + h m ( α 1 + α 2 ) 1 + w ) + h ( r 2 − γ 2 + α 3 1 + w ) − r 1 p 2 k 1 − r 2 h 2 k 2 − βnh − γ 3 n . The first two terms are negative definite if conditions 20 and 21 are satisfied. Hence, d E 1 / dt is a negative definite. Therefore, the extinction point S 1 is GAS. Theorem 9. The blooming plants point S 2 = ( p 1 , 0 , 0 ) is GAS if (22) r 2 + α 2 p m + α 3 1 + w < γ 2 , (23) ( α 1 D ) 2 ≤ r 1 r 2 k 1 k 2 , where, D = 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) . Proof: Let E 2 = ( p − p 1 − p 1 ln ( p p 1 ) ) + h + n , where E 2 : R + 3 → R , which satisfies E 2 ( p 1 , 0 , 0 ) = 0 and E 2 ( p , h , n ) > 0 for all ( p , h , n ) ∈ R + 3 with ( p , h , n ) ≠ ( p 1 , 0 , 0 ) , then d E 2 dt = ( p − p 1 p ) dp dt + dh dt + dn dt = − r 1 k 1 ( p − p 1 ) 2 + α 1 h ( p − p 1 ) D + h r 2 ( 1 − h k 2 ) + α 2 ph D − γ 2 h + α 3 h 1 + w + ch − βnh − γ 3 n Then, by using the upper bound of the blooming plants population, we get d E 2 dt ≤ − ( r 1 k 1 ( p − p 1 ) 2 − α 1 D h ( p − p 1 ) + r 2 k 2 h 2 ) + h ( r 2 + α 2 p m + α 3 1 + w − γ 2 ) − βnh − γ 3 n . Thus, d E 2 dt ≤ − ( r 1 k 1 ( p − p 1 ) + r 2 k 2 h ) 2 + h ( r 2 + α 2 p m + α 3 1 + w − γ 2 ) − βnh − γ 3 n . The first two terms are negative definite if conditions 22 and 23 are satisfied. Hence, d E 2 / dt is a negative definite. Therefore, the blooming plants point S 2 = ( p 1 , 0 , 0 ) is GAS. Theorem 10. The honeybee point S 3 = ( 0 , h 2 , 0 ) , is GAS if (24) r 1 + α 1 h m 1 + w < γ 1 , (25) ( α 2 D ) 2 ≤ r 1 r 2 k 1 k 2 , (26) α 3 β ( 1 + w ) 0 for all ( p , h , n ) ∈ R + 3 with ( p , h , n ) ≠ ( 0 , h 2 , 0 ) , then d E 3 dt = dp dt + ( h − h 2 h ) dh dt + dn dt = ( r 1 p ( 1 − p k 1 ) + α 1 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 1 p ) + ( h − h 2 ) ( ( r 2 ( 1 − h k 2 ) + α 2 p 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 2 ) ) + ( α 3 h 1 + w + ch − βnh − γ 3 n ) ≤ r 1 p − r 1 p 2 k 1 + α 1 hp 1 + w − γ 1 p − r 2 k 2 ( h − h 2 ) 2 + α 2 ( h − h 2 ) p D + α 3 h 1 + w − βnh − γ 3 n Then, by using the upper bound of the honeybees’ population, we get d E 3 dt ≤ − ( r 1 k 1 p 2 − α 2 ( h − h 2 ) p D + ( r 2 k 2 ) ( h − h 2 ) 2 ) + p ( r 1 + α 1 h m 1 + w − γ 1 ) + h ( α 3 1 + w − βn ) − γ 3 n Thus, d E 3 dt ≤ − ( r 1 k 1 p + r 2 k 2 ( h − h 2 ) ) 2 + p ( r 1 + α 1 h m 1 + w − γ 1 ) + h ( α 3 1 + w − βn ) − γ 3 n . The first three terms are negative definite if conditions 24-26 are satisfied. Hence, d E 3 / dt is a negative definite. Therefore, the blooming plants point S 3 = ( 0 , h 2 , 0 ) is GAS. The blooming plants free point S 4 = ( 0 , h 3 , n 3 ) Theorem 11. The blooming plants free point S 4 = ( 0 , h 3 , n 3 ) is GAS if (27) ( α 2 D ) 2 ≤ r 1 r 2 2 k 1 k 2 , (28) ( α 3 ( 1 + w ) D 1 D 2 − βn ) 2 ≤ r 2 ( β h 3 + γ 3 ) 2 k 2 , where, D = 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) , D 1 = ( 1 + w + ch ) and D 2 = ( 1 + w + c h 3 ) . Proof: Let E 4 = p + ( h − h 3 − h 3 ln h h 3 ) + ( n − n 3 2 ) 2 , where E 4 : R + 3 → R , which satisfies E 4 ( 0 , h 3 , n 3 ) = 0 and E 4 ( p , h , n ) > 0 for all ( p , h , n ) ∈ R + 3 with ( p , h , n ) ≠ ( 0 , h 3 , n 3 ) , then d E 4 dt = dp dt + ( h − h 3 h ) dh dt + ( n − n 3 ) dn dt = ( r 1 p ( 1 − p k 1 ) + α 1 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 1 p ) + ( h − h 3 ) ( r 2 ( 1 − h k 2 ) + α 2 p 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 2 ) + ( n − n 3 ) ( α 3 h 1 + w + ch − βnh − γ 3 n ) = r 1 p − r 1 p 2 k 1 + α 1 hp 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 1 p + ( h − h 3 ) ( − r 2 k 2 ( h − h 3 ) + α 2 p 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) ) + ( n − n 3 ) ( α 3 h 1 + w + ch − α 3 h 3 1 + w + c h 3 − βnh − β n 3 h 3 − γ 3 ( n − n 3 ) ) Then, by using the upper bound of the honeybees’ population, we get d E 4 dt ≤ − ( r 1 k 1 p 2 − α 2 ( h − h 3 ) p 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) + ( r 2 2 k 2 ) ( h − h 3 ) 2 ) + p ( r 1 + α 1 h m 1 + w − γ 1 ) − [ ( r 2 2 k 2 ) ( h − h 3 ) 2 − ( α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( 1 + w + ch ) ( 1 + w + c h 3 ) − βn ) ( h − h 3 ) ( n − n 3 ) + ( β h 3 + γ 3 ) ( n − n 3 ) 2 ] Thus, d E 4 dt ≤ − ( r 1 k 1 p + r 2 2 k 2 ( h − h 3 ) ) 2 + p ( r 1 + α 1 h m 1 + w − γ 1 ) − ( r 2 2 k 2 ( h − h 3 ) + ( β h 3 + γ 3 ) ( n − n 3 ) ) 2 The first and the third terms are negative definite if conditions 27 and 28 are satisfied, while the second term is negative under condition 24. Hence, d E 4 / dt is a negative definite. Therefore, the blooming plants free point S 4 = ( 0 , h 3 , n 3 ) is GAS. Theorem 12. The coexistence point S 5 = ( p 4 , h 4 , n 4 ) is GAS if (29) ( ( α 1 + α 2 ) ( 1 + w ) + α 1 b p 4 + α 2 a h 4 N 1 N 2 ) 2 ≤ 1 2 ( r 1 k 1 + α 1 b h 4 N 1 N 2 ) ( r 2 k 2 + α 2 a p 4 N 1 N 2 ) , (30) ( α 3 ( 1 + w ) D 1 D 2 − βn ) 2 ≤ 1 2 ( r 2 k 2 + α 2 a p 4 N 1 N 2 ) ( β h 4 + γ 3 ) , where, N 1 = 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) , N 2 = 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) , D 1 = ( 1 + w + ch ) and D 2 = ( 1 + w + c h 3 ) . Proof: Let E 5 = ( p − p 4 − p 4 ln p p 4 ) + ( h − h 4 − h 4 ln h h 4 ) + ( n − n 4 2 ) 2 , where E 5 : R + 3 → R , which satisfies E 5 ( p 4 , h 4 , n 4 ) = 0 and E 5 ( p , h , n ) > 0 for all ( p , h , n ) ∈ R + 3 with ( p , h , n ) ≠ ( p 4 , h 4 , n 4 ) , then d E 5 dt = ( p − p 4 p ) dp dt + ( h − h 4 h ) dh dt + ( n − n 4 ) dn dt = ( p − p 4 ) ( r 1 ( 1 − p k 1 ) + α 1 h 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 1 ) + ( h − h 4 ) ( r 2 ( 1 − h k 2 ) + α 2 p 1 + w + ( ah + bp ) − γ 2 ) + ( n − n 4 ) ( α 3 h 1 + w + ch − βnh − γ 3 n ) d E 5 dt = − [ ( r 1 k 1 + α 1 b h 4 N 1 N 2 ) ( p − p 4 ) 2 − ( ( α 1 + α 2 ) ( 1 + w ) + α 1 b p 4 + α 2 a h 4 N 1 N 2 ) ( p − p 4 ) ( h − h 4 ) + 1 2 ( r 2 k 2 + α 2 a p 4 N 1 N 2 ) ( h − h 4 ) 2 ] − [ 1 2 ( r 2 k 2 + α 2 a p 4 N 1 N 2 ) ( h − h 4 ) 2 − ( α 3 ( 1 + w ) D 1 D 2 − βn ) ( n − n 4 ) ( h − h 4 ) + ( β h 4 + γ 3 ) ( n − n 4 ) 2 ] Thus, d E 5 dt ≤ − ( ( r 1 k 1 + α 1 b h 4 N 1 N 2 ) ( p − p 4 ) + 1 2 ( r 2 k 2 + α 2 a p 4 N 1 N 2 ) ( h − h 4 ) ) 2 − ( 1 2 ( r 2 k 2 + α 2 a p 4 N 1 N 2 ) ( h − h 4 ) + ( β h 4 + γ 3 ) ( n − n 4 ) ) 2 Hence, d E 5 / dt is a negative definite under conditions 29 and 30 . Therefore, the coexistence point S 5 = ( p 4 , h 4 , n 4 ) is GAS. Bifurcation This section explores the probability of occurrence of transcritical (TB) and Hopf bifurcation (HB) around the non-hyperbolic equilibrium points. For more details, see Refs. 23 - 26 . Theorem 13. For r 2 ∗ = γ 2 , the phn model faces TB at the extinction point S 1 = ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) . Proof: According to J ( S 1 ) given by Eq. (7) , the phn system at S 1 has a zero eigenvalue λ 12 = 0 , at r 2 ∗ = γ 2 , and J ( S 1 ) at r 2 ∗ = γ 2 becomes J ∗ ( S 1 ) = [ r 1 − γ 0 0 0 0 0 0 α 3 1 + w − γ 3 ] Now, suppose that ϑ [ 1 ] = ( ϑ 1 [ 1 ] , ϑ 2 [ 1 ] , ϑ 3 [ 1 ] ) T , and ( T [ 1 ] ) T = ( t 1 [ 1 ] , t 2 [ 1 ] , t 3 [ 1 ] ) T be eigenvectors to λ 22 = 0 of J ∗ ( S 1 ) , and J ∗ T ( S 1 ) , respectively. The calculation gives ϑ [ 1 ] = ( 0 , 1 , α 3 γ 3 ( 1 + w ) ), and ( T [ 1 ] ) T = ( 0 , 1 , 0 ) by solving ( J ∗ ( S 1 ) − λ 12 I ) ϑ [ 1 ] , and ( J ∗ T ( S 1 ) − λ 12 I ) T [ 1 ] for ϑ [ 1 ] and T [ 1 ] . Further, F r 2 ( S , r 2 ) = ( 0 , h ( 1 − h k 2 ) , 0 ) ⇒ F r 2 ( S 1 , r 2 ∗ ) = ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) ( T [ 1 ] ) T F r 2 ( S 1 , r 2 ∗ ) = ( 0 , 1 , 0 ) ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) = 0 ( T [ 1 ] ) T D F r 2 ( S 1 , r 2 ∗ ) ϑ [ 1 ] = ( 0 , 1 , 0 ) [ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ] = 1 ≠ 0 ( T [ 1 ] ) T D 2 F r 2 ( S 1 , r 2 ∗ ) ( ϑ [ 1 ] , ϑ [ 1 ] ) = ( 0 , 1 , 0 ) [ 0 − 2 r 2 ∗ k 2 0 ] = − 2 r 2 ∗ k 2 ≠ 0 Therefore, there is a TB around S 1 with the parameter r 2 ∗ = γ 2 . Theorem 14. For r 1 ∗ = γ 1 , the phn model faces TB at the extinction point S 2 = ( p 1 , 0 , 0 ) if (30) p 1 = k 1 , (31) ( T [ 2 ] ) T D 2 F r 1 ( S 2 , r 1 ∗ ) ( ϑ [ 2 ] , ϑ [ 2 ] ) ≠ 0 Proof: According to J ( S 2 ) given by Eq. (9) , the phn system at S 2 has a zero eigenvalue λ 22 = 0 , at r 1 ∗ = γ 1 , and J ( S 2 ) at r 1 ∗ = γ 1 becomes J ∗ ( S 2 ) = [ 0 0 0 0 r 2 − γ 2 0 0 α 3 1 + w − γ 3 ] , Now, suppose that ϑ [ 2 ] = ( ϑ 1 [ 2 ] , ϑ 2 [ 2 ] , ϑ 3 [ 2 ] ) T and ( T [ 1 ] ) T = ( t 1 [ 2 ] , t 2 [ 2 ] , t 3 [ 2 ] ) T be eigenvectors with respect to λ 22 = 0 of J ∗ ( S 2 ) and J ∗ T ( S 2 ) respectively. Solving ( J ∗ ( S 2 ) − λ 22 I ) ϑ [ 2 ] = 0 , and ( J ∗ T ( S 2 ) − λ 22 I ) T [ 2 ] = 0 for ϑ [ 2 ] , and T [ 2 ] gives ϑ [ 2 ] = ( 1 , 1 , α 3 γ 3 ( 1 + w ) ) T and ( T [ 2 ] ) T = ( 1 , α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( γ 2 − r 2 ) , 1 ) T , where ( γ 2 − r 2 ) ≠ 0 . Further, F r 1 ( S , r 1 ) = ( p ( 1 − p k 1 ) , 0 , 0 ) ⟹ F r 1 ( S 2 , r 1 ∗ ) = ( p 1 ( 1 − p 1 k 1 ) , 0 , 0 ) ( T [ 2 ] ) T F r 1 ( S 2 , r 1 ∗ ) = ( 1 , ∝ 3 ( 1 + w ) ( γ 2 − r 2 ) , 1 ) ( p 1 − p 1 2 k 1 , 0 , 0 ) = p 1 ( 1 − p 1 k 1 ) = 0 under condition 30 . ( T [ 2 ] ) T DF r 1 ( S 2 , r 1 ∗ ) ( ϑ [ 2 ] ) = ( 1 , α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( γ 2 − r 2 ) , 1 ) [ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] = 1 ≠ 0 ( T [ 2 ] ) T D 2 F r 1 ( S 2 , r 1 ∗ ) ( ϑ [ 2 ] , ϑ [ 2 ] ) = ( 1 , α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( γ 2 − r 2 ) , 1 ) [ X 11 [ 2 ] + X 12 [ 2 ] X 21 [ 2 ] + X 22 [ 2 ] X 32 [ 2 ] + X 33 [ 2 ] ∝ 3 γ 3 ( 1 + w ) ] = ( X 11 [ 2 ] + X 12 [ 2 ] ) + α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( γ 2 − r 2 ) ( X 21 [ 2 ] + X 22 [ 2 ] ) + ( X 32 [ 2 ] + X 33 [ 2 ] α 3 γ 3 ( 1 + w ) ) ≠ 0 under condition 31, here, X 11 [ 2 ] = − 2 r 1 k 1 + [ α 1 [ ( 1 + w ) ] ( 1 + w + b p 1 ) 2 ] , X 12 [ 2 ] = [ α 1 ( 1 + w ) ( 1 + w + b p 1 ) 2 ] + [ − 2 a α 1 p 1 ( 1 + w + b p 1 ) 2 ] , X 21 [ 2 ] = [ α 2 ( 1 + w ) ( 1 + w + b p 1 ) 2 ] , X 22 [ 2 ] = [ α 2 [ ( 1 + w ) ] ( 1 + w + b p 1 ) 2 ] + [ − 2 r 2 k 2 − 2 a α 2 p 1 ( 1 + w + b p 1 ) 2 ] , X 32 [ 2 ] = − 2 c α 3 ( 1 + w ) 2 − β α 3 γ 3 ( 1 + w ) , and X 33 [ 2 ] = − β α 3 γ 3 ( 1 + w ) . Therefore, there is a TB around S 2 with the parameter r 1 ∗ = γ 1 . Theorem 15. For r 2 ∗ ∗ = γ 2 k 2 k 2 − 2 h 2 , the phn model faces TB at the honeybee point S 3 = ( 0 , h 2 , 0 ) if (32) h 2 = k 2 , Proof: According to J ( S 3 ) given by Eq. (11) , the phn system at S 3 has a zero eigenvalue λ 32 = 0 , at r 2 ∗ ∗ , and J ( S 3 ) at r 2 ∗ ∗ becomes J ∗ ( S 3 ) = [ α 1 h 2 1 + w + a h 2 + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) 0 0 α h 2 1 + w + a h 2 0 0 0 ( 1 + w ) α 3 ( 1 + w + c h 2 ) 2 − ( β h 2 + γ 3 ) ] . Now, Suppose that ϑ [ 3 ] = ( ϑ 1 [ 3 ] , ϑ 2 [ 3 ] , ϑ 3 [ 3 ] ) and ( T [ 3 ] ) T = ( t 1 [ 3 ] , t 2 [ 3 ] , t 3 [ 3 ] ) T be eigenvectors to λ 32 = 0 of J ∗ ( S 3 ) and J ∗ T ( S 3 ) respectively. Solving ( J ∗ ( S 3 ) − λ 32 I ) ϑ [ 3 ] = 0 , and ( J ∗ T ( S 3 ) − λ 32 I ) T [ 3 ] = 0 for ϑ [ 3 ] and T [ 3 ] gives V [ 3 ] = ( 0 , 1 , α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( β h 2 + γ 3 ) ( 1 + w + c h 2 ) 2 ) and ( T [ 3 ] ) T = ( − α 2 h 2 ( α 1 h 2 + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) ( 1 + w + a h 2 ) ) , 1 , 0 ) , where [ α 1 h 2 + [ ( r 1 − γ 1 ) ( 1 + w + a h 2 ) ] ≠ 0 . Further F r 2 ( S 3 , r 2 ) = ( 0 , h − h k 2 , 0 ) ⇒ F r 2 ( S 3 , r 2 ∗ ∗ ) = ( 0 , h 2 ( 1 − h 2 k 2 ) , 0 ) ( T [ 3 ] ) T F r 2 ( S 3 , r 2 ∗ ∗ ) = ( − α 2 h 2 ( α 1 h 2 + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) ( 1 + w + a h 2 ) ) , 1 , 0 ) ( 0 , h 2 ( 1 − h 2 k 2 ) , 0 ) ( T [ 3 ] ) T F r 2 ( S 3 , r 2 ∗ ∗ ) = h 2 ( 1 − h 2 k 2 ) = 0 under condition 32 . ( T [ 3 ] ) T DF r 2 ( S 3 , r 2 ∗ ∗ ) ( ϑ [ 3 ] ) = ( − α 2 h 2 ( α 1 h 2 + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) ( 1 + w + a h 2 ) ) , 1 , 0 ) [ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ] = 1 ≠ 0 ( T [ 3 ] ) T D 2 F r 2 ( S 3 , r 2 ∗ ∗ ) ( ϑ [ 3 ] , ϑ [ 3 ] ) = ( − α 2 h 2 ( α 1 h 2 + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) ( 1 + w + a h 2 ) ) , 1 , 0 ) [ 0 − 2 r 2 ∗ ∗ k 2 X 32 [ 3 ] − β α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( β h 2 + γ 2 ) ( 1 + w + c h 2 ) 2 ] = − 2 r 2 ∗ ∗ k 2 ≠ 0 , where X 32 [ 3 ] = − 2 c α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( 1 + w + c h 2 ) 3 − β α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( β h 2 + γ 2 ) ( 1 + w + c h 2 ) 2 Therefore, there is a TB around S 3 with the parameter r 2 ∗ ∗ . Theorem 16. For r 2 ∗ ∗ ∗ = γ 2 k 2 k 2 − 2 h 3 , the phn model faces TB at the honeybee point S 4 = ( 0 , h 3 , n 3 ) if (33) h 3 = k 2 , Proof: According to J ( S 4 ) given by Eq. (15) , the phn system at S 4 has a zero eigenvalue λ 42 = 0 , at r 2 ∗ ∗ ∗ , and J ( S 4 ) at r 2 ∗ ∗ ∗ becomes J ∗ ( S 4 ) = [ a 11 0 0 a 21 0 0 0 a 32 − β h 3 − γ 3 ] , where, a 11 = α 1 h 3 ( 1 + w + a h 3 ) + ( r 1 − γ 1 ) , a 21 = α 2 h 3 1 + w + a h 3 and a 32 = α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( 1 + w + c h 3 ) − β n 3 . Now, Suppose that ϑ [ 4 ] = ( ϑ 1 [ 4 ] , ϑ 2 [ 4 ] , ϑ 3 [ 4 ] ) , and ( T [ 4 ] ) T = ( t 1 [ 4 ] , t 2 [ 4 ] , t 3 [ 4 ] ) be an eigenvector of to λ 42 = 0 of J ∗ ( S 4 ) and J ∗ T ( S 4 ) , respectively, which gives ϑ [ 4 ] = ( 0 , 1 , a 32 β h 3 + γ 3 ) and ( T [ 4 ] ) T = ( − a 21 a 11 , 1 , 0 ) . Further, F r 2 ( S , r 2 ) = ( 0 , h ( 1 − h k 2 ) , 0 ) ⇒ F r 2 ( S 4 , r 2 ∗ ∗ ∗ ) = ( 0 , h 2 − h 2 k 2 , 0 ) ( T [ 4 ] ) T F r 2 ( S 3 , r 2 ∗ ) = ( − a 21 a 11 , 1 , 0 ) ( 0 , h 3 2 − h 3 2 k 2 , 0 ) = h 3 ( 1 − h 3 k 2 ) = 0 under condition 33 . ( T [ 4 ] ) T DF r 2 ( S 4 , r 2 ∗ ) ( ϑ [ 4 ] ) = ( − a 21 a 11 , 1 , 0 ) [ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ] = 1 ≠ 0 ( T [ 4 ] ) T D 2 F r 2 ( S 4 , r 2 ∗ ) ( ϑ [ 4 ] , ϑ [ 4 ] ) = ( − a 21 a 11 , 1 , 0 ) [ 0 − 2 r 2 ∗ k 2 − 2 c α 3 ( 1 + w ) ( 1 + w + c h 3 ) 3 + β ( a 32 β h 3 + γ 3 ) 2 ] = − 2 r 2 ∗ k 2 ≠ 0 , Therefore, there is a TB around S 4 with the parameter r 2 ∗ ∗ ∗ . Theorem 17. The phn undergoes a Hopf bifurcation at the coexistence point S 5 to the bifurcation parameter w ∗ if (34) [ Det ] | w = w ∗ > 0 , (35) b α 1 p 4 h 4 + a α 2 p 4 h 4 ≠ α 1 h 4 ( 1 + w ∗ + a h 4 ) + α 2 p 4 ( 1 + w ∗ + b p 4 ) , where the formula of w ∗ is given in the proof. Proof. The Jacobian matrix at S 5 with w ∗ is given by J ( S 5 , w ∗ ) = [ a 11 α 1 p 4 ( 1 + w ∗ + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w ∗ + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 0 α 2 h 4 ( 1 + w ∗ + a h 4 ) ( 1 + w ∗ + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 a 22 0 0 α 3 ( 1 + w ∗ ) ( 1 + w ∗ + c h 4 ) 2 − β n 4 − β h 4 − γ 3 ] , where a 11 = ( r 1 − γ 1 ) − 2 r 1 p 4 k 1 + α 1 h 4 ( 1 + w ∗ + a h 4 ) ( 1 + w ∗ + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 , and a 22 = ( r 2 − γ 2 ) − 2 r 2 h 4 k 2 + α 2 p 4 ( 1 + w ∗ + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w ∗ + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 . The Hopf bifurcation occurred if the following conditions are satisfied. 1. [ Tr ] | w = w ∗ = 0 , 2. [ Det ] | w = w ∗ > 0 , 3. ∂ ∂w [ Re ( λ 1 , 2 ) ] w = w ∗ ≠ 0 (Transversality condition), where Tr and Det are defined in the characteristic equation given by (19) . Now, we set Tr = 0 to find w ∗ , which gives Tr = 0 ⟹ ( r 1 − γ 1 ) − 2 r 1 p 4 k 1 + α 1 h 4 ( 1 + w + a h 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 − 2 r 2 h 4 k 2 + α 2 p 4 ( 1 + w + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 2 + ( r 2 − γ 2 ) = 0 . Let b 1 = ( r 1 − γ 1 ) + ( r 2 − γ 2 ) − 2 r 1 p 4 k 1 − 2 r 2 h 4 k 2 , b 2 = ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) , b 3 = α 1 a h 4 2 + α 2 b p 4 2 , b 4 = ( α 1 h 4 + α 2 p 4 ) , and v = ( 1 + w ) . Then Tr = 0 ⟹ b 1 + b 4 v + b 3 ( v + b 2 ) 2 = 0 Solving the above equation for v , gives ( v + b 2 ) 2 b 1 + b 4 v + b 3 = 0 Then, ( v + b 2 ) 2 b 1 + b 4 v + b 3 = 0 b 1 v 2 + ( 2 b 1 b 2 + b 4 ) v + ( b 1 b 2 2 + b 3 ) = 0 . The discriminant of the above equation is Δ = ( 2 b 1 b 2 + b 4 ) 2 − 4 b 1 ( b 1 b 2 2 + b 3 ) = b 4 2 + 4 b 1 ( b 2 b 4 − b 3 ) . Thus, v = − ( 2 b 1 b 2 + b 4 ) ± Δ 2 b 1 , w ∗ = v − 1 , b 1 ≠ 0 That means condition (1) is satisfied at w ∗ , and the characteristic equation given by (19) can be rewritten as ( − β h 4 − γ 3 − λ ) [ λ 2 + Det ] = 0 Solving the above equation yields λ 1 = − β h 4 − γ 3 , λ 2 , 3 = ± i Det . Clearly λ 2 and λ 3 are complex conjugates if condition 34 is satisfied. In addition, the general roots of Eq. (19) in the neighborhood of w ∗ as λ 2 , 3 = Tr ± i Tr 2 − 4 Det 2 , then ∂ ∂w [ Re ( λ 2 , 3 ) ] w = w ∗ = b α 1 p 4 h 4 + a α 2 p 4 h 4 − α 1 h 4 ( 1 + w ∗ + a h 4 ) − α 2 p 4 ( 1 + w ∗ + b p 4 ) ( 1 + w ∗ + ( a h 4 + b p 4 ) ) 3 ≠ 0 under condition 35 . So, phn system undergoes a Hopf bifurcation at S 5 with the bifurcation parameter w ∗ . Numerical simulations and discussion A numerical confirmation is carried out to complete the analytical results for phn system using MATLAB. The simulations are conducted by using the following set of parameters. (36) r 1 = 0.56 , k 1 = 10 , α 1 = 0.04 , w = 3 , a = 0.02 , b = 0.03 γ 1 = 0.04 , r 2 = 0.18 , k 2 = 6 , α 2 = 0.08 = 0.4 , γ 2 = 0.03 , α 3 = 0.01 , β = 0.00157 , γ 3 = 0.0018 , c = 0.01 . For the parameters listed above in Eq. (36) , the nullclines of phn system are indicated in Figure 2 . The figure depicts the coexistence point S 5 = ( p 4 , h 4 , n 4 ) = ( 0.21 , 0.11 , 0.23 ) , while Figure 3 illustrates the global behavior of S 5 . That means the parameters listed in Eq. (36) corroborate the findings of Theorem 12 , which shows that all other points act as saddle points, except for S 5 . These findings also confirm the uniform persistence for phn system, which confirms the output of Theorem 3 . Figure 2. The nullclines of phn system with the parameters listed in Eq. (36) . Figure 3. The global stability of S 5 = ( 0.21 , 0.11 , 0.23 ) . An important parameter to investigate is the effect of the wind level ( w ) on the interaction of blooming plants p ( t ) , honey honeybees h ( t ) , and honey production n ( t ) . We address two aspects of w : first, the extent to which it influences the species densities in the inner equilibrium, and second, how it can alter phn system’s stability. For a low level of wind flow, i.e., 0 < w < 0.017 , the solution of the phn system approaches a chaotic attractor, see Figure 4(a) . While in the interval 0.017 < w ≤ 0.74 , the solution of the phn system converges to a limit cycle, see Figure 4(b) and Figure 5 . Consequently, for the region 0.74 < w 3.4 , phn system loses two of its components, and the solution in this case settles down to the blooming plants’ point S 2 = ( 0.16 , 0 , 0 ) , see Figure 4(c) . This indicates that when the wind speed is light, the wind helps pollinate or carries the seeds of flowering plants from one place to another, aiding their reproduction. Therefore, the presence of flowering plants contributes to the system’s persistence. In contrast, for a high wind flow, we see that the populations of honeybees and the production of honey face extinction. Figure 4. The effect of various wind speeds w . Figure 5. Hopf bifurcation at w = 0.74 . Now, we have the intrinsic growth rate of the honeybee population ( r 2 ) , which is an essential quantity to discuss since it can potentially influence the population’s densities of blooming plants, honeybees, and honey production. It is clear from Figure 6 that the solution of phn system settles down to the coexistence point S 5 for r 2 > 0.03 , while it stabilized at the extinction point S 1 = ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) for r 2 ≤ 0.03 . This result confirms the occurrence of a transcritical bifurcation at r 2 = r 2 TB = 0.03 , which confirms the output of Theorem 13 , see Figure 7 . Further, Figure 8 indicates the global behavior of the extinction point S 1 . This result confirms the global stability condition of S 1 which has honeybee stated in Theorem 8 . Further, this result shows that r 2 is a critical parameter that impacts the continuity of the whole system’s coexistence. Figure 6. The effect of varying r 2 . Figure 7. Transcritical bifurcation at r 2 = 0.03 . Figure 8. The global stability of S 1 . The effect of varying the intrinsic growth rate r 1 of the population of blooming plants is investigated in Figure 9 . The figure indicates that the solution of phn system converges to the blooming plants point S 2 = ( 0.28 , 0 , 0 ) for r 1 ≤ 0.04 , which means the system faces an occurrence of transcritical bifurcations at r 1 = r 1 TB = 0.04, which confirms the output of Theorem 14 . So, phn system loses two of its components for r 1 ≤ 0.04 . While for r 1 > 0.04 , phn system converges to the coexistence point S 5 . Further, the global stability of S 2 is illustrated in Figure 10 . We can conclude that the intrinsic growth rate r 1 of the blooming plants population is a critical parameter affecting the honeybees’ persistence and honey production. Figure 9. The effect of varying r 1 . Figure 10. The global stability of S 2 . The mutualistic rates between the honeybee population and the blossoming plants, α 1 and α 2 , are examined in Figures 11 and 12 . The density of blossoming plants, the honeybee population, and honey production are all improved as a result of the increase in mutualistic rates. Figure 11. The effect of varying α 1 . Figure 12. The effect of varying α 2 . A rise in the depletion rate of the population of blossoming plants population γ 1 (when γ 1 = 0.57 ) leads to losses of the honeybee population and honey in phn system, and the solution stabilized at the honeybee point S 3 = ( 0 , 0.52 , 0 ) from various initial conditions. This result confirms the global stability theorem of S 3 which was stated in Theorem 10 . As a result, the continued presence of a blossoming plant population significantly impacts the persistence of honey production since the flowering plants are the primary source of sustenance for pollinators. See Figure 13 . Figure 13. The global stability of S 3 when γ 1 = 0.57 . To establish the effect of β on the dynamics of phn , Figure 14 has been drawn with three values of the rate at which honeybees consume honey to survive, i.e., β . The figure shows the solutions settling down to the coexistence point S 5 . The increase in β substantially results in a decline in honey output. Figure 14. The effect of varying β . In order to investigate the sensitivity of the coexistence point S 5 = ( p 4 , h 4 , n 4 ) of phn system, we implement partial rank correlation coefficients (PRCC). The parameters r 1 , k 1 , α 1 , w , a , b , γ 1 , r 2 , k 2 , α 2 , γ 2 , β , γ 3 , c and α 3 serve as input parameters, whereas p 4 , h 4 , and n 4 the output variables. We subsequently generate Figure 15 by utilizing the parameter set in Eq. (36) . Blossoming plants and the honeybee population demonstrate heightened sensitivity to honeybees’ carrying capacity k 2 and the corresponding value of honeybee nutrients from blooming plants α 2 . While the honey production determines heightened sensitivity to α 3 . On the other hand, the wind flow, i.e., w , significantly influences p 4 , h 4 and n 4 . The wind flow significantly reduces the blooming plants, honeybee population, and honey production. It can be inferred that the wind flow is a critical parameter that influences the coexistence of p 4 , h 4 , and n 4 , see Figure 15 . Figure 15. The sensitivity of the data given in Eq. 36 relative to the S 5 = ( p 4 , h 4 , n 4 ) . Conclusion Wind flow profoundly affects blossoming plants, honeybee populations, and honey production dynamics, and impacts ecosystem stability. An ODE mathematical model has been studied to understand these dynamics. The solution of phn system has been established to possess the fundamental attributes, such as positivity and persistence, boundedness, local and global stability, and bifurcation. Numerical results indicated that the honeybee species may be extinct due to increased wind velocities within specific parameter ranges. Furthermore, the coexistence equilibrium becomes unstable as a result of a Hopf bifurcation when a low wind flow induces periodic oscillations. Further, the simulations indicated that the threshold values for the transcritical bifurcation have been precisely determined at a decreased honeybee and blooming plant growth rate. However, the system may reach a point where both the blooming plant and the honeybee populations are no longer viable due to an elevated mortality rate of flowering plants. On the other hand, the increase in mutualistic rates between the honeybee population and the blooming plants has a regenerative effect, supporting the sustainability of the honeybee–honey production system. Data availability This study relies on numerical data generated from the proposed mathematical model. This data includes initial coefficients, initial conditions, and numerical simulation outputs (tables and figures). All of this data is not derived from field measurements but was generated programmatically for the purposes of theoretical analysis and numerical simulation of the system under study. This aligns with the general trend of sharing research data to enhance replication and reuse within the scientific community. All data underlying the results are available as part of the article, and no additional source data are required References 1. Dean AM: A simple model of mutualism. Am. Nat. 1983; 121 (3): 409–417. Publisher Full Text 2. Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S: How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos. 2011; 120 (3): 321–326. Publisher Full Text 3. Lee Y-D, Yokoi T, Nakazawa T: A pollinator crisis can decrease plant abundance despite pollinators being herbivores at the larval stage. Sci. Rep. 2024; 14 (1): 18523. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 4. Fishman MA, Hadany L: Plant–pollinator population dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2010; 78 (4): 270–277. Publisher Full Text 5. Jawad S, Thirthar AA, Nisar KS: The impact of climate change on flowering plants-bees-Vespa orientalis model. Results Control Optim. 2025; 20 : 100583. Publisher Full Text 6. Biswas A, Medda R, Pal S: Dynamics of predatory effect on saturated plant–pollinator mutualistic relationship. Chaos An Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2025; 35 (2). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 7. Hakeem E, Jawad S, Ali AH, et al. : How mathematical models might predict desertification from global warming and dust pollutants. MethodsX. 2025; 14 : 103259. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 8. Lever JJ, van Nes EH , Scheffer M, et al. : The sudden collapse of pollinator communities. Ecol. Lett. 2014; 17 (3): 350–359. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 9. Al Nuaimi M, Jawad S: Modelling and stability analysis of the competitional ecological model with harvesting. Commun. Math. Biol. Neurosci. 2022; 2022 : Article-ID. 10. Shalan RN, Shireen R, Lafta AH: Discrete an SIS model with immigrants and treatment. J. Interdiscip. Math. 2020; 24 : 1201–1206. Publisher Full Text 11. Ali A, Jawad S: Stability analysis of the depletion of dissolved oxygen for the Phytoplankton-Zooplankton model in an aquatic environment. Iraqi J. Sci. 2024; 2736–2748. Publisher Full Text 12. Nezar F, Jawad S, Winter M, et al. : Stability analysis of excessive carbon dioxide gas emission model through following reforestation policy in low-density forest biomass. Baghdad Sci. J. 2025; 22 (4): 1335–1353. 13. Cresswell JE: A demographic approach to evaluating the impact of stressors on bumble bee colonies. Ecol. Entomol. 2017; 42 (2): 221–229. Publisher Full Text 14. Thirthar AA, Panja P, Abdeljawad T: Impact of alarm signals and mutualistic interactions in a food chain model of oxpeckers, zebras, and lions. Partial Differ. Equations Appl. Math. 2025; 14 : 101189. Publisher Full Text 15. Jawad S, Roy S, Thirthar AA, et al. : Deterministic and stochastic risks assessment of excessive CO2 emission on forest biomass under weak allee effect. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 2025; 71 : 9129–9156. Publisher Full Text 16. Thirthar AA, Alaoui AL, Roy S, et al. : Fractional and stochastic dynamics of predator–prey systems: The role of fear and global warming. Eur. Phys. J. B. 2025; 98 (7): 1–21. Publisher Full Text 17. Ahmed M, Jawad S, Das D, et al. : Impact of dust storms on plant biomass: Model structure and dynamic study. Alex. Eng. J. 2025; 126 : 605–622. Publisher Full Text 18. Balfour NJ, Ratnieks FLW: Wind Alters Plant-Pollinator Community Structure, Bee Foraging Rate & Movements Between Plants. Behav. Ecol. 2025; 36 : araf067. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 19. Friedman J, Barrett SCH: Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants. Ann. Bot. 2009; 103 (9): 1515–1527. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 20. Chen F: On a nonlinear nonautonomous predator–prey model with diffusion and distributed delay. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2005; 180 (1): 33–49. Publisher Full Text 21. Place CM: Dynamical Systems: Differential Equations, Maps, and Chaotic Behaviour. Routledge; 2017. 22. Aamer Z, Jawad S, Batiha B, et al. : Evaluation of the Dynamics of Psychological Panic Factor, Glucose Risk and Estrogen Effects on Breast Cancer Model. Computation. 2024; 12 (8): 160. Publisher Full Text 23. Ahmed M, Jawad S: Bifurcation analysis of the role of good and bad bacteria in the decomposing toxins in the intestine with the impact of antibiotic and probiotics supplement. AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing; 2024. 24. Thirthara AA, Jawadb S, Shahc K, et al. : How does media coverage affect a COVID-19 pandemic model with direct and indirect transmission?2024. 25. Javaid Y, Jawad S, Ahmed R, et al. : Dynamic complexity of a discretized predator-prey system with Allee effect and herd behaviour. Appl. Math. Sci. Eng. 2024; 32 (1): 2420953. Publisher Full Text 26. Roy S, AL-Jaf DS, Thirthar AA, et al. : The impact of human shields in autonomous and non-autonomous prey-predator models with modified Cosner functional response. Math. Comput. Simul. 2025; 242 : 54–73. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 26 Dec 2025 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Mathematics, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Baghdad Governorate, Iraq Shireen Jawad Roles: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Zainab Hayder Abid AL-Aali Roles: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (2) version 2 Revised Published: 29 Apr 2026, 14:1459 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172134.2 version 1 Published: 26 Dec 2025, 14:1459 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172134.1 Copyright © 2025 Jawad S and AL-Aali ZHA. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Jawad S and AL-Aali ZHA. Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172134.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 26 Dec 2025 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Seralan V. Reviewer Report For: Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189832.r464608 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1#referee-response-464608 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 25 Mar 2026 Vinoth Seralan , SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189832.r464608 In this work, the authors studied the dynamics of interactions between blooming plants and honeybee populations, which is crucial for addressing honeybee decline and sustainable ecosystems. The mathematical model on dynamics of a blooming plant, honeybee population, and honey ... Continue reading READ ALL In this work, the authors studied the dynamics of interactions between blooming plants and honeybee populations, which is crucial for addressing honeybee decline and sustainable ecosystems. The mathematical model on dynamics of a blooming plant, honeybee population, and honey production symbiosis, which is special emphasis on the effect of high-speed wind flow were investigated. Furthermore, the existence of two difference bifurcation phenomena such as the transcritical and Hopf bifurcations have been discussed. I have few comments as follows: In abstract, the authors mentioned, Habitat loss, diseases, climate change, pesticides, and predation have all contributed to the decline of pollinator species. Although, it has been discussed in the manuscript. More discussions to be added. There are some typos, please correct it. For example. blooming plants p, honey honeybees h (honey is repeated). The biological meaning of the parameter w is not mentioned. The derivation of theoretical bifurcation condition both bifurcations are correct but add a proof write more lines that are numerically satisfied. In phase portrait Figure 4 (a), it has been shown as chaotic trajectories. But in bifurcation diagram Figure 5, its look like a periodic attractor. The numerical simulation section provides strong supporting evidence whenever needed, which is a positive aspect. The prescribed-time results need more biologically justified. The authors suggested to compare their finding by referring some related papers about implementing control of habitat loss in a separate remark. Discuss about sustainable production of honey. Please summary the conclusions with more biological justification and point out how different the model is from other existing models. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? No Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? No Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Mathematical biology, chaos theory I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Seralan V. Reviewer Report For: Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189832.r464608 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1#referee-response-464608 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 29 Apr 2026 Shireen Jawad , Mathematics, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq 29 Apr 2026 Author Response Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to revise our manuscript. We really appreciate the helpful comments from the learned reviewers, which helped improve our manuscript. We have ... Continue reading Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to revise our manuscript. We really appreciate the helpful comments from the learned reviewers, which helped improve our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript in response to each comment and provided our responses below. We sincerely hope the revised manuscript meets your expectations, and we look forward to hearing from you at your convenience. In abstract, the authors mentioned, Habitat loss, diseases, climate change, pesticides, and predation have all contributed to the decline of pollinator species. Although, it has been discussed in the manuscript. More discussions to be added. Response: Thank you for your comment. More discussion of all contributions to the decline of pollinator species has been added. Please see the introduction section. We consider the impact of pesticides in our next study; we mention this at the end of the conclusion section. There are some typos, please correct it. For example. blooming plants p, honey honeybees h (honey is repeated). The biological meaning of the parameter w is not mentioned. Response: Thank you very much for your comment. The repeated word ‘honey’ has been removed. The biological meaning of w is clearly presented in numbers 1-2 of the “Assumptions of the model” section. The derivation of theoretical bifurcation condition both bifurcations are correct but add a proof write more lines that are numerically satisfied. Response: Thank you for your valuable comment. We are glad that the reviewer finds the derivation of the theoretical bifurcation conditions to be correct. In response to your suggestion, we have expanded the numerical simulation section by showing at which specific region the bifurcations could happen. In phase portrait Figure 4 (a), it has been shown as chaotic trajectories. But in bifurcation diagram Figure 5, its look like a periodic attractor. Response: Thank you for your comment. Figure 5 confirms only the accuracy of the Hopf bifurcation for case 0.017 Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to revise our manuscript. We really appreciate the helpful comments from the learned reviewers, which helped improve our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript in response to each comment and provided our responses below. We sincerely hope the revised manuscript meets your expectations, and we look forward to hearing from you at your convenience. In abstract, the authors mentioned, Habitat loss, diseases, climate change, pesticides, and predation have all contributed to the decline of pollinator species. Although, it has been discussed in the manuscript. More discussions to be added. Response: Thank you for your comment. More discussion of all contributions to the decline of pollinator species has been added. Please see the introduction section. We consider the impact of pesticides in our next study; we mention this at the end of the conclusion section. There are some typos, please correct it. For example. blooming plants p, honey honeybees h (honey is repeated). The biological meaning of the parameter w is not mentioned. Response: Thank you very much for your comment. The repeated word ‘honey’ has been removed. The biological meaning of w is clearly presented in numbers 1-2 of the “Assumptions of the model” section. The derivation of theoretical bifurcation condition both bifurcations are correct but add a proof write more lines that are numerically satisfied. Response: Thank you for your valuable comment. We are glad that the reviewer finds the derivation of the theoretical bifurcation conditions to be correct. In response to your suggestion, we have expanded the numerical simulation section by showing at which specific region the bifurcations could happen. In phase portrait Figure 4 (a), it has been shown as chaotic trajectories. But in bifurcation diagram Figure 5, its look like a periodic attractor. Response: Thank you for your comment. Figure 5 confirms only the accuracy of the Hopf bifurcation for case 0.017 Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Reviewer Response 08 May 2026 vinoth seralan , SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India 08 May 2026 Reviewer Response I appreciate the authors for carried out all my comments and suggestions. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. I appreciate the authors for carried out all my comments and suggestions. I appreciate the authors for carried out all my comments and suggestions. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 29 Apr 2026 Shireen Jawad , Mathematics, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq 29 Apr 2026 Author Response Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to revise our manuscript. We really appreciate the helpful comments from the learned reviewers, which helped improve our manuscript. We have ... Continue reading Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to revise our manuscript. We really appreciate the helpful comments from the learned reviewers, which helped improve our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript in response to each comment and provided our responses below. We sincerely hope the revised manuscript meets your expectations, and we look forward to hearing from you at your convenience. In abstract, the authors mentioned, Habitat loss, diseases, climate change, pesticides, and predation have all contributed to the decline of pollinator species. Although, it has been discussed in the manuscript. More discussions to be added. Response: Thank you for your comment. More discussion of all contributions to the decline of pollinator species has been added. Please see the introduction section. We consider the impact of pesticides in our next study; we mention this at the end of the conclusion section. There are some typos, please correct it. For example. blooming plants p, honey honeybees h (honey is repeated). The biological meaning of the parameter w is not mentioned. Response: Thank you very much for your comment. The repeated word ‘honey’ has been removed. The biological meaning of w is clearly presented in numbers 1-2 of the “Assumptions of the model” section. The derivation of theoretical bifurcation condition both bifurcations are correct but add a proof write more lines that are numerically satisfied. Response: Thank you for your valuable comment. We are glad that the reviewer finds the derivation of the theoretical bifurcation conditions to be correct. In response to your suggestion, we have expanded the numerical simulation section by showing at which specific region the bifurcations could happen. In phase portrait Figure 4 (a), it has been shown as chaotic trajectories. But in bifurcation diagram Figure 5, its look like a periodic attractor. Response: Thank you for your comment. Figure 5 confirms only the accuracy of the Hopf bifurcation for case 0.017 Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to revise our manuscript. We really appreciate the helpful comments from the learned reviewers, which helped improve our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript in response to each comment and provided our responses below. We sincerely hope the revised manuscript meets your expectations, and we look forward to hearing from you at your convenience. In abstract, the authors mentioned, Habitat loss, diseases, climate change, pesticides, and predation have all contributed to the decline of pollinator species. Although, it has been discussed in the manuscript. More discussions to be added. Response: Thank you for your comment. More discussion of all contributions to the decline of pollinator species has been added. Please see the introduction section. We consider the impact of pesticides in our next study; we mention this at the end of the conclusion section. There are some typos, please correct it. For example. blooming plants p, honey honeybees h (honey is repeated). The biological meaning of the parameter w is not mentioned. Response: Thank you very much for your comment. The repeated word ‘honey’ has been removed. The biological meaning of w is clearly presented in numbers 1-2 of the “Assumptions of the model” section. The derivation of theoretical bifurcation condition both bifurcations are correct but add a proof write more lines that are numerically satisfied. Response: Thank you for your valuable comment. We are glad that the reviewer finds the derivation of the theoretical bifurcation conditions to be correct. In response to your suggestion, we have expanded the numerical simulation section by showing at which specific region the bifurcations could happen. In phase portrait Figure 4 (a), it has been shown as chaotic trajectories. But in bifurcation diagram Figure 5, its look like a periodic attractor. Response: Thank you for your comment. Figure 5 confirms only the accuracy of the Hopf bifurcation for case 0.017 Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Reviewer Response 08 May 2026 vinoth seralan , SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India 08 May 2026 Reviewer Response I appreciate the authors for carried out all my comments and suggestions. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. I appreciate the authors for carried out all my comments and suggestions. I appreciate the authors for carried out all my comments and suggestions. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Shabbir MS. Reviewer Report For: Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189832.r464611 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1#referee-response-464611 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 13 Mar 2026 Muhammad Sajjad Shabbir , University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189832.r464611 The article develops a mathematical model describing the interaction between blooming plants, honeybees, and honey production while considering wind speed as an environmental disturbance. The model is formulated using nonlinear ordinary differential equations with a Beddington–DeAngelis functional response. The authors ... Continue reading READ ALL The article develops a mathematical model describing the interaction between blooming plants, honeybees, and honey production while considering wind speed as an environmental disturbance. The model is formulated using nonlinear ordinary differential equations with a Beddington–DeAngelis functional response. The authors analyze the system’s dynamics through theoretical methods and numerical simulations, examining properties such as stability and persistence. Bifurcation analysis is also performed to study how parameter changes affect system stability. The results indicate that high wind speeds can destabilize the ecosystem and may lead to the extinction of honeybee populations and reduced honey production. Overall, the manuscript is well organized, mathematically rigorous, and addresses a significant problem in mathematical ecology. I recommend it for indexing provided the following comments are addressed: Parameter estimation issues: Many of the parameter values used in the simulations appear to be selected for illustrative purposes rather than derived from measured ecological data, which may affect the realism of the simulation results. Limited environmental factors: The model only considers wind speed as an environmental disturbance, while other important ecological factors such as temperature variation, pesticide exposure, diseases, and habitat loss are not included. Simplified ecological assumptions: Some biological processes involved in plant–pollinator interactions are simplified in the model, which may overlook complex ecological behaviors occurring in real ecosystems. High mathematical complexity: Several parts of the analysis are mathematically intensive and may be difficult for readers from ecological or interdisciplinary backgrounds to fully interpret. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? No source data required Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Mathematical biology, Optimal control of epidemiological models, numerical solution of ode I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Shabbir MS. Reviewer Report For: Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189832.r464611 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1#referee-response-464611 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 26 Dec 2025 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 Version 2 (revision) 29 Apr 26 read Version 1 26 Dec 25 read read Muhammad Sajjad Shabbir , University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan Vinoth Seralan , SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2026 Seralan V. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 12 May 2026 | for Version 2 Vinoth Seralan , SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India 0 Views copyright © 2026 Seralan V. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions I appreciate the authors for carried out all my comments and suggestions. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Mathematical biology, chaos theory I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Seralan V. Peer Review Report For: Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.198543.r480277) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v2#referee-response-480277 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2026 Seralan V. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 25 Mar 2026 | for Version 1 Vinoth Seralan , SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India 0 Views copyright © 2026 Seralan V. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (2) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions In this work, the authors studied the dynamics of interactions between blooming plants and honeybee populations, which is crucial for addressing honeybee decline and sustainable ecosystems. The mathematical model on dynamics of a blooming plant, honeybee population, and honey production symbiosis, which is special emphasis on the effect of high-speed wind flow were investigated. Furthermore, the existence of two difference bifurcation phenomena such as the transcritical and Hopf bifurcations have been discussed. I have few comments as follows: In abstract, the authors mentioned, Habitat loss, diseases, climate change, pesticides, and predation have all contributed to the decline of pollinator species. Although, it has been discussed in the manuscript. More discussions to be added. There are some typos, please correct it. For example. blooming plants p, honey honeybees h (honey is repeated). The biological meaning of the parameter w is not mentioned. The derivation of theoretical bifurcation condition both bifurcations are correct but add a proof write more lines that are numerically satisfied. In phase portrait Figure 4 (a), it has been shown as chaotic trajectories. But in bifurcation diagram Figure 5, its look like a periodic attractor. The numerical simulation section provides strong supporting evidence whenever needed, which is a positive aspect. The prescribed-time results need more biologically justified. The authors suggested to compare their finding by referring some related papers about implementing control of habitat loss in a separate remark. Discuss about sustainable production of honey. Please summary the conclusions with more biological justification and point out how different the model is from other existing models. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? No Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? No Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Mathematical biology, chaos theory I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (2) Author Response 29 Apr 2026 Shireen Jawad, Mathematics, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to revise our manuscript. We really appreciate the helpful comments from the learned reviewers, which helped improve our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript in response to each comment and provided our responses below. We sincerely hope the revised manuscript meets your expectations, and we look forward to hearing from you at your convenience. In abstract, the authors mentioned, Habitat loss, diseases, climate change, pesticides, and predation have all contributed to the decline of pollinator species. Although, it has been discussed in the manuscript. More discussions to be added. Response: Thank you for your comment. More discussion of all contributions to the decline of pollinator species has been added. Please see the introduction section. We consider the impact of pesticides in our next study; we mention this at the end of the conclusion section. There are some typos, please correct it. For example. blooming plants p, honey honeybees h (honey is repeated). The biological meaning of the parameter w is not mentioned. Response: Thank you very much for your comment. The repeated word ‘honey’ has been removed. The biological meaning of w is clearly presented in numbers 1-2 of the “Assumptions of the model” section. The derivation of theoretical bifurcation condition both bifurcations are correct but add a proof write more lines that are numerically satisfied. Response: Thank you for your valuable comment. We are glad that the reviewer finds the derivation of the theoretical bifurcation conditions to be correct. In response to your suggestion, we have expanded the numerical simulation section by showing at which specific region the bifurcations could happen. In phase portrait Figure 4 (a), it has been shown as chaotic trajectories. But in bifurcation diagram Figure 5, its look like a periodic attractor. Response: Thank you for your comment. Figure 5 confirms only the accuracy of the Hopf bifurcation for case 0.017 View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Reviewer Response 08 May 2026 vinoth seralan, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India I appreciate the authors for carried out all my comments and suggestions. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Seralan V. Peer Review Report For: Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189832.r464608) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1#referee-response-464608 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2026 Shabbir M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 13 Mar 2026 | for Version 1 Muhammad Sajjad Shabbir , University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan 0 Views copyright © 2026 Shabbir M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The article develops a mathematical model describing the interaction between blooming plants, honeybees, and honey production while considering wind speed as an environmental disturbance. The model is formulated using nonlinear ordinary differential equations with a Beddington–DeAngelis functional response. The authors analyze the system’s dynamics through theoretical methods and numerical simulations, examining properties such as stability and persistence. Bifurcation analysis is also performed to study how parameter changes affect system stability. The results indicate that high wind speeds can destabilize the ecosystem and may lead to the extinction of honeybee populations and reduced honey production. Overall, the manuscript is well organized, mathematically rigorous, and addresses a significant problem in mathematical ecology. I recommend it for indexing provided the following comments are addressed: Parameter estimation issues: Many of the parameter values used in the simulations appear to be selected for illustrative purposes rather than derived from measured ecological data, which may affect the realism of the simulation results. Limited environmental factors: The model only considers wind speed as an environmental disturbance, while other important ecological factors such as temperature variation, pesticide exposure, diseases, and habitat loss are not included. Simplified ecological assumptions: Some biological processes involved in plant–pollinator interactions are simplified in the model, which may overlook complex ecological behaviors occurring in real ecosystems. High mathematical complexity: Several parts of the analysis are mathematically intensive and may be difficult for readers from ecological or interdisciplinary backgrounds to fully interpret. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? No source data required Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Mathematical biology, Optimal control of epidemiological models, numerical solution of ode I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Shabbir MS. Peer Review Report For: Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey production model [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :1459 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189832.r464611) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1#referee-response-464611 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Jawad S and AL-Aali ZHA'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459", templates : { twitter : "Impact of high wind speed on blooming plants-honeybees-honey.... Jawad S and AL-Aali ZHA, published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1459/v1" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/172134/189832") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "189832"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "480277": 7, "480276": 0, "453214": 0, "464607": 0, "453215": 0, "464606": 0, "453212": 0, "464605": 0, "453213": 0, "464604": 0, "464603": 0, "453211": 0, "464602": 0, "453220": 0, "453218": 0, "464611": 14, "453219": 0, "464610": 0, "453216": 0, "464609": 0, "453217": 0, "464608": 40, "481135": 0, "454894": 0, "481134": 0, "454895": 0, "454892": 0, "454893": 0, "481143": 0, "481142": 0, "481141": 0, "454900": 0, "481140": 0, "454901": 0, "481139": 0, "454898": 0, "481138": 0, "454899": 0, "481137": 0, "454896": 0, "481136": 0, "454897": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "60ad1165-9414-461d-9931-0661e34eed0f"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });