Analysis of Risk Factor for Anastomotic Leakage after Lower Rectal Cancer Resection, Including Drain Type: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Abstract Background: We investigated the correlations between surgery-related factors and the incidence of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection (LAR) for lower rectal cancer.Methods: A total of 630 patients underwent colorectal surgery between 2011 and 2014 in our department. Of these, 97 patients (15%) underwent LAR and were enrolled in this retrospective study. Temporary ileostomy was performed in each patient.Results: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 21 patients (21.7%). Univariate analysis showed a significant association between operative duration (p=0.005), transanal hand-sewn anastomosis (p=0.014), and operation procedure (p=0.019) and the occurrence of leakage. Multivariate regression reanalysis showed that underlying disease (p=0.044), transanal hand-sewn anastomosis (p=0.019) and drain type (p=0.025) were significantly associated with the occurrence of leakage. The propensity-score analysis showed that closed drainage were 6.3 times more likely to have anastomotic leakage than open drainage in relation to the amount of postoperative drainage (ml), according to the inverse probability of treatment-weighted analysis.Conclusions: Our results indicate that underlying disease, transanal hand-sewn anastomosis, and closed drain may be a risk and predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after LAR for lower rectal cancer. The notable finding was that closed drainage was related to the occurrence of anastomotic leakage and closed drainage was correlated with less volume of postoperative drain discharge than open drain.