Spatial and environmental influences on the assembly of silk microbiomes in a social spider

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,655 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. In nesting animals, the built environment can play an important role in host-associated microbiome assembly. However, the sources and processes structuring the resulting microbiome remain underexplored. In the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola, philopatric sisters collectively build and maintain a silken nest, capture prey, and exhibit alloparental care. We used S. dumicola as a test system to assess the source and spatial/environmental processes structuring the nest microbial communities. We collected paired silk and soil samples along two orthogonal transects in southern Africa. Bacterial and fungal communities were extracted using high-throughput sequencing of 16S-rRNA and ITS barcoding genes and assessed using the SourceTracker tool for R, distance-based regression of soil and silk dissimilarity, and variation partitioning. Silk bacteria were partially derived from soil bacteria, but there is no apparent difference in the contribution of local vs. non-local soils: nest microbial communities are no more similar to microbes in the local soil beneath them than soil found hundreds of kilometers away. In contrast, silk fungi receive few taxa from the soil community but show a stronger relationship with local over non-local soils. Silk bacterial communities are weakly structured by spatial and environmental processes, (i.e. dispersal and abiotic filtering) suggesting low dispersal limitation and a stronger influence of ecological drift. Silk fungal communities, in contrast, indicated stronger associations with spatial and environmental processes. The large contribution of extrinsic sources to the nest microbiome suggests high immigration potential for opportunistic or harmful microbes that may be partly responsible for eventual colony collapse. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2QD21 Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Environmental Microbiology and Microbial Ecology Life Sciences, Life Sciences community ecology, bacteria, fungi, Stegodyphus dumicola Published: 2025-06-03 15:11 Last Updated: 2025-06-03 15:11 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Data and code are available at https://github.com/kjmtaylor22/stegodyve Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00