Impact of junctional zone adenomyosis on reproductive outcomes after first single embryo transfer with donated oocytes: A retrospective single-center cohort study
Junctional zone adenomyosis negatively impacts live birth and miscarriage rates during first single embryo transfer with donor oocytes, independent of implantation rates.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluated 240 infertile women undergoing their first single embryo transfer (SET) with donated oocytes at Instituto Bernabeu, comparing 120 with isolated junctional zone (JZ) adenomyosis diagnosed by 2D–3D transvaginal ultrasound using MUSA criteria to 120 controls without uterine abnormalities. The authors reported that women with JZ adenomyosis had lower live birth rates (34.16% vs 50.83%) and higher miscarriage rates (32.93% vs 11.11%), while implantation rates were not significantly different between groups; multivariable models indicated JZ adenomyosis independently predicted reduced live birth and increased miscarriage risk, and greater severity correlated with higher miscarriage risk. A key limitation explicitly noted is partial data availability due to data loss after analyses, although results were based on the complete dataset originally collected. This paper is centrally about endometriosis-related disease mechanisms and specifically focuses on endometriosis/adenomyosis—namely junctional zone adenomyosis—as it assesses its impact on reproductive outcomes after SET.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,501 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-30T06:25:42.655704+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-07-30T06:12:33.904841+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine