Contemporary Challenges in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis: A Literature Review

other OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex

Abstract

Objectives Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological disease with a significant negative impact on quality of life, reproductive health and long-term clinical outcomes. Diagnostic delay remains a major clinical issue, with many patients experiencing years between symptom onset and definitive diagnosis. The objective of this literature review is to synthesize current evidence on the challenges in diagnosing endometriosis and to highlight key factors contributing to diagnostic delays. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted focusing on studies published since 2018 that report on time to diagnosis, diagnostic methods and barriers in endometriosis diagnosis. Databases searched included PubMed and Embase. Observational studies documenting diagnostic timelines, clinical practices and diagnostic modalities were included. Definitions of diagnostic delay and regional variations in diagnostic intervals were examined. Results Studies consistently showed prolonged diagnostic delays, with time between symptom onset and confirmed diagnosis frequently ranging from 0.3 to 12 years, depending on definitions and study populations. Many women see multiple healthcare providers before diagnosis, reflecting gaps in early recognition and referral to specialists. Diagnostic delay was driven primarily by clinician-related factors, such as low disease awareness and under-recognition of symptoms, as well as variability in access to imaging and specialist care. Traditional imaging techniques like transvaginal ultrasound and MRI improve detection of some endometriosis forms but have limitations, especially for superficial lesions. Laparoscopy with histological confirmation remains the gold standard despite its invasiveness. Conclusions Despite improved clinical guidelines and increased awareness, endometriosis diagnosis still faces significant challenges, including substantial delays influenced by both healthcare provider and system-related factors. Standardized diagnostic criteria, enhanced educational efforts among clinicians, earlier use of appropriate imaging techniques and research into reliable non-invasive biomarkers are crucial to shorten diagnostic pathways and improve patient outcomes.
Full text 2,420 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Contemporary Challenges in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis: A Literature Review | Author | Affiliation | |---|---| Gorbunova, Ana | | Date | Start Page | End Page | |---|---|---| 2026-03-27 | 110 | 110 | Objectives Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological disease with a significant negative impact on quality of life, reproductive health and long-term clinical outcomes. Diagnostic delay remains a major clinical issue, with many patients experiencing years between symptom onset and definitive diagnosis. The objective of this literature review is to synthesize current evidence on the challenges in diagnosing endometriosis and to highlight key factors contributing to diagnostic delays. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted focusing on studies published since 2018 that report on time to diagnosis, diagnostic methods and barriers in endometriosis diagnosis. Databases searched included PubMed and Embase. Observational studies documenting diagnostic timelines, clinical practices and diagnostic modalities were included. Definitions of diagnostic delay and regional variations in diagnostic intervals were examined. Results Studies consistently showed prolonged diagnostic delays, with time between symptom onset and confirmed diagnosis frequently ranging from 0.3 to 12 years, depending on definitions and study populations. Many women see multiple healthcare providers before diagnosis, reflecting gaps in early recognition and referral to specialists. Diagnostic delay was driven primarily by clinician-related factors, such as low disease awareness and under-recognition of symptoms, as well as variability in access to imaging and specialist care. Traditional imaging techniques like transvaginal ultrasound and MRI improve detection of some endometriosis forms but have limitations, especially for superficial lesions. Laparoscopy with histological confirmation remains the gold standard despite its invasiveness. Conclusions Despite improved clinical guidelines and increased awareness, endometriosis diagnosis still faces significant challenges, including substantial delays influenced by both healthcare provider and system-related factors. Standardized diagnostic criteria, enhanced educational efforts among clinicians, earlier use of appropriate imaging techniques and research into reliable non-invasive biomarkers are crucial to shorten diagnostic pathways and improve patient outcomes.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-26T06:07:59.008415+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK