Full text
1,888 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
How will species adapt to changing environments? To what extent does adaptation to previous conditions maintain the variation needed to adapt to future conditions? To answer these kinds of questions, we need to identify locally adaptive alleles and quantify their effects. Theory shows that the architecture of adaptation can depend upon the nature of mutation and on how ecology shapes the processes of migration and selection. Depending on this interplay, adaptation can be driven by few alleles of large effect or many alleles of small effect, but little is known about the relative prevalence of such architectures in nature. Unfortunately, our statistical methods are also biased: it is much easier to identify loci of large effect that contribute repeatedly across populations or species, while alleles of small effect are all but invisible to genomic analysis. There is, therefore, a gap between the total amount of locally adaptive variation and that which is explained by genomic studies. To quantify this missing local adaptation, future studies require a deep integration of genomic and phenotypic analyses.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2SS8Q
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Evolution, Genetics, Genetics and Genomics, Life Sciences
local adaptation, Population genetics, genomics
Published: 2025-10-05 14:34
Last Updated: 2025-10-05 14:34
CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.