The Q-Warg Pipeline: A Robust and Versatile Workflow for Quantitative Analysis of Protoplast Culture Conditions

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Single cells offer a simplified model for investigating complex mechanisms such as cell-cell adhesion. Protoplasts, plant cells without cell walls (CWs), have been instrumental in plant research, industrial applications, and breeding. However, due to the absence of a CW, protoplasts are not considered “true” plant cells and making them less relevant for biophysical studies. Current protocols for CW recovery in protoplasts vary widely among laboratories and starting materials, requiring lab-specific optimizations that often depend on expert knowledge and qualitative assessments. To address this, we have developed a user-friendly streamlined workflow, the Q-Warg pipeline, which enables quantitative comparison of various conditions for CW recovery post-protoplasting. This pipeline employs fluorescence imaging and tailored processing to measure parameters such as morphometry, cell viability, and CW staining intensity. Using this approach, we optimized culture conditions to obtain single plant cells (SPCs) with recovered CWs. Additionally, we demonstrated the robustness and versatility of the workflow by quantifying different fluorescent signals in protoplast suspensions. Overall, the Q-Warg pipeline provides a widely available and user-friendly solution for robust and unbiased characterization of protoplasts culture. The quantitative data generated by the pipeline may be useful in the future to decipher the mechanisms regulating protoplast viability and regeneration. Significance statement Several fields of plant biology, ranging from biotechnology to biomechanics, have recently regained a strong interest in using and studying protoplasts and single cells. Here, we developed a widely accessible quantitative workflow to characterize cell culture recovery after protoplasting along with the demonstration of its usefulness and versatility in various cases. We hope this tool can help other research groups to streamline the procedure needed to establish single plant cell approaches in their lab.
Full text 2,107 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Single cells offer a simplified model for investigating complex mechanisms such as cell-cell adhesion. Protoplasts, plant cells without cell walls (CWs), have been instrumental in plant research, industrial applications, and breeding. However, due to the absence of a CW, protoplasts are not considered “true” plant cells and making them less relevant for biophysical studies. Current protocols for CW recovery in protoplasts vary widely among laboratories and starting materials, requiring lab-specific optimizations that often depend on expert knowledge and qualitative assessments. To address this, we have developed a user-friendly streamlined workflow, the Q-Warg pipeline, which enables quantitative comparison of various conditions for CW recovery post-protoplasting. This pipeline employs fluorescence imaging and tailored processing to measure parameters such as morphometry, cell viability, and CW staining intensity. Using this approach, we optimized culture conditions to obtain single plant cells (SPCs) with recovered CWs. Additionally, we demonstrated the robustness and versatility of the workflow by quantifying different fluorescent signals in protoplast suspensions. Overall, the Q-Warg pipeline provides a widely available and user-friendly solution for robust and unbiased characterization of protoplasts culture. The quantitative data generated by the pipeline may be useful in the future to decipher the mechanisms regulating protoplast viability and regeneration. Significance statement Several fields of plant biology, ranging from biotechnology to biomechanics, have recently regained a strong interest in using and studying protoplasts and single cells. Here, we developed a widely accessible quantitative workflow to characterize cell culture recovery after protoplasting along with the demonstration of its usefulness and versatility in various cases. We hope this tool can help other research groups to streamline the procedure needed to establish single plant cell approaches in their lab. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00