Comparison of Specificity and Sensitivity of AMH and FSH in Diagnosis of Premature Ovarian Failure.

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-07 ⓘ

This study of 96 patients found that anti-Müllerian hormone demonstrated higher sensitivity and negative predictive value than follicle-stimulating hormone for diagnosing premature ovarian failure, allowing measurement throughout the menstrual cycle.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-09 · read from full text ⓘ

This descriptive study evaluated the diagnostic utility of Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) versus Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) for detecting premature ovarian failure in 96 women presenting with menstrual disorders and infertility. The researchers measured serum levels on day three of the menstrual cycle using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, explicitly excluding patients with conditions such as endometriosis to isolate the impact of primary ovarian failure. Results indicated that AMH demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (80%) compared to FSH (28.57%), while both markers exhibited comparable specificity, establishing AMH as a more reliable biochemical marker for assessing ovarian reserve. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper explicitly excludes patients with endometriosis from its inclusion criteria to prevent confounding variables in the diagnosis of premature ovarian failure.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

IntroductionAnti-Müllerian hormone represents the primitive follicular number and ovarian age. Low level of AMH is in relation to early menopausal state and decreased ovarian reserve. AMH level changes occur prior to FSH level in representing ovarian failure. The aim of this study is to compare sensitivity and specificity of AMH with FSH in diagnosis of POF.Material and methodsThis descriptive study is done on 96 patients referred to Dr. Rasekh Clinic. Serum level of AMH and FSH was measured at Day 3 (3rd day of menstrual cycle) and data were analyzed through SPSS 21 software.ResultsResults of AMH and FSH serum level indicate that AMH has more sensitivity (80% versus 28.57%) and almost equal specificity (78.89% versus 78.65%) compared with FSH. Also negative predictive value of AMH (98.61%) and FSH (87.5%) is different. But positive predictive value is the same (17.39%). Diagnostic accuracy of AMH is more than FSH and has significant differences.ConclusionAccording to the results of this study, AMH serum level is more sensitive than FSH serum level. Also AMH has more negative predictive value. Besides, this hormone can be measured at any time of menstrual cycle, against FSH. AMH seems to be more useful in early diagnosis of POF.
Full text 8,196 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 5 sections · click to expand

Section 1

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a polypeptide, member of the transforming growth factor- β (TGF β ) family. AMH gene is placed on chromosome 13 and its receptor is on chromosome 12 called AMHR2 [ 1 , 2 ]. In healthy female fetus, this protein is detected in umbilical cord. Measurement of AMH in different stages of life shows that serum level of AMH decreases during the first four years and then it would increase linearly during the next four years and the serum level will not change during puberty and adolescence. During reproductive age, AMH is secreted from granulosa layer cells of primary follicles which are developed from primordial follicles. AMH is secreted from small antral and preantral follicles which are less than 4 mm. Secretion of AMH reduces during follicle maturation and in follicles which are more than 8 mm AMH is not secreted anymore; therefore AMH serum level is constant during menstruation cycle [ 3 ]. On the other hand, maturation of follicles in each cycle is dependent on secretion of FSH which is different in phases of cycle, so basic level is measured on the third day of cycle [ 4 ]. The number of primordial follicles shows the ovarian age and storage. Computation of primordial follicles is impossible but follicles count during phase of development can lead to approximate number of primordial follicles and ovarian age [ 5 ]. According to the pattern of AMH secretion which is mostly in primordial follicles, serum level of AMH can show the age and storage of ovary [ 6 ]. Evaluation of ovarian storage is an essential step for treatment of infertility. There are several methods for evaluation of ovarian storage such as antral follicular count (AFC) which is done by ultrasonography [ 7 ]. Other methods are measuring estrogen, FSH, and inhibin B serum levels with some restrictions such as time limitation for evaluation of the serum levels [ 7 , 8 ]. Serum level of AMH is associated better with a decline of oocytes/follicles over time. AMH serum level can be measured at any time of cycle and the serum level is not affected by consumption of oral contraceptive pills (OCP), against serum level of FSH and other markers [ 9 , 10 ]. Premature ovarian failure is one of the causes of infertility which is described as a decline in ovarian function and ovarian response to FSH and reduction of estrogen level [ 11 , 12 ]. Incidence of POF and it occurs before forth decade of life earlier than physiologic menopause that occurs in fifth decade of life [ 13 , 14 ]. Serum level of AMH decreases or cannot be detected in patients with POF ( Table 1 ). One of the benefits of AMH serum level measurement is to identify patients with risk factors of POF such as family history of POF, history of chemotherapy and radiation to pelvic region, and history of autoimmune diseases [ 15 , 16 ]. Early detection of ovarian storage and numbers of primordial follicles decline can be used for prevention of infertility and preserving the remaining follicles [ 17 ]. Besides, patients with POF are prone to be involved with adverse effects of menopausal state; therefore early detection of POF can lead to primary prevention of these adverse effects such as osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases [ 18 ]. The aim of this paper is to compare the sensitivity and specificity of AMH and FSH in detection of POF in patients with menstrual disorders diagnosed as primary ovarian failure in Jahrom city.

Section 2

The study was initiated after approval of Research and Ethics Committee of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences; after clarifying the study protocol, written consent was obtained from the participants. This is a descriptive study on 96 women who were referred to Dr. Rasekh Clinic due to menstrual disorders and history of infertility for one year. Initially medical history and demographic information were assessed. Blood was collected on Day 3 (3rd of menstrual cycle), and serum was immediately separated by centrifugation for 6 min at room temperature. Serum AMH and FSH were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Exclusion criteria of the study are having history of autoimmune disease, radiation to pelvis, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and other medical or surgical disorders which are causes of menstrual disorders such as endometriosis, thyroid disease, and pelvic inflammatory disease. Inclusion criteria of the study are women with abnormal vaginal bleeding who are less than 40 years old, women who have decreased volume size of ovary or reduction of follicular numbers and size below normal range, and women with family history of premature ovarian failure:   Normal size of ovary = 2.5–5 cm in length and 1.5 to 3 cm in width and depth.   Volume of ovary (mL) = length (cm) × width (cm) × depth (cm) × 0.52.   Normal count of ovary: 3–6 mm. Normal size of ovary = 2.5–5 cm in length and 1.5 to 3 cm in width and depth. Volume of ovary (mL) = length (cm) × width (cm) × depth (cm) × 0.52. Normal count of ovary: 3–6 mm. Data were analyzed by SPSS for Windows (version 21.0.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Then evaluation of binary classifier for determination of specificity and sensitivity was done.

Section 3

Serum level of AMH measured on Day 3 in women with abnormal vaginal bleeding for diagnosis of POF shows that sensitivity of this test in diagnosis of POF is 80% and specificity is 78.89%. Diagnostic accuracy of this test is 78.95%. Positive predictive value of AMH in diagnosis of POF is 17.39% and negative predictive value of AMH in diagnosis of POF is 98.61%. Sensitivity of FSH in diagnosis of POF is 28.57% and specificity of FSH in diagnosis of POF is 78.65%. Diagnostic accuracy of this test is 71.84%. Positive predictive value of FSH in diagnosis of POF is 17.39% and negative predictive value of FSH in diagnosis of POF is 87.5% ( Figure 1 and Table 2 ). ROC curve shows that most of the cases that are diagnosed as POF also have positive serum level of AMH. ROC curve determines high sensitivity of serum level of AMH in diagnosis of POF (significance 0.027). Area in ROC curve shows that possibility of diagnosing POF with AMH serum level is 79.6%.

Section 4

Sensitivity of AMH in diagnosis of POF was more than that of FSH but both tests had almost equal specificity. Many scientists focused on relation of AMH level in diagnosis of POF but did not compare the specificity and sensitivity of AMH and FSH. Diagnostic accuracy of AMH is more than FSH such that there is significant difference between the two tests ( P value < 0.05). Therefore AMH is more reliable than FSH. Krawczuk-Rybak et al. showed that AMH is identified as ovarian function hormone in patients with lymphoma who have been treated by chemotherapy [ 19 ]. Also in different studies, AMH is a potential and reliable biochemical marker for predicting follicle quality in IVF and success in this procedure [ 20 – 22 ]. Dunlop and Anderson indicate in their study that AMH may also be a useful marker of cancer therapy-related ovarian damage in prepubertal children. AMH is proving to be of increasing value in assessing ovarian function [ 23 ]. The results of these studies are consistent with our findings. Miyazaki et al. clarified the importance of Days 1–5 E for predicting intermittent ovarian function [ 24 ]. As measuring AMH does not have these limitations it is a better method. On the other hand, Dewailly et al. showed in their study that the value of AMH in the diagnosis of PCOS remains controversial, but it may replace AFC in the future [ 25 ]. This shows that scientists want to do more studies to confirm their hypothesis. Results of these studies and other similar studies concur that serum level of AMH shows ovarian storage and a valuable and reliable test in infertility workup.

Section 5

Early diagnosis of reduction of ovarian storage can prevent expensive ways in treatment of infertile woman and in women who are susceptible to POF. As sensitivity of AMH in diagnosis of POF is more than FSH and specificity is equal, AMH is a better marker of POF but both tests can confirm each other having more reliable prediction. Also, oocytes freezing, ovarian tissue freezing, and embryo freezing are recommended for those who are at risk of POF.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0