MENSTRUAL RESPONSE TO LUTEINIZING EXTRACT OF PREGNANCY URINE
Non-randomised trial
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
Hamblen (1), Novak and Hurd (2) and others describe beneficial changes in menstrual irregularities following the hypodermic injection of a luteinizing extract of pregnancy urine (Antuitrin-S, Parke, Davis & Co.).* Search of the literature revealed no observations on its effect upon normal menstruation. The present brief report deals with this relationship. A group of 10 normal women volunteered as subjects for study. Of these, only one was married. Five were medical students and four were studying physical education. Seven were in the third and two were in the fourth decades of life. The married subject was in the fifth decade. The average weight of the ten subjects was 135 pounds and their average height 5 feet 4 inches. The luteinizing extract of pregnancy urine assayed at approximately 100 rat units per cubic centimeter. The subjects received 10 injections. The first dose was 1 cc. and subsequent ones 2 cc, if this amount did not create too much local reaction. In that case a smaller dose was given. The injections were given daily, except Sunday. The total dosage varied from 12 to 20 cc, the average being 17.5 cc
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-15T06:24:24.424788+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK