Bridging the scales: what can microbial ecologists learn from classic ecology?

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,339 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The fields of ecology and microbiology have historically developed independently of one another, resulting in each having unique methods, terminology, and concepts. Microbial ecology aims to synthesise these perspectives, merging the molecular and reductionist strengths of the microbiologist with the systems-level viewpoint of the ecologist. However, unifying disciplines with independent histories is not a straightforward task. Ecology is characterised by a series of concepts that aim to explain the diversity and composition of macroscopic ecosystems. Many of these concepts are associated with longstanding controversies surrounding their definitions and application, and these must be taken into consideration when applying them to new, microbial contexts. These concepts and theories from classic ecology also need to be critically evaluated and adjusted to account for the unique characteristics of microbes. Nonetheless, provided that the distinctions between microbial and macroscopic settings are taken into consideration, microbial systems are ideal experimental systems for many of the concepts from classic ecology. Here, we provide a concise and practical guide for microbiologists to five key frameworks from classic ecology—Niche theory, Trophic levels, Keystone species, Succession, and Metacommunities. We discuss the historical context and use of each framework, assess their applications to microbial systems and associated limitations, and offer suggestions for future research to help bridge the gap between the two fields. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2FM0V Subjects Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Environmental Microbiology and Microbial Ecology Life Sciences, Microbiology

Keywords

Niche theory, Trophic levels, keystone species, Succession, metacommunities, Neutral Theory, Modern Coexistence Theory, ecological filters Dates Published: 2025-06-30 17:17 Last Updated: 2026-05-11 18:09 Older Versions License CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Additional Metadata Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00