Dominant baboons experience more interrupted and less rest at night

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

SUMMARY The amount and quality of sleep individuals get can impact various aspects of human and non-human animal health, ultimately affecting fitness. For wild animals that sleep in groups, individuals may disturb one another, influencing sleep quality and quantity, but this aspect of social sleep has been understudied due to methodological challenges. Here, using nighttime rest (absence of bodily movements) as a proxy for sleep, we test the hypothesis that individual’s social dominance can affect sleep opportunities by studying a troop of wild chacma baboons ( Papio ursinus ), a species with a strong hierarchical social structure. First, we show that the troop’s night-time rest (determined by 40Hz acceleration data) is highly synchronised. Next, we link night-time rest dynamics to daytime spatial networks and dominance hierarchy (from 1Hz GPS data and direct observations). We show that baboon rest synchrony is higher between similarly ranked individuals, and unexpectedly, more dominant baboons experience less and lower-quality rest. We propose that this hierarchy effect is explained by higher-ranked baboons resting closer to more group members, which also leads them exerting greater influence on each other’s night-time behaviour compared to lower-ranked individuals. Our study provides the first empirical evidence for the impact of social hierarchies on sleep in a wild primate, suggesting that dominance status may impose trade-offs between social rank and the quality and quantity of sleep.
Full text 1,667 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
SUMMARY The amount and quality of sleep individuals get can impact various aspects of human and non-human animal health, ultimately affecting fitness. For wild animals that sleep in groups, individuals may disturb one another, influencing sleep quality and quantity, but this aspect of social sleep has been understudied due to methodological challenges. Here, using nighttime rest (absence of bodily movements) as a proxy for sleep, we test the hypothesis that individual’s social dominance can affect sleep opportunities by studying a troop of wild chacma baboons (Papio ursinus), a species with a strong hierarchical social structure. First, we show that the troop’s night-time rest (determined by 40Hz acceleration data) is highly synchronised. Next, we link night-time rest dynamics to daytime spatial networks and dominance hierarchy (from 1Hz GPS data and direct observations). We show that baboon rest synchrony is higher between similarly ranked individuals, and unexpectedly, more dominant baboons experience less and lower-quality rest. We propose that this hierarchy effect is explained by higher-ranked baboons resting closer to more group members, which also leads them exerting greater influence on each other’s night-time behaviour compared to lower-ranked individuals. Our study provides the first empirical evidence for the impact of social hierarchies on sleep in a wild primate, suggesting that dominance status may impose trade-offs between social rank and the quality and quantity of sleep. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes more cautious framing of results, substituting "sleep" with "rest"

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00