Leaf excision has minimal impact on photosynthetic parameters across crop functional types
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Photosynthesis is increasingly becoming a recognised target for crop improvement. Phenotyping photosynthesis-related traits on field-grown material is a key bottleneck to progress here due to logistical barriers and short measurement days. Many studies attempt to overcome these challenges by phenotyping excised leaf material in the laboratory. To date there are no demonstrated examples of the representative nature of photosynthesis measurements performed on excised leaves relative to intact leaves in crops. Here, we tested whether standardised leaf excision on the day prior to phenotyping impacted a range of common photosynthesis-related traits across crop functional types using tomato (C3-dicot), barley (C3-monocot), and maize (C4-monocot). Potentially constraining aspects of leaf physiology that could be forecasted to impair photosynthesis in excised leaves, namely leaf water potential and abscisic acid accumulation, were not different between intact and excised leaves. We also observed non-significant differences in spectral reflectance and chlorophyll fluorescence traits between the treatments across the three species. However, we did observe some significant differences between gas exchange and photosynthetic capacity associated traits across all three species. This study represents a useful reference for those who perform measurements of this nature and the differences reported should be considered in associated experimental design and statistical analyses. Highlight Across the main photosynthesis functional types (C 3 -dicot, C 3 -monot, and C 4 -monot) of major crops (tomato, barley, and maize), measurements of photosynthetic parameters demonstrate few, but important, differences when measured on excised relative to intact leaves.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00