β-Catenin interacts with a Wnt signaling mRNA network in myeloid leukaemia cells through canonical RBP binding.

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 165,889 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
β-Catenin interacts with a Wnt signaling mRNA network in myeloid leukaemia cells through canonical RBP binding. | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article β-Catenin interacts with a Wnt signaling mRNA network in myeloid leukaemia cells through canonical RBP binding. Rhys Morgan, Megan Wagstaff, Okan Sevim, Aaron Goff, Morag Raynor, and 8 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5921123/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 30 Apr, 2025 Read the published version in Oncogene → Version 1 posted 12 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Wnt/β-catenin signaling is important for normal hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) biology and heavily implicated in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). The central mediator β-catenin is an attractive therapeutic target in AML however its targeting has been hampered by a poor characterisation of its molecular interactions in haematopoietic cells, which will differ from its network in solid tissues. Our previous β-catenin interactome study identified the significant enrichment of RNA-binding proteins (RBP) implying post-transcriptional roles for β-catenin in myeloid cells. To identify β-catenin interacting mRNAs we performed β-catenin RNA-immunoprecipitation coupled to RNA-sequencing (RIP-seq) and identified significantly enriched Wnt signalling pathway transcripts. Using β-catenin cross-linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP) we demonstrated a limited capacity for β-catenin to bind RNA directly implying dependence on other RBPs. β-Catenin was found to interact with MSI2 in both myeloid cell lines and AML patient samples, where expression was significantly correlated. MSI2 knockdown reduced Wnt signalling output (TCF/LEF activity), through suppression of LEF-1 expression and nuclear localization. Through both RIP and CLIP we demonstrate MSI2 binds LEF1 mRNA in a partly β-catenin dependent fashion, and may impact the post-transcriptional control of LEF-1 expression. Finally, we show that MSI2-mediated expansion of human HSPCs could be partly driven through LEF1 regulation. This is the first study to experimentally demonstrate functional crosstalk between MSI2 and Wnt signalling in human cells, and indicates potential novel post-transcriptional roles for β-catenin in a haematological context. Biological sciences/Cancer/Haematological cancer/Leukaemia/Acute myeloid leukaemia Biological sciences/Stem cells/Self-renewal Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Introduction Canonical Wnt signalling is an evolutionarily conserved pathway, critical in normal development and disease. 1 In normal haematopoiesis, the central mediator β-catenin regulates the self-renewal 2 and differentiation 3 – 5 of haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC), where its expression is tightly regulated to ensure the correct balance between HSPC maintenance and development. 6 , 7 However its dysregulation is observed across numerous hematological malignancies, including myeloid leukaemias. Overexpression of β-catenin occurs in up to 80% of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cases, 8 through a multitude of mechanisms, 9 that result in hyperactive Wnt signalling 10 and adverse patient survival. 11 Deregulated Wnt signalling contributes to the development of several AML subtypes including normal karyotype, 12 FLT3 − mutant, 13 del(5q) + , 14 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-related, 15 CBF mutated, 16 and PML-RARα + . 17 Mouse models have also shown β-catenin regulates the emergence, maintenance and drug resistance of leukaemia stem cells (LSC) in both AML 18 – 23 and chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). 24 , 25 This, coupled with the observation that only very low levels of Wnt/β-catenin signalling sustain normal haematopoiesis, 6 makes the pathway an attractive therapeutic target. Yet despite this promise, pharmacological attempts to disrupt β-catenin have achieved limited success to date, hampered by a poor understanding of its molecular interactions in a haematopoietic context. In solid tissues β-catenin has important cell adhesion functions through interaction with cadherins in adherens junctions. 26 However, such tight cell-cell adhesion is not prominent in a fluid tissue like blood, meaning free β-catenin likely forms alternative interactions in haematopoietic cells. Indeed, our previous evaluation of β-catenin localisation in myeloid cells has not indicated significant plasma cell membrane localisation. 27 To address this knowledge gap and identify new approaches for targeting β-catenin in haematological malignancy, we characterised β-catenin’s interaction network in myeloid cells and discovered a plethora of novel protein partners. 8 Of note was the significant enrichment of RNA-binding proteins (RBP). 9 RBPs are a diverse family of proteins that bind and regulate the stability, splicing, transport and translation of target RNAs, and are heavily implicated in normal hematopoiesis and leukaemia. 28 Such interactions imply that β-catenin could have a hitherto uncharacterised but important role in post-transcriptional gene expression in haematopoietic cells. In this study we show for the first time that β-catenin associates with a Wnt signalling mRNA network mediated through interactions with canonical RBPs like MSI2. We demonstrate MSI2 interacts with β-catenin and influences Wnt signaling output through modulation of the Wnt transcription factor LEF-1, which could be an important axis for controlling the growth and survival of human HSPCs. Methods Primary samples Bone marrow, peripheral blood or leukapheresis samples from patients diagnosed with AML (Clinical information in Supplementary Table S1 ) were collected in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with approval of University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust and London Brent Research Ethics Committee. Human cord blood (CB) was obtained following informed consent healthy mothers at full-term undergoing elective caesarian sections at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, with approval from Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS (BSUH) trust, the East of England – Essex Research Ethics Committee and HRA and Health and Care Research Wales (18/EE/0403). From all primary samples mononuclear cells (MNC) were isolated via density gradient separation using Ficoll-Hypaque (Merck Millipore) and only samples with ≥ 80% viability included in the study. The CD34 + fraction was derived as previously described 29 from cryopreserved cord blood MNC preparations and enriched to > 85% purity using MiniMACS (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cell culture and drug treatments The myeloid cell lines K562, HL60, HEL, U937, PLB-985, NOMO1, OCI-AML3, EOLI, ML-1, THP-1, KU812 (The European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures) and OCI-AML2, MV4-11, KG-1, KG1a SET2, NB4 and MONOMAC6 (Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH) were confirmed mycoplasma-free and authenticated via short-tandem repeat (STR) analysis prior to general culture as previously. 30 β-Catenin was stabilised using the GSK-3β inhibitor CHIR99021 (Merck-Millipore) as previously described, 8 whilst transcription was inhibited via 2µg/ml Actinomycin D (Merck-Millipore) at the stated timepoints. Purified human CB CD34 + HSPC were isolated and cultured at 5x10 5 /mL in StemSpan SFEMII (Stemcell Technologies) supplemented with human stem cell factor (150ng/mL), human FLT3-ligand (150ng/mL), and human thrombopoietin (TPO; 20ng/mL; Proteintech Group). RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP) RIP analyses were performed using the MagnaRIP kit (Merck-Millipore) according to manufacturer’s guidelines. Briefly, 2x10 6 cells were treated overnight with CHIR99021 or DMSO at 37°C with 5% CO 2 . Cells were collected and washed in PBS followed by resuspension in lysis buffer, incubation on ice and overnight storage − 80°C. Antibody-bead complexes were prepared following manufacturers guidelines with 5µg mouse IgG (Becton Dickinson), rabbit IgG (Merck Millipore), β-catenin (Clone 14, Becton Dickinson), HuR (Clone 3A2, Invitrogen), MSI2 (EP1305Y, Abcam) or LIN28B (Cell signalling Technology) and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes with rotation. The RIP lysates were thawed and incubated with antibody-bead complexes with rotation at 4°C overnight followed by washing of unbound antibody. Each immunoprecipitation was resuspended in proteinase K buffer to remove contaminating protein and followed by addition of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol in a 25:24:1 (Thermofisher Scientific) to separate phases. Aqueous phase was removed to a new eppendorf followed by ethanol addition to precipitate RNA at -80°C overnight. All tubes were centrifuged, followed by washing in 80% ethanol and then air-drying of pellet for 10 minutes at room temperature after a final centrifugation. The RNA pellet was resuspended in 20µl of nuclease-free water and the tubes kept at -80°C ahead of sample assessment by an mRNA bioanalyzer Pico Series II (Agilent). RIP sequencing analysis Raw FASTQ files were trimmed using Cutadapt (version 4.6) to remove adapters identified during the quality control process. 31 The trimmed reads were then mapped to the human genome using HISAT2 (version 2.2.1) with default parameters. 32 The human genome index file used for alignment was downloaded from the HISAT2 website. SAMtools (version 1.21) was used to convert SAM files generated by HISAT2 into BAM files for read counting. 33 Reads were then counted using featureCounts (version 2.0.6) with a human annotation file from Ensembl, applying the parameters: “--primary -C -t exon -g gene_id”. The raw read counts were imported into R to identify differentially enriched RNAs between basal (DMSO) and stabilised β-catenin (CHIR99021) conditions. Differential enrichment analysis, including fold change calculation and statistical analysis, was conducted with the DESeq2 package (version 1.44.0) 34 in R. Data manipulation and visualization were performed using the tidyverse (version 2.0.0) 35 and ComplexHeatmap (version 2.20.0) 36 packages. Cross linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP) 4x10 7 cells were harvested, washed twice with room-temperature PBS and split across four 60 mm x 15 mm cell culture dishes (Corning) prior to UV crosslinking. Crosslinking was performed using three rounds of 100mJ/cm² UV-254 nm irradiation, with agitation between each round. Following UV treatment, cells were recombined and centrifuged at before disposal of supernatant and cell pellets snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Lysates were resuspended in 500µL lysis buffer as previously, 27 and sonicated for 10 cycles of alternate 30 seconds of sonication with 30-second rests. Sonicated lysates were centrifuged to pellet debris followed by quantitation of lysates using the DC protein assay (BioRad) as previously described, 27 to ensure equal protein input for downstream RT-qPCR. Four units of Turbo DNase (Ambion, Thermofisher) was added to each sample and incubated at 37°C for 3 minutes followed by cooling on ice for 3 minutes. 8µg β-catenin or matched murine IgG antibody (Becton Dickinson), MSI2 or LIN28B, and matched Rabbit IgG antibody (Cell Signalling Technology) was conjugated to beads as previously described, 27 but using CLIP lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1% Igepal CA-630, 1% sodium deoxycholate) without protease inhibitors. Lysates were incubated with antibody-bead complexes for a minimum of 1 hour at 4°C with rotation with 150µL original lysate retained for input samples, after which unbound antibody discarded from beads using washes in CLIP lysis buffer. Antibody-bead complexes were resuspended in 250µL Proteinase K elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1% Igepal CA-630, 1% sodium deoxycholate) with 20 mg/mL proteinase K solution (ThermoScientific) added to each sample, followed by incubation at 65°C for 1 hour prior to magnetic bead separation and supernatant transferred to fresh tubes. To each sample, 750µL TRIzol LS reagent (Invitrogen) was added before storage at -80°C for RNA extraction. RNA extraction, purification, and quantification were performed as above. RNA extraction, clean up and quantitation RNA was extracted using the Zymo RNA mini-prep kit (Cambridge Bioscience), cleaned using RNeasy MinElute Clean-up kit (Qiagen), or by DNase treatment using the DNA free removal kit (Thermofisher), all via manufacturer guidelines. 37 RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermofisher) blanked against nuclease-free water. RT-qPCR Purified RNA was converted to cDNA using the high-capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Thermofisher) or the one-step RT-qPCR mix (APTO-GEN, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA). All primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S2 and were diluted to 10mM with qRT-PCR programmes used as per manufacturers guidelines (Merck-Millipore). RT-qPCR was performed on a QuantStudio™ 3 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific) in conjunction with associated software. Relative gene expression was determined first by subtracting the C T value of housekeeping genes ( ACTB , GAPDH or RNA18SN1 ) from the C T value of genes of interest to generate Δ CT . The ΔΔ CT was then calculated by subtracting the average control Δ CT from the Δ CT of each condition and fold change calculated through 2 −ΔΔCT . To account for differences in RNA sample preparation, RIP RNA C T values were normalised to the corresponding input RNA fraction C T value for the same qPCR assay as per manufacturer’s guidelines. Briefly, Δ CT values were calculated by subtracting the C T value of the input fraction from the C T value of the RIP fraction for each target gene, ensuring variability in RNA input or preparation was accounted for. In contrast, for CLIP analysis, normalisation of CLIP RNA to the input was not required, as sample concentrations were matched at the protein level prior to Co-IP. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) Cross-linking and Co-immunoprecipitation was executed as previously. 8 Briefly, 5µg of MSI2 (EP1305Y, Abcam, Oxford, UK), HuR (Clone 3A2, Invitrogen), β-catenin (Clone 14, Becton Dickinson), mouse IgG (Becton Dickinson) of rabbit IgG (Merck Millipore, New Jersey, United States) was complexed with Protein G Dynabeads (Invitrogen), and incubated with 1mg of whole cell lysate overnight in Co-IP lysis buffer (1 x Cell Signalling Technology lysis buffer, plus 10% glycerol and 0.5mM dithiothreitol) at 4°C or with the addition of 20µg/ml RNase A (Thermofisher Scientific). Following washing of antibody-bead complexes five times in Co-IP lysis buffer, each sample was diluted in 2x Laemmli buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) plus Co-IP lysis buffer and heated to 95°C for 5 minutes prior to immunoblotting. Immunoblotting Immunoblotting was performed as previously, 8 using antibodies to β-catenin, MSI2, LEF-1, GAPDH (Proteintech, Manchester, UK), Lamin A/C (Merck Millipore, New Jersey, United States) and α-tubulin (Merck Millipore) already outlined in above sections. Lentivirus preparation K562 and KU812 and cells were lentivirally transduced with the β-catenin-activated reporter (BAR) or mutant ‘found unresponsive’ control (fuBAR) system as previously. 8 The lentiviral expression plasmids used for transgene expression in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S3 and were used alongside their appropriate matched controls. Flow cytometry For Wnt reporter assessment, 2x10 5 BAR/fuBAR containing cells were treated overnight with either DMSO or CHIR99021. TCF/LEF reporter activity (Venus YFP intensity) was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis using a CytoFLEX Flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, California, USA) in conjunction with FlowJo software Version 10.10 (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR USA) acquiring a minimum of 2x10 4 debris excluded events. For immunophenotyping, up to 5x10 4 CB-derived CD34 + HSPC were seeded into wells of 96-well plate in 100µl staining buffer (1xPBS, 0.5% BSA) and stained with 10µg/mL antibodies to CD34-PE (Clone 581, Biolegend) and CD45-PerCPCy5.5 (Clone QA17A19, Biolegend) or the equivalent concentration-, manufacturer- and isotype-matched control antibodies (Clone MOPC-21, Biolegend). Nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation Nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation was performed as previously. 8 Statistics For densitometry, ImageJ Version 2.9.0 (National Institute of Health) was used to quantify regions of interest which was normalised to the GAPDH intensity obtained within each respective sample. Spearman Rank correlation was assessed using Prism Version 10.3.1 (GraphPad Software, LLC), alongside statistical tests including one-sample or students t-test, using a threshold of p < 0.05. Unless otherwise stated all tests were performed in biological triplicates with data representing the mean ± 1 standard deviation (s.d). Results β-Catenin RIP-seq reveals enrichment with Wnt signalling mRNAs Our previous β-catenin interactome study in myeloid cells revealed the significant enrichment of RBPs, 8 , 9 indicating a putative novel role for β-catenin in post-transcriptional processes in haematological cells. To first confirm whether β-catenin associates with RNA in myeloid cells we performed β-catenin RNA-immunoprecipitation (RIP) and examined RNA concentration and size using a Bioanalyser system. We first confirmed efficient RIP using K562 cells and a canonical RBP target, HuR ( ELAVL1 , also found to interact with β-catenin; Supplemental Figure S1 ), 38 with a known mRNA binding partner ACTB detected by RT-qPCR (Fig. 1 B). Using this assay we next successfully enriched β-catenin via RIP from K562 cells under basal (DMSO) or Wnt signalling stimulated (5µM GSK3β inhibitor CHIR99021) conditions (Fig. 1 C) and showed abundant RNA enrichment versus IgG-RIP (Fig. 1 D). Following successful β-catenin RIP we next coupled this to RNA-sequencing to identify β-catenin-associated transcripts. Using K562 and HEL cells which we have previously shown to be acutely Wnt signalling responsive, 8 we identified 582 and 1179 mRNAs respectively, that were enriched (FDR p < 0.05) between basal and stabilized β-catenin conditions, which included Wnt signalling transcripts (Fig. 2 A; raw β-catenin RIP-seq data publicly available at ArrayExpress under reference E-MTAB-14675, and processed data available as Supplementary Data File 1). Further gene ontology pathway analysis highlighted Wnt/β-catenin signalling mRNAs as amongst the most significantly enriched from K562 β-catenin RIP-seq (Fig. 2 B), and a number of these were also observed in the β-catenin RIP-seq from HEL cells (Fig. 2 C). Using β-catenin RIP-RT-qPCR (versus IgG RIP-RT-qPCR) we validated enrichment of several Wnt signalling mRNAs in K562 and HEL cells including AMER1 , BCL9L , AXIN2 and LEF1 (Fig. 2 D and E). Taken together, these data show that β-catenin associates with mRNA in myeloid cells which are significantly enriched for Wnt signalling components. β-Catenin has weak capacity for RNA binding in myeloid cells β-Catenin lacks a canonical RNA-binding motif however intrinsically disordered regions (IDR), which comprise β-catenin’s N- and C-termini (Supplemental Figure S2 ), 39 are commonly implicated in RNA binding by non-canonical RBPs. 40 Furthermore, Armadillo domains are the one of the most frequently implicated structures in non-canonical RNA binding and β-catenin contains 12 such repeating domains in its central region which predict RNA binding (Supplemental Figure S3). 41 β-Catenin has been reported to directly bind the 3’-UTR of mRNAs, 38 , 42 and has recently been shown to bind double-stranded RNA. 43 Therefore, to assess the RNA binding capacity of β-catenin in the haematopoietic system we performed β-catenin cross-linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP), a more stringent method of RBP:RNA capture. As shown in Fig. 3 A, β-catenin RIP once again pulled down with abundant RNA relative to IgG RIP, as did a positive canonical RBP control with LIN28B RIP. However, using a CLIP approach, despite efficient β-catenin isolation (Fig. 3 B), there was no observable RNA enrichment over the control IgG CLIP, whilst LIN28B CLIP still pulled down abundant RNA as expected, suggesting β-catenin does not directly bind RNA strongly in this context. MSI2 interacts with β-catenin in myeloid cells We anticipated that β-catenin might network with Wnt signalling mRNAs indirectly through other canonical RBPs and returned to our previously characterised β-catenin interaction network. 8 , 9 Musashi-2 (MSI2) was identified as a putative β-catenin interacting RBP in myeloid cells (Fig. 4 A), 8 and colorectal SW620 cells suggesting this interaction could also occur beyond haematopoietic tissue (Supplemental Figure S4). To confirm interaction, we performed reciprocal MSI2 co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) from K562 and HEL cells and confirmed consistent β-catenin enrichment under both basal and Wnt signalling activated conditions (Fig. 4CD). Since MSI2 is an RBP, 44 and β-catenin has also been shown to bind RNA, 38 , 42 we assessed whether the β-catenin:MSI2 interaction could be a consequence of RNA co-occupancy. However, after repeating MSI2 co-IP +/-RNase A, and confirming complete digestion of RNA (Supplemental Figure S5), 27 the MSI2:β-catenin protein interaction remained suggesting these proteins are complexed irrespective of RNA presence (Fig. 5 CD). Furthermore, using AlphaFold3 modelling, we found the accuracy of the predicted relative positions of the subunits in the β-catenin:MSI2 complex to be low, suggesting that direct interaction is unlikely and thus likely mediated by intermediary partners (Supplemental Fig. 5). β-Catenin interacts with MSI2 in myeloid cell lines and primary AML cells To assess the potential scope of cooperation between MSI2 and β-catenin across myeloid cells we assessed MSI2 expression across a panel of 18 myeloid cell lines. Two thirds of the myeloid cell lines assessed exhibited abundant co-expression of both β-catenin and MSI2 (Fig. 5 A) which exhibited a degree of correlation ( p = 0.03; Fig. 5 B). To explore the clinical relevance of the β-catenin:MSI2 association, we screened 20 AML patients for protein expression of MSI2 and β-catenin (patient clinical details provided in Supplemental Table S1 ). Like myeloid cell lines, MSI2 was frequently co-expressed with β-catenin to a similar frequency observed in myeloid cell lines (12/20 samples [60%]; Fig. 5 C), with an extensive correlation ( p < 0.001) between the two proteins (Fig. 5 D). To examine if the MSI2:β-catenin interaction could be detected in patient cells, we performed an MSI2 Co-IP in a primary AML sample containing abundant levels of both proteins and where ample cellular material existed (patient 10) and confirmed MSI2 interaction with β-catenin (Fig. 5 E). Taken together these data indicate the β-catenin:MSI2 interaction could represent an abundant and clinically relevant association in AML cells. MSI2 impacts Wnt signalling output through modulation of LEF-1 To evaluate if MSI2 could bind or regulate Wnt mRNAs we assessed its net impact on Wnt signalling output using the b eta-catenin a ctivated r eporter as done previously. 8 , 27 , 30 Depletion of MSI2 using two unique shRNAs had little impact on β-catenin level but did cause a concomitant decrease in expression of the Wnt transcription factor LEF-1 (Fig. 6 A). As could be expected from diminished LEF-1, this resulted in diminished Wnt signalling output from both K562 and KU812 cells exhibiting MSI2 knockdown (Fig. 6 B-D). MSI2 knockdown in HEL cells also diminished Wnt signalling output and LEF-1 expression (Supplemental Figure S7), however we were unable to use this cell line for subsequent experiments since only one MSI2 shRNA variant remained viable after lentiviral transduction and selection. We also demonstrated that ectopic MSI2 expression increased nuclear LEF-1 expression and TCF/LEF activity in K562 cells (Supplemental Figure S8) in Wnt signalling activated conditions. To understand the basis for reduced TCF/LEF output in MSI2-deficient cells, we performed nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation and examined the expression/localisation of Wnt signalling components. Again, we observed limited impact of MSI2 knockdown on β-catenin level or nuclear localisation in response to Wnt signalling activation but did note markedly reduced LEF-1 expression and nuclear localisation in K562 and KU812 cells under both basal and Wnt signalling active states (Fig. 6 E). To understand the basis for reduced LEF-1 expression upon MSI2 knockdown we examined mRNA levels using qRT-PCR and observed significantly reduced LEF1 (but not that of another critical Wnt effector; TCF7L2 ) expression in MSI2-deficient K562 and KU812 cells (Fig. 6 F and G). Collectively these data indicate that MSI2 can influence Wnt signalling activity through modulation of the Wnt effector LEF-1. MSI2 binds LEF1 mRNA and influences its stability Given the role of MSI2 as an RBP and regulator of post-transcriptional gene expression, 44 we next assessed whether LEF1 could be an mRNA partner for MSI2. After first confirming efficient MSI2 RIP in K562 cells (Fig. 7 A), and enrichment of known mRNA partners MYB and MYC , 45 we observed enriched LEF1 (and TCF7L2 ) mRNA versus control IgG RIP (Fig. 7 B). Similarly, using an MSI2 CLIP approach we observed enrichment of LEF1 transcript (and MYC and MYB ) versus IgG CLIP (Fig. 7 C) indicating that LEF1 could be a direct mRNA binding target of MSI2. Given β-catenin immunoprecipitates with LEF1 mRNA through both RIP-seq and RIP-qRT-PCR (Fig. 2 ) but shows limited capacity for direct RNA binding (Fig. 3 ), we hypothesised that β-catenin may impact binding of canonical RBPs like MSI2 to LEF1 mRNA. To interrogate this, we generated β-catenin depleted K562 cells using two unique shRNAs and re-assessed MSI2 binding to LEF1 mRNA using MSI2 RIP-RT-qPCR and MSI2-CLIP-RT-qPCR. Firstly, we confirmed β-catenin depletion had no impact on total MSI2 protein (Fig. 7 D), or overall LEF1 mRNA expression in β-catenin depleted K562 RIP (Fig. 7 E) and CLIP inputs (Fig. 7 F). However, we observed attenuation of LEF1 mRNA binding with MSI2 upon β-catenin knockdown through both MSI2-RIP (Fig. 7 G) and MSI2-CLIP (Fig. 7 H). Finally, given MSI2’s prominent roles in post-transcription we assessed LEF1 mRNA stability following the global inhibition of transcription by actinomycin D (ActD) treatment in K562 cells. Using the K562 variant exhibiting the most complete MSI2 knockdown (shRNA#2) LEF1 mRNA demonstrated decreased stability compared with the non-targeting shRNA (relative to their respective 0hr timepoint levels; Fig. 7 I). This corresponded to a markedly accelerated depletion of LEF-1 protein at 8hrs ActD treatment compared with non-targeting shRNA controls (Fig. 7 J), which is particularly notable given the normally stable half-life we typically observe for the LEF-1 peptide (Supplemental Figure S9). In summary, these data suggest that β-catenin promotes MSI2 binding to LEF1 , and MSI2 can modulate the subsequent stability of LEF1 mRNA through a post-transcriptional mechanism. MSI2 regulation of LEF-1 may represent an important regulatory axis in human HSPC growth and survival Both MSI2 and LEF1 have individually documented roles in the maintenance and function of HSPC. 46 – 50 Previously, MSI2 has been shown to promote HSPC expansion and we hypothesized that some of this activity could be mediated through LEF-1. To interrogate this hypothesis human CB-derived CD34 + HSPC were isolated and lentivirally transduced with ectopic MSI2 expression (Fig. 8 A) alongside either non-targeting, or LEF-1 shRNAs (Fig. 8 B). From day 4 onwards (3 days post-lentiviral transduction) we observed a modest but consistent increase in the expansion rates of HSPCs expressing ectopic MSI2 versus control cultures, which was higher (32%±2 increase) at day 8 of liquid culture (Fig. 8 C) in keeping with previous reports of MSI2-mediated HSPC expansion. 50 A higher percentage of CD34 + events were also observed in MSI2 overexpressing cultures versus controls at this timepoint (Fig. 8 D). Increases in the expansion rates and CD34 positivity of MSI2 overexpressing cultures were curtailed in the presence of LEF-1 shRNA (Fig. 8 CD). Primary HSPC cultures harbouring LEF-1 shRNA exhibited consistently reduced growth rates which were lower with shRNA#2 at days 8, 11 and 13 of liquid culture (Fig. 8 D). Indeed, the growth repression mediated by LEF-1 extended beyond suppressing MSI2-induced expansion, implying independently important roles for LEF1 in human HSPC biology. These data are consistent with our previous study showing LEF-1 can impact the proliferation of myeloid leukaemia cells, 8 and implies that part of MSI2’s capacity to expand human HSPCs could be mediated through LEF-1. Discussion Wnt signalling is a critical pathway regulating human HSCs and is frequently implicated in haematological malignancy. The central mediator of the pathway, β-catenin, has been a longstanding therapeutic target in leukaemia but attempts to therapeutically target the molecule have achieved limited success to date – curtailed by a poor understanding of its molecular interactions in haematopoietic cells. In solid tissues, β-catenin has a vital role in cell adhesion within membrane complexes where it facilitates tight cell-cell adhesion, however such complexes are not a prominent feature of blood cells meaning free β-catenin likely serves alternative functions in this context. Following on from our previous studies showing that β-catenin interacts with vast RBP networks in myeloid cells, 8 , 9 we now demonstrate for the first time that β-catenin may contribute towards post-transcriptional regulation in haematopoietic cells. To identify transcripts over which β-catenin may have post-transcriptional influence in myeloid cells we initially performed β-catenin RIPseq after first confirming β-catenin pulled down with RNA. We identified hundreds enriched transcripts with β-catenin under basal versus Wnt signalling activated conditions across K562 and HEL cells. From K562 cells we identified Wnt/β-catenin signalling as the top signalling pathway enriched from β-catenin associated mRNAs, with many also observed in HEL β-catenin RIPseq. The existence of feedback loops within Wnt signalling has been known for some time with both positive and negative regulators known to be transcriptional targets of the pathway such as LEF1 , 51 LGR5 , 52 FZD7 , 53 and AXIN2 , 54 RNF43 , 55 DKK1 , 56 respectively. However, these were thought to be regulated in a predominantly transcriptional fashion. Our data raise the prospect that β-catenin may also influence feedback loops in Wnt signalling through post-transcriptional mechanisms including both established Wnt target genes, but also Wnt signalling mRNAs that are not transcriptional targets of the pathway including AMER1 , BCL9L , DVL2 and CSNK1E . The concept that β-catenin could post-transcriptionally govern Wnt signalling is gaining traction with a recent report showing that is it recruited to the translation initiation complex in the dentate gyrus of mice. 57 Patil and colleagues demonstrated that following eIF4E phosphorylation, β-catenin was substantially recruited to the eIF4E cap complex following long-term potentiation where it preferentially augmented the translation of Wnt signalling mRNAs including Wnt4 , Lrp5 , Fzd2 , Fzd4 and Dvl2 . This follows from another study reporting β-catenin recruitment to the messenger ribonucleoprotein and translational pre-initiation complex through the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), where it repressed translation. 58 Such a post-transcriptional role for free cytoplasmic/nuclear β-catenin might be more prominent in a fluid tissue like blood where its other well characterised role in cell adhesion may not be so relevant. However, trying to disentangle β-catenin’s transcriptional influences from its post-transcriptional effects is technically challenging, especially since data from T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL) cells indicate β-catenin-dependent transcriptional signatures include genes involved with RNA biosynthesis and processing. 59 The capacity for β-catenin to bind RNA directly remains unclear. Previously, β-catenin has been shown to bind selective mRNAs including COX2 through the 3’UTR AU-rich elements in concert with RBPs such as HuR, 38 , 42 and recently has been shown to bind double stranded RNA. 43 Numerous reports also exist of β-catenin binding and modulating the stability/splicing of numerous transcripts including CA9 , SNAI1 , IL6 , 60 Cadherin 11 , 61 and an estrogen receptor-β ( ER-β ) variant. 62 Armadillo domains have also been identified as one of the most frequent domain types associated with RNA binding amongst non-canonical RBPs, 41 and β-catenin has 12 such repeating structures in its central domain. However, β-catenin has no recognised canonical RNA binding motif, and we observed little RNA pull down through a more direct CLIP assessment in myeloid cells. Therefore, we hypothesise that β-catenin’s interactions with RNA in this context occur indirectly through binding other canonical RBPs and there were many identified in our original β-catenin interactome study. 8 , 9 Thus far, we have confirmed interactions with RBPs such as WT1, 27 HuR (Supplemental Figure S1 A), LIN28B and TOE1 (unpublished) and all of these β-catenin:RBP interactions occur irrespective of RNA presence (Fig. 4BC), suggesting β-catenin complexes with RBPs, rather than associates though co-occupancy of RNA. This follows from many other reported interactions of β-catenin with RBPs including FUS, 63 HuR, 38 , 60 and FMRP, 58 and suggests a wider role for β-catenin in RNA:RBP complexes. We were the first to report functional crosstalk between Wnt/β-catenin signalling and MSI2 in myeloid cells. 64 A subsequent report from the Sheng group adopted a deletion of the chromosome 5q (del(5q)) murine model of MDS which has previously demonstrated a dependency on the negative Wnt regulator and tumour suppressor APC for MDS development. 15 The authors show that MSI2 may also impact Wnt signalling function in murine HSC, however there no established measurements of Wnt signalling activity (e.g. TCF/LEF activity, Wnt target gene assessment, β-catenin stabilisation/nuclear localision dynamics) performed in this study. 65 We found the principle connection between these two proteins appeared to be the Wnt transcription factor LEF-1 which was suppressed with MSI2 knockdown across multiple cell lines. This aligns with a previous report of lower LEF-1 (and TCF4) levels (protein and mRNA) upon MSI2 depletion in SMMC-7721 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. 66 A Wnt gene signature was also observed in response to MSI2 loss in four human leukaemia cell lines in a study by Kharas et al , which were reciprocally upregulated upon ectopic MSI2 expression in murine HSC. 47 Given the well documented importance of MSI2 to HSPCs, 46 , 67 , 68 we reasoned that regulation of LEF1 might be a mechanism utilised by MSI2 to control HSPC growth and survival. Indeed, LEF1 knockdown perturbed MSI2-mediated expansion of HSPCs, however we cannot rule out LEF1 acting independently of any MSI2-mediated regulation since it is also a key regulator of the HSPC compartment. 49 , 69 Finally, this study partly examined the mechanism by which MSI2 could regulate LEF1 expression and found that MSI2 bound LEF1 mRNA through both RIP and CLIP approaches. This is in agreement with an elegant study by the Pillai group who also performed MSI2 iCLIP in K562 cells and we noted that LEF1 was a high confidence mRNA partner in their dataset. 70 Interestingly, they found only 2.6% of 4,000 high confidence MSI2 mRNA partners (mainly via 3'-UTR) are subsequently subject to translational regulation by MSI2. Our study also suggests that perhaps mRNA stability, rather than translation, is the key mechanism regulating LEF1 expression, concordant with MSI2’s previously documented roles in modulating mRNA stability. 71 – 74 We observed the degree of MSI2: LEF1 binding could be impacted by β-catenin level (with no consistent or substantial overall change to total LEF1 or MSI2 levels) alluding to a wider role for β-catenin augmenting RBP:RNA complexes in myeloid cells. How β-catenin influences RBP:RNA complexes remains unknown and could represent a novel function for β-catenin in haematopoietic cells. In its well characterised transcriptional role it recruits TCF/LEF transcription factors and transcriptional co-activators (CBP, p300) to the DNA promoters of Wnt target genes, and perhaps β-catenin performs similar scaffolding functions for facilitating specific RBP:RNA interactions, particularly those implicating Wnt signalling mRNAs. However, trying to resolve its well characterised transcriptional effects, from any potential post-transcriptional influences, will be technically challenging, especially since both nascent RNA and active RNA polymerase II have been recently been observed within β-catenin condensates. 39 Further work is now required to define β-catenin’s post-transcriptional versus transcriptional roles in a haematological context. Declarations Disclosure statement : The authors declare no conflict of interest. Author contributions MW performed experiments, analysed data, co-wrote the manuscript and managed laboratory. OS completed RIP-seq analyses, AG performed CLIP analyses, MR generated library preps and ran RNA sequencing whilst HP and EM performed AlphaFold predictive modelling. DN provided experimental advice, whilst TC and AB sourced primary clinical samples. LC, SN and BT provided RNA experimental guidance and reagents. RGM performed experiments, analysed data, co-wrote the manuscript, secured funding and directed the study. Acknowledgements This work was funded by the Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund (KKL1051/KKL1446), Leukaemia & Myeloma Research UK (4–5/06.21R) and the Children’s Cancer & Leukaemia Group (CCLGA 2023 16 Morgan). We are grateful to the Leeds Genomics facility for executing RNA sequencing experiments. Kind thanks to Dr Paraskevi Diamanti (University of Bristol) for AML patient sample collection and Lizzy Hoole (Institute for Child Life & Health, UHBristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust) for supplying clinical data. Thanks to the midwives and clinical research nurses at University Hospitals Sussex (UHS) NHS trust including Raquel Akieme, Valentina Toska, Lorraine Shah-Goodwin, Denise Skinner, Elohor Uwadiogbu and Caroline Humphreys, for the collection of human umbilical cord blood. We are indebted to the patients and their families who gave consent for their cells to be used for our research. References Nusse, R., and Clevers, H. (2017). Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling, Disease, and Emerging Therapeutic Modalities. Cell 169 , 985-999. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016. Reya, T., Duncan, A.W., Ailles, L., Domen, J., Scherer, D.C., Willert, K., Hintz, L., Nusse, R., and Weissman, I.L. (2003). A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 423 , 409-414. Danek, P., Kardosova, M., Janeckova, L., Karkoulia, E., Vanickova, K., Fabisik, M., Lozano-Asencio, C., Benoukraf, T., Tirado-Magallanes, R., Zhou, Q., et al. (2020). beta-Catenin-TCF/LEF signaling promotes steady-state and emergency granulopoiesis via G-CSF receptor upregulation. Blood 136 , 2574-2587. 10.1182/blood.2019004664. Brown, A.L., Salerno, D.G., Sadras, T., Engler, G.A., Kok, C.H., Wilkinson, C.R., Samaraweera, S.E., Sadlon, T.J., Perugini, M., Lewis, I.D., et al. (2012). The GM-CSF receptor utilizes beta-catenin and Tcf4 to specify macrophage lineage differentiation. Differentiation 83 , 47-59. S0301-4681(11)00126-5 [pii];10.1016/j.diff.2011.08.003 [doi]. Shooshtarizadeh, P., Helness, A., Vadnais, C., Brouwer, N., Beauchemin, H., Chen, R., Bagci, H., Staal, F.J.T., Cote, J.F., and Moroy, T. (2019). Gfi1b regulates the level of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in hematopoietic stem cells and megakaryocytes. Nat Commun 10 , 1270. 10.1038/s41467-019-09273-z. Luis, T.C., Ichii, M., Brugman, M.H., Kincade, P., and Staal, F.J. (2012). Wnt signaling strength regulates normal hematopoiesis and its deregulation is involved in leukemia development. Leukemia 26 , 414-421. leu2011387 [pii];10.1038/leu.2011.387 [doi]. Luis, T.C., Naber, B.A., Roozen, P.P., Brugman, M.H., de Haas, E.F., Ghazvini, M., Fibbe, W.E., van Dongen, J.J., Fodde, R., and Staal, F.J. (2011). Canonical wnt signaling regulates hematopoiesis in a dosage-dependent fashion. Cell Stem Cell 9 , 345-356. Morgan, R.G., Ridsdale, J., Payne, M., Heesom, K.J., Wilson, M.C., Davidson, A., Greenhough, A., Davies, S., Williams, A.C., Blair, A., et al. (2019). LEF-1 drives aberrant beta-catenin nuclear localization in myeloid leukemia cells. Haematologica 104 , 1365-1377. 10.3324/haematol.2018.202846. Wagstaff, M., Coke, B., Hodgkiss, G.R., and Morgan, R.G. (2022). Targeting beta-catenin in acute myeloid leukaemia: past, present, and future perspectives. Biosci Rep. 10.1042/BSR20211841. Simon, M., Grandage, V.L., Linch, D.C., and Khwaja, A. (2005). Constitutive activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway in acute myeloid leukaemia. Oncogene 24 , 2410-2420. Ysebaert, L., Chicanne, G., Demur, C., De, T.F., Prade-Houdellier, N., Ruidavets, J.B., Mansat-De, M., V, Rigal-Huguet, F., Laurent, G., Payrastre, B., et al. (2006). Expression of beta-catenin by acute myeloid leukemia cells predicts enhanced clonogenic capacities and poor prognosis. Leukemia 20 , 1211-1216. Griffiths, E.A., Golding, M.C., Srivastava, P., Povinelli, B.J., James, S.R., Ford, L.A., Wetzler, M., Wang, E.S., and Nemeth, M.J. (2015). Pharmacological targeting of beta-catenin in normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia blasts. Haematologica 100 , e49-52. 10.3324/haematol.2014.113118. Jiang, X., Mak, P.Y., Mu, H., Tao, W., Mak, D.H., Kornblau, S., Zhang, Q., Ruvolo, P., Burks, J.K., Zhang, W., et al. (2018). Disruption of Wnt/beta-Catenin Exerts Antileukemia Activity and Synergizes with FLT3 Inhibition in FLT3-Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 24 , 2417-2429. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1556. Li, L., Sheng, Y., Li, W., Hu, C., Mittal, N., Tohyama, K., Seba, A., Zhao, Y.Y., Ozer, H., Zhu, T., and Qian, Z. (2017). beta-Catenin Is a Candidate Therapeutic Target for Myeloid Neoplasms with del(5q). Cancer Res 77 , 4116-4126. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0202. Stoddart, A., Wang, J., Hu, C., Fernald, A.A., Davis, E.M., Cheng, J.X., and Le Beau, M.M. (2017). Inhibition of WNT signaling in the bone marrow niche prevents the development of MDS in the Apc(del/+) MDS mouse model. Blood 129 , 2959-2970. 10.1182/blood-2016-08-736454. Tonks, A., Pearn, L., Musson, M., Gilkes, A., Mills, K.I., Burnett, A.K., and Darley, R.L. (2007). Transcriptional dysregulation mediated by RUNX1-RUNX1T1 in normal human progenitor cells and in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia 21 , 2495-2505. Muller-Tidow, C., Steffen, B., Cauvet, T., Tickenbrock, L., Ji, P., Diederichs, S., Sargin, B., Kohler, G., Stelljes, M., Puccetti, E., et al. (2004). Translocation products in acute myeloid leukemia activate the Wnt signaling pathway in hematopoietic cells. Mol Cell Biol. 24 , 2890-2904. Wang, Y., Krivtsov, A.V., Sinha, A.U., North, T.E., Goessling, W., Feng, Z., Zon, L.I., and Armstrong, S.A. (2010). The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway is required for the development of leukemia stem cells in AML. Science 327 , 1650-1653. Yeung, J., Esposito, M.T., Gandillet, A., Zeisig, B.B., Griessinger, E., Bonnet, D., and So, C.W. (2010). beta-Catenin mediates the establishment and drug resistance of MLL leukemic stem cells. Cancer Cell 18 , 606-618. Dietrich, P.A., Yang, C., Leung, H.H., Lynch, J.R., Gonzales, E., Liu, B., Haber, M., Norris, M.D., Wang, J., and Wang, J.Y. (2014). GPR84 sustains aberrant beta-catenin signaling in leukemic stem cells for maintenance of MLL leukemogenesis. Blood 124 , 3284-3294. 10.1182/blood-2013-10-532523. Fong, C.Y., Gilan, O., Lam, E.Y., Rubin, A.F., Ftouni, S., Tyler, D., Stanley, K., Sinha, D., Yeh, P., Morison, J., et al. (2015). BET inhibitor resistance emerges from leukaemia stem cells. Nature 525 , 538-542. 10.1038/nature14888. Perry, J.M., Tao, F., Roy, A., Lin, T., He, X.C., Chen, S., Lu, X., Nemechek, J., Ruan, L., Yu, X., et al. (2020). Overcoming Wnt-beta-catenin dependent anticancer therapy resistance in leukaemia stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 22 , 689-700. 10.1038/s41556-020-0507-y. Sakoda, T., Kikushige, Y., Miyamoto, T., Irifune, H., Harada, T., Hatakeyama, K., Kunisaki, Y., Kato, K., and Akashi, K. (2023). TIM-3 signaling hijacks the canonical Wnt/beta-catenin pathway to maintain cancer stemness in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv 7 , 2053-2065. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008405. Zhao, C., Blum, J., Chen, A., Kwon, H.Y., Jung, S.H., Cook, J.M., Lagoo, A., and Reya, T. (2007). Loss of beta-catenin impairs the renewal of normal and CML stem cells in vivo. Cancer Cell 12 , 528-541. Jamieson, C.H., Ailles, L.E., Dylla, S.J., Muijtjens, M., Jones, C., Zehnder, J.L., Gotlib, J., Li, K., Manz, M.G., Keating, A., et al. (2004). Granulocyte-macrophage progenitors as candidate leukemic stem cells in blast-crisis CML. N Engl J Med. 351 , 657-667. Yamada, S., Pokutta, S., Drees, F., Weis, W.I., and Nelson, W.J. (2005). Deconstructing the cadherin-catenin-actin complex. Cell 123 , 889-901. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.020. Wagstaff, M., Tsaponina, O., Caalim, G., Greenfield, H., Milton-Harris, L., Mancini, E.J., Blair, A., Heesom, K.J., Tonks, A., Darley, R.L., et al. (2023). Crosstalk between beta-catenin and WT1 signaling activity in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 108 , 283-289. 10.3324/haematol.2021.280294. Hodson, D.J., Screen, M., and Turner, M. (2019). RNA-binding proteins in hematopoiesis and hematological malignancy. Blood 133 , 2365-2373. 10.1182/blood-2018-10-839985. Olaitan, S., Wagstaff, M., Sevim, O., Akieme, R., Toska, V., Humphreys, C., Shah-Goodwin, L., Bell, J., Chevassut, T., and Morgan, R.G. (2022). Assessment of mononuclear cell populations derived from human umbilical cord blood. Eur J Haematol 109 , 787-788. 10.1111/ejh.13846. Morgan, R.G., Pearn, L., Liddiard, K., Pumford, S.L., Burnett, A.K., Tonks, A., and Darley, R.L. (2013). gamma-Catenin is overexpressed in acute myeloid leukemia and promotes the stabilization and nuclear localization of beta-catenin. Leukemia 27 , 336-343. 10.1038/leu.2012.221. Martin, M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. 2011 17 , 3. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. Kim, D., Paggi, J.M., Park, C., Bennett, C., and Salzberg, S.L. (2019). Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol 37 , 907-915. 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4. Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., and Genome Project Data Processing, S. (2009). The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25 , 2078-2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. Love, M.I., Huber, W., and Anders, S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome biology 15 , 550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. Wickham H, A.M., Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, François R, Grolemund G, Hayes A, Henry L, Hester J, Kuhn M, Pedersen TL, Miller E, Bache SM, Müller K, Ooms J, Robinson D, Seidel DP, Spinu V, Takahashi K, Vaughan D, Wilke C, Woo K, Yutani H (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 4 , 1686. doi:10.21105/joss.01686. Gu, Z.G., Eils, R., and Schlesner, M. (2016). Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32 , 2847-2849. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313. M., v.d.W., Castrop, J., Korinek, V., and Clevers, H. (1996). Extensive alternative splicing and dual promoter usage generate Tcf-1 protein isoforms with differential transcription control properties. Mol.Cell Biol. 16 , 745-752. Kim, I., Kwak, H., Lee, H.K., Hyun, S., and Jeong, S. (2012). beta-Catenin recognizes a specific RNA motif in the cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA 3'-UTR and interacts with HuR in colon cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res 40 , 6863-6872. 10.1093/nar/gks331. Gui, T., Fleming, C., Manzato, C., Bourgeois, B., Sirati, N., Heuer, J., Papadionysiou, I., Montfort, D.I.V., Gijzen, M.V., Smits, L.M.M., et al. (2023). Targeted perturbation of signaling-driven condensates. Mol Cell 83 , 4141-4157 e4111. 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.10.023. Calabretta, S., and Richard, S. (2015). Emerging Roles of Disordered Sequences in RNA-Binding Proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 40 , 662-672. 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.012. Moore, S., Jarvelin, A.I., Davis, I., Bond, G.L., and Castello, A. (2018). Expanding horizons: new roles for non-canonical RNA-binding proteins in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 48 , 112-120. 10.1016/j.gde.2017.11.006. Lee, H.K., and Jeong, S. (2006). Beta-Catenin stabilizes cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA by interacting with AU-rich elements of 3'-UTR. Nucleic Acids Res 34 , 5705-5714. 10.1093/nar/gkl698. Yang, Z., Zhou, J., Li, Z., Guo, J., Fang, L., Xiao, X., and Xiao, S. (2024). Identification of whole-cell dsRNA-binding proteins by phase separation. RNA Biol 21 , 32-45. 10.1080/15476286.2024.2386498. Kharas, M.G., and Lengner, C.J. (2017). Stem Cells, Cancer, and MUSASHI in Blood and Guts. Trends Cancer 3 , 347-356. 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.03.007. Nguyen, D.T.T., Lu, Y., Chu, K.L., Yang, X., Park, S.M., Choo, Z.N., Chin, C.R., Prieto, C., Schurer, A., Barin, E., et al. (2020). HyperTRIBE uncovers increased MUSASHI-2 RNA binding activity and differential regulation in leukemic stem cells. Nat Commun 11 , 2026. 10.1038/s41467-020-15814-8. Hope, K.J., Cellot, S., Ting, S.B., MacRae, T., Mayotte, N., Iscove, N.N., and Sauvageau, G. (2010). An RNAi screen identifies Msi2 and Prox1 as having opposite roles in the regulation of hematopoietic stem cell activity. Cell Stem Cell 7 , 101-113. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.007. Kharas, M.G., Lengner, C.J., Al-Shahrour, F., Bullinger, L., Ball, B., Zaidi, S., Morgan, K., Tam, W., Paktinat, M., Okabe, R., et al. (2010). Musashi-2 regulates normal hematopoiesis and promotes aggressive myeloid leukemia. Nat Med 16 , 903-908. 10.1038/nm.2187. Edmaier, K.E., Stahnke, K., Vegi, N., Mulaw, M., Ihme, S., Scheffold, A., Rudolph, K.L., and Buske, C. (2014). Expression of the lymphoid enhancer factor 1 is required for normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell function. Leukemia 28 , 227-230. 10.1038/leu.2013.238. Feder, K., Edmaier-Schroger, K., Rawat, V.P.S., Kirsten, N., Metzeler, K., Kraus, J.M., Dohner, K., Dohner, H., Kestler, H.A., Feuring-Buske, M., and Buske, C. (2020). Differences in expression and function of LEF1 isoforms in normal versus leukemic hematopoiesis. Leukemia 34 , 1027-1037. 10.1038/s41375-019-0635-1. Rentas, S., Holzapfel, N., Belew, M.S., Pratt, G., Voisin, V., Wilhelm, B.T., Bader, G.D., Yeo, G.W., and Hope, K.J. (2016). Musashi-2 attenuates AHR signalling to expand human haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 532 , 508-511. 10.1038/nature17665. Hovanes, K., Li, T.W., Munguia, J.E., Truong, T., Milovanovic, T., Lawrence Marsh, J., Holcombe, R.F., and Waterman, M.L. (2001). Beta-catenin-sensitive isoforms of lymphoid enhancer factor-1 are selectively expressed in colon cancer. Nat Genet 28 , 53-57. 10.1038/88264. Barker, N., van Es, J.H., Kuipers, J., Kujala, P., van den Born, M., Cozijnsen, M., Haegebarth, A., Korving, J., Begthel, H., Peters, P.J., and Clevers, H. (2007). Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 449 , 1003-1007. 10.1038/nature06196. Willert, J., Epping, M., Pollack, J.R., Brown, P.O., and Nusse, R. (2002). A transcriptional response to Wnt protein in human embryonic carcinoma cells. BMC Dev Biol 2 , 8. 10.1186/1471-213x-2-8. Yan, D., Wiesmann, M., Rohan, M., Chan, V., Jefferson, A.B., Guo, L., Sakamoto, D., Caothien, R.H., Fuller, J.H., Reinhard, C., et al. (2001). Elevated expression of axin2 and hnkd mRNA provides evidence that Wnt/beta -catenin signaling is activated in human colon tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 , 14973-14978. 10.1073/pnas.261574498. Takahashi, N., Yamaguchi, K., Ikenoue, T., Fujii, T., and Furukawa, Y. (2014). Identification of two Wnt-responsive elements in the intron of RING finger protein 43 (RNF43) gene. PloS one 9 , e86582. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086582. Niida, A., Hiroko, T., Kasai, M., Furukawa, Y., Nakamura, Y., Suzuki, Y., Sugano, S., and Akiyama, T. (2004). DKK1, a negative regulator of Wnt signaling, is a target of the beta-catenin/TCF pathway. Oncogene 23 , 8520-8526. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207892. Patil, S., Chalkiadaki, K., Mergiya, T.F., Krimbacher, K., Amorim, I.S., Akerkar, S., Gkogkas, C.G., and Bramham, C.R. (2023). eIF4E phosphorylation recruits beta-catenin to mRNA cap and promotes Wnt pathway translation in dentate gyrus LTP maintenance. iScience 26 , 106649. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106649. Ehyai, S., Miyake, T., Williams, D., Vinayak, J., Bayfield, M.A., and McDermott, J.C. (2018). FMRP recruitment of beta-catenin to the translation pre-initiation complex represses translation. EMBO Rep 19 . 10.15252/embr.201745536. Garcia-Hernandez, V., Arambilet, D., Guillen, Y., Lobo-Jarne, T., Maqueda, M., Gekas, C., Gonzalez, J., Iglesias, A., Vega-Garcia, N., Sentis, I., et al. (2023). beta-Catenin activity induces an RNA biosynthesis program promoting therapy resistance in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. EMBO Mol Med 15 , e16554. 10.15252/emmm.202216554. D'Uva, G., Bertoni, S., Lauriola, M., De Carolis, S., Pacilli, A., D'Anello, L., Santini, D., Taffurelli, M., Ceccarelli, C., Yarden, Y., et al. (2013). Beta-catenin/HuR post-transcriptional machinery governs cancer stem cell features in response to hypoxia. PloS one 8 , e80742. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080742. Farina, A.K., Bong, Y.S., Feltes, C.M., and Byers, S.W. (2009). Post-transcriptional regulation of cadherin-11 expression by GSK-3 and beta-catenin in prostate and breast cancer cells. PloS one 4 , e4797. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004797. Lee, H.K., Choi, Y.S., Park, Y.A., and Jeong, S. (2006). Modulation of oncogenic transcription and alternative splicing by beta-catenin and an RNA aptamer in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res 66 , 10560-10566. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2526. Sato, S., Idogawa, M., Honda, K., Fujii, G., Kawashima, H., Takekuma, K., Hoshika, A., Hirohashi, S., and Yamada, T. (2005). beta-catenin interacts with the FUS proto-oncogene product and regulates pre-mRNA splicing. Gastroenterology 129 , 1225-1236. S0016-5085(05)01389-2 [pii];10.1053/j.gastro.2005.07.025 [doi]. Wagstaff, M., Nguyen, D., Blair, A., Towler, B., Newbury, S., and Morgan, R. (2024). A β-catenin:MSI2 axis regulates the expression of LEF1 and subsequent human haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell proliferation. bioRxiv, 2024.2001.2028.577638. 10.1101/2024.01.28.577638. Zhang, H., Guo, R., Li, Z., Ma, R., Xu, S., Yin, L., Zhu, H., Huang, Z., Xing, C., Yang, Y., et al. (2024). MSI2 mediates WNT/beta-Catenin pathway function in hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia. 10.1038/s41375-024-02447-9. Wang, M.H., Qin, S.Y., Zhang, S.G., Li, G.X., Yu, Z.H., Wang, K., Wang, B., Teng, M.J., and Peng, Z.H. (2015). Musashi-2 promotes hepatitis Bvirus related hepatocellular carcinoma progression via the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Am J Cancer Res 5 , 1089-1100. de Andres-Aguayo, L., Varas, F., Kallin, E.M., Infante, J.F., Wurst, W., Floss, T., and Graf, T. (2011). Musashi 2 is a regulator of the HSC compartment identified by a retroviral insertion screen and knockout mice. Blood 118 , 554-564. 10.1182/blood-2010-12-322081. Park, S.M., Deering, R.P., Lu, Y., Tivnan, P., Lianoglou, S., Al-Shahrour, F., Ebert, B.L., Hacohen, N., Leslie, C., Daley, G.Q., et al. (2014). Musashi-2 controls cell fate, lineage bias, and TGF-beta signaling in HSCs. J Exp Med 211 , 71-87. 10.1084/jem.20130736. Yu, S., Li, F., Xing, S., Zhao, T., Peng, W., and Xue, H.H. (2016). Hematopoietic and Leukemic Stem Cells Have Distinct Dependence on Tcf1 and Lef1 Transcription Factors. J Biol Chem 291 , 11148-11160. 10.1074/jbc.M116.717801. Karmakar, S., Ramirez, O., Paul, K.V., Gupta, A.K., Kumari, V., Botti, V., de Los Mozos, I.R., Neuenkirchen, N., Ross, R.J., Karanicolas, J., et al. (2022). Integrative genome-wide analysis reveals EIF3A as a key downstream regulator of translational repressor protein Musashi 2 (MSI2). NAR Cancer 4 , zcac015. 10.1093/narcan/zcac015. Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, X.S., Zhu, F.M., Xie, F., Jiang, C.Y., Zhang, Z.Y., Gao, Y.L., Wang, Y.C., Li, B., et al. (2020). RNA-binding protein Musashi2 stabilizing androgen receptor drives prostate cancer progression. Cancer Sci 111 , 369-382. 10.1111/cas.14280. Li, M., Li, A.Q., Zhou, S.L., Lv, H., Wei, P., and Yang, W.T. (2020). RNA-binding protein MSI2 isoforms expression and regulation in progression of triple-negative breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 39 , 92. 10.1186/s13046-020-01587-x. Bennett, C.G., Riemondy, K., Chapnick, D.A., Bunker, E., Liu, X., Kuersten, S., and Yi, R. (2016). Genome-wide analysis of Musashi-2 targets reveals novel functions in governing epithelial cell migration. Nucleic Acids Res 44 , 3788-3800. 10.1093/nar/gkw207. Duggimpudi, S., Kloetgen, A., Maney, S.K., Munch, P.C., Hezaveh, K., Shaykhalishahi, H., Hoyer, W., McHardy, A.C., Lang, P.A., Borkhardt, A., and Hoell, J.I. (2018). Transcriptome-wide analysis uncovers the targets of the RNA-binding protein MSI2 and effects of MSI2's RNA-binding activity on IL-6 signaling. J Biol Chem 293 , 15359-15369. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002243. Dormoy-Raclet, V., Menard, I., Clair, E., Kurban, G., Mazroui, R., Di Marco, S., von Roretz, C., Pause, A., and Gallouzi, I.E. (2007). The RNA-binding protein HuR promotes cell migration and cell invasion by stabilizing the beta-actin mRNA in a U-rich-element-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 27 , 5365-5380. 10.1128/MCB.00113-07. Additional Declarations There is NO conflict of interest to disclose. Supplementary Files SupplementaryfiguresWagstaffetal.docx Supplementary figures SupplementarydatafileWagstaffetal.xlsx Supplementary data Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 30 Apr, 2025 Read the published version in Oncogene → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: revise 26 Feb, 2025 Review # 2 received at journal 20 Feb, 2025 Review # 4 received at journal 20 Feb, 2025 Review # 1 received at journal 14 Feb, 2025 Reviewer # 4 agreed at journal 30 Jan, 2025 Reviewer # 3 agreed at journal 30 Jan, 2025 Reviewer # 2 agreed at journal 30 Jan, 2025 Reviewer # 1 agreed at journal 30 Jan, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 30 Jan, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 29 Jan, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 28 Jan, 2025 First submitted to journal 28 Jan, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5921123","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":409058575,"identity":"56a93559-8e3e-44ec-b1e7-b6387bbe4e30","order_by":0,"name":"Rhys Morgan","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-6294","institution":"University of Sussex","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rhys","middleName":"","lastName":"Morgan","suffix":""},{"id":409058576,"identity":"c069deef-49c4-4608-b09b-0cc5d2375484","order_by":1,"name":"Megan Wagstaff","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sussex","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Megan","middleName":"","lastName":"Wagstaff","suffix":""},{"id":409058577,"identity":"e412b791-56f0-48b0-a8eb-998e0874c5ca","order_by":2,"name":"Okan Sevim","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sussex","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Okan","middleName":"","lastName":"Sevim","suffix":""},{"id":409058578,"identity":"1b719c48-a9d5-49a0-9a90-e03649a4ebba","order_by":3,"name":"Aaron Goff","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sussex","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Aaron","middleName":"","lastName":"Goff","suffix":""},{"id":409058579,"identity":"29474908-19ff-4cb5-92de-58328b655438","order_by":4,"name":"Morag Raynor","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Morag","middleName":"","lastName":"Raynor","suffix":""},{"id":409058580,"identity":"e39002e6-8395-4a5f-b9ad-32ec720bd982","order_by":5,"name":"Hyun Park","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hyun","middleName":"","lastName":"Park","suffix":""},{"id":409058581,"identity":"a308787c-6cd2-401e-bebb-61ccc0de3fd1","order_by":6,"name":"Erika Mancini","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9591-7898","institution":"University of Sussex","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Erika","middleName":"","lastName":"Mancini","suffix":""},{"id":409058582,"identity":"19ddd137-e841-4a07-b3fc-37429e679633","order_by":7,"name":"Diu Nguyen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Diu","middleName":"","lastName":"Nguyen","suffix":""},{"id":409058583,"identity":"1b7df455-278b-40a0-942d-be9e11dd74b2","order_by":8,"name":"Timothy Chevassut","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Timothy","middleName":"","lastName":"Chevassut","suffix":""},{"id":409058584,"identity":"816ad130-0903-425c-8564-264b43de207b","order_by":9,"name":"Allison Blair","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Allison","middleName":"","lastName":"Blair","suffix":""},{"id":409058585,"identity":"515c0c8e-b267-4fae-90f9-876d4d7db00a","order_by":10,"name":"leandro castellano","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3059-4829","institution":"imperial","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"leandro","middleName":"","lastName":"castellano","suffix":""},{"id":409058586,"identity":"01300639-c12f-452c-bcbc-20c3630b2881","order_by":11,"name":"Sarah Newbury","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sussex","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sarah","middleName":"","lastName":"Newbury","suffix":""},{"id":409058587,"identity":"e4bd3086-a62d-4ee0-929d-73ecf2374819","order_by":12,"name":"Ben Towler","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-1131","institution":"University of Sussex","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ben","middleName":"","lastName":"Towler","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-01-28 22:50:17","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5921123/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5921123/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-025-03415-y","type":"published","date":"2025-04-30T04:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":75409744,"identity":"bacc833e-d98a-472c-ab31-aa411a79cf40","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-04 09:05:21","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":942852,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eβ-Catenin RIP enriches with RNA from myeloid cells. A) Immunoblot showing HuR levels in HuR RIP performed from K562 cells. B) Graph summarising the fold enrichment ACTB mRNA (known HuR binding target)75 obtained from RT-qPCR analysis of IgG or HuR RIP analysis from K562 cells (n=1) C) Representative immunoblot showing β-catenin level obtained from β-catenin RIPs performed from K562 cells (+/- CHIR99021), ID= immunodepleted lysate. D) Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer gel showing RNA isolated from IgG or β-catenin RIP performed from K562 cells (+/- CHIR99021).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"WagstaffSevimetalFigure1.tif.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/5f38ebfd58374e810974c738.jpg"},{"id":75409741,"identity":"3e902543-7315-4d21-8bfd-f21de5e7b5f2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-04 09:05:21","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":3214055,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eβ-Catenin RIP enriches with Wnt signalling mRNAs. Volcano plots showing the fold change in mRNA abundance detected within β-catenin RIP performed from DMSO (basal Wnt signalling) versus CHIR99021 (activated Wnt signalling) treated A) K562 or B) HEL cells (n=3). Red dots represent enriched (Padj\u0026lt;0.05) mRNAs whilst blue dots highlight Wnt signalling mRNAs. C) Gene set enrichment analysis using the human Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB Hallmark 2020) for pathways represented amongst the significantly enriched mRNAs (Padj\u0026lt;0.05), obtained in β-catenin RIP from K562 cells +/- CHIR99021 with adjusted -Log10 P values annotated. Summary graphs showing the fold enrichment of selected Wnt signalling mRNAs isolated from IgG or β-catenin RIP-RT-qPCR performed in D) K562 and E) HEL cells. Data represents mean ± 1 s.d (n = 3). Statistical analysis is denoted by *p\u0026lt;0.05 and **p\u0026lt;0.01 as deduced from a student’s t-test.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"WagstaffSevimetalFigure2.tif.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/dfb048a815ffafed31517ab3.jpg"},{"id":75409733,"identity":"fc7be2d2-9f33-4652-a8fe-a8a7264bf1d9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-04 09:05:19","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":731708,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eβ-Catenin CLIP does not enrich with RNA from myeloid cells. A) Representative Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer gel showing RNA isolated from IgG, β-catenin or LIN28B RIP and CLIP performed in K562 cells. B) Representative immunoblot showing β-catenin level in IgG or β-catenin RIP performed from K562 cells using 1hr or 16hr primary antibody incubation, ID= immunodepleted lysate.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"WagstaffSevimetalFigure3.tif.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/cca58292fdfdb8123f488337.jpg"},{"id":75409734,"identity":"0f496127-aa21-466a-ad78-8b05d0d59ef4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-04 09:05:19","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2001068,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eβ-Catenin interacts with MSI2 in myeloid cells. A) Scatter plots showing MSI2 detection in β-catenin interactomes performed in cytosolic fractions of K562 and HEL cells. Vertical dashed red line indicates the threshold for 2-fold change in protein binding at log2 (=1) relative to IgG Co-IP. Horizontal red line represents threshold for p\u0026lt;0.05 on log10 scale (=1.3). Highlighted red dots indicate enriched interactions (p\u0026lt;0.05), green labels highlight position of MSI2, and blue labels highlight position of β-catenin bait. Representative immunoblots showing the level of β-catenin protein present in MSI2 Co-IPs derived from B) K562 and C) HEL whole cell lysates +/- 20µg/mL RNaseA +/-5µM CHIR99021 overnight. ID= immunodepleted lysate. Data represents mean ± 1 s.d (n = 3). Statistical analysis is denoted by *p\u0026lt;0.05, **p\u0026lt;0.01 and ****p\u0026lt;0.0001 as deduced from a student’s t-test.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"WagstaffSevimetalFigure4.tif.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/eb264744433ed051ec8fd0da.jpg"},{"id":75409794,"identity":"c4783881-dda3-4f1c-9e2c-3783a782d1b5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-04 09:05:22","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1976626,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMSI2 and β-catenin correlate and interact in primary AML patient samples. A) Immunoblot of 18 myeloid leukemia cell lines showing the relative level of β-catenin and MSI2 protein, with GAPDH used to assess protein loading. B) Summary scatter plot showing the correlation (Spearman Rank R=0.6, P\u0026lt;0.03) between relative β-catenin and MSI2 protein expression across 18 myeloid cell lines (normalised to GAPDH expression within each cell line). C) Immunoblot screen of 20 primary AML patient samples showing the relative level of β-catenin and MSI2 protein (light and dark exposures). * denotes samples co-overexpressing both β-catenin and MSI2 relative to levels in CB MNC and CB CD34+ enriched fraction (pooled from five independent CB samples). X = Void sample containing no protein as deduced from negative GAPDH detection. B) Summary scatter plot showing the correlation (Spearman Rank R=0.79, P\u0026lt;0.0001) between relative β-catenin and MSI2 protein expression in 20 primary AML patient samples (normalised to GAPDH expression in each sample). C) Immunoblot showing the level of β-catenin protein present in an MSI2 Co-IP performed from primary AML patient sample #10 of sample screen.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"WagstaffSevimetalFigure5.tif.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/9729e2a074e095ede51a6f7b.jpg"},{"id":75409746,"identity":"2f7a3786-ed59-4aae-a5a3-b5e543e5ebba","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-04 09:05:21","extension":"jpg","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2496562,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMSI2 knockdown impairs Wnt signalling output through LEF-1 modulation. A) Immunoblots showing MSI2, β-catenin and LEF1 level in K562 and KU812 cells harbouring MSI2 shRNA or non-targeting shRNA controls. GAPDH indicates protein loading. B) Representative flow cytometric histograms showing intensity of the TCF-dependent expression of Venus Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP) from the β-catenin activated reporter (BAR) reporter, or negative control ‘found unresponsive’ BAR (fuBAR; containing mutated promoter binding sites) in K562 and KU812 cells +/- MSI2 shRNA following treatment with 5μM CHIR99021 overnight. The fuBAR (dashed), non-targeting control shRNA (grey filled), and two MSI2 shRNAs (blue or red) histograms are shown. Summary graphs showing the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) generated from the BAR/fuBAR in C) K562 and D) KU812 cells +/- MSI2 shRNA with +/- 5μM CHIR99021. E) Immunoblots showing total β-catenin, LEF-1 and MSI2 subcellular localization in K562 and KU812 cells lentivirally transduced with two different MSI2 shRNAs +/- 5μM CHIR99021. Lamin A/C and α-tubulin indicate the purity/loading of the nuclear (N) and cytosol (C) fractions respectively. Summary graph showing the fold change in LEF1 and TCF7L2 mRNA expression as assessed by RT-qPCR in F) K562 and G) KU812 cells expressing MSI2 shRNA. Fold change is relative to matched respective controls (black dashed line) and overall expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene β-actin (ACTB). Data represents mean ± 1 s.d (n = 3). Statistical analysis is denoted by *p\u0026lt;0.05, **p\u0026lt;0.01 and ****p\u0026lt;0.0001 as deduced from a student’s t-test.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"WagstaffSevimetalFigure6.tif.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/489e0477eb032db6da58a6f2.jpg"},{"id":75411650,"identity":"43148562-8a61-47fd-ac91-7c15a89dc205","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-04 09:13:22","extension":"jpg","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2570407,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMSI2 regulates LEF-1 expression and binds LEF1 in a partly β-catenin dependent fashion. A) Immunoblot showing MSI2 level in MSI2 RIP performed from K562 cells. ID= immunodepleted lysate. Summary graphs showing the fold enrichment of TCF7L2, MYC, MYB, and LEF1 mRNA in MSI2 B) RIP and C) CLIP performed from K562 cells. Fold enrichment is relative to matched IgG RIPs (dashed black line). D) Immunoblots showing MSI2 and β-catenin level in K562 cell lines harbouring β-catenin shRNAs versus non-targeting shRNA control. GAPDH indicates protein loading. Summary graphs showing the fold change in LEF1 mRNA expression in input K562 cells harbouring β-catenin shRNA versus non-targeting shRNA control (dashed black line) used for E) MSI2 RIP and F) MSI2 CLIP. Summary graphs showing the fold enrichment of LEF1 mRNA (versus IgG RIP) in MSI2 G) RIP and H) CLIP generated from K562 cells +/- β-catenin shRNAs. I) Line graph summarising the fold change in LEF1 mRNA expression (relative to T=0hrs for each respective cell line) in K562 cells harbouring MSI2 shRNA (red) versus non-targeting shRNA control (black) treated with 2µg/ml ActD for indicated times. J) Immunoblot showing the levels of MSI2, β-catenin, and LEF-1 protein in K562 cells +/- MSI2 shRNA with treatment of 2µg/ml ActD for indicated timepoints. Data represents mean ± 1 s.d (n = 3). Statistical analysis is denoted by *p\u0026lt;0.05 and **p\u0026lt;0.01 as deduced from a student’s t-test.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"WagstaffSevimetalFigure7.tif.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/2c29de8fc1b74657a8717b40.jpg"},{"id":75411652,"identity":"ec407739-d90c-473a-a4ca-0be0abee1013","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-04 09:13:22","extension":"jpg","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1345379,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMSI2 mediated human HSPC expansion is partly mediated through LEF-1. A) Immunoblot showing the level of MSI2 in day 4 primary CB-derived HSPC cultures following 3 days post lentiviral transduction with empty vector (EV) or human MSI2. GAPDH indicates protein loading. B) Representative day 4 flow cytometric histograms plots showing percentage GFP+ events in primary HSPC cultures lentivirally transduced with ectopic MSI2 +/- LEF-1 or non-targeting (NT) shRNA, versus matched untransduced cells. C) Line graph showing fold-expansion of HSPC cultures following lentiviral transduction with ectopic MSI2 +/- LEF-1 shRNAs. D) Bar graph showing the relative percentage of CD34+ events in day 8 HSPC liquid cultures following lentiviral transduction with ectopic MSI2 +/- LEF-1 shRNAs. All data represents mean ± 1 s.d (n = 3). Statistical analysis is denoted by *p\u0026lt;0.05 and **p\u0026lt;0.01 as deduced from a student’s t-test.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"WagstaffSevimetalFigure8.tif.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/d66d49fc24a0a2c045ea099f.jpg"},{"id":81675121,"identity":"243732ff-7c0d-4ca8-a656-b53d6a653199","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-30 07:09:56","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":16217507,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/914162a8-110b-4a89-a29e-7ace7f8b18aa.pdf"},{"id":75409743,"identity":"01e959c1-6ad7-475e-9655-9b0d17d23aac","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-04 09:05:21","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":25766035,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary figures","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryfiguresWagstaffetal.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/c1ed201a01bf6b57b754be5a.docx"},{"id":75411651,"identity":"38653cc1-24da-40d7-a4a0-503d04ce9ab5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-04 09:13:22","extension":"xlsx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":2776359,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary data","description":"","filename":"SupplementarydatafileWagstaffetal.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5921123/v1/bb49dd9be06f0adcb45f9e0e.xlsx"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e conflict of interest to disclose.","formattedTitle":"β-Catenin interacts with a Wnt signaling mRNA network in myeloid leukaemia cells through canonical RBP binding.","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eCanonical Wnt signalling is an evolutionarily conserved pathway, critical in normal development and disease.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In normal haematopoiesis, the central mediator β-catenin regulates the self-renewal\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and differentiation\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR4\" citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e of haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC), where its expression is tightly regulated to ensure the correct balance between HSPC maintenance and development.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e However its dysregulation is observed across numerous hematological malignancies, including myeloid leukaemias. Overexpression of β-catenin occurs in up to 80% of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cases,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e through a multitude of mechanisms,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e that result in hyperactive Wnt signalling\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and adverse patient survival.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Deregulated Wnt signalling contributes to the development of several AML subtypes including normal karyotype,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e FLT3\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003emutant,\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003e del(5q)\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e,\u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-related,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e CBF mutated,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and PML-RARα\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003csup\u003e17\u003c/sup\u003e Mouse models have also shown β-catenin regulates the emergence, maintenance and drug resistance of leukaemia stem cells (LSC) in both AML\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR19 CR20 CR21 CR22\" citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML).\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e This, coupled with the observation that only very low levels of Wnt/β-catenin signalling sustain normal haematopoiesis,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e makes the pathway an attractive therapeutic target. Yet despite this promise, pharmacological attempts to disrupt β-catenin have achieved limited success to date, hampered by a poor understanding of its molecular interactions in a haematopoietic context.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn solid tissues β-catenin has important cell adhesion functions through interaction with cadherins in adherens junctions.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e However, such tight cell-cell adhesion is not prominent in a fluid tissue like blood, meaning free β-catenin likely forms alternative interactions in haematopoietic cells. Indeed, our previous evaluation of β-catenin localisation in myeloid cells has not indicated significant plasma cell membrane localisation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e To address this knowledge gap and identify new approaches for targeting β-catenin in haematological malignancy, we characterised β-catenin\u0026rsquo;s interaction network in myeloid cells and discovered a plethora of novel protein partners.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Of note was the significant enrichment of RNA-binding proteins (RBP).\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e RBPs are a diverse family of proteins that bind and regulate the stability, splicing, transport and translation of target RNAs, and are heavily implicated in normal hematopoiesis and leukaemia.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Such interactions imply that β-catenin could have a hitherto uncharacterised but important role in post-transcriptional gene expression in haematopoietic cells.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this study we show for the first time that β-catenin associates with a Wnt signalling mRNA network mediated through interactions with canonical RBPs like MSI2. We demonstrate MSI2 interacts with β-catenin and influences Wnt signaling output through modulation of the Wnt transcription factor LEF-1, which could be an important axis for controlling the growth and survival of human HSPCs.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePrimary samples\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBone marrow, peripheral blood or leukapheresis samples from patients diagnosed with AML (Clinical information in Supplementary Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e) were collected in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with approval of University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust and London Brent Research Ethics Committee. Human cord blood (CB) was obtained following informed consent healthy mothers at full-term undergoing elective caesarian sections at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, with approval from Brighton \u0026amp; Sussex University Hospitals NHS (BSUH) trust, the East of England \u0026ndash; Essex Research Ethics Committee and HRA and Health and Care Research Wales (18/EE/0403). From all primary samples mononuclear cells (MNC) were isolated via density gradient separation using Ficoll-Hypaque (Merck Millipore) and only samples with \u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;80% viability included in the study. The CD34\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e fraction was derived as previously described\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e from cryopreserved cord blood MNC preparations and enriched to \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;85% purity using MiniMACS (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer's instructions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCell culture and drug treatments\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe myeloid cell lines K562, HL60, HEL, U937, PLB-985, NOMO1, OCI-AML3, EOLI, ML-1, THP-1, KU812 (The European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures) and OCI-AML2, MV4-11, KG-1, KG1a SET2, NB4 and MONOMAC6 (Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH) were confirmed mycoplasma-free and authenticated via short-tandem repeat (STR) analysis prior to general culture as previously.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e β-Catenin was stabilised using the GSK-3β inhibitor CHIR99021 (Merck-Millipore) as previously described,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e whilst transcription was inhibited via 2\u0026micro;g/ml Actinomycin D (Merck-Millipore) at the stated timepoints. Purified human CB CD34\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e HSPC were isolated and cultured at 5x10\u003csup\u003e5\u003c/sup\u003e/mL in StemSpan SFEMII (Stemcell Technologies) supplemented with human stem cell factor (150ng/mL), human FLT3-ligand (150ng/mL), and human thrombopoietin (TPO; 20ng/mL; Proteintech Group).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eRNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP)\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRIP analyses were performed using the MagnaRIP kit (Merck-Millipore) according to manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s guidelines. Briefly, 2x10\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e cells were treated overnight with CHIR99021 or DMSO at 37\u0026deg;C with 5% CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e. Cells were collected and washed in PBS followed by resuspension in lysis buffer, incubation on ice and overnight storage \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;80\u0026deg;C. Antibody-bead complexes were prepared following manufacturers guidelines with 5\u0026micro;g mouse IgG (Becton Dickinson), rabbit IgG (Merck Millipore), β-catenin (Clone 14, Becton Dickinson), HuR (Clone 3A2, Invitrogen), MSI2 (EP1305Y, Abcam) or LIN28B (Cell signalling Technology) and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes with rotation. The RIP lysates were thawed and incubated with antibody-bead complexes with rotation at 4\u0026deg;C overnight followed by washing of unbound antibody.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEach immunoprecipitation was resuspended in proteinase K buffer to remove contaminating protein and followed by addition of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol in a 25:24:1 (Thermofisher Scientific) to separate phases. Aqueous phase was removed to a new eppendorf followed by ethanol addition to precipitate RNA at -80\u0026deg;C overnight. All tubes were centrifuged, followed by washing in 80% ethanol and then air-drying of pellet for 10 minutes at room temperature after a final centrifugation. The RNA pellet was resuspended in 20\u0026micro;l of nuclease-free water and the tubes kept at -80\u0026deg;C ahead of sample assessment by an mRNA bioanalyzer Pico Series II (Agilent).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eRIP sequencing analysis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRaw FASTQ files were trimmed using Cutadapt (version 4.6) to remove adapters identified during the quality control process.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The trimmed reads were then mapped to the human genome using HISAT2 (version 2.2.1) with default parameters.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The human genome index file used for alignment was downloaded from the HISAT2 website. SAMtools (version 1.21) was used to convert SAM files generated by HISAT2 into BAM files for read counting.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Reads were then counted using featureCounts (version 2.0.6) with a human annotation file from Ensembl, applying the parameters: \u0026ldquo;--primary -C -t exon -g gene_id\u0026rdquo;. The raw read counts were imported into R to identify differentially enriched RNAs between basal (DMSO) and stabilised β-catenin (CHIR99021) conditions. Differential enrichment analysis, including fold change calculation and statistical analysis, was conducted with the DESeq2 package (version 1.44.0)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e in R. Data manipulation and visualization were performed using the tidyverse (version 2.0.0)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and ComplexHeatmap (version 2.20.0)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e packages.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCross linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP)\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4x10\u003csup\u003e7\u003c/sup\u003e cells were harvested, washed twice with room-temperature PBS and split across four 60 mm x 15 mm cell culture dishes (Corning) prior to UV crosslinking. Crosslinking was performed using three rounds of 100mJ/cm\u0026sup2; UV-254 nm irradiation, with agitation between each round. Following UV treatment, cells were recombined and centrifuged at before disposal of supernatant and cell pellets snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Lysates were resuspended in 500\u0026micro;L lysis buffer as previously,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and sonicated for 10 cycles of alternate 30 seconds of sonication with 30-second rests. Sonicated lysates were centrifuged to pellet debris followed by quantitation of lysates using the DC protein assay (BioRad) as previously described,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e to ensure equal protein input for downstream RT-qPCR. Four units of Turbo DNase (Ambion, Thermofisher) was added to each sample and incubated at 37\u0026deg;C for 3 minutes followed by cooling on ice for 3 minutes. 8\u0026micro;g β-catenin or matched murine IgG antibody (Becton Dickinson), MSI2 or LIN28B, and matched Rabbit IgG antibody (Cell Signalling Technology) was conjugated to beads as previously described,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e but using CLIP lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1% Igepal CA-630, 1% sodium deoxycholate) without protease inhibitors. Lysates were incubated with antibody-bead complexes for a minimum of 1 hour at 4\u0026deg;C with rotation with 150\u0026micro;L original lysate retained for input samples, after which unbound antibody discarded from beads using washes in CLIP lysis buffer. Antibody-bead complexes were resuspended in 250\u0026micro;L Proteinase K elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1% Igepal CA-630, 1% sodium deoxycholate) with 20 mg/mL proteinase K solution (ThermoScientific) added to each sample, followed by incubation at 65\u0026deg;C for 1 hour prior to magnetic bead separation and supernatant transferred to fresh tubes. To each sample, 750\u0026micro;L TRIzol LS reagent (Invitrogen) was added before storage at -80\u0026deg;C for RNA extraction. RNA extraction, purification, and quantification were performed as above.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eRNA extraction, clean up and quantitation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eRNA was extracted using the Zymo RNA mini-prep kit (Cambridge Bioscience), cleaned using RNeasy MinElute Clean-up kit (Qiagen), or by DNase treatment using the DNA free removal kit (Thermofisher), all via manufacturer guidelines.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermofisher) blanked against nuclease-free water.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eRT-qPCR\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePurified RNA was converted to cDNA using the high-capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Thermofisher) or the one-step RT-qPCR mix (APTO-GEN, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA). All primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e and were diluted to 10mM with qRT-PCR programmes used as per manufacturers guidelines (Merck-Millipore). RT-qPCR was performed on a QuantStudio\u0026trade; 3 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific) in conjunction with associated software. Relative gene expression was determined first by subtracting the C\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e value of housekeeping genes (\u003cem\u003eACTB\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eGAPDH\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003eRNA18SN1\u003c/em\u003e) from the C\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e value of genes of interest to generate Δ\u003csup\u003eCT\u003c/sup\u003e. The ΔΔ\u003csup\u003eCT\u003c/sup\u003e was then calculated by subtracting the average control Δ\u003csup\u003eCT\u003c/sup\u003e from the Δ\u003csup\u003eCT\u003c/sup\u003e of each condition and fold change calculated through 2\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;ΔΔCT\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo account for differences in RNA sample preparation, RIP RNA C\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e values were normalised to the corresponding input RNA fraction C\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e value for the same qPCR assay as per manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s guidelines. Briefly, Δ\u003csup\u003eCT\u003c/sup\u003e values were calculated by subtracting the C\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e value of the input fraction from the C\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e value of the RIP fraction for each target gene, ensuring variability in RNA input or preparation was accounted for. In contrast, for CLIP analysis, normalisation of CLIP RNA to the input was not required, as sample concentrations were matched at the protein level prior to Co-IP.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCo-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCross-linking and Co-immunoprecipitation was executed as previously.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Briefly, 5\u0026micro;g of MSI2 (EP1305Y, Abcam, Oxford, UK), HuR (Clone 3A2, Invitrogen), β-catenin (Clone 14, Becton Dickinson), mouse IgG (Becton Dickinson) of rabbit IgG (Merck Millipore, New Jersey, United States) was complexed with Protein G Dynabeads (Invitrogen), and incubated with 1mg of whole cell lysate overnight in Co-IP lysis buffer (1 x Cell Signalling Technology lysis buffer, plus 10% glycerol and 0.5mM dithiothreitol) at 4\u0026deg;C or with the addition of 20\u0026micro;g/ml RNase A (Thermofisher Scientific). Following washing of antibody-bead complexes five times in Co-IP lysis buffer, each sample was diluted in 2x Laemmli buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) plus Co-IP lysis buffer and heated to 95\u0026deg;C for 5 minutes prior to immunoblotting.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eImmunoblotting\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eImmunoblotting was performed as previously,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e using antibodies to β-catenin, MSI2, LEF-1, GAPDH (Proteintech, Manchester, UK), Lamin A/C (Merck Millipore, New Jersey, United States) and α-tubulin (Merck Millipore) already outlined in above sections.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLentivirus preparation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eK562 and KU812 and cells were lentivirally transduced with the β-catenin-activated reporter (BAR) or mutant \u0026lsquo;found unresponsive\u0026rsquo; control (fuBAR) system as previously.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The lentiviral expression plasmids used for transgene expression in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S3 and were used alongside their appropriate matched controls.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFlow cytometry\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor Wnt reporter assessment, 2x10\u003csup\u003e5\u003c/sup\u003e BAR/fuBAR containing cells were treated overnight with either DMSO or CHIR99021. TCF/LEF reporter activity (Venus YFP intensity) was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis using a CytoFLEX Flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, California, USA) in conjunction with FlowJo software Version 10.10 (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR USA) acquiring a minimum of 2x10\u003csup\u003e4\u003c/sup\u003e debris excluded events. For immunophenotyping, up to 5x10\u003csup\u003e4\u003c/sup\u003e CB-derived CD34\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e HSPC were seeded into wells of 96-well plate in 100\u0026micro;l staining buffer (1xPBS, 0.5% BSA) and stained with 10\u0026micro;g/mL antibodies to CD34-PE (Clone 581, Biolegend) and CD45-PerCPCy5.5 (Clone QA17A19, Biolegend) or the equivalent concentration-, manufacturer- and isotype-matched control antibodies (Clone MOPC-21, Biolegend).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eNuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eNuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation was performed as previously.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistics\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor densitometry, ImageJ Version 2.9.0 (National Institute of Health) was used to quantify regions of interest which was normalised to the GAPDH intensity obtained within each respective sample. Spearman Rank correlation was assessed using Prism Version 10.3.1 (GraphPad Software, LLC), alongside statistical tests including one-sample or students t-test, using a threshold of \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05. Unless otherwise stated all tests were performed in biological triplicates with data representing the mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1 standard deviation (s.d).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eβ-Catenin RIP-seq reveals enrichment with Wnt signalling mRNAs\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur previous β-catenin interactome study in myeloid cells revealed the significant enrichment of RBPs,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e indicating a putative novel role for β-catenin in post-transcriptional processes in haematological cells. To first confirm whether β-catenin associates with RNA in myeloid cells we performed β-catenin RNA-immunoprecipitation (RIP) and examined RNA concentration and size using a Bioanalyser system. We first confirmed efficient RIP using K562 cells and a canonical RBP target, HuR (\u003cem\u003eELAVL1\u003c/em\u003e, also found to interact with β-catenin; Supplemental Figure \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e),\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e with a known mRNA binding partner \u003cem\u003eACTB\u003c/em\u003e detected by RT-qPCR (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eB). Using this assay we next successfully enriched β-catenin via RIP from K562 cells under basal (DMSO) or Wnt signalling stimulated (5\u0026micro;M GSK3β inhibitor CHIR99021) conditions (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC) and showed abundant RNA enrichment versus IgG-RIP (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eD).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFollowing successful β-catenin RIP we next coupled this to RNA-sequencing to identify β-catenin-associated transcripts. Using K562 and HEL cells which we have previously shown to be acutely Wnt signalling responsive,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e we identified 582 and 1179 mRNAs respectively, that were enriched (FDR \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) between basal and stabilized β-catenin conditions, which included Wnt signalling transcripts (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA; raw β-catenin RIP-seq data publicly available at ArrayExpress under reference E-MTAB-14675, and processed data available as Supplementary Data File 1). Further gene ontology pathway analysis highlighted Wnt/β-catenin signalling mRNAs as amongst the most significantly enriched from K562 β-catenin RIP-seq (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB), and a number of these were also observed in the β-catenin RIP-seq from HEL cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC). Using β-catenin RIP-RT-qPCR (versus IgG RIP-RT-qPCR) we validated enrichment of several Wnt signalling mRNAs in K562 and HEL cells including \u003cem\u003eAMER1\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBCL9L\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eAXIN2\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD and E). Taken together, these data show that β-catenin associates with mRNA in myeloid cells which are significantly enriched for Wnt signalling components.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eβ-Catenin has weak capacity for RNA binding in myeloid cells\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eβ-Catenin lacks a canonical RNA-binding motif however intrinsically disordered regions (IDR), which comprise β-catenin\u0026rsquo;s N- and C-termini (Supplemental Figure \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e),\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e are commonly implicated in RNA binding by non-canonical RBPs.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Furthermore, Armadillo domains are the one of the most frequently implicated structures in non-canonical RNA binding and β-catenin contains 12 such repeating domains in its central region which predict RNA binding (Supplemental Figure S3).\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e β-Catenin has been reported to directly bind the 3\u0026rsquo;-UTR of mRNAs,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and has recently been shown to bind double-stranded RNA.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Therefore, to assess the RNA binding capacity of β-catenin in the haematopoietic system we performed β-catenin cross-linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP), a more stringent method of RBP:RNA capture. As shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA, β-catenin RIP once again pulled down with abundant RNA relative to IgG RIP, as did a positive canonical RBP control with LIN28B RIP. However, using a CLIP approach, despite efficient β-catenin isolation (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB), there was no observable RNA enrichment over the control IgG CLIP, whilst LIN28B CLIP still pulled down abundant RNA as expected, suggesting β-catenin does not directly bind RNA strongly in this context.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMSI2 interacts with β-catenin in myeloid cells\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe anticipated that β-catenin might network with Wnt signalling mRNAs indirectly through other canonical RBPs and returned to our previously characterised β-catenin interaction network.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Musashi-2 (MSI2) was identified as a putative β-catenin interacting RBP in myeloid cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA),\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and colorectal SW620 cells suggesting this interaction could also occur beyond haematopoietic tissue (Supplemental Figure S4). To confirm interaction, we performed reciprocal MSI2 co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) from K562 and HEL cells and confirmed consistent β-catenin enrichment under both basal and Wnt signalling activated conditions (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4CD). Since MSI2 is an RBP,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and β-catenin has also been shown to bind RNA,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e we assessed whether the β-catenin:MSI2 interaction could be a consequence of RNA co-occupancy. However, after repeating MSI2 co-IP +/-RNase A, and confirming complete digestion of RNA (Supplemental Figure S5),\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e the MSI2:β-catenin protein interaction remained suggesting these proteins are complexed irrespective of RNA presence (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eCD). Furthermore, using AlphaFold3 modelling, we found the accuracy of the predicted relative positions of the subunits in the β-catenin:MSI2 complex to be low, suggesting that direct interaction is unlikely and thus likely mediated by intermediary partners (Supplemental Fig.\u0026nbsp;5).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eβ-Catenin interacts with MSI2 in myeloid cell lines and primary AML cells\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo assess the potential scope of cooperation between MSI2 and β-catenin across myeloid cells we assessed MSI2 expression across a panel of 18 myeloid cell lines. Two thirds of the myeloid cell lines assessed exhibited abundant co-expression of both β-catenin and MSI2 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA) which exhibited a degree of correlation (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.03; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eB). To explore the clinical relevance of the β-catenin:MSI2 association, we screened 20 AML patients for protein expression of MSI2 and β-catenin (patient clinical details provided in Supplemental Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Like myeloid cell lines, MSI2 was frequently co-expressed with β-catenin to a similar frequency observed in myeloid cell lines (12/20 samples [60%]; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eC), with an extensive correlation (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) between the two proteins (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eD). To examine if the MSI2:β-catenin interaction could be detected in patient cells, we performed an MSI2 Co-IP in a primary AML sample containing abundant levels of both proteins and where ample cellular material existed (patient 10) and confirmed MSI2 interaction with β-catenin (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eE). Taken together these data indicate the β-catenin:MSI2 interaction could represent an abundant and clinically relevant association in AML cells.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMSI2 impacts Wnt signalling output through modulation of LEF-1\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo evaluate if MSI2 could bind or regulate Wnt mRNAs we assessed its net impact on Wnt signalling output using the \u003cb\u003eb\u003c/b\u003eeta-catenin \u003cb\u003ea\u003c/b\u003ectivated \u003cb\u003er\u003c/b\u003eeporter as done previously.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Depletion of MSI2 using two unique shRNAs had little impact on β-catenin level but did cause a concomitant decrease in expression of the Wnt transcription factor LEF-1 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA). As could be expected from diminished LEF-1, this resulted in diminished Wnt signalling output from both K562 and KU812 cells exhibiting MSI2 knockdown (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eB-D). MSI2 knockdown in HEL cells also diminished Wnt signalling output and LEF-1 expression (Supplemental Figure S7), however we were unable to use this cell line for subsequent experiments since only one MSI2 shRNA variant remained viable after lentiviral transduction and selection. We also demonstrated that ectopic MSI2 expression increased nuclear LEF-1 expression and TCF/LEF activity in K562 cells (Supplemental Figure S8) in Wnt signalling activated conditions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo understand the basis for reduced TCF/LEF output in MSI2-deficient cells, we performed nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation and examined the expression/localisation of Wnt signalling components. Again, we observed limited impact of MSI2 knockdown on β-catenin level or nuclear localisation in response to Wnt signalling activation but did note markedly reduced LEF-1 expression and nuclear localisation in K562 and KU812 cells under both basal and Wnt signalling active states (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eE). To understand the basis for reduced LEF-1 expression upon MSI2 knockdown we examined mRNA levels using qRT-PCR and observed significantly reduced \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e (but not that of another critical Wnt effector; \u003cem\u003eTCF7L2\u003c/em\u003e) expression in MSI2-deficient K562 and KU812 cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eF and G). Collectively these data indicate that MSI2 can influence Wnt signalling activity through modulation of the Wnt effector LEF-1.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMSI2 binds LEF1 mRNA and influences its stability\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGiven the role of MSI2 as an RBP and regulator of post-transcriptional gene expression,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e we next assessed whether \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e could be an mRNA partner for MSI2. After first confirming efficient MSI2 RIP in K562 cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eA), and enrichment of known mRNA partners \u003cem\u003eMYB\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eMYC\u003c/em\u003e,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e we observed enriched \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e (and \u003cem\u003eTCF7L2\u003c/em\u003e) mRNA versus control IgG RIP (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eB). Similarly, using an MSI2 CLIP approach we observed enrichment of \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e transcript (and \u003cem\u003eMYC\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eMYB\u003c/em\u003e) versus IgG CLIP (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eC) indicating that \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e could be a direct mRNA binding target of MSI2. Given β-catenin immunoprecipitates with \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA through both RIP-seq and RIP-qRT-PCR (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e) but shows limited capacity for direct RNA binding (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e), we hypothesised that β-catenin may impact binding of canonical RBPs like MSI2 to \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA. To interrogate this, we generated β-catenin depleted K562 cells using two unique shRNAs and re-assessed MSI2 binding to \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA using MSI2 RIP-RT-qPCR and MSI2-CLIP-RT-qPCR. Firstly, we confirmed β-catenin depletion had no impact on total MSI2 protein (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eD), or overall \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA expression in β-catenin depleted K562 RIP (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eE) and CLIP inputs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eF). However, we observed attenuation of \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA binding with MSI2 upon β-catenin knockdown through both MSI2-RIP (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eG) and MSI2-CLIP (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eH).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, given MSI2\u0026rsquo;s prominent roles in post-transcription we assessed \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA stability following the global inhibition of transcription by actinomycin D (ActD) treatment in K562 cells. Using the K562 variant exhibiting the most complete MSI2 knockdown (shRNA#2) \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA demonstrated decreased stability compared with the non-targeting shRNA (relative to their respective 0hr timepoint levels; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eI). This corresponded to a markedly accelerated depletion of LEF-1 protein at 8hrs ActD treatment compared with non-targeting shRNA controls (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eJ), which is particularly notable given the normally stable half-life we typically observe for the LEF-1 peptide (Supplemental Figure S9). In summary, these data suggest that β-catenin promotes MSI2 binding to \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e, and MSI2 can modulate the subsequent stability of \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA through a post-transcriptional mechanism.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eMSI2 regulation of LEF-1 may represent an important regulatory axis in human HSPC growth and survival\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBoth MSI2 and LEF1 have individually documented roles in the maintenance and function of HSPC.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR47 CR48 CR49\" citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Previously, MSI2 has been shown to promote HSPC expansion and we hypothesized that some of this activity could be mediated through LEF-1. To interrogate this hypothesis human CB-derived CD34\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e HSPC were isolated and lentivirally transduced with ectopic MSI2 expression (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eA) alongside either non-targeting, or LEF-1 shRNAs (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eB). From day 4 onwards (3 days post-lentiviral transduction) we observed a modest but consistent increase in the expansion rates of HSPCs expressing ectopic MSI2 versus control cultures, which was higher (32%\u0026plusmn;2 increase) at day 8 of liquid culture (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eC) in keeping with previous reports of MSI2-mediated HSPC expansion.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e A higher percentage of CD34\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e events were also observed in MSI2 overexpressing cultures versus controls at this timepoint (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eD). Increases in the expansion rates and CD34 positivity of MSI2 overexpressing cultures were curtailed in the presence of LEF-1 shRNA (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eCD). Primary HSPC cultures harbouring LEF-1 shRNA exhibited consistently reduced growth rates which were lower with shRNA#2 at days 8, 11 and 13 of liquid culture (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003eD). Indeed, the growth repression mediated by LEF-1 extended beyond suppressing MSI2-induced expansion, implying independently important roles for LEF1 in human HSPC biology. These data are consistent with our previous study showing LEF-1 can impact the proliferation of myeloid leukaemia cells,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and implies that part of MSI2\u0026rsquo;s capacity to expand human HSPCs could be mediated through LEF-1.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eWnt signalling is a critical pathway regulating human HSCs and is frequently implicated in haematological malignancy. The central mediator of the pathway, β-catenin, has been a longstanding therapeutic target in leukaemia but attempts to therapeutically target the molecule have achieved limited success to date \u0026ndash; curtailed by a poor understanding of its molecular interactions in haematopoietic cells. In solid tissues, β-catenin has a vital role in cell adhesion within membrane complexes where it facilitates tight cell-cell adhesion, however such complexes are not a prominent feature of blood cells meaning free β-catenin likely serves alternative functions in this context. Following on from our previous studies showing that β-catenin interacts with vast RBP networks in myeloid cells,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e we now demonstrate for the first time that β-catenin may contribute towards post-transcriptional regulation in haematopoietic cells.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo identify transcripts over which β-catenin may have post-transcriptional influence in myeloid cells we initially performed β-catenin RIPseq after first confirming β-catenin pulled down with RNA. We identified hundreds enriched transcripts with β-catenin under basal versus Wnt signalling activated conditions across K562 and HEL cells. From K562 cells we identified Wnt/β-catenin signalling as the top signalling pathway enriched from β-catenin associated mRNAs, with many also observed in HEL β-catenin RIPseq.\u0026nbsp;The existence of feedback loops within Wnt signalling has been known for some time with both positive and negative regulators known to be transcriptional targets of the pathway such as \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e \u003cem\u003eLGR5\u003c/em\u003e,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e \u003cem\u003eFZD7\u003c/em\u003e,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAXIN2\u003c/em\u003e,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e \u003cem\u003eRNF43\u003c/em\u003e,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e \u003cem\u003eDKK1\u003c/em\u003e,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e respectively. However, these were thought to be regulated in a predominantly transcriptional fashion. Our data raise the prospect that β-catenin may also influence feedback loops in Wnt signalling through post-transcriptional mechanisms including both established Wnt target genes, but also Wnt signalling mRNAs that are not transcriptional targets of the pathway including \u003cem\u003eAMER1\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBCL9L\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eDVL2\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eCSNK1E\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe concept that β-catenin could post-transcriptionally govern Wnt signalling is gaining traction with a recent report showing that is it recruited to the translation initiation complex in the dentate gyrus of mice.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Patil and colleagues demonstrated that following eIF4E phosphorylation, β-catenin was substantially recruited to the eIF4E cap complex following long-term potentiation where it preferentially augmented the translation of Wnt signalling mRNAs including \u003cem\u003eWnt4\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eLrp5\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eFzd2\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eFzd4\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eDvl2\u003c/em\u003e. This follows from another study reporting β-catenin recruitment to the messenger ribonucleoprotein and translational pre-initiation complex through the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), where it repressed translation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Such a post-transcriptional role for free cytoplasmic/nuclear β-catenin might be more prominent in a fluid tissue like blood where its other well characterised role in cell adhesion may not be so relevant. However, trying to disentangle β-catenin\u0026rsquo;s transcriptional influences from its post-transcriptional effects is technically challenging, especially since data from T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL) cells indicate β-catenin-dependent transcriptional signatures include genes involved with RNA biosynthesis and processing.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe capacity for β-catenin to bind RNA directly remains unclear. Previously, β-catenin has been shown to bind selective mRNAs including COX2 through the 3\u0026rsquo;UTR AU-rich elements in concert with RBPs such as HuR,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and recently has been shown to bind double stranded RNA.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Numerous reports also exist of β-catenin binding and modulating the stability/splicing of numerous transcripts including \u003cem\u003eCA9\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eSNAI1\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eIL6\u003c/em\u003e,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e \u003cem\u003eCadherin 11\u003c/em\u003e,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and an estrogen receptor-β (\u003cem\u003eER-β\u003c/em\u003e) variant.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Armadillo domains have also been identified as one of the most frequent domain types associated with RNA binding amongst non-canonical RBPs,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and β-catenin has 12 such repeating structures in its central domain. However, β-catenin has no recognised canonical RNA binding motif, and we observed little RNA pull down through a more direct CLIP assessment in myeloid cells. Therefore, we hypothesise that β-catenin\u0026rsquo;s interactions with RNA in this context occur indirectly through binding other canonical RBPs and there were many identified in our original β-catenin interactome study.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Thus far, we have confirmed interactions with RBPs such as WT1,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e HuR (Supplemental Figure \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eA), LIN28B and TOE1 (unpublished) and all of these β-catenin:RBP interactions occur irrespective of RNA presence (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4BC), suggesting β-catenin complexes with RBPs, rather than associates though co-occupancy of RNA. This follows from many other reported interactions of β-catenin with RBPs including FUS,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e63\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e HuR,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and FMRP,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and suggests a wider role for β-catenin in RNA:RBP complexes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe were the first to report functional crosstalk between Wnt/β-catenin signalling and MSI2 in myeloid cells.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e64\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e A subsequent report from the Sheng group adopted a deletion of the chromosome 5q (del(5q)) murine model of MDS which has previously demonstrated a dependency on the negative Wnt regulator and tumour suppressor APC for MDS development.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The authors show that MSI2 may also impact Wnt signalling function in murine HSC, however there no established measurements of Wnt signalling activity (e.g. TCF/LEF activity, Wnt target gene assessment, β-catenin stabilisation/nuclear localision dynamics) performed in this study.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e65\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e We found the principle connection between these two proteins appeared to be the Wnt transcription factor LEF-1 which was suppressed with MSI2 knockdown across multiple cell lines. This aligns with a previous report of lower LEF-1 (and TCF4) levels (protein and mRNA) upon MSI2 depletion in SMMC-7721 hepatocellular carcinoma cells.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e66\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e A Wnt gene signature was also observed in response to MSI2 loss in four human leukaemia cell lines in a study by Kharas \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e, which were reciprocally upregulated upon ectopic MSI2 expression in murine HSC.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Given the well documented importance of MSI2 to HSPCs,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e67\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e68\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e we reasoned that regulation of \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e might be a mechanism utilised by MSI2 to control HSPC growth and survival. Indeed, \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e knockdown perturbed MSI2-mediated expansion of HSPCs, however we cannot rule out \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e acting independently of any MSI2-mediated regulation since it is also a key regulator of the HSPC compartment.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e69\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, this study partly examined the mechanism by which MSI2 could regulate \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e expression and found that MSI2 bound \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA through both RIP and CLIP approaches. This is in agreement with an elegant study by the Pillai group who also performed MSI2 iCLIP in K562 cells and we noted that \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e was a high confidence mRNA partner in their dataset.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e70\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Interestingly, they found only 2.6% of 4,000 high confidence MSI2 mRNA partners (mainly via 3'-UTR) are subsequently subject to translational regulation by MSI2. Our study also suggests that perhaps mRNA stability, rather than translation, is the key mechanism regulating \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e expression, concordant with MSI2\u0026rsquo;s previously documented roles in modulating mRNA stability.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR72 CR73\" citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e71\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR74\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e74\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e We observed the degree of MSI2:\u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e binding could be impacted by β-catenin level (with no consistent or substantial overall change to total \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e or MSI2 levels) alluding to a wider role for β-catenin augmenting RBP:RNA complexes in myeloid cells. How β-catenin influences RBP:RNA complexes remains unknown and could represent a novel function for β-catenin in haematopoietic cells. In its well characterised transcriptional role it recruits TCF/LEF transcription factors and transcriptional co-activators (CBP, p300) to the DNA promoters of Wnt target genes, and perhaps β-catenin performs similar scaffolding functions for facilitating specific RBP:RNA interactions, particularly those implicating Wnt signalling mRNAs. However, trying to resolve its well characterised transcriptional effects, from any potential post-transcriptional influences, will be technically challenging, especially since both nascent RNA and active RNA polymerase II have been recently been observed within β-catenin condensates.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Further work is now required to define β-catenin\u0026rsquo;s post-transcriptional versus transcriptional roles in a haematological context.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDisclosure statement\u003c/strong\u003e: The authors declare no conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor contributions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMW performed experiments, analysed data, co-wrote the manuscript and managed laboratory. OS completed RIP-seq analyses, AG performed CLIP analyses, MR generated library preps and ran RNA sequencing whilst HP and EM performed AlphaFold predictive modelling. DN provided experimental advice, whilst TC and AB sourced primary clinical samples. LC, SN and BT provided RNA experimental guidance and reagents. RGM performed experiments, analysed data, co-wrote the manuscript, secured funding and directed the study.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis work was funded by the Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund (KKL1051/KKL1446), Leukaemia \u0026amp; Myeloma Research UK (4\u0026ndash;5/06.21R) and the Children\u0026rsquo;s Cancer \u0026amp; Leukaemia Group (CCLGA 2023 16 Morgan). We are grateful to the Leeds Genomics facility for executing RNA sequencing experiments. Kind thanks to Dr Paraskevi Diamanti (University of Bristol) for AML patient sample collection and Lizzy Hoole (Institute for Child Life \u0026amp; Health, UHBristol \u0026amp; Weston NHS Foundation Trust) for supplying clinical data. Thanks to the midwives and clinical research nurses at University Hospitals Sussex (UHS) NHS trust including Raquel Akieme, Valentina Toska, Lorraine Shah-Goodwin, Denise Skinner, Elohor Uwadiogbu and Caroline Humphreys, for the collection of human umbilical cord blood. We are indebted to the patients and their families who gave consent for their cells to be used for our research.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNusse, R., and Clevers, H. (2017). Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling, Disease, and Emerging Therapeutic Modalities. Cell \u003cem\u003e169\u003c/em\u003e, 985-999. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReya, T., Duncan, A.W., Ailles, L., Domen, J., Scherer, D.C., Willert, K., Hintz, L., Nusse, R., and Weissman, I.L. (2003). A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature \u003cem\u003e423\u003c/em\u003e, 409-414.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDanek, P., Kardosova, M., Janeckova, L., Karkoulia, E., Vanickova, K., Fabisik, M., Lozano-Asencio, C., Benoukraf, T., Tirado-Magallanes, R., Zhou, Q., et al. (2020). beta-Catenin-TCF/LEF signaling promotes steady-state and emergency granulopoiesis via G-CSF receptor upregulation. Blood \u003cem\u003e136\u003c/em\u003e, 2574-2587. 10.1182/blood.2019004664.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrown, A.L., Salerno, D.G., Sadras, T., Engler, G.A., Kok, C.H., Wilkinson, C.R., Samaraweera, S.E., Sadlon, T.J., Perugini, M., Lewis, I.D., et al. (2012). The GM-CSF receptor utilizes beta-catenin and Tcf4 to specify macrophage lineage differentiation. Differentiation \u003cem\u003e83\u003c/em\u003e, 47-59. S0301-4681(11)00126-5 [pii];10.1016/j.diff.2011.08.003 [doi].\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShooshtarizadeh, P., Helness, A., Vadnais, C., Brouwer, N., Beauchemin, H., Chen, R., Bagci, H., Staal, F.J.T., Cote, J.F., and Moroy, T. (2019). Gfi1b regulates the level of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in hematopoietic stem cells and megakaryocytes. Nat Commun \u003cem\u003e10\u003c/em\u003e, 1270. 10.1038/s41467-019-09273-z.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLuis, T.C., Ichii, M., Brugman, M.H., Kincade, P., and Staal, F.J. (2012). Wnt signaling strength regulates normal hematopoiesis and its deregulation is involved in leukemia development. Leukemia \u003cem\u003e26\u003c/em\u003e, 414-421. leu2011387 [pii];10.1038/leu.2011.387 [doi].\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLuis, T.C., Naber, B.A., Roozen, P.P., Brugman, M.H., de Haas, E.F., Ghazvini, M., Fibbe, W.E., van Dongen, J.J., Fodde, R., and Staal, F.J. (2011). Canonical wnt signaling regulates hematopoiesis in a dosage-dependent fashion. Cell Stem Cell \u003cem\u003e9\u003c/em\u003e, 345-356.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMorgan, R.G., Ridsdale, J., Payne, M., Heesom, K.J., Wilson, M.C., Davidson, A., Greenhough, A., Davies, S., Williams, A.C., Blair, A., et al. (2019). LEF-1 drives aberrant beta-catenin nuclear localization in myeloid leukemia cells. Haematologica \u003cem\u003e104\u003c/em\u003e, 1365-1377. 10.3324/haematol.2018.202846.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWagstaff, M., Coke, B., Hodgkiss, G.R., and Morgan, R.G. (2022). Targeting beta-catenin in acute myeloid leukaemia: past, present, and future perspectives. Biosci Rep. 10.1042/BSR20211841.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSimon, M., Grandage, V.L., Linch, D.C., and Khwaja, A. (2005). Constitutive activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway in acute myeloid leukaemia. Oncogene \u003cem\u003e24\u003c/em\u003e, 2410-2420.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYsebaert, L., Chicanne, G., Demur, C., De, T.F., Prade-Houdellier, N., Ruidavets, J.B., Mansat-De, M., V, Rigal-Huguet, F., Laurent, G., Payrastre, B., et al. (2006). Expression of beta-catenin by acute myeloid leukemia cells predicts enhanced clonogenic capacities and poor prognosis. Leukemia \u003cem\u003e20\u003c/em\u003e, 1211-1216.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGriffiths, E.A., Golding, M.C., Srivastava, P., Povinelli, B.J., James, S.R., Ford, L.A., Wetzler, M., Wang, E.S., and Nemeth, M.J. (2015). Pharmacological targeting of beta-catenin in normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia blasts. Haematologica \u003cem\u003e100\u003c/em\u003e, e49-52. 10.3324/haematol.2014.113118.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJiang, X., Mak, P.Y., Mu, H., Tao, W., Mak, D.H., Kornblau, S., Zhang, Q., Ruvolo, P., Burks, J.K., Zhang, W., et al. (2018). Disruption of Wnt/beta-Catenin Exerts Antileukemia Activity and Synergizes with FLT3 Inhibition in FLT3-Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res \u003cem\u003e24\u003c/em\u003e, 2417-2429. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1556.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi, L., Sheng, Y., Li, W., Hu, C., Mittal, N., Tohyama, K., Seba, A., Zhao, Y.Y., Ozer, H., Zhu, T., and Qian, Z. (2017). beta-Catenin Is a Candidate Therapeutic Target for Myeloid Neoplasms with del(5q). Cancer Res \u003cem\u003e77\u003c/em\u003e, 4116-4126. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0202.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStoddart, A., Wang, J., Hu, C., Fernald, A.A., Davis, E.M., Cheng, J.X., and Le Beau, M.M. (2017). Inhibition of WNT signaling in the bone marrow niche prevents the development of MDS in the Apc(del/+) MDS mouse model. Blood \u003cem\u003e129\u003c/em\u003e, 2959-2970. 10.1182/blood-2016-08-736454.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTonks, A., Pearn, L., Musson, M., Gilkes, A., Mills, K.I., Burnett, A.K., and Darley, R.L. (2007). Transcriptional dysregulation mediated by RUNX1-RUNX1T1 in normal human progenitor cells and in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia \u003cem\u003e21\u003c/em\u003e, 2495-2505.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMuller-Tidow, C., Steffen, B., Cauvet, T., Tickenbrock, L., Ji, P., Diederichs, S., Sargin, B., Kohler, G., Stelljes, M., Puccetti, E., et al. (2004). Translocation products in acute myeloid leukemia activate the Wnt signaling pathway in hematopoietic cells. Mol Cell Biol. \u003cem\u003e24\u003c/em\u003e, 2890-2904.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang, Y., Krivtsov, A.V., Sinha, A.U., North, T.E., Goessling, W., Feng, Z., Zon, L.I., and Armstrong, S.A. (2010). The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway is required for the development of leukemia stem cells in AML. Science \u003cem\u003e327\u003c/em\u003e, 1650-1653.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYeung, J., Esposito, M.T., Gandillet, A., Zeisig, B.B., Griessinger, E., Bonnet, D., and So, C.W. (2010). beta-Catenin mediates the establishment and drug resistance of MLL leukemic stem cells. Cancer Cell \u003cem\u003e18\u003c/em\u003e, 606-618.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDietrich, P.A., Yang, C., Leung, H.H., Lynch, J.R., Gonzales, E., Liu, B., Haber, M., Norris, M.D., Wang, J., and Wang, J.Y. (2014). GPR84 sustains aberrant beta-catenin signaling in leukemic stem cells for maintenance of MLL leukemogenesis. Blood \u003cem\u003e124\u003c/em\u003e, 3284-3294. 10.1182/blood-2013-10-532523.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFong, C.Y., Gilan, O., Lam, E.Y., Rubin, A.F., Ftouni, S., Tyler, D., Stanley, K., Sinha, D., Yeh, P., Morison, J., et al. (2015). BET inhibitor resistance emerges from leukaemia stem cells. Nature \u003cem\u003e525\u003c/em\u003e, 538-542. 10.1038/nature14888.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerry, J.M., Tao, F., Roy, A., Lin, T., He, X.C., Chen, S., Lu, X., Nemechek, J., Ruan, L., Yu, X., et al. (2020). Overcoming Wnt-beta-catenin dependent anticancer therapy resistance in leukaemia stem cells. Nat Cell Biol \u003cem\u003e22\u003c/em\u003e, 689-700. 10.1038/s41556-020-0507-y.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSakoda, T., Kikushige, Y., Miyamoto, T., Irifune, H., Harada, T., Hatakeyama, K., Kunisaki, Y., Kato, K., and Akashi, K. (2023). TIM-3 signaling hijacks the canonical Wnt/beta-catenin pathway to maintain cancer stemness in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv \u003cem\u003e7\u003c/em\u003e, 2053-2065. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008405.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhao, C., Blum, J., Chen, A., Kwon, H.Y., Jung, S.H., Cook, J.M., Lagoo, A., and Reya, T. (2007). Loss of beta-catenin impairs the renewal of normal and CML stem cells in vivo. Cancer Cell \u003cem\u003e12\u003c/em\u003e, 528-541.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJamieson, C.H., Ailles, L.E., Dylla, S.J., Muijtjens, M., Jones, C., Zehnder, J.L., Gotlib, J., Li, K., Manz, M.G., Keating, A., et al. (2004). Granulocyte-macrophage progenitors as candidate leukemic stem cells in blast-crisis CML. N Engl J Med. \u003cem\u003e351\u003c/em\u003e, 657-667.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYamada, S., Pokutta, S., Drees, F., Weis, W.I., and Nelson, W.J. (2005). Deconstructing the cadherin-catenin-actin complex. Cell \u003cem\u003e123\u003c/em\u003e, 889-901. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.020.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWagstaff, M., Tsaponina, O., Caalim, G., Greenfield, H., Milton-Harris, L., Mancini, E.J., Blair, A., Heesom, K.J., Tonks, A., Darley, R.L., et al. (2023). Crosstalk between beta-catenin and WT1 signaling activity in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica \u003cem\u003e108\u003c/em\u003e, 283-289. 10.3324/haematol.2021.280294.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHodson, D.J., Screen, M., and Turner, M. (2019). RNA-binding proteins in hematopoiesis and hematological malignancy. Blood \u003cem\u003e133\u003c/em\u003e, 2365-2373. 10.1182/blood-2018-10-839985.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOlaitan, S., Wagstaff, M., Sevim, O., Akieme, R., Toska, V., Humphreys, C., Shah-Goodwin, L., Bell, J., Chevassut, T., and Morgan, R.G. (2022). Assessment of mononuclear cell populations derived from human umbilical cord blood. Eur J Haematol \u003cem\u003e109\u003c/em\u003e, 787-788. 10.1111/ejh.13846.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMorgan, R.G., Pearn, L., Liddiard, K., Pumford, S.L., Burnett, A.K., Tonks, A., and Darley, R.L. (2013). gamma-Catenin is overexpressed in acute myeloid leukemia and promotes the stabilization and nuclear localization of beta-catenin. Leukemia \u003cem\u003e27\u003c/em\u003e, 336-343. 10.1038/leu.2012.221.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMartin, M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. 2011 \u003cem\u003e17\u003c/em\u003e, 3. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKim, D., Paggi, J.M., Park, C., Bennett, C., and Salzberg, S.L. (2019). Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol \u003cem\u003e37\u003c/em\u003e, 907-915. 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., and Genome Project Data Processing, S. (2009). The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics \u003cem\u003e25\u003c/em\u003e, 2078-2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLove, M.I., Huber, W., and Anders, S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome biology \u003cem\u003e15\u003c/em\u003e, 550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWickham H, A.M., Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, Fran\u0026ccedil;ois R, Grolemund G, Hayes A, Henry L, Hester J, Kuhn M, Pedersen TL, Miller E, Bache SM, M\u0026uuml;ller K, Ooms J, Robinson D, Seidel DP, Spinu V, Takahashi K, Vaughan D, Wilke C, Woo K, Yutani H (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software \u003cem\u003e4\u003c/em\u003e, 1686. doi:10.21105/joss.01686.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGu, Z.G., Eils, R., and Schlesner, M. (2016). Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics \u003cem\u003e32\u003c/em\u003e, 2847-2849. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eM., v.d.W., Castrop, J., Korinek, V., and Clevers, H. (1996). Extensive alternative splicing and dual promoter usage generate Tcf-1 protein isoforms with differential transcription control properties. Mol.Cell Biol. \u003cem\u003e16\u003c/em\u003e, 745-752.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKim, I., Kwak, H., Lee, H.K., Hyun, S., and Jeong, S. (2012). beta-Catenin recognizes a specific RNA motif in the cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA 3\u0026apos;-UTR and interacts with HuR in colon cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res \u003cem\u003e40\u003c/em\u003e, 6863-6872. 10.1093/nar/gks331.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGui, T., Fleming, C., Manzato, C., Bourgeois, B., Sirati, N., Heuer, J., Papadionysiou, I., Montfort, D.I.V., Gijzen, M.V., Smits, L.M.M., et al. (2023). Targeted perturbation of signaling-driven condensates. Mol Cell \u003cem\u003e83\u003c/em\u003e, 4141-4157 e4111. 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.10.023.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCalabretta, S., and Richard, S. (2015). Emerging Roles of Disordered Sequences in RNA-Binding Proteins. Trends Biochem Sci \u003cem\u003e40\u003c/em\u003e, 662-672. 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.012.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMoore, S., Jarvelin, A.I., Davis, I., Bond, G.L., and Castello, A. (2018). Expanding horizons: new roles for non-canonical RNA-binding proteins in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev \u003cem\u003e48\u003c/em\u003e, 112-120. 10.1016/j.gde.2017.11.006.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLee, H.K., and Jeong, S. (2006). Beta-Catenin stabilizes cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA by interacting with AU-rich elements of 3\u0026apos;-UTR. Nucleic Acids Res \u003cem\u003e34\u003c/em\u003e, 5705-5714. 10.1093/nar/gkl698.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang, Z., Zhou, J., Li, Z., Guo, J., Fang, L., Xiao, X., and Xiao, S. (2024). Identification of whole-cell dsRNA-binding proteins by phase separation. RNA Biol \u003cem\u003e21\u003c/em\u003e, 32-45. 10.1080/15476286.2024.2386498.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKharas, M.G., and Lengner, C.J. (2017). Stem Cells, Cancer, and MUSASHI in Blood and Guts. Trends Cancer \u003cem\u003e3\u003c/em\u003e, 347-356. 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.03.007.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNguyen, D.T.T., Lu, Y., Chu, K.L., Yang, X., Park, S.M., Choo, Z.N., Chin, C.R., Prieto, C., Schurer, A., Barin, E., et al. (2020). HyperTRIBE uncovers increased MUSASHI-2 RNA binding activity and differential regulation in leukemic stem cells. Nat Commun \u003cem\u003e11\u003c/em\u003e, 2026. 10.1038/s41467-020-15814-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHope, K.J., Cellot, S., Ting, S.B., MacRae, T., Mayotte, N., Iscove, N.N., and Sauvageau, G. (2010). An RNAi screen identifies Msi2 and Prox1 as having opposite roles in the regulation of hematopoietic stem cell activity. Cell Stem Cell \u003cem\u003e7\u003c/em\u003e, 101-113. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.007.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKharas, M.G., Lengner, C.J., Al-Shahrour, F., Bullinger, L., Ball, B., Zaidi, S., Morgan, K., Tam, W., Paktinat, M., Okabe, R., et al. (2010). Musashi-2 regulates normal hematopoiesis and promotes aggressive myeloid leukemia. Nat Med \u003cem\u003e16\u003c/em\u003e, 903-908. 10.1038/nm.2187.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEdmaier, K.E., Stahnke, K., Vegi, N., Mulaw, M., Ihme, S., Scheffold, A., Rudolph, K.L., and Buske, C. (2014). Expression of the lymphoid enhancer factor 1 is required for normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell function. Leukemia \u003cem\u003e28\u003c/em\u003e, 227-230. 10.1038/leu.2013.238.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeder, K., Edmaier-Schroger, K., Rawat, V.P.S., Kirsten, N., Metzeler, K., Kraus, J.M., Dohner, K., Dohner, H., Kestler, H.A., Feuring-Buske, M., and Buske, C. (2020). Differences in expression and function of LEF1 isoforms in normal versus leukemic hematopoiesis. Leukemia \u003cem\u003e34\u003c/em\u003e, 1027-1037. 10.1038/s41375-019-0635-1.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRentas, S., Holzapfel, N., Belew, M.S., Pratt, G., Voisin, V., Wilhelm, B.T., Bader, G.D., Yeo, G.W., and Hope, K.J. (2016). Musashi-2 attenuates AHR signalling to expand human haematopoietic stem cells. Nature \u003cem\u003e532\u003c/em\u003e, 508-511. 10.1038/nature17665.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHovanes, K., Li, T.W., Munguia, J.E., Truong, T., Milovanovic, T., Lawrence Marsh, J., Holcombe, R.F., and Waterman, M.L. (2001). Beta-catenin-sensitive isoforms of lymphoid enhancer factor-1 are selectively expressed in colon cancer. Nat Genet \u003cem\u003e28\u003c/em\u003e, 53-57. 10.1038/88264.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBarker, N., van Es, J.H., Kuipers, J., Kujala, P., van den Born, M., Cozijnsen, M., Haegebarth, A., Korving, J., Begthel, H., Peters, P.J., and Clevers, H. (2007). Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature \u003cem\u003e449\u003c/em\u003e, 1003-1007. 10.1038/nature06196.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWillert, J., Epping, M., Pollack, J.R., Brown, P.O., and Nusse, R. (2002). A transcriptional response to Wnt protein in human embryonic carcinoma cells. BMC Dev Biol \u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e, 8. 10.1186/1471-213x-2-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYan, D., Wiesmann, M., Rohan, M., Chan, V., Jefferson, A.B., Guo, L., Sakamoto, D., Caothien, R.H., Fuller, J.H., Reinhard, C., et al. (2001). Elevated expression of axin2 and hnkd mRNA provides evidence that Wnt/beta -catenin signaling is activated in human colon tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America \u003cem\u003e98\u003c/em\u003e, 14973-14978. 10.1073/pnas.261574498.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTakahashi, N., Yamaguchi, K., Ikenoue, T., Fujii, T., and Furukawa, Y. (2014). Identification of two Wnt-responsive elements in the intron of RING finger protein 43 (RNF43) gene. PloS one \u003cem\u003e9\u003c/em\u003e, e86582. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086582.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNiida, A., Hiroko, T., Kasai, M., Furukawa, Y., Nakamura, Y., Suzuki, Y., Sugano, S., and Akiyama, T. (2004). DKK1, a negative regulator of Wnt signaling, is a target of the beta-catenin/TCF pathway. Oncogene \u003cem\u003e23\u003c/em\u003e, 8520-8526. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207892.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePatil, S., Chalkiadaki, K., Mergiya, T.F., Krimbacher, K., Amorim, I.S., Akerkar, S., Gkogkas, C.G., and Bramham, C.R. (2023). eIF4E phosphorylation recruits beta-catenin to mRNA cap and promotes Wnt pathway translation in dentate gyrus LTP maintenance. iScience \u003cem\u003e26\u003c/em\u003e, 106649. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106649.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEhyai, S., Miyake, T., Williams, D., Vinayak, J., Bayfield, M.A., and McDermott, J.C. (2018). FMRP recruitment of beta-catenin to the translation pre-initiation complex represses translation. EMBO Rep \u003cem\u003e19\u003c/em\u003e. 10.15252/embr.201745536.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGarcia-Hernandez, V., Arambilet, D., Guillen, Y., Lobo-Jarne, T., Maqueda, M., Gekas, C., Gonzalez, J., Iglesias, A., Vega-Garcia, N., Sentis, I., et al. (2023). beta-Catenin activity induces an RNA biosynthesis program promoting therapy resistance in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. EMBO Mol Med \u003cem\u003e15\u003c/em\u003e, e16554. 10.15252/emmm.202216554.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eD\u0026apos;Uva, G., Bertoni, S., Lauriola, M., De Carolis, S., Pacilli, A., D\u0026apos;Anello, L., Santini, D., Taffurelli, M., Ceccarelli, C., Yarden, Y., et al. (2013). Beta-catenin/HuR post-transcriptional machinery governs cancer stem cell features in response to hypoxia. PloS one \u003cem\u003e8\u003c/em\u003e, e80742. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080742.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFarina, A.K., Bong, Y.S., Feltes, C.M., and Byers, S.W. (2009). Post-transcriptional regulation of cadherin-11 expression by GSK-3 and beta-catenin in prostate and breast cancer cells. PloS one \u003cem\u003e4\u003c/em\u003e, e4797. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004797.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLee, H.K., Choi, Y.S., Park, Y.A., and Jeong, S. (2006). Modulation of oncogenic transcription and alternative splicing by beta-catenin and an RNA aptamer in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res \u003cem\u003e66\u003c/em\u003e, 10560-10566. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2526.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSato, S., Idogawa, M., Honda, K., Fujii, G., Kawashima, H., Takekuma, K., Hoshika, A., Hirohashi, S., and Yamada, T. (2005). beta-catenin interacts with the FUS proto-oncogene product and regulates pre-mRNA splicing. Gastroenterology \u003cem\u003e129\u003c/em\u003e, 1225-1236. S0016-5085(05)01389-2 [pii];10.1053/j.gastro.2005.07.025 [doi].\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWagstaff, M., Nguyen, D., Blair, A., Towler, B., Newbury, S., and Morgan, R. (2024). A \u0026beta;-catenin:MSI2 axis regulates the expression of \u0026lt;em\u0026gt;LEF1\u0026lt;/em\u0026gt; and subsequent human haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell proliferation. bioRxiv, 2024.2001.2028.577638. 10.1101/2024.01.28.577638.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhang, H., Guo, R., Li, Z., Ma, R., Xu, S., Yin, L., Zhu, H., Huang, Z., Xing, C., Yang, Y., et al. (2024). MSI2 mediates WNT/beta-Catenin pathway function in hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia. 10.1038/s41375-024-02447-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang, M.H., Qin, S.Y., Zhang, S.G., Li, G.X., Yu, Z.H., Wang, K., Wang, B., Teng, M.J., and Peng, Z.H. (2015). Musashi-2 promotes hepatitis Bvirus related hepatocellular carcinoma progression via the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Am J Cancer Res \u003cem\u003e5\u003c/em\u003e, 1089-1100.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ede Andres-Aguayo, L., Varas, F., Kallin, E.M., Infante, J.F., Wurst, W., Floss, T., and Graf, T. (2011). Musashi 2 is a regulator of the HSC compartment identified by a retroviral insertion screen and knockout mice. Blood \u003cem\u003e118\u003c/em\u003e, 554-564. 10.1182/blood-2010-12-322081.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePark, S.M., Deering, R.P., Lu, Y., Tivnan, P., Lianoglou, S., Al-Shahrour, F., Ebert, B.L., Hacohen, N., Leslie, C., Daley, G.Q., et al. (2014). Musashi-2 controls cell fate, lineage bias, and TGF-beta signaling in HSCs. J Exp Med \u003cem\u003e211\u003c/em\u003e, 71-87. 10.1084/jem.20130736.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYu, S., Li, F., Xing, S., Zhao, T., Peng, W., and Xue, H.H. (2016). Hematopoietic and Leukemic Stem Cells Have Distinct Dependence on Tcf1 and Lef1 Transcription Factors. J Biol Chem \u003cem\u003e291\u003c/em\u003e, 11148-11160. 10.1074/jbc.M116.717801.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKarmakar, S., Ramirez, O., Paul, K.V., Gupta, A.K., Kumari, V., Botti, V., de Los Mozos, I.R., Neuenkirchen, N., Ross, R.J., Karanicolas, J., et al. (2022). Integrative genome-wide analysis reveals EIF3A as a key downstream regulator of translational repressor protein Musashi 2 (MSI2). NAR Cancer \u003cem\u003e4\u003c/em\u003e, zcac015. 10.1093/narcan/zcac015.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhao, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, X.S., Zhu, F.M., Xie, F., Jiang, C.Y., Zhang, Z.Y., Gao, Y.L., Wang, Y.C., Li, B., et al. (2020). RNA-binding protein Musashi2 stabilizing androgen receptor drives prostate cancer progression. Cancer Sci \u003cem\u003e111\u003c/em\u003e, 369-382. 10.1111/cas.14280.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi, M., Li, A.Q., Zhou, S.L., Lv, H., Wei, P., and Yang, W.T. (2020). RNA-binding protein MSI2 isoforms expression and regulation in progression of triple-negative breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res \u003cem\u003e39\u003c/em\u003e, 92. 10.1186/s13046-020-01587-x.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBennett, C.G., Riemondy, K., Chapnick, D.A., Bunker, E., Liu, X., Kuersten, S., and Yi, R. (2016). Genome-wide analysis of Musashi-2 targets reveals novel functions in governing epithelial cell migration. Nucleic Acids Res \u003cem\u003e44\u003c/em\u003e, 3788-3800. 10.1093/nar/gkw207.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDuggimpudi, S., Kloetgen, A., Maney, S.K., Munch, P.C., Hezaveh, K., Shaykhalishahi, H., Hoyer, W., McHardy, A.C., Lang, P.A., Borkhardt, A., and Hoell, J.I. (2018). Transcriptome-wide analysis uncovers the targets of the RNA-binding protein MSI2 and effects of MSI2\u0026apos;s RNA-binding activity on IL-6 signaling. J Biol Chem \u003cem\u003e293\u003c/em\u003e, 15359-15369. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002243.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDormoy-Raclet, V., Menard, I., Clair, E., Kurban, G., Mazroui, R., Di Marco, S., von Roretz, C., Pause, A., and Gallouzi, I.E. (2007). The RNA-binding protein HuR promotes cell migration and cell invasion by stabilizing the beta-actin mRNA in a U-rich-element-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol \u003cem\u003e27\u003c/em\u003e, 5365-5380. 10.1128/MCB.00113-07.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"oncogene","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"onc","sideBox":"Learn more about [Oncogene](http://www.nature.com/onc/)","snPcode":"41388","submissionUrl":"https://mts-onc.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Oncogene","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5921123/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5921123/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eWnt/β-catenin signaling is important for normal hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) biology and heavily implicated in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). The central mediator β-catenin is an attractive therapeutic target in AML however its targeting has been hampered by a poor characterisation of its molecular interactions in haematopoietic cells, which will differ from its network in solid tissues. Our previous β-catenin interactome study identified the significant enrichment of RNA-binding proteins (RBP) implying post-transcriptional roles for β-catenin in myeloid cells. To identify β-catenin interacting mRNAs we performed β-catenin RNA-immunoprecipitation coupled to RNA-sequencing (RIP-seq) and identified significantly enriched Wnt signalling pathway transcripts. Using β-catenin cross-linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP) we demonstrated a limited capacity for β-catenin to bind RNA directly implying dependence on other RBPs. β-Catenin was found to interact with MSI2 in both myeloid cell lines and AML patient samples, where expression was significantly correlated. MSI2 knockdown reduced Wnt signalling output (TCF/LEF activity), through suppression of LEF-1 expression and nuclear localization. Through both RIP and CLIP we demonstrate MSI2 binds \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA in a partly β-catenin dependent fashion, and may impact the post-transcriptional control of LEF-1 expression. Finally, we show that MSI2-mediated expansion of human HSPCs could be partly driven through \u003cem\u003eLEF1\u003c/em\u003e regulation. This is the first study to experimentally demonstrate functional crosstalk between MSI2 and Wnt signalling in human cells, and indicates potential novel post-transcriptional roles for β-catenin in a haematological context.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"β-Catenin interacts with a Wnt signaling mRNA network in myeloid leukaemia cells through canonical RBP binding.","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-02-04 09:05:12","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5921123/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"revise","date":"2025-02-26T12:15:14+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-02-20T17:02:09+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-02-20T10:16:40+00:00","index":4,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-02-14T12:30:37+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-01-30T13:14:51+00:00","index":4,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-01-30T13:12:19+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-01-30T12:04:00+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-01-30T11:31:13+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-01-30T11:12:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-01-29T11:58:45+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-01-28T22:46:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Oncogene","date":"2025-01-28T22:46:23+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"oncogene","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"onc","sideBox":"Learn more about [Oncogene](http://www.nature.com/onc/)","snPcode":"41388","submissionUrl":"https://mts-onc.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Oncogene","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4450e509-7f7c-4732-8a8d-6881303c31ef","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 4th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":43618710,"name":"Biological sciences/Cancer/Haematological cancer/Leukaemia/Acute myeloid leukaemia"},{"id":43618711,"name":"Biological sciences/Stem cells/Self-renewal"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-04-30T07:09:47+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-5921123","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-025-03415-y","journal":{"identity":"oncogene","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Oncogene"},"publishedOn":"2025-04-30 04:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"April 30th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-02-04 09:05:12","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41388-025-03415-y","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-025-03415-y","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5921123","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5921123","identity":"rs-5921123","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00