Thoracic Endometriosis: A Review Comparing 480 Patients Based on Catamenial and Non-Catamenial Presentation

Nura Fitnat Topbaş Selçuki, Sevil Yılmaz, Cihan Kaya, Taner Usta, Engin Oral
In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2020 · vol. 27(7) , pp. S45 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.374 · W4245634476
review OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This review compared 480 thoracic endometriosis patients, analyzing differences between catamenial (menstrually-related) and non-catamenial presentations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisthoracic_endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-27T06:17:51.937953+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK