Reward Reduces Motor Fatigability by Increasing Movement Vigour

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,467 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Reward can enhance motor performance. However, its potential to counteract motor fatigability, a reduction in motor performance during sustained movements, remains underinvestigated. This could be particularly relevant in neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis, where increased motor fatigability is a prominent symptom. One form of motor fatigability is motor slowing, a decline in movement speed over time evoked by fast, repetitive movements. In this study, we investigated whether the possibility to earn reward attenuates motor slowing, and examined associated changes in muscle activity and pupil size, a putative marker of physical effort. Participants performed a wrist tapping task at maximal voluntary speed with or without the possibility of earning a reward. We found that wrist tapping induced motor slowing and that slowing was significantly reduced by reward. Over time, tapping became more costly as indicated by higher muscle activity and coactivation per tap. This was accompanied by a sustained pupil dilation, which could not solely be explained by tapping speed. These findings suggest that, rather than restoring efficient motor control, reward attenuates motor slowing by allowing participants to access a performance reserve and invest more resources into the task, reflected by increased muscle activation per tap and sustained pupil dilation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00