Biologic agents and innovative interventional approaches in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus
review
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a difficult disease to study, having a variable disease course characterized by exacerbations and remissions. A variety of biologic agents are under investigation as potential treatments for SLE. These products are designed to specifically interfere with the following immunologic processes: T cell activation/T cell-B cell collaboration, production of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, deposition of anti-double-stranded DNA antibody complexes, complement activation, and immune complex deposition and cytokine activation and modulation. More aggressive interventions include gene therapy and stem cell transplantation. Immunomodulatory agents recently examined in patients with SLE include: thalidomide, AS101, 2' chlordeoxyadenosine, mycophenolate mofetil, and bindarit. Additional innovative pharmaceutical treatments include the mild androgen dehydroepiandrosterone, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and the prolactin inhibitor, bromocriptine. A variety of these biologic and pharmaceutical agents offer promise as potential therapies. Active participation in clinical trial efforts to develop international consensus regarding trial methodology and outcome measures are crucial to the development of these innovative therapies.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (48)
- doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-5-199903020-00013 via openalex
- doi:10.4049/jimmunol.154.10.4996 via openalex
- doi:10.1023/a:1023242732212 via openalex
- doi:10.1182/blood.v92.10.3505 via openalex
- doi:10.7326/0003-4819-129-12-199812150-00007 via openalex
- doi:10.4049/jimmunol.154.3.1470 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/096120339500400409 via openalex
- doi:10.4049/jimmunol.155.5.2369 via openalex
- doi:10.1191/096120398678920352 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90720-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1084/jem.177.6.1675 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/art.1780400504 via openalex
- doi:10.1191/096120398678920334 via openalex
- doi:10.1006/clin.1997.4368 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm199610313351807 via openalex
- doi:10.1084/jem.181.3.839 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf01541225 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/ard.57.3.125 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/ard.56.1.5 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/art.1780400505 via openalex
- doi:10.1126/science.7520604 via openalex
- doi:10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9469489 via openalex
- doi:10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9708620 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70096-9 via openalex
- W2300885738 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/096120339500400102 via openalex
- doi:10.1172/jci5857 via openalex
- doi:10.1172/jci111692 via openalex
- doi:10.1191/096120398678920424 via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000237391 via openalex
- doi:10.1006/cimm.1996.0251 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0049-0172(98)80013-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1073/pnas.95.26.15542 via openalex
- doi:10.4049/jimmunol.159.6.2658 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/art.1780400117 via openalex
- doi:10.1191/096120399678847380 via openalex
- doi:10.4049/jimmunol.155.5.2318 via openalex
- doi:10.1146/annurev.iy.11.040193.001203 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90122-x via openalex
- doi:10.1191/096120398678920037 via openalex
- doi:10.1006/cimm.1995.1058 via openalex
- doi:10.4049/jimmunol.160.5.2158 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/art.1780370906 via openalex
- doi:10.1038/nm0895-839 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/08916939309077372 via openalex
- doi:10.1084/jem.179.1.305 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/art.1780381216 via openalex
- doi:10.4049/jimmunol.161.7.3781 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:39:27.580236+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-20T06:30:07.000247+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK