Full text
61,423 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Resilience, mental health, sleep, and smoking mediate pathways between lifetime stressors and Multiple Sclerosis severity | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Resilience, mental health, sleep, and smoking mediate pathways between lifetime stressors and Multiple Sclerosis severity View ORCID Profile Carri S. Polick , Hala Darwish , Leo Pestillo de Olivera , Ali Watson , Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci , Patrick S. Calhoun , Robert Ploutz-Snyder , Cathleen M. Connell , Tiffany J. Braley , Sarah A. Stoddard doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.24302405 Carri S. Polick 1 School of Nursing, Duke University , Durham, NC, USA 2 VA Healthcare System , Durham, NC, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Carri S. Polick For correspondence: Carri.polick{at}duke.edu Hala Darwish 3 Division of Multiple Sclerosis & Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology , Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4 School of Nursing, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Leo Pestillo de Olivera 5 Health Promotion Department, Cesumar University , Brazil PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ali Watson 6 School of Medicine, Duke University , Durham, NC, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci 7 Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University , Durham, NC, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Patrick S. Calhoun 2 VA Healthcare System , Durham, NC, USA 8 Department of Psychiatry, Duke University , Durham, NC, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Robert Ploutz-Snyder 4 School of Nursing, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA PhD, Pstat Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Cathleen M. Connell 9 School of Public Health, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Tiffany J. Braley 3 Division of Multiple Sclerosis & Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology , Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA MD, MS Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sarah A. Stoddard 4 School of Nursing, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Intro Lifetime stressors (e.g., poverty, violence, discrimination) have been linked to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) features; yet mechanistic pathways and relationships with cumulative disease severity remain nebulous. Further, protective factors like resilience, that may attenuate the effects of stressors on outcomes, are seldom evaluated. Aim To deconstruct pathways between lifetime stressors and cumulative severity on MS outcomes, accounting for resilience. Methods Adults with MS (N=924) participated in an online survey through the National MS Society listserv. Structural Equation Modeling was used to examine the direct and indirect effect of lifetime stressors (count/severity) on MS severity (self-reported disability, relapse burden, fatigue, pain intensity and interference), via resilience, mental health (anxiety and depression), sleep disturbance, and smoking. Results The final analytic model had excellent fit (GFI=0.998). Lifetime stressors had a direct relationship with MS severity (β=0.27, p<.001). Resilience, mental health, sleep disturbance, and smoking significantly mediated the relationship between lifetime stressors and MS severity. The total effect of mediation was significant (β=0.45). Conclusions This work provides foundational evidence to inform conceptualization of pathways by which stress could influence MS disease burden. Resilience may attenuate effects of stressors, while poor mental health, smoking, and sleep disturbances may exacerbate their impact. Parallel with usual care, these mediators could be targets for early multimodal therapies to improve disease course. Highlights Lifetime stressors directly and indirectly relate to MS severity. Resilience, mental health, sleep, and smoking were mediators. Resilience attenuated the effects of stressors on mental health, sleep, and smoking. Multi-modal interventions are needed to help improve MS symptom severity. 1. Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune mediated disease of the central nervous system associated with high physical, emotional, and cognitive morbidity that contribute to personal and societal costs 1 . Although immunomodulatory treatments designed to slow or prevent MS disability progression have advanced over the last decade 1 , these treatments do not adequately prevent or reverse many of the “invisible” symptoms associated with MS (e.g., fatigue, mood disturbances, pain). These invisible symptoms negatively affect both physical and cognitive wellbeing. A preventative lens focused on adjacent interventional targets to prevent additional morbidity in parallel with disease modifying therapies (DMTs) may help lessen the overall disease burden trajectory and associated costs, while improving quality of life. Although stress has long been linked to MS, the exact mechanism and relationships remain nebulous with mixed evidence 2 , 3 . Since the landmark Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) study 4 , overwhelming evidence suggests that childhood stress and adversity (e.g., violence, neglect) are associated with a plethora of negative health outcomes including many of the leading causes of mortality 5 . The relationship between stress and negative health outcomes is thought to be mediated in part by increased inflammatory processes and risky health behaviors (e.g., substance use) 4 , 5 . Recently, there has been growing interest in the association between childhood stress and immune mediated diseases including MS. 6 , 7 While the literature on this topic is still scarce, preliminary evidence suggests that childhood stress is associated with decreased health-related quality of life and increased fatigue in people with MS (PwMS) 8 , 9 . The literature examining the relationship between childhood stress and adversity with MS related outcomes is currently limited by a failure to include a lifetime approach to the assessment of stressful life events 10 . The childhood stress experience impacts the adult stress experience (e.g., increased perception of stress, pain), and failure to account for both could limit insight on this topic 11 , 12 . To date, there has been only one published study to apply a comprehensive lifespan approach to examine the association between stress and MS features. Results indicated that both child and adult stressors were related to worse disability in PwMS 13 . Yet, when evaluating relapse burden, childhood stress was not a significant predictor after adult stressors were added to the model, indicating shared contributions and the possibility that proximal stressors may have a greater impact on health outcomes. Results highlight the importance of including stressors across the lifetime when examining contributions of stressors on MS related outcomes 13 . 1.1 Potential mediators There has also been little research examining the relationship between stressful events starting in childhood and MS severity that have accounted for other variables known to be related to both stress and MS disease burden. The association between lifetime stressors and MS health is likely not only direct. Indeed, previous studies have identified potential mediators, which are variables that are caused by the independent variable and influence the dependent variable. For example, it is well known that stress exposure is associated with worse mental health, health risk behaviors (e.g., tobacco smoking), and increased sleep disturbance 12 , 14 , 15 . In turn, psychological distress, smoking, and sleep problems are known to be related worse MS outcomes 16 - 18 . PwMS have a higher lifetime prevalence of mental health challenges including depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, adjustment disorders, and psychotic disorders 19 - 21 . The prevalence and severity of sleep disturbances, including poor sleep quality, sleep fragmentation, sleep apnea, insomnia, and restless legs syndrome (RLS), are increased in PwMS 22 - 24 . Despite their high prevalence and impact, sleep disturbances often go unrecognized and untreated 25 , contributing to other symptoms as well as diminishing quality of life in PwMS 24 , 26 , 27 . Lastly, tobacco smoking is particularly harmful in the context of MS 28 . Through inflammatory and immune processes, smokers have 50% higher risk of developing MS, progress faster through the disease continuum with increased disability and relapses 29 - 31 . Further, some evidence linked smoking to reduced effectiveness of some DMTs 32 , 33 , yet disability and the overall disease course can improve after cessation 30 . Smoking has rarely been accounted for while evaluating relationships between childhood stress and MS, and smoking, mental health issues, and sleep have never been evaluated as mediators between lifetime stress and MS outcomes 10 . Another important potential mediator of the association between stressful life event and health outcomes is psychological resilience. Resilience is defined as “the process and outcome of successfully adapting to difficult or challenging life experiences, especially through mental, emotional, and behavioral flexibility and adjustment to external and internal demands” 34 . Individuals with MS benefit from resilience as it empowers them to surmount challenges and barriers associated with the uncertainties of MS and its symptoms 35 . PwMS with heightened resiliency appear to have enhanced quality of life and better mental health 36 , 37 . Numerous determinants of resilience in MS have been identified. Individual characteristics, such as personality traits like optimism and problem-focused coping strategies 38 , 39 . Additionally, social support has consistently emerged as a critical factor in promoting resilience and improving health-related quality of life for individuals with MS 37 . Yet, resilience has not yet been evaluated as a potential mediator between lifetime stressors and health outcomes amongst PwMS. 1.2 Aim The aim of this study was to examine the direct and potential mediating pathways between lifetime stressors and severity of MS symptoms through other factors known to be associated with both exposure to stressors and MS symptoms. More specifically, we examined resilience, mental health, smoking, and sleep disturbances as mediators between lifetime stressors and MS severity. 2. Methods This study is a secondary data analysis of the Stress-MS dataset approved by Duke University IRB. PwMS were recruited to complete an online survey through the US National MS Society email listserv in October 2021. Additional details can be found in the original papers 13 , 40 . Eligible participants were US-based adults with MS who consented to the online survey during the month of recruitment. Those without a diagnosis of MS were ineligible. The described methodological procedures followed the indications of the APA Standards for Quantitative Research 41 and the checklist for Structural Equation Modeling described by Kang and Ahn 42 . 2.1 Measures and model indicators 2.1.1 Lifetime stressors Lifetime Stressors included a count of stressors and cumulative sum severity of stressors, measured by the Stress and Adversity Inventory - STRAIN 43 . The STRAIN tool is a NIMH/RDoC (Research Domain Criteria) recommended instrument, which effectively and dependably evaluates an individual’s aggregated experience with stressors spanning childhood and adulthood, totaling 55 different stressors. Examples include childhood abuse, financial strain, inter-personal or community violence, and discrimination. Stressor severity items are scored on a scale from “Very slightly or not at all” to “Extremely” and then summed. Higher scores for severity or count represent higher stress levels. Stressors were assessed as the cumulative adult count/severity. 2.1.2 Resilience The Multiple Sclerosis Resiliency Scale (MSRS) 44 is a comprehensive self-report measure specifically tailored to the unique challenges and experiences faced by individuals living with MS and spans from before their disease to the present. The MSRS contains 25 items on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree” to 4 = “strongly agree”), the higher the score, the greater the level of resilience. The measure includes five subscales: Emotional and Cognitive Strategies (13 items; e.g. “I can deal with the stress related to my MS”); Physical Activity and Diet (3 items, e.g., “Exercising helps me reduce my stress”); MS Peer Support (2 Items; e.g. “I have learned to reach out to others with MS”); Support from Family and Friends (5 Items; e.g. “I have supportive relationships on while I can rely”); and Spirituality (2 Items, e.g. “Having belief in a higher power helps me deal with my MS”). The MSRS total score is calculated by adding the 25 items together, this total score was used in the model. The validity and reliability study showed good internal consistency results for the total score (Cronbach’s α = 0.84) and ranged from fair to excellent for the five subscales (0.74 to 0.91). Since some MSRS questions ask about a longer length of time retrospectively than the other measures, it was modeled as the first mediator. 2.1.3 Mental Health Issues Mental Health Issues was comprised of two Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) tools 45 , 46 . PROMIS Anxiety (4 item) and PROMIS Depression (4 item) captured symptoms of both. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with respective scores ranging from 4 to 20. Elevated scores on these scales are indicative of more severe symptomatology. 2.1.4 Sleep Disturbance Sleep disturbance was measured with the PROMIS Sleep 46 (4 item) which captures sleep quality and sleep difficulties over the past week on a 5-point Likert scale. Examples include “My sleep quality was…” (very good to very poor), and “I had a problem with my sleep” (Not at all to very much). A sleep disturbance score is obtained by the sum of the 4 items responses. 2.1.5 Smoking The variable Smoking is assessed with a single item self-report history with tobacco (Never smoker; Ex-smoker; Current or social smoker). 2.1.6 MS severity MS severity was assessed through fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, disability level, and relapse burden changes since Covid-19 onset. Fatigue over the past week was measured by PROMIS Fatigue-MS (8 item), which was developed from the PROMIS fatigue item bank with the aid of input from MS patients and clinical experts 47 . This scale has a 5-point Likert scale from “Never” to “Always”. Examples include “How often are you too tired to think clearly?” and “How often did you have trouble finishing things because of your fatigue?” The scoring of the PROMIS Fatigue-MS 8 item is based on a T-score metric, whereby elevated scores are indicative of heightened levels of fatigue. Pain intensity over the past week was measured by PROMIS Pain Intensity 46 (3 item), with a 5-point Likert scale from “Had no pain” to “Very severe pain”. Examples include “How intense was your average pain?” and. “How intense was your pain at its worst?” Pain Interference over the past week was measured by PROMIS Pain Interference 46 (8 item) with a 5-point Likert scale from Not at all to Very much. Examples include “How much did pain interfere with your day-to-day activity?” and “How much did pain interfere with things you usually do for fun?” Relapse burden was measured by participants reporting how their relapses have changed since COVID-19. For example, a worse burden (e.g., more frequent, disabling, painful, longer relapses), no change, a lighter burden (e.g., less painful, fatiguing, shorter), or no relapses between March 2020 and data collection in October 2021. Disability was measured by the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), an accepted measure for measuring MS disability. Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) is a validated patient reported scale of MS disability 48 , 49 . This is a 1-item scale with scores ranging from 0-8 representing the progression from normal function (0) to being bedridden (8). Scores are commonly converted to categorical outcomes for interpretability of mild, moderate, or severe disability 48 , which was implemented in this study. 2.2 Measurement and Structural Model setting We first developed a measurement model that assessed the structure and adequacy of the measurement of the latent variables. In this model, we had three latent variables, defined in the measure session (Lifetime Stressors, Mental Health Issues, and MS Severity). Lifetime Stressor is an exogenous variable and the main predictor in our model. Mental Health is a mediator, functioning as endogenous and exogenous. MS severity is an endogenous variable, the main outcome in the model. Next, we developed a causal diagram based on previous literature to display the hypothesized association between Lifetime Stressors and MS severity, mediated by mental health severity, sleep disturbance and smoking. The structural model depicts the hypothesized association paths between the exogenous variables with MS severity, mediated by mental health issues, sleep disturbance and smoke. Our hypothesized model assumed a path from Lifetime Stressors to Resilience (mediation) and a direct path to MS severity. Resilience has a path to Mental Health Issues, Sleep Disturbance and Smoking (mediation) and a direct path to MS Severity. Mental Health Issues, Sleep Disturbance and Smoking have a path to the outcome, MS severity. The model was specified to be identified following the consideration that a SEM model must have fewer parameters than observed variables. According to Figure 1 , a difference between the number of observed variables included in the model (45) and the number of parameters to be estimated (31) results in 14 degrees of freedom of the mode. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Measurement model: impact of Lifetime Stressors on MS Severity mediated by Resilience, Mental Health Issues, Sleep Disturbance and Smoking. 2.3 Data analysis Summary statistics were generated for the participant demographics as well as for the measures employed in the model. We used mean results (with confidence interval), standard deviation, frequency, and percentage for sociodemographic variables. Polychoric correlations were used to depict the association of all indicators included in the. We also used Structural equation modeling (SEM) 50 approach to evaluate the association of Stressors and Multiple Sclerosis Severity, and the mediation role of resilience, mental health, sleep disturbances and smoking. All analyses were undertaken using a significance level of p < 0.05. and conducted with R Language for Statistical Computing, version 4.3.0 51 , Correlation structures were estimated using the qgraph package 52 and SEM models were fit using the lavaan package version 0.6-16 53 . 2.3.1 SEM estimation, evaluation and modification We estimated the SEM model using Weighted Least Squares Mean and Variance Adjusted (WLSMV) method. This approach has been reported to adjust for mixed-data models including categorical data indicators. This is a robust estimator that is less sensitive to violations of normality than other estimators maximum likelihood based estimators 50 . For the treatment of missing data, we used an imputation of values for variables from Likert scales, and the method of most frequent category for categorical variables 54 . We iteratively tested the SEM models and presented measures of association for the direct, indirect, and total coefficients of association between variables. We examined the goodness of fit of the constructed models using the chi-squared (χ2) test with the degree of freedom to compare the proposed model to a saturated model. To complement the result of the chi-square test, we used other measures, GFI, AGFI, RMSEA (with CI), CFI, and TLI. The GFI (Goodness-of-Fit Index) and AGFI (Adjusted GFI) indices are indices of general adjustment of the model, and their values close to 1 are considered ideal, with values above 0.90 considered acceptable. The CFI (Comparative Fit Index) and TLI (Tucker Lewis Index) measures are indices that compare the performance of the model with the null model (without variables), for these measures, the ideal values are close to 1, being at least 0.90 an optimal value. The RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation) is a parsimony index that attempts to correct flaws in the chi-square measure, considering ideal values below 0.08 55 , 56 . We tested the hypothesized model and inspected the modification indices to evaluate the model structure changes, evaluating the relationship of the errors of measurement and endogenous variables. We also tested variations of the model to evaluate its plausibility, equivalency and parsimony with a fully mediated path and partially mediated path. 3. Results Aligning with much MS research, participants were mostly women (83.7%), with average age of 48.7 (SD 12.8, ranging from 18 to 85 years). The mean age of onset of symptoms was 30.4 years (SD 10.4), and the mean age at diagnosis was 35.8 years (SD 10.3). The predominant type of MS was Relapsing Remitting (79.1%), followed by Progressive Relapsing (1.4%). Regarding education, 36.6% of the participants had a bachelor’s degree and 26.8% had a master’s degree. Household income varied widely, with the most common income range being over $150,000 (20.9%), followed by $50,000 to $74,999 (16.1%) and $75,000 to $99,999 (14.9%) ( Table 1 ). Correlations among study variables are found in Table 2 . View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Subject demographics View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2: Correlation between model variables 4.1 SEM model estimation Our model specification is depicted in Figure 1 , along with the estimated path coefficients. This model 1 showed adequate goodness of fit indices with respect to the available data ( Table 3 ). The latent variables in the measurement models showed adequate adjustments with factor loadings. To test the hypothesis that the effect of the lifetime stressors on the MS severity is fully mediated by the mediating variables, an alternative model (Model 2) was tested. This model presents the same characteristics as the already tested Model 1, however, without the direct paths between Lifetime Stressors and MS Severity and between Resilience and MS Severity. The fit indices for Models 1 and 2 are displayed in Table 3 . View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 3. Fit indices of tested Models Lifetime Stressors (LFS), Mental Health Issues (MHI), Sleep Disturbance (SD), and Smoking (SMO) were all significantly and positively associated with MS severity, meaning that as stressors, mental health issues, sleep disturbance and smoking all increased, so did MS severity. Although not significant, resilience was negatively associated with MS Severity (β=0.085, P=.192), suggesting that as resilience increased the severity of MS symptoms decreased. Also notable, there was a negative association between lifetime stressors and resilience which indicates that PwMS who experienced more stressors reported lower resilience scores ( Figure 1 ). Direct and total effect estimates are displayed in Table 4 . View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 4. Standardized path coefficients: Direct, indirect, and total effects As seen in Table 4 , lifetime stressors positively affected (i.e. worsened) MS severity indirectly through resilience and mental health issues, sleep disturbances, and smoking. In contrast to the direct pathway, the indirect effects from resilience to MS severity through mental health issues, sleep disturbance, and smoking highlight that resilience does significantly negatively relate to (i.e. reduce) MS severity through these three mediators, when not accounting for lifetime stressors. When accounting for stressors the total effect is positive, indicating that resilience may help mitigate risk but does not fully counter the effect of lifetime stressors. 4. Discussion This study is the first to elucidate pathways that underlie the association between lifetime stressors and MS severity, through several addressable conditions that could ultimately serve as targets for future mitigation and prevention efforts. Research on comprehensively measured lifetime stressors and MS outcomes is scarce, and little attention has been given to positive factors such as resilience or other mediating pathways to MS severity. As expected, each exposure studied mediated relationships between stressors and adverse MS outcomes, highlighting resilience, mental health, sleep, and smoking as potential avenues for mitigating risk for more severe MS symptoms. Surprisingly, the direct relationship from resilience to MS severity was not statistically significant, however, the indirect pathways from resilience through smoking, mental health, and sleep were significant. This suggests that resilience could be an upstream target for intervention to have earlier influence over health outcomes and/or behaviors that subsequently have downstream effects on the severity of MS disease burden. However, the direct relationship from stressors to MS severity was significant, supporting that stressors would be a further upstream target for intervention. Indeed, the prevention or minimization of stress exposure for all people with MS requires action at the policy and public health level. On a macroscopic level, addressing financial strain, unstable housing, discrimination, and provisions for mental health support, substance use and domestic violence could help lessen acute and chronic stress and subsequently optimize health for PwMS and beyond. Recently, for the first time, the World Health Organization (WHO) listed MS disease modifying therapies on the Essential Medication List 57 . Policies that follow this lead to continue to improve MS treatment access, coverage, and affordability, may have long term impact on the financial stress of PwMS, as MS is the second most costly chronic disease in the US 1 . However, until such policies can be implemented, more needs to be done to enhance resilience and mitigate said pathways in individuals. On an individual level, in line with our findings, Novak and Lev-Ari (2023) found a relationship between resilience, adult stress, and sleep quality in PwMS, and that higher levels of resilience are associated with better mental and physical health outcomes in the context of MS 58 . Moreover, fostering resilience is associated with improved management of challenges in aging PwMS. Higher levels of resilience contribute to better quality of life and overall well-being in older PwMS 59 . Resilience is a multifaceted process influenced by various interrelated systems that requires a comprehensive, culturally sensitive approach when supporting individuals in stressed environments. The intricate interplay of various factors from diverse systems, such as personal, familial, social, cultural, and environmental collectively contribute to an individual’s ability to effectively cope with adversity 60 , 61 . Ungar and Theron’s foundational article in The Lancet Psychiatry (2020) established a theoretical framework of multisystemic resilience 62 . It underscores the significance of considering multiple factors simultaneously to understand how resilience is fostered in young individuals facing challenges 62 . This is of high significance for PwMS. The individual strengths, familial support, community resources, and cultural values will play a significant and crucial role in promoting MS recovery and positive mental health outcomes. Our results emphasize the need for more mixed-methods and multi-modal approaches and cross-cultural comparisons to capture the complexities and adaptability of resilience across diverse environments in MS 63 . Our findings along with other research generally highlight the need for more complex, perhaps multi-modal, intervention approaches that could target resilience and additional mediators like sleep, mental health, and smoking in PwMS. Emerging research that investigated the effectiveness of a group resilience intervention for PwMS delivered through frontline services found it to be a potential way to improve psychological well-being and coping skills 64 . This group-based intervention provided a supportive environment for sharing experiences and developing effective strategies to manage the impact of the disease. In addition to resilience, emotional competencies in MS were explored by Sadeghi-Bahmani and colleagues 65 , 66 . Their research delves into understanding the role of emotional competencies in PwMS, with a focus on emotional regulation and processing, and has even used a multi-modal approach of mindfulness based stress reduction coupled with acceptance and commitment therapy 66 . Emotional competencies, such as emotional regulation, have been found to be associated with better psychological well-being and coping abilities in PwMS. Understanding and promoting resilience, along with emotional competencies, in PwMS can have profound implications for enhancing their ability to cope with stressors and improve health and wellness. Further research and the development of MS-focused resilience interventions which have built in components of, or are in tandem with, mental health, sleep, and smoking interventions may hold the most promising avenues for supporting PwMS to combat prevalent burdensome symptoms like fatigue. Fatigue is highly debilitating, affects around 80% of PwMS, and is a leading cause of diminished quality of life and reduced social participation 67 , 68 . Despite its impact, existing interventions to treat fatigue are only modestly to moderately effective for a subset of individuals, making the identification of treatable secondary contributors a high priority. While the biological underpinnings of fatigue in MS are heterogeneous, substantial evidence has linked sleep disturbances to MS fatigue 23 , 69 , 70 . Furthermore, recent work suggest that sleep behaviors have the potential to affect response to fatigue interventions 71 , 72 . Our findings that smoking is a mediator for MS severity highlights how multi-modal interventions that address resilience factors in addition to smoking cessation treatment may have the highest potential for impact. Ongoing clinical trials have shown promising results using a multi-modal approach combining 1) Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with health education, stress, and coping components, 2) Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) and 3) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as a tailored smoking cessation intervention for veterans with PTSD 73 . However, there has not yet been a single- or multi-modal tailored intervention developed for MS despite evidence of disease specific concerns regarding quitting 28 , 74 . For example, people with MS have reported concern over the stress of quitting causing MS relapses, increased anxiety, uncertainty about adverse drug reactions, and the desire to have MS-focused information as motivation to quit 74 , 75 . Evidence from Australia highlights that PwMS are not satisfied with the cessation care they get, yet, we currently lack a US perspective regarding programmatic preferences and barriers for cessation treatment 75 . 4.1 Clinical implications Referrals for sleep disturbances, smoking cessation clinics, and mental health treatment could be implemented in parallel with standard MS treatment to promote better health outcomes. While smoking intervention research for PwMS is lacking, there is much evidence that sleep and mental health interventions can improve the health and wellbeing of PwMS. Efforts should be made to strengthen the referral pathway from neurology and primary care providers to these adjunct treatments. An implementation science lens would be a good approach for future research to investigate how to best integrate or strengthen the screening and referral workflow to connect more PwMS to these existing services. 4.2 Limitations Pertinent limitations include cross-sectional data; however, temporal ordering can at least be established with childhood and previous stressors and outcomes in adults. These findings may not generalize to all PwMS as this sample was only a small portion of the National MS Society listserv (nearly 80,000). However, this sample does generally align with conventional US MS research samples including very large studies 76 and large studies that have similarly used the NMSS listserv 77 . 5. Conclusion This work is foundational to improving conceptualization of stress, protective factors, responding behaviors, and the severity of MS disease burden. Several significant mediating pathways were found from stressors to MS severity, through resilience, sleep, mental health, and smoking. This highlights potential upstream targets for intervention across sociopolitical and individual levels. In conjunction with usual care, increasing referrals to existing treatment services for mental health, sleep disturbances, and smoking cessation could have synergistic positive benefits to the health and wellbeing of PwMS. Data Availability Data in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors Footnotes ↵ * Denotes co-senior authorship Funding: C.S. Polick was supported by NIH/NINR grant #T32NR016914 Complexity: Innovations for Promoting Health and Safety, the Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI), and the Durham VA. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders. COI statement: The authors of this original work have no conflicts of interest. REFERENCES 1. ↵ Hartung DM . Health economics of disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis in the United States . Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders . 2021 ; 14 : 1756286420987031 . 2. ↵ Artemiadis AK , Anagnostouli MC , Alexopoulos EC . Stress as a risk factor for multiple sclerosis onset or relapse: a systematic review . Neuroepidemiology . 2011 ; 36 ( 2 ): 109 – 120 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 3. ↵ Briones-Buixassa L , Montañés-Masias B , Milà-Villaroel R , et al. The bidirectional effect of stress and functionality in multiple sclerosis and the interaction role of anxiety, coping and social support . Journal of Psychosomatic Research . 2023 ; 170 : 111375 . 4. ↵ Felitti VJ , Anda RF , Nordenberg D , et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study . American journal of preventive medicine . 1998 ; 14 ( 4 ): 245 – 258 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 5. ↵ Grummitt LR , Kreski NT , Kim SG , Platt J , Keyes KM , McLaughlin KA . Association of childhood adversity with morbidity and mortality in US adults: a systematic review . JAMA pediatrics . 2021 ; 175 ( 12 ): 1269 – 1278 . OpenUrl 6. ↵ MacDonald TM , Fisk JD , Bernstein CN , et al. The association between childhood maltreatment and pain catastrophizing in individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases . Journal of psychosomatic research . 2021 ; 145 : 110479 . 7. ↵ Wan A , Bernstein CN , Graff LA , et al. Childhood maltreatment and psychiatric comorbidity in immune-mediated inflammatory disorders . Psychosomatic medicine . 2022 ; 84 ( 1 ): 10 – 19 . OpenUrl CrossRef 8. ↵ Eilam-Stock T , Links , J. , Khan , N. Z. , Bacon , T. E. , Zuniga , G. , Laing , L. , Sammarco , C. , Sherman , K. , Charvet , L. Adverse childhood experiences predict reaction to multiple sclerosis diagnosis . Health Psychology Open . 2021 ; 8 ( 2 ): 1 – 11 . doi: 10.1177/20551029211052830 OpenUrl CrossRef 9. ↵ Pust GE , Dettmers C , Randerath J , et al. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis is associated with childhood adversities . Frontiers in psychiatry . 2020 ; 11 : 811 . 10. ↵ Polick CS , Polick SR , Stoddard SA . Relationships between childhood trauma and multiple sclerosis: A systematic review . Journal of psychosomatic research . 2022 ; 160 : 110981 . doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110981 OpenUrl CrossRef 11. ↵ Albott CS , Forbes MK , Anker JJ . Association of childhood adversity with differential susceptibility of transdiagnostic psychopathology to environmental stress in adulthood . JAMA network open . 2018 ; 1 ( 7 ): e185354 – e185354 . doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5354 OpenUrl CrossRef 12. ↵ Tesarz J , Eich W , Treede R-D , Gerhardt A . Altered pressure pain thresholds and increased wind-up in adult patients with chronic back pain with a history of childhood maltreatment: a quantitative sensory testing study . Pain . 2016 ; 157 ( 8 ): 1799 – 1809 . doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000586 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Polick CS , Ploutz-Snyder RJ , Braley TJ , Connell CM , Stoddard SA . Associations among stressors across the lifespan, disability, and relapses in adults with multiple sclerosis . Brain & Behavior . 2023 ; 13 ( 5 ): e3073 . doi: 10.1002/brb3.3073 OpenUrl CrossRef 14. ↵ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Fast Facts: Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences . 2023 . https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/fastfact.html 15. ↵ Sullivan K , Rochani H , Huang L-T , Donley DK , Zhang J . Adverse childhood experiences affect sleep duration for up to 50 years later . Sleep . 2019 ; 42 ( 7 ):zsz087. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz087 OpenUrl CrossRef 16. ↵ Manouchehrinia A , Huang J , Hillert J , et al. Smoking attributable risk in multiple sclerosis . Frontiers in Immunology . 2022 ; 13 : 845 . doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.840158 OpenUrl CrossRef 17. Braley TJ , Boudreau EA . Sleep disorders in multiple sclerosis . Current neurology and neuroscience reports . 2016 ; 16 : 1 – 8 . doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0649-2 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Heitmann H , Andlauer TF , Korn T , et al. Fatigue, depression, and pain in multiple sclerosis: how neuroinflammation translates into dysfunctional reward processing and anhedonic symptoms . Multiple Sclerosis Journal . 2022 ; 28 ( 7 ): 1020 – 1027 . doi: 10.1177/1352458520972279 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Minden SL , Feinstein A , Kalb RC , et al. Evidence-based guideline: assessment and management of psychiatric disorders in individuals with MS: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology . Neurology . 2014 ; 82 ( 2 ): 174 – 181 . doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000013 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. Corallo F , Lo Buono V , Genovese R , et al. A complex relation between depression and multiple sclerosis: a descriptive review . Neurological Sciences . 2019 ; 40 : 1551 – 1558 . doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-03889-1 OpenUrl CrossRef 21. ↵ Silveira C , Guedes R , Maia D , Curral R , Coelho R . Neuropsychiatric symptoms of multiple sclerosis: state of the art . Psychiatry investigation . 2019 ; 16 ( 12 ): 877 . doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0106 OpenUrl CrossRef 22. ↵ Braley TJ , Segal BM , Chervin RD . Sleep-disordered breathing in multiple sclerosis . Neurology . 2012 ; 79 ( 9 ): 929 – 936 . doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318266fa9d OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 23. ↵ Braley TJ , Segal BM , Chervin RD . Obstructive sleep apnea and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis . Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine . 2014 ; 10 ( 2 ): 155 – 162 . doi: 10.5664/jcsm.3442 OpenUrl CrossRef 24. ↵ Braley TJ , Shieu MM , Zaheed AB , Dunietz GL . Pathways between multiple sclerosis, sleep disorders, and cognitive function: Longitudinal findings from The Nurses’ Health Study . Multiple Sclerosis Journal . 2023 ; 29 ( 3 ): 436 – 446 . doi: 10.1177/13524585221144215 OpenUrl CrossRef 25. ↵ Braley TJ , Segal BM , Chervin RD . Obstructive sleep apnea is an under-recognized and consequential morbidity in multiple sclerosis . Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine . 2014 ; 10 ( 6 ): 709 – 710 . doi: 10.5664/jcsm.3820 OpenUrl CrossRef 26. ↵ Valentine TR , Kratz AL , Kaplish N , Chervin RD , Braley TJ . Sleep-disordered breathing and neurocognitive function in multiple sclerosis: Differential associations across cognitive domains . Multiple Sclerosis Journal . 2023 : 13524585231169465 . doi: 10.1177/13524585231169465 OpenUrl CrossRef 27. ↵ Kołtuniuk A , Kazimierska-Zając M , Pogłódek D , Chojdak-Łukasiewicz J . Sleep disturbances, degree of disability and the quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 2022 ; 19 ( 6 ): 3271 . doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063271 OpenUrl CrossRef 28. ↵ Polick CS , Rubenstein D , Shah S , Beckham J.C. , Calhoun PS , Noonan D . Addressing smoking in persons with Multiple Sclerosis: State of the science and need for a targeted intervention . Nicotine and Tobacco Research . 2023 : 1 – 3 . doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad159 OpenUrl CrossRef 29. ↵ Hedström AK , Bäärnhielm M , Olsson T , Alfredsson L . Tobacco smoking, but not Swedish snuff use, increases the risk of multiple sclerosis . Neurology . 2009 ; 73 ( 9 ): 696 – 701 . doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b59c40 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 30. ↵ Tanasescu R , Constantinescu CS , Tench CR , Manouchehrinia A . Smoking cessation and the reduction of disability progression in multiple sclerosis: a cohort study . Nicotine and Tobacco Research . 2018 ; 20 ( 5 ): 589 – 595 . doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx084 OpenUrl CrossRef 31. ↵ Rosso M , Chitnis T . Association between cigarette smoking and multiple sclerosis: a review . JAMA neurology . 2020 ; 77 ( 2 ): 245 – 253 . OpenUrl 32. ↵ Bachelet D , Hässler S , Mbogning C , et al. Occurrence of anti-drug antibodies against interferon-beta and natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: a collaborative cohort analysis . PloS one . 2016 ; 11 ( 11 ): e0162752 . OpenUrl 33. ↵ Hedström A , Alfredsson L , Lundkvist Ryner M , Fogdell-Hahn A , Hillert J , Olsson T . Smokers run increased risk of developing anti-natalizumab antibodies . Multiple Sclerosis Journal . 2014 ; 20 ( 8 ): 1081 – 1085 . doi: 10.1177/1352458513515086 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 34. ↵ American Psychological Association . APA Dictionary of Psychology: Resilience . 2023 . https://dictionary.apa.org/resilience 35. ↵ Silverman AM , Verrall AM , Alschuler KN , Smith AE , Ehde DM . Bouncing back again, and again: a qualitative study of resilience in people with multiple sclerosis . Disability and Rehabilitation . 2017 ; 39 ( 1 ): 14 – 22 . doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1138556 OpenUrl CrossRef 36. ↵ Kasser SL , Zia A . Mediating role of resilience on quality of life in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a structural equation modeling approach . Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation . 2020 ; 101 ( 7 ): 1152 – 1161 . doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.02.010 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 37. ↵ Koelmel E , Hughes AJ , Alschuler KN , Ehde DM . Resilience mediates the longitudinal relationships between social support and mental health outcomes in multiple sclerosis . Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation . 2017 ; 98 ( 6 ): 1139 – 1148 . doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.09.127 OpenUrl CrossRef 38. ↵ Gromisch ES , Neto LO , Sloan J , Tyry T , Foley FW . Using the Multiple Sclerosis Resiliency Scale to identify psychological distress in persons with multiple sclerosis . Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders . 2021 ; 53 : 103079 . doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103079 OpenUrl CrossRef 39. ↵ Tan-Kristanto S , Kiropoulos LA . Resilience, self-efficacy, coping styles and depressive and anxiety symptoms in those newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis . Psychology, health & medicine . 2015 ; 20 ( 6 ): 635 – 645 . doi: 10.1080/13548506.2014.999810 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 40. ↵ Polick CS , Ploutz-Snyder RJ , Braley TJ , Connell CM , Stoddard SA . Fatigue, pain interference, and psychiatric morbidity in multiple sclerosis: The role of childhood stress . PLOS ONE . 2023 ; 18 ( 10 ): e0292233 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292233 OpenUrl CrossRef 41. ↵ Appelbaum M , Cooper H , Kline RB , Mayo-Wilson E , Nezu AM , Rao SM . Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report . American Psychologist . 2018 ; 73 ( 1 ): 3 . doi: 10.1037/amp0000191 OpenUrl CrossRef 42. ↵ Kang H , Ahn J-W . Model setting and interpretation of results in research using structural equation modeling: A checklist with guiding questions for reporting . Asian Nursing Research . 2021 ; 15 ( 3 ): 157 – 162 . doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2021.06.001 OpenUrl CrossRef 43. ↵ Slavich GM , Shields GS . Assessing lifetime stress exposure using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An overview and initial validation . Psychosomatic Medicine . 2018 ; 80 ( 1 ): 17 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 44. ↵ Gromisch ES , Sloan J , Zemon V , et al. Development of the Multiple Sclerosis Resiliency Scale (MSRS) . Rehabilitation psychology . 2018 ; 63 ( 3 ): 357 . doi: 10.1037/rep0000219 OpenUrl CrossRef 45. ↵ Cella D , Riley W , Stone A , et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008 . Journal of clinical epidemiology . 2010 ; 63 ( 11 ): 1179 – 1194 . doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 46. ↵ Health Measures . PROMIS: Why Use PROMIS? https://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis 47. ↵ Cook KF , Bamer AM , Roddey TS , Kraft GH , Kim J , Amtmann D . A PROMIS fatigue short form for use by individuals who have multiple sclerosis . Quality of Life Research 2012 ; 21 : 1021 – 1030 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 48. ↵ Learmonth YC , Motl RW , Sandroff BM , Pula JH , Cadavid D . Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis . BMC neurology . 2013 ; 13 ( 1 ): 1 – 8 . OpenUrl 49. ↵ Marrie RA , McFadyen C , Yaeger L , Salter A . A systematic review of the validity and reliability of the patient-determined disease steps scale . International Journal of MS Care . 2023 ; 25 ( 1 ): 20 – 25 . doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2021-102 OpenUrl CrossRef 50. ↵ Kline RB . Principles and practice of structural equation modeling . Guilford publications ; 2023 . 51. ↵ R Core Team . R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing . https://www.r-project.org/ 52. ↵ Epskamp S , Cramer AOJ , Waldorp LJ , Schmittmann VD , Borsboom D. qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data . Journal of Statistical Software . 2012 ; 48 ( 4 ): 1 – 18 . doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i04 OpenUrl CrossRef 53. ↵ Rosseel Y . lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of statistical software . 2012 ; 48 : 1-36 . doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02 OpenUrl CrossRef 54. ↵ Wu W , Jia F , Enders C . A comparison of imputation strategies for ordinal missing data on Likert scale variables . Multivariate behavioral research . 2015 ; 50 ( 5 ): 484 – 503 . doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1022644 OpenUrl CrossRef 55. ↵ Hu Lt , Bentler PM . Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives . Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal . 1999 ; 6 ( 1 ): 1 – 55 . doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science 56. ↵ Marsh HW , Hau K-T , Grayson D . Goodness of fit in structural equation models . 2005 ; 57. ↵ World Health Organization (WHO) . WHO endorses landmark public health decisions on Essential Medicines for Multiple Sclerosis . https://www.who.int/news/item/26-07-2023-who-endorses-landmark-public-health-decisions-on-essential-medicines-for-multiple-sclerosis#:~:text=Today%20the%20World%20Health%20Organization,and%20cardiovascular%20conditions%2C%20among%20others . 58. ↵ Novak AM , Lev-Ari S . Resilience, stress, well-being, and sleep quality in multiple sclerosis . Journal of Clinical Medicine . 2023 ; 12 ( 2 ): 716 . doi: 10.3390/jcm12020716 OpenUrl CrossRef 59. ↵ Ploughman M , Downer M , Pretty R , et al. The impact of resilience on healthy aging with multiple sclerosis . Quality of Life Research . 2020 ; 29 ( 10 ): 2769 – 2779 . doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02521-6 OpenUrl CrossRef 60. ↵ Theron L , Murphy K , Ungar M . Multisystemic resilience: Learning from youth in stressed environments . Youth & Society . 2022 ; 54 ( 6 ): 1000 – 1022 . doi: 10.1177/0044118X211017335 OpenUrl CrossRef 61. ↵ Theron L , Rothmann S , Höltge J , Ungar M . Differential adaptation to adversity: A latent profile analysis of youth engagement with resilience-enabling cultural resources and mental health outcomes in a stressed Canadian and South African community . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology . 2022 ; 53 ( 3-4 ): 403 – 425 . doi: 10.1177/00220221221077353 OpenUrl CrossRef 62. ↵ Ungar M , Theron L . Resilience and mental health: How multisystemic processes contribute to positive outcomes . The Lancet Psychiatry . 2020 ; 7 ( 5 ): 441 – 448 . doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30434-1 OpenUrl CrossRef 63. ↵ Ungar M , Theron L , Murphy K , Jefferies P . Researching multisystemic resilience: A sample methodology . Frontiers in Psychology . 2021 ; 11 : 3808 . doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607994 OpenUrl CrossRef 64. ↵ Giovannetti AM , Solari A , Pakenham KI . Effectiveness of a group resilience intervention for people with multiple sclerosis delivered via frontline services . Disability and Rehabilitation . 2022 ; 44 ( 22 ): 6582 – 6592 . doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1960441 OpenUrl CrossRef 65. ↵ Sadeghi-Bahmani D , Motl RW , Bahmani LS , et al. Emotional competencies in multiple sclerosis . Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders . 2023 ; 78 : 104896 . doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104896 OpenUrl CrossRef 66. ↵ Sadeghi-Bahmani D , Esmaeili L , Mokhtari F , et al. Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) on symptoms and emotional competencies in individuals with multiple sclerosis . Multiple sclerosis and related disorders . 2022 ; 67 : 104029 . doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104029 OpenUrl CrossRef 67. ↵ Oliva Ramirez A , Keenan A , Kalau O , Worthington E , Cohen L , Singh S . Prevalence and burden of multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: a systematic literature review . BMC neurology . 2021 ; 21 : 1 – 16 . doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02396-1 OpenUrl CrossRef 68. ↵ Allataifeh E , Khalil H , Almhdawi K , et al. The clinical correlates of participation levels in people with multiple sclerosis . NeuroRehabilitation . 2020 ; 47 ( 2 ): 153 – 160 . doi: 10.3233/NRE-203131 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 69. ↵ Kaminska M , Kimoff R , Benedetti A , et al. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with fatigue in multiple sclerosis . Multiple Sclerosis Journal . 2012 ; 18 ( 8 ): 1159 – 1169 . doi: 10.1177/1352458511432328 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 70. ↵ Whibley D , Goldstein C , Kratz AL , Braley TJ . A multidimensional approach to sleep health in multiple sclerosis . Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders . 2021 ; 56 : 103271 . doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103271 OpenUrl CrossRef 71. ↵ Kratz AL , Alschuler KN , Ehde DM , et al. A randomized pragmatic trial of telephone-delivered cognitive behavioral-therapy, modafinil, and combination therapy of both for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: the design of the “COMBO-MS” trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials . 2019 ; 84 : 105821 . doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105821 OpenUrl CrossRef 72. ↵ Braley TJ , Alschuler K , Ehde D , et al. A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Telephone-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Modafinil, and Combination Therapy of Both Interventions for Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: Primary Results From the COMBO-MS. presented at: ACTRIMS ; 2023 ; San Diego, CA. 73. ↵ Young JR , Galla JT , Polick CS , et al. Multimodal smoking cessation treatment combining transcranial magnetic stimulation, cognitive behavioral therapy, and nicotine replacement therapy in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: A feasibility randomized controlled trial protocol . medRxiv . 2023 ; doi: 10.1101/2023.09.06.23294958 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 74. ↵ Hunter A , Grech LB , Borland R , Das Nair R , White SL , Marck CH . Barriers and motivators for tobacco smoking cessation in people with multiple sclerosis . Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders . 2021 ; 54 : 103085 . doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103085 OpenUrl CrossRef 75. ↵ Weld-Blundell I , Grech L , Borland R , White SL, das Nair R , Marck CH. Smoking habits, awareness and support needs for cessation among people with multiple sclerosis in Australia: findings from an online survey. BMJ open . 2022 ; 12 ( 7 ): e059637 . doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059637 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 76. ↵ Marrie RA , Leung S , Tyry T , Cutter GR , Fox R , Salter A . Use of eHealth and mHealth technology by persons with multiple sclerosis . Multiple sclerosis and related disorders . 2019 ; 27 : 13 – 19 . doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.036 OpenUrl CrossRef 77. ↵ Braley TJ , Whibley D , Alschuler KN , et al. Cannabinoid use among Americans with MS: Current trends and gaps in knowledge . Multiple Sclerosis Journal–Experimental, Translational and Clinical . 2020 ; 6 ( 3 ): 2055217320959816 . doi: 10.1177/2055217320959816 OpenUrl CrossRef View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 07, 2024. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Resilience, mental health, sleep, and smoking mediate pathways between lifetime stressors and Multiple Sclerosis severity Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Resilience, mental health, sleep, and smoking mediate pathways between lifetime stressors and Multiple Sclerosis severity Carri S. Polick , Hala Darwish , Leo Pestillo de Olivera , Ali Watson , Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci , Patrick S. Calhoun , Robert Ploutz-Snyder , Cathleen M. Connell , Tiffany J. Braley , Sarah A. Stoddard medRxiv 2024.02.06.24302405; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.24302405 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Resilience, mental health, sleep, and smoking mediate pathways between lifetime stressors and Multiple Sclerosis severity Carri S. Polick , Hala Darwish , Leo Pestillo de Olivera , Ali Watson , Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci , Patrick S. Calhoun , Robert Ploutz-Snyder , Cathleen M. Connell , Tiffany J. Braley , Sarah A. Stoddard medRxiv 2024.02.06.24302405; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.24302405 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Neurology Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (573) Allergy and Immunology (865) Anesthesia (302) Cardiovascular Medicine (4456) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (445) Dermatology (383) Emergency Medicine (610) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1515) Epidemiology (15244) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1132) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6618) Geriatric Medicine (669) Health Economics (1002) Health Informatics (4556) Health Policy (1372) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1614) Hematology (543) HIV/AIDS (1270) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15932) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1106) Medical Education (624) Medical Ethics (147) Nephrology (670) Neurology (6632) Nursing (346) Nutrition (999) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1148) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3347) Ophthalmology (980) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (421) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (665) Pediatrics (1696) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (693) Primary Care Research (714) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5463) Public and Global Health (9254) Radiology and Imaging (2210) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1371) Respiratory Medicine (1197) Rheumatology (598) Sexual and Reproductive Health (715) Sports Medicine (532) Surgery (714) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a0304df07ff48e2e',t:'MTc4MDAwMzIzOA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.