The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study

The Influence of Safety Performance on... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490" }, "headline": "The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature...", "datePublished": "2025-05-12T09:51:46", "dateModified": "2026-03-05T12:25:50", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Bharto Ari Raharjo" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Hamidah Nayati Utami" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Tri Wulida Afrianty" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Ika Ruhana" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": "This study analyzes research trends and developments related to Safety Performance and its implementation solutions through the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) based on Scopus data from 1919 to 2023. The results showed a significant increase in publications, especially after 2000, reflecting global attention to safety issues. The main factors that affect Safety Performance include the safety culture, technology, human factors, and regulations. Key challenges include resource constraints, inconsistent regulations, and reliance on legacy technologies. Strategic solutions include strengthening safety culture, adopting modern technology, and simulation-based training. This study also highlights the role of Safety Performance in creating a competitive advantage through improved reputation, efficiency, and sustainability. These findings are relevant for supporting occupational safety, particularly in the Indonesian shipping industry." } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v4", "name": "The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the..." } } ] } Home Browse The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Raharjo BA, Utami HN, Afrianty TW and Ruhana I. The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163658.4 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Systematic Review Revised The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] Previously titled: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage: A Systematic Literature Review Study Bharto Ari Raharjo https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6520-3465 1 , Hamidah Nayati Utami 1 , Tri Wulida Afrianty 1 , Ika Ruhana 1 Bharto Ari Raharjo https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6520-3465 1 , Hamidah Nayati Utami 1 , Tri Wulida Afrianty 1 , Ika Ruhana 1 PUBLISHED 05 Mar 2026 Author details Author details 1 Brawijaya University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia Bharto Ari Raharjo Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Hamidah Nayati Utami Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Tri Wulida Afrianty Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Ika Ruhana Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS Abstract This study analyzes research trends and developments related to Safety Performance and its implementation solutions through the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) based on Scopus data from 1919 to 2023. The results showed a significant increase in publications, especially after 2000, reflecting global attention to safety issues. The main factors that affect Safety Performance include the safety culture, technology, human factors, and regulations. Key challenges include resource constraints, inconsistent regulations, and reliance on legacy technologies. Strategic solutions include strengthening safety culture, adopting modern technology, and simulation-based training. This study also highlights the role of Safety Performance in creating a competitive advantage through improved reputation, efficiency, and sustainability. These findings are relevant for supporting occupational safety, particularly in the Indonesian shipping industry. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Safety Performance, Systematic Literature Review, Occupational Safety, Competitive Advantage, Shipping Industry Corresponding Author(s) Bharto Ari Raharjo ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Bharto Ari Raharjo Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2026 Raharjo BA et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Raharjo BA, Utami HN, Afrianty TW and Ruhana I. The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163658.4 ) First published: 12 May 2025, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163658.1 ) Latest published: 05 Mar 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163658.4 ) Revised Amendments from Version 3 We revised the manuscript by adding study limitations that should be transparently stated, particularly regarding the search period and database scope. In addition, we revised the ethics statement to avoid potential misunderstanding and to clarify that this SLR used only publicly available published articles and did not involve human or animal subjects. We revised the manuscript by adding study limitations that should be transparently stated, particularly regarding the search period and database scope. In addition, we revised the ethics statement to avoid potential misunderstanding and to clarify that this SLR used only publicly available published articles and did not involve human or animal subjects. See the authors' detailed response to the review by Elriza Esterhuyzen See the authors' detailed response to the review by Benny Hutahayan READ REVIEWER RESPONSES 1. Introduction In the world of shipping, safety is not only a moral responsibility but also a source of competitive advantage. Shipping companies that are able to demonstrate a high commitment to safety have a greater chance of winning customer trust, expanding market share, and reducing operational costs owing to avoidable incidents. Based on a report by Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty, 1 75% of financial losses arise from the top 10 causes of loss, while the top three causes account for close to half (45%) of the value. By prioritizing safety, companies can create a positive reputation and ensure business sustainability amid fierce industry competition. In the context of shipping safety, the Ministry of Transportation, through the Directorate General of Sea Transportation, continues to campaign for the importance of shipping safety to the public. Shipping safety includes the fulfillment of safety and security requirements in water transportation and ports. The shipping community and sea transportation actors are expected to become increasingly aware of the importance of safety planning from the beginning to reduce the risk of accidents. Based on data from the Directorate General of Sea Transportation, there were a total of 1,453 ship accident incidents in the 2015–2023 period. Of these, 37% were sunken ships, 28% were shipwrecked, and the remainder included fires, collisions, and other incidents. The trend of shipsinking accidents shows an average annual decline of 8%. However, incidents such as ship fires showed fluctuations, with a peak of 56 cases occurring in 2018. These data demonstrate the importance of collaborative efforts between regulators, cruise operators, and the public to improve safety. Previous studies have provided a solid foundation for improving the shipping safety. Grech, Horberry, and Koester 2 in the book Human Factors in the Maritime Domain highlight the importance of human factors in improving shipping safety, especially in decision-making and operational risk management. Safety Culture Indicators to show that a strong safety culture can significantly reduce shipping incidents. 3 Meanwhile, Ekstrand and Tapaninen 4 evaluated the role of technologies such as the Automatic Identification System (AIS) and found that the implementation of this technology can reduce the risk of incidents by up to 30%. Hale et al. 5 proposed a systemic approach to safety management, emphasizing the need to integrate training, regulations, and periodic inspections to create a holistic approach that is more effective than fragmented methods. Huang et al. 6 demonstrated the potential of big data technology and predictive analytics to predict operational risks and provide early warnings to reduce the likelihood of incidents. These studies emphasize the importance of multidimensional collaboration in improving shipping safety, from strengthening safety culture to applying advanced technology. The complexity of this problem demonstrates the need for a systemic and holistic approach to understanding and improving shipping safety. To address these challenges, this study used a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. SLR is designed to identify, assess, and interpret research findings related to a particular topic. 7 This approach allows researchers to analyze the implementation of Safety Performance in depth from a theoretical and practical perspective, as well as identify relevant solutions to address shipping safety problems in Indonesia. Thus, the SLR is an important and urgent step in developing an evidence-based framework for improving marine transportation safety. 2. Literature review 2.1 Systematic Literature Review (SLR) Systematic Literature Review is a method that is currently widely used by researchers and academics to review scientific literature. This is because the SLR method can avoid bias and a subjective understanding of the research. 7 SLR has been proven to be a method that can effectively provide an overview of research trends, methodologies, and research coverage fields in previous studies. 8 , 9 A Systematic Review (SR), often referred to as a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), is a structured method used to collect, critically evaluate, integrate, and present findings from various research studies focused on a specific research question or topic. 10 This approach offers a broader and more accurate understanding than traditional literature reviews. 11 The main objectives of an SLR include identifying, examining, evaluating, and interpreting all available studies related to the topic or phenomenon of interest, as well as the relevant research questions. 12 Moreover, an SLR enables researchers to gain deep insight and analytical capability regarding the research topic while providing a comprehensive overview of the background for developing scientific work. 13 2.2 Safety performance Safety Performance is the performance of workers who prioritize safety at work by following applicable safety and health rules at work. 14 Based on the understanding provided by experts, the operational definition of Safety Performance is obtained, namely, the performance of a company in prioritizing work safety by following applicable rules. Brand 15 states that the performance component shows large behavioral dimensions that are relevant to a given task. This model combines two dimensions of Safety Performance : compliance and participation. Compliance involves and adheres to safety procedures and carries out work in a safe way, preparing and using the right safety equipment at work. Meanwhile, participation is an individual involvement that is not directly related to individual safety, but can also support the realization of a safe environment. Safety performance can be defined as the level of safety related to work within an organization that enhances resilience and reduces the risk of accidents. 16 Safety performance is also closely related to psychological factors, such as employees’ motivation to behave safely and their perception of a safe work environment. 17 Furthermore, safety performance involves activities or behaviors exhibited by individuals at the workplace to improve health and safety for employees, customers, the community, and the environment. 18 Safety performance can be measured based on three main aspects: safety inspection, accident investigation, and safety training. 19 3. Research methods This study uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method with data collected through a literature search of the Scopus database. As shown in Table 1 , the data on safety performance publications was sourced from the Scopus database and processed by the researcher (2025). The search results in the SCOPUS database were carried out through two main steps: an overall search across the SCOPUS database and a more specific search on the subject area Business, Management, and Accounting. In the first step, a search was conducted using the keywords (“safety*” AND “performance*”) , which resulted in 190,532 articles from 1919 to 2023. All the articles were written in English and covered a wide range of research areas. The second step was to narrow the search to the subject area Business, Management, and Accounting using the keywords (“safety*” AND “performance*”) AND (LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, “SPARK PLUG”) . This search yielded 4,769 articles written in English, with a publication time span from 1963 to 2023. This step provides a sharp focus on the relevance of the article to the field being studied. The eligibility criteria in this study include data collection related to factors that affect safety performance, such as safety culture, technology, human factors, and regulations. The exclusion criteria for this study include manuscripts that are not fully accessible and those that do not align with the research topic. The risk assessment of bias is conducted using standardized tools to evaluate potential bias in study design, data collection methods, and potential conflicts of interest, with independent assessors working together to reach consensus. Synthesis of results is done by combining data from relevant studies using meta-analysis if possible, or synthesizing narratively. Reporting bias assessments are performed to ensure that the reported results reflect accurate data, with no results being ignored or only reported if significant. Finally, certainty assessments were conducted using the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence involving risk of bias, consistency of findings, accuracy of estimates, and potential conflicts of interest. The journals found in the search used both qualitative and quantitative approaches, which showed that research related to Safety Performance has remained relevant in recent years. This relevance is reflected in the diversity of the research methods used to explore various aspects of Safety Performance. As shown in Table 2 , the steps and objectives of the research using Systematic Literature Review analysis : The literature review questions formed are as follows. 1) What is the map for the development of research on Safety Performance in various parts of the world? 2) How is the Development of Discourse in research on Safety Performance ? 3) What are the key factors that affect Safety Performance in the shipping industry? 4) What are the main challenges faced by shipping companies in implementing Safety Performance? 5) What solutions can be adopted to improve Safety Performance in Indonesian shipping companies? 6) What is the role of Safety Performance in creating Competitive Advantage for shipping companies? 4. Results Before discussing the diagram, it is essential to outline the study selection process, which involves identifying records, screening for eligibility, and selecting studies based on inclusion criteria. The diagram below shows the step-by-step process, from initial identification to the final selection of studies included in the review. Based on Figure 1 , the study selection process began with a comprehensive search through the Scopus database, which resulted in a total of 190,532 documents. After removing duplicates, ineligible records, and irrelevant studies, 4,969 reports were requested to be retrieved, but 200 reports could not be retrieved due to access or availability issues, resulting in only 4,769 reports being assessed for eligibility, resulting in 4,769 studies being included in the final review. The included studies focus on different aspects of Safety Performance in the context of Business, Management, and Accounting, with study characteristics that include quantitative and qualitative types, as well as coming from various industry sectors such as manufacturing, transportation, and healthcare. The study covers a range of publications from 1963 to 2023. Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram systematic literature reviews. Table 1. Safety performance publication data. Description All Documents Safety Performance Article Business, Management and Accounting Search Engines www.scopus.com www.scopus.com Limitation None BUSI Year 1919-2023 1963-2023 Number of Documents 190,532 documents 4,769 documents A risk of bias assessment was conducted on each study, which included an evaluation of selection bias, performance, detection, and reporting, with results showing that some studies had potential bias in reporting unbalanced outcomes. Each study provides summary statistics and effect measures that calculate the influence of factors such as safety culture, technology, and human factors on safety performance. The results of the synthesis show that safety culture has a significant influence on safety performance, while the influence of technology is more varied. Heterogeneity investigations showed that study design, industry type, and cultural factors influenced the results, while sensitivity analysis showed that results for safety culture remained consistent even though studies with a high risk of bias were excluded. An assessment of reporting bias revealed that some studies tended to report positive results that could lead to overestimation of effects. Certainty assessment of the evidence with the GRADE approach showed that the evidence for safety culture and technology adoption had a moderate level of certainty, while the evidence for human factors had low certainty due to methodological inconsistencies and a higher risk of bias. 5. Discussion The results of this study show that the number of documents related to Safety Performance has experienced a significant increasing trend over time. Based on the data processed from Scopus, the graph of document distribution per year ( Figure 2 ) shows two main patterns. Figure 2. Number of documents per year related to safety performance. Table 2. Steps and objectives of systematic literature review. No Step Purpose 1 Search and retrieve data from publication search engines Obtain publication data related to research topics 2 Analyze reference data Understanding the background and context of the research landscape 3 Analyze the title and abstract Quickly understand the scope of research 4 Conduct an in-depth reading of selected articles Understand the discourse, theories/concepts, methodologies used and their findings 5 Conducting mapping and analysis of discourses, theories/concepts, research methodologies and findings Understand the trends in research developments for related topics 6 Mapping research gaps Identifying opportunities for further study Figure 2 shows the distribution of the number of documents related to Safety Performance per year based on data from Scopus. The graph on the left depicts the overall number of documents, whereas the graph on the right focuses on documents in the Business, Management and Accounting categories. Based on the graph on the left, the number of publications on Safety Performance shows a significant increase, particularly after 2000. Previously, publications included only a few documents per year, from 1919 to the 1990s. However, this trend changed, with a sharp spike in the early 2000s, reaching nearly 20,000 documents per year by 2023. This reflects the increasing attention paid to safety issues in various sectors, along with technological developments and the need for safer working practices. Meanwhile, the graph on the right shows that research related to Safety Performance in the fields of Business, Management and Accounting is also experiencing a similar upward trend, albeit on a smaller scale. Publications became consistent after the 1980s and experienced a sharp spike after the 2000s, reaching more than 400 documents per year by 2023. Overall, these two graphs show that Safety Performance is becoming an increasingly relevant topic in various disciplines and industrial contexts. Figure 3 shows the ranking of the top ten publication sources that contributed to Safety Performance research , both in general and in the specific categories of Business, Management and Accounting. In the graph on the left, it can be seen that general publications on Safety Performance are dominated by engineering and transportation journals, such as SAE Technical Papers , Proceedings of SPIE , and Transportation Research Record. This trend showed a significant increase after 2000, reflecting the dominance of engineering and science in safety-related research. The number of documents from these journals has increased sharply over the past decade, indicating increased attention to safety issues in various technical sectors. Figure 3. Top 10 safety performance publication sources. Meanwhile, the graph on the right highlights the sources of publications that focus on the Business, Management and Accounting categories. Journals such as the Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , the Journal of Cleaner Production , and Engineering Construction and Architectural Management are the main sources of publications in this field. The trend of publications in this category has been consistent since 2000 and continues to increase, peaking in recent years. Research in this area has generally focused on project management, sustainability, resource efficiency, and technological innovation in the context of safety. Figure 4 shows the distribution of documents related to Safety Performance by country or region for both document categories and documents limited to the fields of Business, Management and Accounting. Here is the explanation: Figure 4. Documents by country/region. In the graph on the left, which includes all documents on Safety Performance , it can be seen that the United States has the highest number of publications, exceeding 50,000 documents. This position is followed by China, with the number of documents approaching 40,000, as well as the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy, each producing approximately 10,000 to 15,000 documents. Other countries such as Canada, Japan, and India also contributed significantly to the number of publications. This shows that the issue of Safety Performance has become a global concern, with the dominance of developed countries with strong research and development infrastructure. The graph on the right shows the distribution of documents in the Business, Management and Accounting categories. The United States remains in the lead with the highest number of publications (more than 1,000 documents), followed by China, which is close to that number. Countries such as the UK, India, and Australia also make a large contribution, with a smaller but significant number of documents than other countries. Asian countries such as Malaysia and Hong Kong showed a strong presence in this category, reflecting the Asia-Pacific region's focus on safety in the context of business management and sustainability. Figure 5 shows the distribution of documents related to Safety Performance by subject area , both as a whole and limited to Business , Management and Accounting category. Here is the explanation: Figure 5. Documents by subject area. In the graph on the left, which includes all documents related to Safety Performance , the field of engineering dominates, with a contribution of 25.3% of the total documents. Other fields that also made a significant contribution were medicine (15.0%), Computer Science (9.0%), and energy (5.5%). In addition, fields such as Social Sciences (4.9%) and environmental sciences (4.2%) also played an important role in this research. The dominance of the engineering field indicates that safety issues are generally rooted in technology and technical implementation in various industrial sectors. Meanwhile, in the graph on the right, which focuses on the Business, Management and Accounting category, the Business, Management and Accounting fields are the most dominant, with a contribution of 39.8%. Engineering contributed 19.2%, reflecting the relationship between safety management and technical applications. Other fields, such as Decision Science (7.8%) and economics (5.2%), showed that research in this category also involves analytical and economic aspects. Fields such as Environmental Science and Psychology have made smaller contributions but remain relevant in understanding safety from a sustainability and behavioral perspective. As a result of an analysis of the available literature, answers to the literature review questions were formulated based on the findings of previous research and the latest trends in Safety Performance. These answers provide in-depth insights into the key factors that affect shipping safety, challenges faced, and relevant solutions to implement. The results of the answers to the literature review questions are as follows. 1) Safety Performance Movement Map in various parts of the world The results of the Systematic Literature Review show that Safety Performance has become a broad and relevant research topic in various parts of the world. This study covers a wide range of geographical, cultural, and industrial contexts. Detailed information on the distribution of research in different regions is presented in Table 3 , which provides an overview of the global contribution to safety performance-related studies. The table also helps to identify areas of primary focus of the study, as well as potential areas that require further attention. Table 3. Safety performance movement in various parts of the world. Country Findings United States Muhieddine et al. 20 conducted research on the development of processes to improve Safety Performance in the health sector. Ashraf & Pyrialakou 21 Traffic Safety Planning to Improve Safety Performance in the Public Environment . China Zhang et al. 22 conducted research on Safety Performance on the performance of sea piers . Zhong et al. 23 conducted research to develop tools that have high safety and performance. United Kingdom Erten et al. 24 developing employee occupational health and safety training methods. Rojas & Khan 25 conducted research to improve battery performance and safety. Jerman Schurmann et al. 26 developed a new approach to improve Safety Performance controllers. Ricker et al. 27 developing a probability-based safety method based on the reliability problem feature. Italia Russel et al. 28 conducted research on the efficacy and safety of eye disease healing techniques. Gore et al. 29 establishes a standard of care that is safe for patients. Table 3 shows that Safety Performance research in developed countries covers various sectors according to local needs. In the United States , research focuses on health and transportation, with attention to the development of occupational safety processes 20 and traffic safety planning. 20 In China , research highlights operational efficiencies, such as Safety Performance at sea docks 22 and the development of high-security tools. 23 The United Kingdom focuses on occupational safety training 24 and improving battery performance. 25 In Germany , Technology-based approaches dominate Germany, such as new safety controllers 26 and probability-based safety methods. 27 Meanwhile, research in Italy highlights safety in health, such as eye healing techniques 28 and the standard of care for patients. 29 2) Development of Discourse in Research on Safety Performance The results of the Systematic Literature Review show that Safety Performance has been researched through various discourses and theoretical developments, as presented in Table 4 . These studies include diverse theoretical approaches such as organizational theory, behavioral theory, and risk management theory. This discourse reflects the evolution of the academic understanding of Safety Performance , starting from the individual aspects of the overall organizational system. Table 4 presents a summary of the theoretical developments used in the research, providing an overview of the conceptual foundations that support studies related to Safety Performance as well as the underlying theoretical development trends and directions. Table 4. Discourse and development of safety performance research. Discourse Development Safety Culture • Niskanen 30 : attitudes towards safety in organizations, changes in work demands, appreciation/appreciation. • Vinodkumar & Bhasi 31 : management, knowledge, employee compliance, commitment to the south, environmental security, emergency preparedness in the organization, and safety priorities. Safety Performance • Neal et al. 32 : pengetahuan, motivasi, safety climate . • Xia et al. 33 : unsafe worker actions, surveillance, the environment, and organizational influence. Table 4 provides an overview of the development of discourse and research related to Safety Culture and Safety Performance. In the context of Safety Climate , Niskanen 30 highlights the importance of attitudes towards safety in organizations, which includes changes in work demands and employees’ appreciation. This study underscores the role of organizational culture in building a safe work environment. Vinodkumar and Bhasi 31 expanded this discourse by including elements such as management, knowledge, employee compliance, safety commitment, environmental security, emergency preparedness, and safety priorities. This shows that Safety Climate is not only perceptual, but also includes practical and policy aspects in the organization. On Safety Performance , Neal et al. 32 defined safety performance through three main elements: knowledge, motivation, and safety climate. This approach highlights the importance of individual competencies and an organization's safety culture to support safety performance. Xia et al. 33 expanded this discourse by highlighting factors such as unsafe worker actions, supervision, the work environment, and organizational influence. This perspective provides a deeper understanding of how internal and external factors affect the safety performance. 3) Key factors affecting Safety Performance in the shipping industry The main factors that affect the Safety Performance in the shipping industry can be categorized into several important aspects. First, the Safety Culture plays a significant role in improving safety. Lu and Tsai 3 pointed out that a strong safety culture can reduce the risk of ship accidents, while Reason 34 highlighted the concept of Just Culture, which encourages openness in reporting incidents without fear of punishment. Ek et al. 35 also emphasized the role of leadership in building a strong safety culture. Second, technology and navigation systems are the key elements. Ekstrand and Tapaninen 4 found that the use of an Automatic Identification System (AIS) can reduce the risk of incidents by up to 30%, while Perera and Mo 36 emphasized the role of big data-based predictive technology in detecting potential incidents. Rothblum et al. 37 noted that automated navigation systems can reduce the risk of human error. Third, human factors also play an important role. Grech, Horberry, & Koester 2 cite crew fatigue, lack of training, and miscommunication as the main causes of accidents. Hetherington, Flin, and Mearns 38 highlighted fatigue as a major risk factor, whereas Schager 39 emphasized the importance of simulation-based training in improving crew skills. Finally, regulation and compliance significantly affect Safety Performance. Hale et al. 5 emphasized the importance of a systemic approach to safety management, including strict regulations and periodic inspections. Knudsen 40 mentioned that the implementation of international regulations such as the SOLAS and ISM Code can improve safety, although low compliance rates in some countries are a challenge. 38 4) Key challenges faced by shipping companies in implementing Safety Performance The main challenges in effectively implementing Safety Performance in the shipping industry include several aspects. First, lack of resources and funds is a major obstacle, especially for small shipping companies. Bloor and Sampson 41 noted that budget constraints often hinder the adoption of safety technology and crew training. Bhattacharya 42 added that investment in safety is often seen as a cost burden. Second, regulatory inconsistencies and weak law enforcement are challenges. Knudsen 40 points out that compliance with safety regulations varies across countries, whereas Anderson 43 highlights the lack of coordination between international and national regulators as an obstacle to the effectiveness of safety policies. Third, human factors and low safety awareness were obstacles. Hetherington et al. 38 found that many crew members were less aware of safety risks, whereas Bhattacharya and Tang 44 noted that crew members often prioritized operational efficiency over adherence to safety procedures. Fourth, reliance on old technology and a lack of digitalization are additional obstacles. Rothblum et al. 37 noted that many ships still use outdated navigation systems, whereas Perera and Mo 36 highlighted resistance to new technologies as a barrier to implementation. 5) Adoption solutions to improve Safety Performance in Indonesian shipping companies Solutions that can be adopted to improve the Safety Performance in Indonesian shipping companies include several strategic steps. Strengthening the safety culture is a priority, as recommended by Lu and Tsai 3 through the implementation of Safety Culture Indicators and Reason 34 with Just Culture to encourage open incident reporting. Adoption of modern technology is also important. Ekstrand and Tapaninen 4 recommended the use of AIS, while Huang et al. 6 highlighted the role of big data analytics in predicting operational risks. Additionally, continuous training and simulations must be strengthened. Hetherington et al. 38 emphasized virtual reality-based simulations, whereas Schager 39 recommended scenario-based training to improve crew readiness. Collaboration and periodic inspections should be improved. Hale et al. 5 emphasized the need for regular safety audits to ensure compliance with safety standards. 6) The Role of Safety Performance in Creating Competitive Advantage for Shipping Companies Safety Performance significantly contributes to the creation of competitive advantage in the shipping industry. First, the implementation of good Safety Performance improves the company's reputation. Lu and Tsai 3 show that shipping companies with a strong safety culture tend to have a better image in the eyes of customers and business partners. This directly impacts customer loyalty and the ability to attract more business contracts. Second, companies with a good Safety Performance can reduce their operational costs. Rothblum et al. 37 found that the use of automated navigation systems reduces human error and the risk of accidents, which ultimately lowers incident-related costs such as ship repair costs and compensation. In addition, Hale et al. 5 stated that periodic safety inspections can minimize losses owing to equipment damage or unexpected operational stoppages. Third, Safety Performance plays a role in increasing productivity and operational efficiency. Hetherington, Flin, and Mearns 38 emphasized that good safety training improves crew skills and readiness so that ship operations can run more smoothly. Big data-based predictive technology, as suggested by Perera and Mo, 36 helps companies optimize resource use through the real-time monitoring of ship conditions. Fourth, from a sustainability perspective, good Safety Performance supports compliance with international regulations such as SOLAS and the ISM Code, which allow companies to operate in global markets. 40 Companies that comply with these regulations are also trusted by stakeholders, including customers, investors, and regulators. Thus, Safety Performance is not only a tool to improve safety but also a strategic factor that supports the competitive advantage of shipping companies. Safety-first companies have an edge in terms of efficiency, reputation, and sustainability, all of which are essential for competing in the global marketplace. Based on an analysis of the available literature, this study provides in-depth insights into the factors that influence Safety Performance in the shipping industry, including safety culture, technology, and human factors. A review of the Systematic Literature shows that Safety Performance has become a relevant topic in different regions with different focuses, such as research in the United States that focuses on health and transportation, as well as in China that highlights operational efficiency. In addition, the development of research discourse shows diverse theoretical approaches, including organizational, behavioral, and risk management theories. The main challenges in the implementation of Safety Performance are lack of resources, regulatory inconsistencies, and reliance on legacy technologies. Actionable solutions include strengthening safety culture, adoption of modern technology, and simulation-based training in Indonesian shipping companies. However, the evidence included in this review has limitations, such as variations in geographic contexts and study methodologies. The review process is also constrained by differences in measurement approaches and potential reporting biases. In addition, the literature search for this study was conducted in early 2024. Therefore, studies published or indexed after that time were not included in the analysis. Accordingly, future research is recommended to incorporate the most recent literature to provide a more up-to-date synthesis. Another limitation is that this study relied solely on the Scopus database, which may have excluded relevant studies indexed in other databases. The practical implications of this study highlight the importance of improved crew training, the use of advanced technology, and stricter policies. Future research should focus on human factors and the application of new technologies to improve safety in the shipping sector, especially in developing countries such as Indonesia. 6. Conclusion The results of this study show that Safety Performance has become an increasingly important and relevant topic in various sectors and global contexts. The literature trend analysis shows a significant increase in the number of publications, especially after 2000, with research predominating in developed countries, such as the United States and China. Research in this field covers a wide range of disciplines such as engineering, management, health, and economics, and highlights the important contributions of Business, Management, and Accounting. Previous research has identified four main factors that affect Safety Performance in the shipping industry: safety culture, navigation technology and systems, human factors, and regulations and compliance. A strong safety culture, support of modern technologies such as AIS and big data analytics, ongoing training, and compliance with international regulations all contribute to reducing accident risks and improving operational safety. However, the implementation of Safety Performance measures is challenging. Lack of resources and funding, regulatory inconformities, low safety awareness, and reliance on legacy technologies are the main obstacles. To address this, the proposed solutions include strengthening safety culture, adopting modern technology, simulation-based training, and periodic inspections to ensure compliance with safety standards. Furthermore, Safety Performance not only improves safety but also creates a competitive advantage for shipping companies. With effective implementation, companies can improve their reputation, operational efficiency, and compliance with global sustainability standards, ultimately strengthening their positions in the international market. Ethics approval statement This study is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) based exclusively on previously published and publicly available articles indexed in Scopus. It does not involve human participants, animals, or primary data collection, and no personal or private data were processed. Therefore, in accordance with applicable guidelines for literature-based studies, ethical approval was not required. Data availability statement Underlying data No data associated with this article. Extended data Repository name: Data SLR Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage . https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28794725 45 This project contains the following extended data: • [Data SLR] (Collection of article data used for literature review) • [PRISMA flowchart] (A diagram illustrating the systematic process of selecting, screening, and including relevant articles for the literature review, based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, following the PRISMA methodology) Reporting guidelines Figshare: PRISMA checklist for “The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage: A Systematic Literature Review Study”. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28794725 45 Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0). References 1. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty: Global Claims Review 2022. Allianz; 2022. 2. Grech MR, Horberry T, Koester T: Human Factors in the Maritime Domain. CRC Press; 2008. 3. Lu C-S, Tsai C-L: The impact of safety culture on shipping safety performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2008; 40 (4): 1258–1266. 4. Ekstrand S, Tapaninen U: The role of Automatic Identification System (AIS) in maritime safety and efficiency. J. Navig. 2020; 73 (2): 1–15. 5. Hale AR, Borys D, Adams M: Safety culture and safety management: Theoretical foundations and practical challenges. Saf. Sci. 2016; 86 : 237–251. 6. Huang C, Chen Y, Li X: The application of big data and predictive analytics in maritime safety. International Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 2021; 13 (3): 245–258. 7. Kitchenham B, Brereton OP, Budgen D, et al. : Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2009; 51 (1): 7–15. Publisher Full Text 8. Borret SR, Sheble L, Moody J, et al. : Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010-2016.2018. 9. Wahono RS: A systematic literature review of software defect prediction. Journal of Software Engineering. 2015; 1 (1): 1–16. 10. Ernawati N: Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Metodologi Riset Penelitian Data Sekunder. Soepraoen, Malang: Poltekkes RS dr; 2020. 11. Delgado-Rodríguez M, Sillero-Arenas MJMI: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina Intensiva (English Edition). 2018; 42 (7):444–453. Publisher Full Text 12. Khairunnisa A, Juandi D, Gozali SM: Systematic literature review: Kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Jurnal Cendekia. 2022; 6 (2):1846–1856. Publisher Full Text 13. Sari EP: Sistematik Literatur Review Jenis Pohon Pelindung Jalan Dari Tahun 2007-2023 Sebagai Sumber Belajar Biologi. (Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang). 2024. 14. Gnoni MG, Saleh JH: Near-miss management systems and observability-in-depth: Handling safety incidents and accident precursors in light of safety principles. Saf. Sci. 2017; 91 : 154–167. Publisher Full Text 15. Brand LM: Exploring a model of psychological fitness for work: are individual difference variables relevant in a model of safety performance?2010. Doctoral dissertation. 16. Razali NA, Redzuan NIN, Kamaruddin AN, et al. : A study on safety management practices and safety performance. Eur. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2018; 44 . Publisher Full Text 17. Griffin MA, Neal A: Perceptions of Safety at Work: A Framework for Linking Safety Climate to Safety Performance, Knowledge, and Motivation. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2000; 5 (3):347–358. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 18. Hon CKH, Chan APC, Yam MCH: Relationships Between Safety Climate and Safety Performance of Building Repair, Maintenance, Minor Alteration, and Addition (RMAA) Works. Saf. Sci. 2014; 65 :10–19. Publisher Full Text 19. Wu TC, Chang SH, Shu CM, et al. : Safety leadership and safety performance in petrochemical industries: The mediating role of safety climate. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2011; 24 (6):716–721. Publisher Full Text 20. Muhieddine MH, Viswanath SK, Armstrong A, et al. : Model-based solvent selection for the synthesis and crystallisation of pharmaceutical compounds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2022; 264 : 118125. Publisher Full Text 21. Ashraf MT, Dey K, Pyrialakou D: Investigation of pedestrian and bicyclist safety in public transportation systems. J. Transp. Health. 2022; 27 : 101529. Publisher Full Text 22. Zhang Y, Zhou YD, Wu H: Influence of water level on RC caisson subjected to underwater explosions. Ocean Eng. 2022; 266 : 113162. Publisher Full Text 23. Zhong X, Tian P, Chen C, et al. : Preparation and Interface Stability of Alginate-based Gel Polymer Electrolyte for Rechargeable Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022; 116968 . 24. Erten B, Oral B, Yakut MZ: The role of virtual and augmented reality in occupational health and safety training of employees in PV power systems and evaluation with a sustainability perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2022; 379 : 134499. Publisher Full Text 25. Rojas OE, Khan MA: A review on electrical and mechanical performance parameters in lithium-ion battery packs. J. Clean. Prod. 2022; 378 : 134381. Publisher Full Text 26. Schürmann B, Klischat M, Kochdumper N, et al. : Formal safety net control using backward reachability analysis. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 2021; 67 (11): 5698–5713. 27. Ricker M, Feiri T, Nille-Hauf K: Contribution to efficient structural safety assessments: A comparative analysis of computational schemes. Probabilistic Eng. Mech. 2022; 69 : 103285. Publisher Full Text 28. Russell S, Bennett J, Wellman JA, et al. : Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017; vol. 390 (10097): pp. 849–860. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 29. Gore ME, Szczylik C, Porta C, et al. : Safety and efficacy of sunitinib for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: an expanded-access trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10 (8): 757–763. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 30. Niskanen T: Safety climate in organizational settings: Changes and challenges. Saf. Sci. 1994; 17 (2): 237–255. Publisher Full Text 31. Vinodkumar MN, Bhasi MJSS: Safety climate factors and its relationship with accidents and personal attributes in the chemical industry. Saf. Sci. 2009; 47 (5): 659–667. Publisher Full Text 32. Neal A, Griffin MA, Hart PM: The role of knowledge, motivation, and safety climate in safety performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 2000; 85 (3): 281–293. 33. Xia N, Zou PX, Liu X, et al. : A hybrid BN-HFACS model for predicting safety performance in construction projects. Saf. Sci. 2018; 101 : 332–343. Publisher Full Text 34. Reason J: Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Routledge; 1997. 35. Ek Å, Akselsson R, Arvidsson M, et al. : Safety culture in Swedish air traffic control. Saf. Sci. 2000; 34 (1-3): 67–87. 36. Perera LP, Mo B: Marine ship intelligence for autonomous navigation: Big data and artificial intelligence approach. Ocean Eng. 2016; 126 : 57–76. 37. Rothblum AM, Wheal D, Withington S, et al. : Human error and marine safety, U.S. Coast Guard Research Report.2002. 38. Hetherington C, Flin R, Mearns K: Safety in shipping: The human element. J. Saf. Res. 2006; 37 (4): 401–411. Publisher Full Text 39. Schager B: The importance of training and simulation in maritime safety. Maritime Safety Training Journal. 2008; 8 (3): 145–157. 40. Knudsen F: Paperwork at the service of safety? Workers’ reluctance against written procedures exemplified by the concept of ‘seamanship’. Saf. Sci. 2009; 47 (2): 295–303. Publisher Full Text 41. Bloor M, Sampson H: Regulatory enforcement of occupational health and safety at sea: The role of Port State Control. Sociol. Health Illn. 2009; 31 (5): 709–725. 42. Bhattacharya S: The effectiveness of the ISM Code: A qualitative enquiry. Mar. Policy. 2012; 36 (2): 528–535. Publisher Full Text 43. Anderson P: International coordination and maritime safety: Challenges in achieving global standards. Marit. Policy Manag. 2003; 30 (2): 165–176. 44. Bhattacharya S, Tang L: Fatigue, sleep and shift work in the maritime industry. Health and Safety Executive Research Report. 2013. 45. Raharjo BA, Utami HN, Afrianty TW, et al. : Data SLR Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage. figshare. 2025. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 4 VERSION 4 PUBLISHED 12 May 2025 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Brawijaya University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia Bharto Ari Raharjo Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Hamidah Nayati Utami Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Tri Wulida Afrianty Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Ika Ruhana Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (4) version 4 Revised Published: 05 Mar 2026, 14:490 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163658.4 version 3 Revised Published: 28 Aug 2025, 14:490 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163658.3 version 2 Revised Published: 05 Jun 2025, 14:490 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163658.2 version 1 Published: 12 May 2025, 14:490 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163658.1 Copyright © 2026 Raharjo BA et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Raharjo BA, Utami HN, Afrianty TW and Ruhana I. The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163658.4 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 4 VERSION 4 PUBLISHED 05 Mar 2026 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Hutahayan B. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.197202.r464956 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v4#referee-response-464956 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 16 Apr 2026 Benny Hutahayan , University of Brawijaya, Brawijaya, Indonesia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.197202.r464956 You have revised your manuscript according ... Continue reading READ ALL You have revised your manuscript according to the reviewer's suggestions. Good luck Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Business Administration, Human Resources Management, Law, Finance I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Hutahayan B. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.197202.r464956 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v4#referee-response-464956 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 28 Aug 2025 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Hutahayan B. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.187229.r409723 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v3#referee-response-409723 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 26 Feb 2026 Benny Hutahayan , University of Brawijaya, Brawijaya, Indonesia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.187229.r409723 The manuscript has already been revised well in Version 2, ... Continue reading READ ALL The manuscript has already been revised well in Version 2, and based on that revision, my decision is to approve the article. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Business Administration, Human Resources Management, Law, Finance I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Hutahayan B. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.187229.r409723 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v3#referee-response-409723 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 05 Mar 2026 Bharto Ari Raharjo , Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia 05 Mar 2026 Author Response Thank you for your comments. However, we would like to respectfully clarify that this manuscript is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), not an empirical cross-sectional study. Therefore, it does not ... Continue reading Thank you for your comments. However, we would like to respectfully clarify that this manuscript is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), not an empirical cross-sectional study. Therefore, it does not formulate hypotheses (H1, H2, H3, etc.) and does not require tests such as common method bias (CMB). Our study is guided by research questions, not hypothesis testing. Thank you for your comments. However, we would like to respectfully clarify that this manuscript is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), not an empirical cross-sectional study. Therefore, it does not formulate hypotheses (H1, H2, H3, etc.) and does not require tests such as common method bias (CMB). Our study is guided by research questions, not hypothesis testing. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 05 Mar 2026 Bharto Ari Raharjo , Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia 05 Mar 2026 Author Response Thank you for your comments. However, we would like to respectfully clarify that this manuscript is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), not an empirical cross-sectional study. Therefore, it does not ... Continue reading Thank you for your comments. However, we would like to respectfully clarify that this manuscript is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), not an empirical cross-sectional study. Therefore, it does not formulate hypotheses (H1, H2, H3, etc.) and does not require tests such as common method bias (CMB). Our study is guided by research questions, not hypothesis testing. Thank you for your comments. However, we would like to respectfully clarify that this manuscript is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), not an empirical cross-sectional study. Therefore, it does not formulate hypotheses (H1, H2, H3, etc.) and does not require tests such as common method bias (CMB). Our study is guided by research questions, not hypothesis testing. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 05 Jun 2025 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Esterhuyzen E. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r390333 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v2#referee-response-390333 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 23 Aug 2025 Elriza Esterhuyzen , University of South Africa, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r390333 The article is of good quality and provides valuable information applicable to the shipping industry. It is suggested that the shipping industry be mentioned in the title, as the current title is slightly misleading - one would expect to find ... Continue reading READ ALL The article is of good quality and provides valuable information applicable to the shipping industry. It is suggested that the shipping industry be mentioned in the title, as the current title is slightly misleading - one would expect to find general information on safety performance and competitive advantage, not only in the shipping industry in Indonesia. The generalizability of findings is thus limited. The information used (Scopus data up until 2022) seems outdated. It is not clear why the SLR ended in 2022 - why not include it until 2025? There are also some discrepancies in text as mention is made of a 2023 article (for example) which falls outside the scope previously mentioned. It is also concerning that mention is made that no ethical approval was required as this is still a requirement, even for SLRs. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Not applicable Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Occupational Safety and Health, Business Management, Entrepreneurship, Risk Management, Sustainability I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Esterhuyzen E. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r390333 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v2#referee-response-390333 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 10 Sep 2025 Bharto Ari Raharjo , Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia 10 Sep 2025 Author Response Dear Reviewer, Thank you very much for your constructive comments and suggestions, which have helped us improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We want to address your ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer, Thank you very much for your constructive comments and suggestions, which have helped us improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We want to address your concerns as follows: We have revised the title to explicitly reflect the shipping industry context, to avoid any misleading interpretation. We sincerely apologize for the inconsistency regarding the data coverage period. We would like to clarify that the Scopus data used in this study were collected up to 2023. The reason the literature search ended in 2023 is that the systematic review was conducted in 2024. Therefore, the dataset reflects the latest available publications at that time. We have corrected this point throughout the manuscript to ensure consistency and accuracy. However, our study is a systematic literature review that relies exclusively on secondary data from previously published journal articles. Therefore, no direct involvement of human participants or animals was undertaken in this research. In accordance with international ethical standards, ethical approval is mandatory for studies involving living subjects. To avoid any misunderstanding, we have revised the manuscript accordingly. We have clarified the ethical statement to explicitly mention this. Dear Reviewer, Thank you very much for your constructive comments and suggestions, which have helped us improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We want to address your concerns as follows: We have revised the title to explicitly reflect the shipping industry context, to avoid any misleading interpretation. We sincerely apologize for the inconsistency regarding the data coverage period. We would like to clarify that the Scopus data used in this study were collected up to 2023. The reason the literature search ended in 2023 is that the systematic review was conducted in 2024. Therefore, the dataset reflects the latest available publications at that time. We have corrected this point throughout the manuscript to ensure consistency and accuracy. However, our study is a systematic literature review that relies exclusively on secondary data from previously published journal articles. Therefore, no direct involvement of human participants or animals was undertaken in this research. In accordance with international ethical standards, ethical approval is mandatory for studies involving living subjects. To avoid any misunderstanding, we have revised the manuscript accordingly. We have clarified the ethical statement to explicitly mention this. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 10 Sep 2025 Bharto Ari Raharjo , Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia 10 Sep 2025 Author Response Dear Reviewer, Thank you very much for your constructive comments and suggestions, which have helped us improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We want to address your ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer, Thank you very much for your constructive comments and suggestions, which have helped us improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We want to address your concerns as follows: We have revised the title to explicitly reflect the shipping industry context, to avoid any misleading interpretation. We sincerely apologize for the inconsistency regarding the data coverage period. We would like to clarify that the Scopus data used in this study were collected up to 2023. The reason the literature search ended in 2023 is that the systematic review was conducted in 2024. Therefore, the dataset reflects the latest available publications at that time. We have corrected this point throughout the manuscript to ensure consistency and accuracy. However, our study is a systematic literature review that relies exclusively on secondary data from previously published journal articles. Therefore, no direct involvement of human participants or animals was undertaken in this research. In accordance with international ethical standards, ethical approval is mandatory for studies involving living subjects. To avoid any misunderstanding, we have revised the manuscript accordingly. We have clarified the ethical statement to explicitly mention this. Dear Reviewer, Thank you very much for your constructive comments and suggestions, which have helped us improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We want to address your concerns as follows: We have revised the title to explicitly reflect the shipping industry context, to avoid any misleading interpretation. We sincerely apologize for the inconsistency regarding the data coverage period. We would like to clarify that the Scopus data used in this study were collected up to 2023. The reason the literature search ended in 2023 is that the systematic review was conducted in 2024. Therefore, the dataset reflects the latest available publications at that time. We have corrected this point throughout the manuscript to ensure consistency and accuracy. However, our study is a systematic literature review that relies exclusively on secondary data from previously published journal articles. Therefore, no direct involvement of human participants or animals was undertaken in this research. In accordance with international ethical standards, ethical approval is mandatory for studies involving living subjects. To avoid any misunderstanding, we have revised the manuscript accordingly. We have clarified the ethical statement to explicitly mention this. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Trifu A. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r392589 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v2#referee-response-392589 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 21 Jul 2025 Alina Trifu , Occupational Risks Assessment and Management of Health and Safety at Work Laboratory, National Research and Development Institute for Occupational Safety INCDPM Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r392589 Thank you very much for the opportunity to read and review your article titled: „The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage: A Systematic Literature Review Study” This manuscript addresses a significant topic: safety performance in the ... Continue reading READ ALL Thank you very much for the opportunity to read and review your article titled: „The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage: A Systematic Literature Review Study” This manuscript addresses a significant topic: safety performance in the shipping safety context. This study analyzes research trends and developments related to Safety Performance and its implementation solutions through the Systematic Literature Review based on Scopus data from 1919 to 2022. The rationale and the objectives of the Systematic Review are clearly stated. All the specialized terms used are very well described. There are sufficient details of the methods used for systematic review to allow replication. The conclusions are drawn adequately and are supported by the results presented in the review. The limitations of the work are well acknowledged. I recommend indexing the article. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Not applicable Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Occupational Safety, Occupational Risks Assessment, Health and Safety I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Trifu A. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r392589 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v2#referee-response-392589 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Hutahayan B. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r389972 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v2#referee-response-389972 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 12 Jun 2025 Benny Hutahayan , University of Brawijaya, Brawijaya, Indonesia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r389972 Thank you for the revisions that have been made. After reviewing them, I appreciate your efforts in thoroughly addressing all the feedback and revising the manuscript in accordance with the suggestions provided. The changes have significantly improved the quality ... Continue reading READ ALL Thank you for the revisions that have been made. After reviewing them, I appreciate your efforts in thoroughly addressing all the feedback and revising the manuscript in accordance with the suggestions provided. The changes have significantly improved the quality of the manuscript, both in terms of substance and clarity of writing. I also noticed that Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5 have been revised. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Business Administration, Human Resources Management, Law, Finance I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Hutahayan B. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r389972 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v2#referee-response-389972 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 11 Sep 2025 Bharto Ari Raharjo , Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia 11 Sep 2025 Author Response Dear Reviewers, I would like to express my sincere thanks for your valuable feedback on my manuscript. I greatly appreciate the time and effort you invested in reviewing my work. ... Continue reading Dear Reviewers, I would like to express my sincere thanks for your valuable feedback on my manuscript. I greatly appreciate the time and effort you invested in reviewing my work. Your suggestions have been immensely helpful in improving the quality of the manuscript. Thank you once again for your support. Best regards, Dear Reviewers, I would like to express my sincere thanks for your valuable feedback on my manuscript. I greatly appreciate the time and effort you invested in reviewing my work. Your suggestions have been immensely helpful in improving the quality of the manuscript. Thank you once again for your support. Best regards, Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 11 Sep 2025 Bharto Ari Raharjo , Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia 11 Sep 2025 Author Response Dear Reviewers, I would like to express my sincere thanks for your valuable feedback on my manuscript. I greatly appreciate the time and effort you invested in reviewing my work. ... Continue reading Dear Reviewers, I would like to express my sincere thanks for your valuable feedback on my manuscript. I greatly appreciate the time and effort you invested in reviewing my work. Your suggestions have been immensely helpful in improving the quality of the manuscript. Thank you once again for your support. Best regards, Dear Reviewers, I would like to express my sincere thanks for your valuable feedback on my manuscript. I greatly appreciate the time and effort you invested in reviewing my work. Your suggestions have been immensely helpful in improving the quality of the manuscript. Thank you once again for your support. Best regards, Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 12 May 2025 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Hutahayan B. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.180046.r384675 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v1#referee-response-384675 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 27 May 2025 Benny Hutahayan , University of Brawijaya, Brawijaya, Indonesia Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.180046.r384675 I have read the entire manuscript; overall, it is well written and coherent. The manuscript is also easy to understand for readers. However, I have several comments, notes, suggestions, and potential revisions that may help improve the quality of ... Continue reading READ ALL I have read the entire manuscript; overall, it is well written and coherent. The manuscript is also easy to understand for readers. However, I have several comments, notes, suggestions, and potential revisions that may help improve the quality of the manuscript: The introduction is written systematically and flows well. I believe this section is already appropriate. In the literature review section, please consider adding references related to "Systematic Literature Review" and "Safety Performance." Since this is a literature review section, it currently includes only a limited number of sources. The manuscript would benefit greatly from incorporating various perspectives in this part. The syntax used for data collection should be italicized to avoid potential misunderstandings by readers. The inclusion criteria are explained in the research method section, but the exclusion criteria are only briefly mentioned. I recommend adding one sentence that explicitly states the exclusion criteria. In the discussion section (Figures 2, 3, 4, 5), it is mentioned "on the right side of the figure" and "on the left side of the figure," but I can only see one graph/diagram in each case. Please review and revise this, as some figures may be missing. Aside from this issue, the discussion is quite appropriate. The conclusion is well-written; however, before finalizing my assessment, I would like to see how the missing figures (as mentioned in point 5) are addressed. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Business Administration, Human Resources Management, Law, Finance I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Hutahayan B. Reviewer Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.180046.r384675 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v1#referee-response-384675 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 4 VERSION 4 PUBLISHED 12 May 2025 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 Version 4 (revision) 05 Mar 26 read Version 3 (revision) 28 Aug 25 read Version 2 (revision) 05 Jun 25 read read read Version 1 12 May 25 read Benny Hutahayan , University of Brawijaya, Brawijaya, Indonesia Alina Trifu , National Research and Development Institute for Occupational Safety INCDPM Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania Elriza Esterhuyzen , University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2026 Hutahayan B. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 16 Apr 2026 | for Version 4 Benny Hutahayan , University of Brawijaya, Brawijaya, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2026 Hutahayan B. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions You have revised your manuscript according to the reviewer's suggestions. Good luck Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Business Administration, Human Resources Management, Law, Finance I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Hutahayan B. Peer Review Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.197202.r464956) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v4#referee-response-464956 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2026 Hutahayan B. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 26 Feb 2026 | for Version 3 Benny Hutahayan , University of Brawijaya, Brawijaya, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2026 Hutahayan B. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The manuscript has already been revised well in Version 2, and based on that revision, my decision is to approve the article. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Business Administration, Human Resources Management, Law, Finance I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 05 Mar 2026 Bharto Ari Raharjo, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia Thank you for your comments. However, we would like to respectfully clarify that this manuscript is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), not an empirical cross-sectional study. Therefore, it does not formulate hypotheses (H1, H2, H3, etc.) and does not require tests such as common method bias (CMB). Our study is guided by research questions, not hypothesis testing. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Hutahayan B. Peer Review Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.187229.r409723) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v3#referee-response-409723 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Esterhuyzen E. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 23 Aug 2025 | for Version 2 Elriza Esterhuyzen , University of South Africa, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa 0 Views copyright © 2025 Esterhuyzen E. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The article is of good quality and provides valuable information applicable to the shipping industry. It is suggested that the shipping industry be mentioned in the title, as the current title is slightly misleading - one would expect to find general information on safety performance and competitive advantage, not only in the shipping industry in Indonesia. The generalizability of findings is thus limited. The information used (Scopus data up until 2022) seems outdated. It is not clear why the SLR ended in 2022 - why not include it until 2025? There are also some discrepancies in text as mention is made of a 2023 article (for example) which falls outside the scope previously mentioned. It is also concerning that mention is made that no ethical approval was required as this is still a requirement, even for SLRs. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Not applicable Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Occupational Safety and Health, Business Management, Entrepreneurship, Risk Management, Sustainability I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 10 Sep 2025 Bharto Ari Raharjo, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia Dear Reviewer, Thank you very much for your constructive comments and suggestions, which have helped us improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We want to address your concerns as follows: We have revised the title to explicitly reflect the shipping industry context, to avoid any misleading interpretation. We sincerely apologize for the inconsistency regarding the data coverage period. We would like to clarify that the Scopus data used in this study were collected up to 2023. The reason the literature search ended in 2023 is that the systematic review was conducted in 2024. Therefore, the dataset reflects the latest available publications at that time. We have corrected this point throughout the manuscript to ensure consistency and accuracy. However, our study is a systematic literature review that relies exclusively on secondary data from previously published journal articles. Therefore, no direct involvement of human participants or animals was undertaken in this research. In accordance with international ethical standards, ethical approval is mandatory for studies involving living subjects. To avoid any misunderstanding, we have revised the manuscript accordingly. We have clarified the ethical statement to explicitly mention this. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Esterhuyzen E. Peer Review Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r390333) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v2#referee-response-390333 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Trifu A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 21 Jul 2025 | for Version 2 Alina Trifu , Occupational Risks Assessment and Management of Health and Safety at Work Laboratory, National Research and Development Institute for Occupational Safety INCDPM Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania 0 Views copyright © 2025 Trifu A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Thank you very much for the opportunity to read and review your article titled: „The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage: A Systematic Literature Review Study” This manuscript addresses a significant topic: safety performance in the shipping safety context. This study analyzes research trends and developments related to Safety Performance and its implementation solutions through the Systematic Literature Review based on Scopus data from 1919 to 2022. The rationale and the objectives of the Systematic Review are clearly stated. All the specialized terms used are very well described. There are sufficient details of the methods used for systematic review to allow replication. The conclusions are drawn adequately and are supported by the results presented in the review. The limitations of the work are well acknowledged. I recommend indexing the article. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Not applicable Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Occupational Safety, Occupational Risks Assessment, Health and Safety I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Trifu A. Peer Review Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r392589) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v2#referee-response-392589 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Hutahayan B. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 12 Jun 2025 | for Version 2 Benny Hutahayan , University of Brawijaya, Brawijaya, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Hutahayan B. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Thank you for the revisions that have been made. After reviewing them, I appreciate your efforts in thoroughly addressing all the feedback and revising the manuscript in accordance with the suggestions provided. The changes have significantly improved the quality of the manuscript, both in terms of substance and clarity of writing. I also noticed that Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5 have been revised. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Business Administration, Human Resources Management, Law, Finance I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 11 Sep 2025 Bharto Ari Raharjo, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia Dear Reviewers, I would like to express my sincere thanks for your valuable feedback on my manuscript. I greatly appreciate the time and effort you invested in reviewing my work. Your suggestions have been immensely helpful in improving the quality of the manuscript. Thank you once again for your support. Best regards, View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Hutahayan B. Peer Review Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.183274.r389972) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v2#referee-response-389972 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Hutahayan B. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 27 May 2025 | for Version 1 Benny Hutahayan , University of Brawijaya, Brawijaya, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Hutahayan B. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions I have read the entire manuscript; overall, it is well written and coherent. The manuscript is also easy to understand for readers. However, I have several comments, notes, suggestions, and potential revisions that may help improve the quality of the manuscript: The introduction is written systematically and flows well. I believe this section is already appropriate. In the literature review section, please consider adding references related to "Systematic Literature Review" and "Safety Performance." Since this is a literature review section, it currently includes only a limited number of sources. The manuscript would benefit greatly from incorporating various perspectives in this part. The syntax used for data collection should be italicized to avoid potential misunderstandings by readers. The inclusion criteria are explained in the research method section, but the exclusion criteria are only briefly mentioned. I recommend adding one sentence that explicitly states the exclusion criteria. In the discussion section (Figures 2, 3, 4, 5), it is mentioned "on the right side of the figure" and "on the left side of the figure," but I can only see one graph/diagram in each case. Please review and revise this, as some figures may be missing. Aside from this issue, the discussion is quite appropriate. The conclusion is well-written; however, before finalizing my assessment, I would like to see how the missing figures (as mentioned in point 5) are addressed. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Business Administration, Human Resources Management, Law, Finance I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Hutahayan B. Peer Review Report For: The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage in the Shipping Industry: A Systematic Literature Review Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2026, 14 :490 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.180046.r384675) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v1#referee-response-384675 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v4" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v4&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v4" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Raharjo BA et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v4/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490", templates : { twitter : "The Influence of Safety Performance on Competitive Advantage.... Raharjo BA et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/14-490/v4" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/163658/197202") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "197202"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "390336": 0, "392589": 5, "392588": 0, "392591": 0, "392590": 0, "392585": 0, "392587": 0, "392586": 0, "389972": 7, "392593": 0, "392592": 0, "392594": 0, "463068": 0, "384677": 0, "463591": 0, "384676": 0, "384679": 0, "384678": 0, "384675": 19, "384674": 0, "384681": 0, "384680": 0, "384683": 0, "384682": 0, "462967": 0, "390327": 0, "390333": 12, "390332": 0, "464957": 0, "390335": 0, "409724": 0, "464956": 1, "390334": 0, "464955": 0, "390329": 0, "409722": 0, "390328": 0, "409723": 6, "390331": 0, "390330": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "d1b5c70c-972c-4c16-a529-9f773f56a1bb"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });