Iron and zinc biofortification in potato through the introduction of NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE and FERRITIN genes

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Micronutrient deficiencies, such as those involving iron, zinc, and vitamin A, represent a critical global public health challenge. Crop biofortification offers a cost-effective solution by enhancing the micronutrient content of staple foods, particularly in regions with limited access to diverse diets. In this study, we developed a high-iron and high-zinc Spunta potato variety through the co-expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE 1 ( AtNAS1 ) gene under a constitutive promoter and the Phaseolus vulgaris FERRITIN ( PvFERRITIN ) gene under a tuber-specific promoter. Of the five co-expressing events evaluated, we identified FN4 as the optimal line, achieving significant levels of iron and zinc biofortification without compromising yield. This line exhibited an enhanced capacity to accumulate iron in tubers under conditions of increased soil iron availability, maintaining yield even when vegetative growth was reduced due to elevated soil iron levels. The FN4 variety showed a 2.1-and 1.8-fold increase in iron and zinc content, respectively, in the tubers. A typical portion of this variety could provide 33.3% of the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for iron and 19.8% for zinc in women of reproductive age. This biofortified potato has the potential to reduce iron deficiency anemia and zinc deficiency, enhancing the health of populations in both rural and urban areas affected by poverty.
Full text 57,708 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Iron and zinc biofortification in potato through the introduction of NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE and FERRITIN genes | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Iron and zinc biofortification in potato through the introduction of NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE and FERRITIN genes View ORCID Profile Juan I. Cortelezzi , View ORCID Profile Martina Zubillaga , Victoria R. Scardino , Marina Fumagalli , View ORCID Profile María N. Muñiz García , View ORCID Profile Daniela A. Capiati doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.01.640813 Juan I. Cortelezzi 1 Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular “Dr. Héctor Torres” (INGEBI), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Vuelta de Obligado 2490 , Cuidad de Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina 2 Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2160 , Cuidad de Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Juan I. Cortelezzi Martina Zubillaga 1 Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular “Dr. Héctor Torres” (INGEBI), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Vuelta de Obligado 2490 , Cuidad de Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina 2 Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2160 , Cuidad de Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Martina Zubillaga Victoria R. Scardino 1 Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular “Dr. Héctor Torres” (INGEBI), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Vuelta de Obligado 2490 , Cuidad de Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Marina Fumagalli 1 Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular “Dr. Héctor Torres” (INGEBI), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Vuelta de Obligado 2490 , Cuidad de Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site María N. Muñiz García 1 Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular “Dr. Héctor Torres” (INGEBI), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Vuelta de Obligado 2490 , Cuidad de Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for María N. Muñiz García For correspondence: dcapiati{at}dna.uba.ar dcapiati{at}gmail.com noemunizgarcia{at}gmail.com Daniela A. Capiati 1 Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular “Dr. Héctor Torres” (INGEBI), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Vuelta de Obligado 2490 , Cuidad de Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina 2 Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2160 , Cuidad de Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Daniela A. Capiati For correspondence: dcapiati{at}dna.uba.ar dcapiati{at}gmail.com noemunizgarcia{at}gmail.com Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF Abstract Micronutrient deficiencies, such as those involving iron, zinc, and vitamin A, represent a critical global public health challenge. Crop biofortification offers a cost-effective solution by enhancing the micronutrient content of staple foods, particularly in regions with limited access to diverse diets. In this study, we developed a high-iron and high-zinc Spunta potato variety through the co-expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE 1 ( AtNAS1 ) gene under a constitutive promoter and the Phaseolus vulgaris FERRITIN ( PvFERRITIN ) gene under a tuber-specific promoter. Of the five co-expressing events evaluated, we identified FN4 as the optimal line, achieving significant levels of iron and zinc biofortification without compromising yield. This line exhibited an enhanced capacity to accumulate iron in tubers under conditions of increased soil iron availability, maintaining yield even when vegetative growth was reduced due to elevated soil iron levels. The FN4 variety showed a 2.1-and 1.8-fold increase in iron and zinc content, respectively, in the tubers. A typical portion of this variety could provide 33.3% of the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for iron and 19.8% for zinc in women of reproductive age. This biofortified potato has the potential to reduce iron deficiency anemia and zinc deficiency, enhancing the health of populations in both rural and urban areas affected by poverty. INTRODUCTION Deficiencies in essential micronutrients, such as iron, zinc, vitamin A, folate, vitamin B12, vitamin D, and iodine, can lead to severe health consequences ( Stevens et al. 2022 ). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), iron deficiency anemia is the most common nutritional disorder, affecting approximately 25% of the global population, with young children and pregnant women at greatest risk (WHO 2015). Zinc deficiency is another major concern, particularly as it contributes to stunting in children (International Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group 2004). It is estimated that 1.1 billion people worldwide are at risk of zinc deficiency due to inadequate dietary intake ( Kumssa et al. 2015 ). Crop biofortification has emerged as a promising strategy to tackle food security challenges, particularly in developing countries ( Labuschagne 2023 ). This approach enhances the nutritional value through selective breeding or biotechnological methods to increase essential nutrients in the edible parts of plants. Advances in genetic engineering to enhance iron and zinc levels in crops began in the early 21 st century, with various methods tested over time ( Stangoulis and Knez 2022 ). Early strategies for iron biofortification focused on the use of the FERRITIN gene, which encodes a storage protein capable of binding up to 4,500 iron atoms ( Theil 2003 ). In rice, FERRITIN genes from Glycine max or Phaseolus vulgaris were expressed using endosperm-specific promoters, leading to a 2-to 3-fold increase in grain iron concentration ( Goto et al. 1999 ; Lucca et al. 2002 ; Vasconcelos et al. 2003 ). However, other studies reported no improvements in rice iron concentration using the same approach ( Qu Le et al. 2005 ). The introduction of FERRITIN alone may be insufficient to significantly enhance iron content, as effective biofortification likely requires not only improved iron storage but also increased uptake and translocation. In this context, the NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE ( NAS ) gene has gained attention. Nicotianamine (NA), a non-proteinogenic amino acid, chelates metal cations and plays a crucial role in the internal transport of iron and zinc within plants ( Nozoye 2018 ). Introducing NAS alone has led to iron content increases of 2-to 4.5-fold in soybean seeds, sweet potato tubers, potato tubers, rice grains, and wheat grains ( Nozoye et al. 2014 ; Nozoye et al. 2017 ; Zha et al. 2022 ; Masuda et al. 2009 ; Johnson et al. 2011 ; Singh et al. 2017 ). This strategy also provides the additional benefit of increasing zinc levels ( Nozoye 2018 ). In rice, the combined expression of NAS and FERRITIN has achieved significantly higher iron biofortification compared to FERRITIN alone, resulting in a 4-to 6-fold increase in iron content in grains ( Tsakirpaloglou et al. 2023 ; Wirth et al. 2009 ). However, in wheat, co-expression of NAS and FERRITIN did not result in higher iron levels compared to the expression of either NAS or FERRITIN alone ( Singh et al. 2017 ). These findings highlight the need for biofortification strategies to be tailored and tested for each specific crop species. To further enhance iron biofortification, additional genes have been introduced in combination with FERRITIN and NAS . One such gene is OsYSL2 , which encodes a transporter for the Fe(II)-NA complex ( Masuda et al. 2012 ). Another key gene is IDS3 , which encodes mugineic acid synthase, an enzyme crucial for the biosynthesis of mugineic acid, an iron chelator with functions similar to NA ( Masuda et al. 2013 ). The AtIRT gene, encoding the Iron-Regulated Transporter responsible for iron uptake from soil into roots, has also been used in combination with FERRITIN and NAS ( Boonyaves et al. 2017 ). More recently, the TaVIT2-D gene, encoding a vacuolar iron transporter, was introduced alongside NAS to enhance iron content in wheat grains ( Harrington et al. 2023 ). Potato ( Solanum tuberosum ) is the world’s most consumed non-grain food crop, with over 50% of production occurring in developing countries where micronutrient malnutrition is widespread ( Singh et al. 2021 ). Enhancing the micronutrient content of potato tubers is therefore vital for improving public health, particularly in regions where potatoes constitute a dietary staple for a significant portion of the population. While potatoes are already a rich source of micronutrients ( Zaheer and Akhtar 2016 ), they offer a unique advantage in terms of iron absorption. Their iron absorption rate is approximately 28% ( Jongstra et al. 2020 ), substantially higher than the 1-4% typically found in legumes ( DellaValle et al. 2015 ). This makes potatoes a particularly efficient dietary source of iron, which is especially important in areas where iron deficiency is a prevalent public health concern. This study aimed to develop biofortified varieties of the potato cultivar Spunta, the most widely cultivated variety in Argentina, with enhanced iron and zinc content in its tubers. To achieve this, two genes were employed: the FERRITIN gene from Phaseolus vulgaris ( PvFERRITIN ), expressed under the control of the tuber-specific PATATIN promoter, and the NAS1 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana ( AtNAS1 ) regulated by the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter. These genes were introduced either individually or in combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS Generation of potato transgenic lines expressing AtNAS1 and PvFERRITIN Construction of the pPZP-NPTII-35S::AtNAS1 vector: The 35S::AtNAS1-tNOS cassette was amplified from the IINF vector ( Boonyaves et al. 2017 ) and cloned into the pPZP-NPTII binary vector. Construction of the pPZP-NPTII-B33::PvFERRITIN vector: The PATATIN promoter (B33) sequence was obtained by restriction enzyme digestion of the pBIN-B33 vector ( Rocha-Sosa et al. 1989 ). The PvFERRITIN-tNOS cassette was amplified by PCR from the IINF vector. The B33::PvFERRITIN-tNOS cassette was assembled in an intermediary vector and then transferred into the pPZP-NPTII binary vector. Construction of the pPZP-NPTII-AtNAS1-PvFERRITIN vector: The B33::PvFERRITIN-tNOS cassette described above was inserted into the pPZP-NPTII-35S::AtNAS1 vector. The binary vectors described above were used to generate transgenic plants. Transformation of Solanum tuberosum (cv. Spunta) minituber discs was performed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens , following the protocol described by Muñiz García et al. (2014) . Regenerated plants carrying no plasmid but obtained by the same regeneration method as the transgenic lines were used as controls (referred to as wild type) for phenotypic evaluation. Eight transgenic lines were obtained: one expressing AtNAS1 (N1), two expressing PvFERRITIN (F1 and F2), and five expressing both genes (FN1-FN5). Plant growth conditions Transgenic and wild type plants were propagated in vitro from single-node cuttings on MS medium (prod no. M519, PhytoTechnology Laboratories, Shawnee Mission, KS, USA) containing 20 g L -1 sucrose solidified with 0.7% (w v -1 ) agar, and cultivated in a growth chamber under a 16-h photoperiod (4,000 lx light intensity) at 22 °C. Soil-grown potato plants were obtained by soil transfer of in vitro grown plants ( ex vitro ), or by planting seed tubers. Plants were cultivated in a greenhouse maintained between 22 °C and 24 °C, under a 16-h light photoperiod, in 1 L pots filled with commercial substrate Klassman TS 085 (Klasmann-Deilmann GmbH, Germany). For the assessment of line FN4 in soil ( Fig. 8 ), plants grown from seed tubers were cultivated in 3 L pots filled with a commercial soil-organic compost mixture (Hi-Soil, Argentina). To evaluate the effect of soil iron concentration ( Fig. 9 ), plants obtained ex vitro were cultivated in 1 L pots containing 200 g of Klassman TS 085 substrate, either with or without the addition of 5 or 10 g of the iron chelate iron(III) ethylenediamine di(o-hydroxyphenylacetic) acid (Fe-EDDHA; Basafer® Plus, COMPO EXPERT, Germany). Molecular characterization of transgenic plants PCR amplification of the transgenes: Plant genomic DNA was isolated from leaves of in vitro plants as described by Murray and Thompson (1980) . PCR amplification of the transgenes was performed using the primer pairs AtNAS1 (forward and reverse), PvFERRITIN (forward and reverse) and NPTII (forward and reverse). Amplification of elongation factor 1-α gene ( EF1-α ) with the primers EF1-α (forward and reverse) was performed as control. The primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Reverse transcription-PCR (RT–PCR): Expression of the transgenes was determined by RT-PCR. RNA was isolated from leaves and tubers, and cDNA synthesis was performed as described in País et al. (2010) . The amount of cDNA used in each reaction was derived from 50 ng of total RNA. PCR reactions were performed using the primer pairs AtNAS1 (forward and reverse), PvFERRITIN (forward and reverse) and EF1-α (forward and reverse) (Supplementary Table S1). Reactions were carried out under the following conditions: AtNAS1 : 55 °C of annealing temperature, 36 cycles (tubers) - 52 °C of annealing temperature, 28 cycles (leaves); PvFERRITIN : 62 °C of annealing temperature, 40 cycles (tubers); EF1-α : 50 °C of annealing temperature, 38 cycles (tubers) - 52 °C of annealing temperature, 28 cycles (leaves). PCR and RT-PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in a 1.5 % agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining, inverting the original image. Growth, morphological parameters and tuber yield Growth and morphological parameters were determined in soil-grown potato plants obtained either by soil transfer of in vitro grown plants ( ex vitro ) or by planting seed tubers. Growth and morphological parameters were determined 4 weeks after soil transfer, or 4 weeks after tuber planting. The apical leaflet area and shape (length to width ratio) of the second fully expanded leaf were determined using the Image J software ( Schindelin et al. 2012 ). Tuber yield was assessed in plants either transferred to soil ex vitro or grown from seed tubers. Tubers were harvested after plant senescence to determine tuber yield, evaluate tuber characteristics, and measure metals content. Dry matter, protein and starch content Dry matter content was determined by oven-drying finely chopped tubers at 80 °C until a constant weight was achieved (approximately 16 hours). The dry matter percentage (%) was calculated using the formula: 100 × (dry weight fresh weight -1 ). Protein content in fresh tubers was determined using the Bradford method ( Bradford 1976 ). Starch was measured according to the method described by Muñiz García et al. (2022) . Determination of iron and zinc content Iron and zinc content was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. Approximately 2 g of tuber samples were incinerated at 500 °C for 5 h. The resulting ashes were suspended in 5 mL of 20% (v v -1 ) HCl. The solution was then diluted to a final volume of 50 mL with distilled water. Metal concentrations were measured using an AAAnalyst 200 (Perkin-Elmer) atomic absorption spectrometer. Alternatively iron content was measured using a modified protocol from Manzanares et al. (1990) . Tuber samples were ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted with 3 µL of 1N HCl per mg of leaf tissue for 16 h at 20 °C. Following extraction, 300 µL of the solution were incubated with 200 µL of 20% NH₂OH·HCl for 5 min, then buffered with 200 µL of an acetate-acetic acid solution. From this mixture, 200 µL were transferred to a transparent 96-well plate in triplicate. The iron content was determined by adding 100 µL of 1.5% (w/v) o-phenanthroline solution and measuring the absorbance at 510 nm, using a calibration curve generated from iron(III) nitrate processed though the same protocol. This colorimetric method yields results comparable to those of atomic absorption spectrometry in plant samples ( Manzanares et al. 1990 ). The method used for iron measurement is specified in the respective figure legends. Measurement of leaf water loss and relative water content (RWC) Water loss and RWC were determined in the apical leaflet of the second fully expanded leaf from plants obtained ex vitro or grown from seed tubers, 4 weeks after soil transfer or 4 weeks after tuber planting. To measure water loss by air drying, leaflets were detached and placed at 22 °C. The fresh weight was measured at different time points. Water loss was calculated as the percentage of initial fresh weight lost at each time point. RWC was determined as described in Muñiz García et al. (2018) . Stomatal size, stomatal density and stomatal index Assessments of stomatal characteristics were conducted in plants obtained ex vitro or developed from seed tubers, 4 weeks after soil transfer or 4 weeks after tuber planting, respectively. The third fully expanded leaf was collected and impressions of the central area of the abaxial surface were obtained using dental silicone polymer. After drying, these impressions served as molds onto which transparent nail polish was applied. The resulting nail polish film was then transferred to a microscope slide and examined under a Nikon Eclipse Ti-E inverted microscope with 400x magnification. The images acquired were used to quantify stomatal density (number of stomata per mm²), stomatal size (µm²; measured using the Image J software), and the stomatal index, calculated as the number of stomata per 200 x 200 µm area divided by the total number of epidermal cells, multiplied by 100. For each leaf, data from two fields were averaged. Chlorophyll and carotenoid content Chlorophyll (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll) and total carotenoid content were determined spectrophotometrically. Samples were homogenized in acetone 80% (v v -1 ) (1 mL per 10 mg of fresh weight) followed by centrifugation at 3000 g for 5 min. The absorbance was measured at 663, 645 and 480 nm. The content of chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll were calculated according to Arnon (1949) . Total carotenoid content (mg g fresh weight -1 ) was calculated using the following formula: [A480 + (0.114 A663) - (0.638 A645)] V (1000 FW) -1 , where V is the total extract volume (mL), and FW is the weight (mg) of the sample extracted. Alternatively, chlorophyll content was measured on fully expanded leaves using a SPAD chlorophyll meter (Clorofilio1, Cavadevices, Argentina). Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronís multiple comparisons test, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukeýs multiple comparisons test, or Student‘s t test. A P- value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Generation of potato transgenic lines expressing AtNAS1 and PvFERRITIN S. tuberosum cv. Spunta was transformed with three distinct plasmids encoding AtNAS1 , PvFERRITIN , or both PvFERRITIN and AtNAS1 , respectively ( Fig. 1a ). AtNAS1 was driven by the constitutive 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus, while PvFERRITIN was expressed under the control of the tuber-specific PATATIN promoter. Eight transgenic lines were successfully established: one expressing AtNAS1 (N1), two expressing PvFERRITIN (F1 and F2), and five co-expressing both genes (FN1-FN5). All transgenic lines exhibited root development in selective media (Supplementary Fig. S1). The presence of the transgenes was confirmed by PCR amplification from genomic DNA ( Fig. 1b ). Expression of the respective transgenes was confirmed by RT-PCR in tubers and leaves ( Fig. 1c, d ). Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 1. Molecular characterization of the transgenic plants. a Schematic representation of the gene constructs used for the development of transgenic plants. b PCR analysis of genomic DNA isolated from leaves of wild type (wt) and transgenic plants (N1, F1-2, FN1-5) to detect the presence of the transgenes AtNAS1 , PvFERRITIN , and the NPTII gene. c and d RT-PCR analysis of AtNAS1 and PvFERRITIN in tubers and leaves of wild type and transgenic lines. A representative result of three independent experiments is shown. In d , all lanes were from the same gels but were not originally adjacent. Vegetative growth and tuberization The impact of AtNAS1 and PvFERRITIN expression on vegetative parameters was evaluated in plants transferred from in vitro conditions to soil ( ex vitro ). Overall, the co-expressing lines exhibited altered growth parameters compared to the wild type ( Fig. 2 ). Lines FN2, FN3, and FN5 displayed reduced stature ( Fig. 2a ), while FN1, FN3, and FN5 had fewer leaves per plant ( Fig. 2b ). Additionally, leaf size was smaller in FN1, FN2, FN3, and FN5 compared to the wild type ( Fig. 2c, d ). Notably, these parameters were unaffected in line FN4 ( Fig. 2a-d ). Despite the reduction in leaf size in certain transgenic lines, overall leaf morphology remained comparable to that of the wild type across all lines ( Fig. 2e, f ). A similar trend was observed in plants derived from seed tubers (Supplementary Fig. S2). However, under these conditions, only FN2 exhibited reductions in both leaf number and leaf size (Supplementary Fig. S2b, c), and alterations in leaf morphology were observed in FN1, FN2, FN3, and FN5 (Supplementary Fig. S2d, e). Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 2. Vegetative growth. Wild type and transgenic plants were produced ex vitro . 4 weeks after soil transfer, vegetative growth parameters were determined. a Plant height. b Number of leaves per plant. c - e Area, dry mass, and shape (length width -1 ; e ) of the apical leaflet of the second fully expanded leaf. f Representative image of the leaflets. a - c and e Data pooled from four distinct planting/harvest events, represented as individual measurements (dots: plants, or leaves from different plants) and mean ± s.e.m. d Data pooled from seven distinct planting/harvest events, represented as individual measurements (dots: leaves from different plants) and mean ± s.e.m. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; **** P < 0.001, compared with the wt by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. When evaluating tuberization parameters in ex vitro plants, FN1, FN2, FN3, and FN5 exhibited reduced yield and tuber weight compared to the wild type ( Fig. 3a, b ). Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 3. Yield and tuber characteristics. Wild type and transgenic plants were produced ex vitro . Tubers were harvested after plant senescence, and yield and tuber characteristics were determined. a Tuber yield. b Average tuber weight. c Number of tubers obtained per plant. d Tuber shape, defined as the ratio between the major and minor diameter. e Representative image of tubers. f Dry matter, protein, and starch content of tubers. a - d : Data pooled from four distinct planting/harvest events, represented as individual measurements (dots: plants, or average data of the tubers produced by one plant) and mean ± s.e.m. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.005; **** P < 0.001, compared with the wt by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. f : Data are the mean ± s.e.m of at least three tubers from different plants from a single planting/harvest event; the differences between transgenic lines and wt were not significant for any of the parameters analyzed. Furthermore, FN2, FN3, and FN5 showed a decrease in the number of tubers produced per plant ( Fig. 3c ). In contrast, these parameters remained unchanged in N1, F1, F2, and FN4 ( Fig. 3a-c ). Notably, tubers from F1 and FN5 plants displayed an altered shape ( Fig. 3d, e ). A similar trend in tuber yield was observed in plants developed from seed tubers (Supplementary Fig. S3a-c). However, under these conditions, more transgenic lines exhibited altered tuber shape (Supplementary Fig. S3d and e). No significant differences were observed in dry matter, protein, or starch content between the wild type and any of the transgenic lines ( Fig. 3f ). Iron and zinc content Iron and zinc content was assessed in tubers of wild type and transgenic plants obtained ex vitro ( Fig. 4 ). Lines N1, F1, and F2 exhibited iron levels comparable to those of the wild type, whereas FN1, FN2, FN3, FN4 and FN5 showed increased iron concentrations. Similarly, the co-expressing lines displayed higher zinc levels compared to the wild type. The FN5 line exhibited stunted growth and a significantly reduced tuber yield at the onset of this study. Consequently, due to the limited availability of tuber material, this line was excluded from the zinc content analysis. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 4. Iron and zinc content of tubers. Tubers of wild type and transgenic plants produced ex vitro were harvested after plant senescence. Iron content ( a ) was determined using the colorimetric method, and zinc content ( b ) was measured by atomic absorption spectrometry. a Data pooled from two independent planting/harvest events for wt, N1, F2, FN1, and FN4, and from one event for F1, FN2, FN3, and FN5. b Data pooled from three distinct planting/harvest events for wt, N1, F1, F2, FN2 and FN4, and from two events for FN1 and FN3. Data are presented as individual measurements (dots: tubers from different plants) and mean ± s.e.m. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.005; **** P < 0.001, compared with the wt by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. Water loss, RWC and stomatal characteristics Given the critical role of water balance in plant physiology and the observation that various co-expressing lines exhibit altered leaf morphology, the effect of AtNAS1 and PvFERRITIN expression on water retention capacity was assessed. This evaluation involved measuring the rate of water loss and relative water content (RWC) in wild type and transgenic plants obtained ex vitro . As shown in Fig. 5a and 5b , leaves from transgenic lines N1, F1, FN2, FN3, and FN5 exhibited an increased rate of water loss compared to the wild type, whereas no significant effect was observed in F2, FN1, and FN4. Additionally, FN2, FN3 and FN5 also showed a decrease in RWC ( Fig. 5c, d ). Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 5. Water loss and RWC. a Water loss rate, determined in wild type and transgenic plants produced ex vitro 1-7 h after leaf detachment (statistical analysis is shown in Supplementary Fig. S4). b Water loss rate 24 h after leaf detachment; data pooled from three distinct planting/harvest events, represented as individual measurements (dots: leaves from different plants) and mean ± s.e.m; *** P < 0.005; **** P < 0.001, compared with the wt by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. c RWC, determined in wild type and transgenic plants produced ex vitro after 2, 4 and 8 h (statistical analysis is shown in Supplementary Fig. S5). d RWC after 24 h; data pooled from four distinct planting/harvest events, represented as individual measurements (dots: leaves from different plants) and mean ± s.e.m; **** P < 0.001, compared with the wt by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. To determine whether the reduced water retention capacity in the transgenic lines is due to an impaired stomatal function, the stomatal characteristics of the different lines were evaluated using plants obtained ex vitro . The lines FN2, FN3 and FN5 exhibited lower stomatal density and larger stomatal size compared to wild type plants, whereas these parameters were unaffected in N1, F1, F2, FN1, and FN4 ( Fig. 6a, b, d ). The stomatal index was reduced in FN2, FN3 and FN5, but this reduction was not statistically significant ( Fig. 6c ). When assessing plants developed from seed tubers, similar results were observed (Supplementary Fig. S6). However, under these conditions, the differences in stomatal index between the wild type and lines FN2, FN3, and FN5 were statistically significant. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 6. Stomatal characteristics. Stomatal density ( a ), stomatal size ( b ), and stomatal index ( c ) were determined in wild type and transgenic plants produced ex vitro . d Representative image of abaxial epidermis (scale bar: 40 μm). a - c Data pooled from three distinct planting/harvest events, represented as individual measurements (dots: leaves from different plants) and mean ± s.e.m; * P < 0.05; *** P < 0.005; **** P < 0.001, compared with the wt by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. It has been observed that plants with a higher density of smaller stomata exhibit faster stomatal responses, whereas larger stomata present slower kinetics ( Lawson and Matthews 2020 ). Therefore, the increased stomatal size and reduced stomatal density observed in lines FN2, FN3 and FN5 may contribute to their impaired ability to adjust stomatal movements, resulting in increased rates of water loss and decreased RWC. Photosynthetic pigments When assessing the photosynthetic pigments chlorophyll and carotenoids in ex vitro plants, a significant decrease in total chlorophyll content was observed in lines FN1 and FN5 compared to the wild type, due to reductions in chlorophyll a and b (Fig. a-c). FN2, and FN3 showed a same trend, but the differences from the wild type were not statistically significant. In contrast, chlorophyll content remained unaffected in lines N1, F1, F2, and FN4. No differences were observed in the chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b ratio among the transgenic lines and the wild type ( Fig. 7d ). The total carotenoid content remained unchanged in all transgenic lines ( Fig. 7e ). Similar results were obtained for plants grown from seed tubers (Supplementary Fig. S7). Under these conditions, lines FN1, FN3, and FN5 exhibited a statistically significant reduction in total chlorophyll content due to decreases in chlorophyll a and b. Additionally, FN5 exhibited a reduction in total carotenoid content. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 7. Photosynthetic pigments content. Total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b content ( a - c ); chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b ratio ( d ), and total carotenoids content ( e ), determined in leaves from wild type and transgenic plants produced ex vitro . Data are the mean ± s.e.m of individual measurements (dots: leaves from different plants) from a single planting/harvest event. * P < 0.05, compared with the wt by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. Assessment of line FN4 grown in soil The assessment of morphological and physiological parameters, along with iron and zinc content, was conducted on plants grown either ex vitro or from seed tubers in Klassman TS 085 substrate. This substrate is composed of Sphagnum peat moss, fertilizer, and trace elements, providing a stable composition that is essential for ensuring experimental reproducibility. From this evaluation, we determined that the FN4 line exhibits increased iron and zinc content in tubers, without compromising yield or affecting any of the assessed morphological or physiological parameters ( Fig. 2 - 7 ). We evaluated the performance of the FN4 line using plants grown from seed tubers in a soil and organic compost mixture, simulating conditions more comparable to field cultivation. Under these growth conditions, FN4 plants showed no significant differences compared to wild type plants in terms of plant height ( Fig. 8a ), number of leaves per plant ( Fig. 8b ), tuber yield ( Fig. 8d ), tuber weight ( Fig. 8e ), number of tubers per plant ( Fig. 8f ), or tuber shape ( Fig. 8g ). However, FN4 plants exhibited an increased chlorophyll concentration compared to the wild type ( Fig. 8c ). The iron and zinc contents were significantly higher in tubers from FN4 plants than in those from wild-type plants ( Fig. 8h, i ), with increases of 111.4% for iron and 79.1% for zinc. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 8. Assessment of line FN4 grown in soil. Wild type and FN4 plants developed from seed tubers were cultivated in pots filled with soil-compost mixture. 4 weeks after planting, the plant height ( a ), the number of leaves per plant ( b ), and the chlorophyll content (SPAD units; c ) were measured. Data are the mean ± s.e.m of individual measurements (dots: plants, or leaves from different plants) from a single planting/harvest event. Tubers were harvested after plant senescence, and the tuber yield ( d ), the average tuber weight ( e ), the number of tubers obtained per plant ( f ), and the tuber shape, defined as the ratio between the major and minor diameter ( g ) were determined. Data are the mean ± s.e.m of individual measurements (dots: plants, or average data of the tubers produced by one plant) from a single planting/harvest event. h and i Iron and zinc content of tubers, measured by atomic absorption spectrometry. Data are the mean ± s.e.m of 6 tubers from different plants from a single planting/harvest event. **** P < 0.001, compared with the wt by Student‘s t test. Effects of soil iron concentration on growth, yield and tuber iron content We evaluated the growth, yield, and iron accumulation in tubers of wild-type and FN4 plants using ex vitro plants cultivated in Klassman TS 085 substrate, with or without the addition of varying amounts of Fe-EDDHA. The addition of 5 g of Fe-EDDHA did not significantly affect plant height ( Fig. 9a ), number of leaves ( Fig. 9b ), or yield ( Fig. 9d ) in either wild type or FN4 plants. In contrast, the addition of 10 g of Fe-EDDHA negatively impacted growth in both wild type and FN4 plants ( Fig. 9a ), but only reduced yield in the wild type ( Fig. 9d ). Chlorophyll content increased in response to Fe-EDDHA addition in the leaves of both wild-type and FN4 plants ( Fig. 9c ). Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 9. Effects of soil iron concentration on growth, yield and tuber iron content. Wild type and FN4 plants produced ex vitro were cultivated in Klassman TS 085 substrate, with or without the addition of the indicated amounts of Fe-EDDHA. 4 weeks after soil transfer, the plant height ( a ), number of leaves per plant ( b ), and SPAD units ( c ) were determined. Tubers were harvested after plant senescence; the tuber yield was determined ( d ), and tuber iron content was measured by the colorimetric method ( e ). Data are the mean ± s.e.m of individual measurements (dots: plants, average data of the tubers produced by one plant, or tubers from different plants) from a single planting/harvest event. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukeýs post-hoc test. Different letters in the bar graphs indicate statistically significant differences. Interestingly, tuber iron content significantly increased in both wild type and FN4 plants with the addition of 5 g of Fe-EDDHA. However, while the addition of 10 g of Fe-EDDHA further enhanced iron content in FN4 tubers, no such increase was observed in wild type tubers ( Fig. 9e ). These results indicate that line FN4 has a greater capacity to accumulate iron in tubers compared to the wild type, with iron accumulation in the wild type saturating at lower soil iron concentrations. DISCUSSION The aim of this study was to develop biofortified varieties of the potato cultivar Spunta with enhanced iron and zinc content in the tubers. To achieve this, transgenic potato plants were generated expressing AtNAS1 , PvFERRITIN , or both genes ( Fig. 1 ). Remarkably, significant increases in iron and zinc concentrations were observed exclusively in lines co-expressing both genes ( Fig. 4 ). These findings reveal that simultaneous expression of AtNAS1 and PvFERRITIN is required to achieve substantial enhancements in iron and zinc levels in Spunta potato tubers. A recent study demonstrated that overexpression of AtNAS1 alone in the potato variety Désirée increased tuber iron content by 2.4-fold ( Zha et al. 2022 ). Using a similar approach, we generated one Spunta line (N1), which showed no differences in tuber iron or zinc content compared to the wild type ( Fig. 4 ). However, to draw robust conclusions about the effectiveness of this strategy, it would have been necessary to obtain additional Spunta lines overexpressing AtNAS1 alone. The phenotypic evaluation of the transgenic lines revealed that co-expression of AtNAS1 and PvFERRITIN affects both vegetative growth and tuber yield ( Fig. 2 , Fig. 3a-c ). Among the lines expressing both genes, FN4 exhibited the least adverse effects, with growth and tuberization parameters closely resembling those of the wild type. Furthermore, our findings indicate that AtNAS1 and PvFERRITIN expression in potato impairs the plant’s water retention capacity possibly by altering stomatal density and size ( Fig. 5 , Fig. 6 ). The reduction in stomatal density, accompanied by an increase in stomatal size in lines FN2, FN3, and FN5, along with smaller leaf sizes and reduced leaf numbers, suggests that the introduction of these genes impacts multiple aspects of leaf development. Additionally, co-expression of AtNAS1 and PvFERRITIN influences photosynthetic pigment concentration ( Fig. 7 ). Notably, FN4 showed no significant changes in water loss rate, RWC, or stomatal characteristics, while exhibiting increased chlorophyll levels ( Fig. 8c ; Fig. 9c ). Tubers of the FN4 line exhibited a greater capacity to accumulate iron than wild type tubers under conditions of increased soil iron availability, without affecting plant yield, even when vegetative growth rates were reduced due to elevated soil iron levels ( Fig. 9 ). This outcome highlights the effectiveness of introducing the PvFERRITIN gene under the control of a tuber-specific promoter, in combination with the AtNAS1 gene, to enhance iron uptake, transport, and targeted accumulation in the tubers. Our findings demonstrate that the co-expression of AtNAS1 under a constitutive promoter and PvFERRITIN under a tuber-specific promoter is a promising strategy for improving iron and zinc content in the tubers of the Spunta potato variety. However, given the potential effects of these genes on growth, development, and yield, it is crucial to evaluate multiple transformation events to select one that offers effective biofortification with minimal negative impacts. In this study, among five co-expressing events, we identified FN4, which exhibits a 2.1-and 1.8-fold increase in tuber iron and zinc content, respectively, without compromising yield ( Fig. 8 ). Additionally, our findings indicate that iron accumulation in tubers is influenced by the substrate in which the plants are cultivated ( Fig. 4 ; Fig. 8 ; Fig. 9 ). Therefore, when assessing strategies for iron biofortification in potato, it is important to test different substrates. The biofortified FN4 potato variety could be an important dietary source of iron. For women aged 19 to 50, the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for iron is 18.0 mg/day, assuming an absorption rate of 18% (Institute of Medicine 2001). Considering an absorption rate of 28.4%, as found in yellow-fleshed potatoes ( Jongstra et al. 2020 ), a 300 g serving of FN4 tubers (equivalent to the average weight of a Spunta tuber) would provide 33.3% of the daily iron requirement. Additionally, the same portion would fulfill 19.8% of the daily zinc RDA for women. This variety holds significant potential to address iron deficiency anemia and zinc deficiency, improving the health of populations in both rural and urban areas affected by poverty. Field testing is necessary to confirm the agronomic resilience and nutritional benefits of this high-iron/high-zinc potato variety. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material. Author contributions DAC and MNMG conceived and designed the research. JIC, MZ, VRS, and MF conducted the experiments and analyzed the data. DAC wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version. Funding This work was supported by the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) and the National Agency for the Promotion of Science and Technology (ANPCyT). Data Availability The data that support this study are available in the article and accompanying online supplementary material. Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Acknowledgements We thank Navreet K. Bhullar for his kind gift of the IINF vector. References ↵ Arnon DI ( 1949 ) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol 24 : 1 – 15 . doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1 OpenUrl FREE Full Text ↵ Boonyaves K , Wu TY , Gruissem W , Bhullar NK ( 2017 ) Enhanced Grain Iron Levels in Rice Expressing an IRON-REGULATED METAL TRANSPORTER, NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE , and FERRITIN Gene Cassette . Front Plant Sci 8 : 130 . doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00130 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Bradford MM ( 1976 ) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding . Anal Biochem 72 : 248 – 54 . doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ DellaValle DM , Glahn RP , Shaff JE , O’Brien KO ( 2015 ) Iron Absorption from an Intrinsically Labeled Lentil Meal Is Low but Upregulated in Women with Poor Iron Status . J Nutr 145 : 2253 – 2257 . doi: 10.3945/jn.115.217273 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Goto F , Yoshihara T , Shigemoto N , Toki S , Takaiwa F ( 1999 ) Iron fortification of rice seed by the soybean ferritin gene . Nat Biotechnol 17 : 282 – 286 . doi: 10.1038/7029 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Micronutrients ( 2001 ) Dietary Reference Intakes for vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc: a report of the Panel on Micronutrients. Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine . Washington, DC : National Academy Press . ↵ Harrington SA , Connorton JM , Nyangoma NIM , McNelly R , Morgan YML , Aslam MF , Sharp PA , Johnson AAT , Uauy C , Balk J ( 2023 ) A two-gene strategy increases iron and zinc concentrations in wheat flour, improving mineral bioaccessibility . Plant Physiol 191 : 528 – 541 . doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac499 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed International Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group (IZiNCG) ; Brown KH , Rivera JA , Bhutta Z , Gibson RS , King JC , Lönnerdal B , Ruel MT , Sandtröm B , Wasantwisut E , Hotz C ( 2004 ) International Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group (IZiNCG) technical document #1. Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations and options for its control . Food Nutr Bull 25 (1 Suppl 2):S99-203 ↵ Johnson AA , Kyriacou B , Callahan DL , Carruthers L , Stangoulis J , Lombi E , Tester M ( 2011 ) Constitutive overexpression of the OsNAS gene family reveals single-gene strategies for effective iron-and zinc-biofortification of rice endosperm . PLoS One 6 : e24476 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024476 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Jongstra R , Mwangi MN , Burgos G , Zeder C , Low JW , Mzembe G , Liria R , Penny M , Andrade MI , Fairweather-Tait S , Zum Felde T , Campos H , Phiri KS , Zimmermann MB , Wegmüller R ( 2020 ) Iron Absorption from Iron-Biofortified Sweetpotato Is Higher Than Regular Sweetpotato in Malawian Women while Iron Absorption from Regular and Iron-Biofortified Potatoes Is High in Peruvian Women . J Nutr 150 : 3094 – 3102 . doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa267 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kumssa DB , Joy EJ , Ander EL , Watts MJ , Young SD , Walker S , Broadley MR ( 2015 ) Dietary calcium and zinc deficiency risks are decreasing but remain prevalent . Sci Rep 5 : 10974 . doi: 10.1038/srep10974 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Labuschagne M ( 2023 ) Biofortification to improve food security . Emerg Top Life Sci 7 : 219 – 227 . doi: 10.1042/ETLS20230066 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Lawson T , Matthews J ( 2020 ) Guard Cell Metabolism and Stomatal Function . Annu Rev Plant Biol 71 : 273 – 302 . doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100251 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Lucca P , Hurrell R , Potrykus I ( 2002 ) Fighting iron deficiency anemia with iron-rich rice . J Am Coll Nutr 21 : 184S – 190 S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2002 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ van Beusichem , M.L Manzanares M , Lucena JJ , Gárate A ( 1990 ) Iron(II) determination in leaves of strawberry ( Fragaria vesca ). In: van Beusichem , M.L . (eds) Plant Nutrition — Physiology and Applications. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences , vol 41. Springer , Dordrecht . doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-0585-6_135 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Masuda H , Ishimaru Y , Aung MS , Kobayashi T , Kakei Y , Takahashi M , Higuchi K , Nakanishi H , Nishizawa NK ( 2012 ) Iron biofortification in rice by the introduction of multiple genes involved in iron nutrition . Sci Rep 2 : 543 . doi: 10.1038/srep00543 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Masuda H , Kobayashi T , Ishimaru Y , Takahashi M , Aung MS , Nakanishi H , Mori S , Nishizawa NK ( 2013 ) Iron-biofortification in rice by the introduction of three barley genes participated in mugineic acid biosynthesis with soybean ferritin gene . Front Plant Sci 4 : 132 . doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00132 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Masuda H , Usuda K , Kobayashi T , Ishimaru Y , Kakei Y , Takahashi M , Higuchi K , Nakanishi H , Mori S , Nishizawa NK ( 2009 ) Overexpression of the barley nicotianamine synthase gene HvNAS1 increases iron and zinc concentrations in rice grains Rice 2:155–166. doi: 10.1007/s12284-009-9031-1 OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science ↵ Muñiz García MN , Cortelezzi JI , Capiati DA ( 2022 ) The protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit StPP2Ac2b is involved in the control of potato tuber sprouting and source-sink balance in tubers and sprouts . J Exp Bot 73 : 6784 – 6799 . doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac326 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Muñiz García MN , Cortelezzi JI , Fumagalli M , Capiati DA ( 2018 ) Expression of the Arabidopsis ABF4 gene in potato increases tuber yield, improves tuber quality and enhances salt and drought tolerance . Plant Mol Biol 98 : 137 – 152 . doi: 10.1007/s11103-018-0769-y OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Muñiz García MN , Stritzler M , Capiati DA ( 2014 ) Heterologous expression of Arabidopsis ABF4 gene in potato enhances tuberization through ABA-GA crosstalk regulation . Planta 239 : 615 – 631 . doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-2001-2 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Murray MG , Thompson WF ( 1980 ) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA . Nucleic Acids Res 8 : 4321 – 4325 . doi: 10.1093/nar/8.19.4321 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Nozoye T ( 2018 ) The Nicotianamine Synthase Gene Is a Useful Candidate for Improving the Nutritional Qualities and Fe-Deficiency Tolerance of Various Crops . Front Plant Sci 9 : 340 . doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00340 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Nozoye T , Kim S , Kakei Y , Takahashi M , Nakanishi H , Nishizawa NK ( 2014 ) Enhanced levels of nicotianamine promote iron accumulation and tolerance to calcareous soil in soybean . Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 78 : 1677 – 1684 . doi: 10.1080/09168451.2014.936350 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Nozoye T , Otani M , Senoura T , Nakanishi H , Nishizawa NK ( 2017 ) Overexpression of barley nicotianamine synthase 1 confers tolerance in the sweet potato to iron deficiency in calcareous soil . Plant Soil 418 : 75 – 88 . doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-3134-4 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ País SM , García MN , Téllez-Iñón MT , Capiati DA ( 2010 ) Protein phosphatases type 2A mediate tuberization signaling in Solanum tuberosum L. leaves . Planta 232 : 37 – 49 . doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1150-9 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Qu le Q , Yoshihara T , Ooyama A , Goto F , Takaiwa F ( 2005 ) Iron accumulation does not parallel the high expression level of ferritin in transgenic rice seeds . Planta 222 : 225 – 233 . doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-1530-8 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Rocha-Sosa M , Sonnewald U , Frommer W , Stratmann M , Schell J , Willmitzer L ( 1989 ) Both developmental and metabolic signals activate the promoter of a class I patatin gene . EMBO J 8 : 23 – 29 . doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03344.x OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Schindelin J , Arganda-Carreras I , Frise E , Kayniv V , Longair M , Pietzsch T , Preibisch S , Rueden C , Saalfeld S , Schmid B , Tinevez JY , White DJ , Hartenstein V , Eliceiri K , Tomancak P , Cardona A ( 2012 ) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis . Nat Methods 9 : 676 – 682 . doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Singh B , Goutam U , Kukreja S , Sharma J , Sood S , Bhardwaj V ( 2021 ). Potato biofortification: an effective way to fight global hidden hunger . Physiol Mol Biol Plants 27 : 2297 – 2313 . doi: 10.1007/s12298-021-01081-4 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Singh SP , Keller B , Gruissem W , Bhullar NK ( 2017 ) Rice NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE 2 expression improves dietary iron and zinc levels in wheat . Theor Appl Genet 130 : 283 – 292 . doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2808-x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Stangoulis JCR , Knez M ( 2022 ) Biofortification of major crop plants with iron and zinc-achievements and future directions . Plant Soil 474 : 57 – 76 . doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05330-7 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Stevens GA , Beal T , Mbuya MNN , Luo H , Neufeld LM ; Global Micronutrient Deficiencies Research Group ( 2022 ) Micronutrient deficiencies among preschool-aged children and women of reproductive age worldwide: a pooled analysis of individual-level data from population-representative surveys . Lancet Glob Health 10 : e1590 – e1599 . doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00367-9 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Theil EC ( 2003 ) Ferritin: at the crossroads of iron and oxygen metabolism . J Nutr 133 : 1549S – 1553 S. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.5.1549S OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Tsakirpaloglou N , Bueno-Mota GM , Soriano JC , Arcillas E , Arines FM , Yu SM , Stangoulis J , Trijatmiko KR , Reinke R , Tohme J , Bouis H , Slamet-Loedin IH ( 2023 ) Proof of concept and early development stage of market-oriented high iron and zinc rice expressing dicot ferritin and rice nicotianamine synthase genes . Sci Rep 13 : 676 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26854-z OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Vasconcelos M , Datta K , Oliva N , Khalekuzzaman M , Torrizo L , Krishnan S , Oliveira M , Goto F , Datta SK ( 2003 ) Enhanced iron and zinc accumulation in transgenic rice with the ferritin gene . Plant Sci 164 : 371 – 378 . doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00421-1 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Wirth J , Poletti S , Aeschlimann B , Yakandawala N , Drosse B , Osorio S , Tohge T , Fernie AR , Günther D , Gruissem W , Sautter C ( 2009 ) Rice endosperm iron biofortification by targeted and synergistic action of nicotianamine synthase and ferritin . Plant Biotechnol J 7 : 631 – 644 . doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00430.x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science World Health Organization ( 2015 ) The Global Prevalence of Anemia in 2011. World Health Organization: Geneva , Switzerland , 2015 . ↵ Zaheer K , Akhtar MH ( 2016 ) Potato production, usage, and nutrition-a review . Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56 : 711 – 721 . doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.724479 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Zha M , Li X , Li R , Huang J , Fan J , Zhang J , Wang Y , Zhang C ( 2022 ) Overexpression of Nicotianamine Synthase (AtNAS1) Increases Iron Accumulation in the Tuber of Potato . Plants (Basel) 11 : 2741 . doi: 10.3390/plants11202741 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted March 07, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Iron and zinc biofortification in potato through the introduction of NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE and FERRITIN genes Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Iron and zinc biofortification in potato through the introduction of NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE and FERRITIN genes Juan I. Cortelezzi , Martina Zubillaga , Victoria R. Scardino , Marina Fumagalli , María N. Muñiz García , Daniela A. Capiati bioRxiv 2025.03.01.640813; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.01.640813 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Iron and zinc biofortification in potato through the introduction of NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE and FERRITIN genes Juan I. Cortelezzi , Martina Zubillaga , Victoria R. Scardino , Marina Fumagalli , María N. Muñiz García , Daniela A. Capiati bioRxiv 2025.03.01.640813; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.01.640813 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Plant Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7635) Biochemistry (17691) Bioengineering (13892) Bioinformatics (41937) Biophysics (21452) Cancer Biology (18588) Cell Biology (25504) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13378) Ecology (19899) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24320) Genetics (15609) Genomics (22506) Immunology (17736) Microbiology (40394) Molecular Biology (17181) Neuroscience (88605) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2832) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4824) Physiology (7641) Plant Biology (15156) Scientific Communication and Education (2045) Synthetic Biology (4294) Systems Biology (9825) Zoology (2271)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00