Osteoporosis Prevalence in Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic Syndrome: Implications for Mortality

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 53,626 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Osteoporosis Prevalence in Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic Syndrome: Implications for Mortality | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Osteoporosis Prevalence in Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic Syndrome: Implications for Mortality Xi Du , Qianyu Yang , Zhiqiang Duan , Hui Gu , Xue Zhang , Hao Liu , Mao Xiao , View ORCID Profile Zhuoxing Li , Ming Zhao , View ORCID Profile Xiang Xiao doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.10.25322036 Xi Du 1 Chengdu PiDu District People’s Hospital, the 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Qianyu Yang 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College , Chengdu, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Zhiqiang Duan 3 Department of Nephrology, Air Force Hospital of Western Theater Command , 610021, Chengdu, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Hui Gu 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College , Chengdu, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Xue Zhang 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College , Chengdu, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Hao Liu 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College , Chengdu, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Mao Xiao 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College , Chengdu, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Zhuoxing Li 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College , Chengdu, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Zhuoxing Li Ming Zhao 1 Chengdu PiDu District People’s Hospital, the 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: chuanbeiyi.2005{at}163.com xxiang1001{at}163.com Xiang Xiao 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College , Chengdu, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Xiang Xiao For correspondence: chuanbeiyi.2005{at}163.com xxiang1001{at}163.com Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Objective This study aims to investigate the prevalence of osteoporosis (OS) in patients with Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic (CKM) Syndrome and its relationship with the risk of mortality in CKM patients. Methods Patients diagnosed with CKM were included from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database between 2009 and 2018. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, while the secondary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality. The relationship between OS and the prognosis of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in CKM patients was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox regression model. Results A total of 602 Non-CKM (stage 0) and 6129 CKM (stages 1, 2, 3, and 4) patients were included. The prevalence of OS in CKM patients at stages 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 3.49%, 2.25%, 4.97%, 13.52%, and 8.39%, respectively. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that compared to the normal bone mineral density group, CKM patients in the osteopenia group had a 55% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR=1.55; 95% CI, 1.22-1.98, P = 0.001) and a 120% increase in the risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR=2.20; 95% CI, 1.39-3.46, P = 0.001); In the OS group, CKM patients exhibited a 199% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.99; 95% CI, 1.86-4.82, P = 0.001) and a 2.14-fold increase in the risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR=3.14; 95% CI, 1.09-9.02, P = 0.03). Conclusion Osteopenia and OS are more prevalent in patients with CKM and are associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. 1. Introduction The cardiovascular-renal-metabolic (CKM) syndrome is a scientific statement proposed by the American Heart Association (AHA). The CKM syndrome is defined as a systemic disease characterized by the pathophysiological interactions between metabolic risk factors, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the cardiovascular system, leading to a high incidence of multiple organ dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular outcomes [ 1 ] . Furthermore, it reflects the interactions between metabolic risk factors, CKD, and the cardiovascular system, which have profound effects on morbidity and mortality [ 2 ] . The definition of osteoporosis (OS) is “a systemic skeletal disease characterized by a reduction in bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to an increased fragility of bones and a heightened risk of fractures” [ 3 ] . It is not only a common disease in aging societies but also an important risk factor for various chronic diseases. Many risk factors associated with OS include low peak bone mass achieved during growth, hormonal factors, the use of certain medications, smoking, low physical activity, inadequate calcium and vitamin D intake, ethnicity, short stature, and a personal or family history of fractures [ 4 ] . Moreover, the risk factors also include hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, oxidative stress, inflammation, Hyperhomocysteinemia, cardiovascular diseases, among others [ 5 , 6 ] . OS, as a metabolic bone disease [ 7 ] . It may also coexist with other metabolic diseases, including but not limited to obesity, diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [ 8 ] . Current research findings indicate that OS may be associated with various metabolic-related diseases, including CKD, hyperparathyroidism, and atherosclerosis [ 9 – 11 ] . However, since the concept of CKM was put forward, there has been no research on its incidence and interrelationships in CKM yet. CKM patients often exhibit various factors associated with the occurrence of OS, which may lead to a high prevalence of OS within this population; moreover, the condition of OS itself may further complicate the pathology and unfavorable prognosis of CKM patients. Therefore, elucidating the relationship between the two is essential for a more comprehensive understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of CKM. This understanding is critically important for reducing cardiovascular and all-cause mortality risks in CKM patients and improving their quality of life, and it provides a basis for developing more effective prevention and treatment strategies. Thus, our study aims to explore the prevalence of OS among patients with CKM syndrome and its relationship with the risk of mortality in these patients. 2. Methods 2.1 Research Design and Participants The data for this study is derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2009 to 2018, with CKM stage 0 defined as Non-CKM and CKM stages 1-4 defined as CKM. NHANES aims to explore individual-level demographic, health, and nutrition information through personal interviews and standardized physical examinations conducted by Mobile Examination Centers (MEC), and to assess the health and nutritional status of non-institutionalized civilians in the United States [ 12 ] . In this study, in order to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the research, we adopted the staging structure of CKM syndrome proposed by the American Heart Association: 1) Stage 0, no CKM risk factors; 2) Stage 1, excessive or dysfunctional fat; 3) Stage 2, metabolic risk factors (hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome) or moderate to high-risk CKD; 4) Stage 3, subclinical cardiovascular disease or risk equivalents in CKM syndrome (high predicted cardiovascular disease risk or very high-risk CKD); 5) Stage 4, clinical cardiovascular disease in CKM syndrome [ 2 ] ( Supplementar table 1) . The diagnosis and classification of OS utilized dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) [ 13 ] . In the NHANES database, OS is defined as (1) a T-score of ≤ −2.5 for the femoral neck or lumbar spine; (2) occurrence of a low-trauma hip fracture (regardless of bone density), or clinical fractures of the vertebrae, proximal humerus, pelvis, or distal forearm with T-scores > −2.5 but < −1.0; or (3) a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score that meets the intervention threshold set by the National Osteoporosis Foundation (hip fracture risk ≥ 3% or major osteoporotic fracture risk ≥ 20%), fulfilling any one of the above criteria [ 14 ] . Exclusion criteria: 1) Absence of CKM diagnosis, 2) Age under 20 years, 3) Pregnancy, 4) Missing osteoporosis-related data. All-cause mortality is defined as the termination of an individual’s life due to any cause, while cardiovascular death is defined as the death directly caused by diseases related to the cardiovascular system [ 15 ] . The definitions of smoking, drinking, hypertension, anemia, hyperlipidemia, diabetes,CKD, etc. can be found in Supplementary Table 1 . NHANES is a survey project conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics. The study protocol adheres to the ethical standards set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964 and its subsequent amendments, and has received approval from the National Health Statistics Research Ethics Review Board. All participants signed informed consent forms [ 16 ] . 2.2. Statistical analysis According to the guidelines of the CDC in the United States, the statistical methods used in this study accounted for sample weights. Count data were described using means (standard error, SE), and categorical variables were described using percentages (SE). A multivariable Cox regression model was employed to evaluate the relationship between OS and the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in CKM patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess the relationship between OS and the prognosis of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in CKM patients. The method of deletion is used to handle missing values. In the sensitivity analysis, multiple imputation is employed to address the missing values, in order to eliminate the bias caused by the deletion of missing data. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.3.1, and a two-sided P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3. Results 3.1 Baseline characteristics Our study included data from 49,693 patients in the NHANES database from 2009 to 2018. After exclusions, a total of 602 Non-CKM (CKM stage 0) and 6129 CKM patients (CKM stage 1, 2, 3, 4) were finally included, among which the proportion of stage 1 patients was 26.36%, stage 2 patients 60.27%, stage 3 patients 3.74%, and stage 4 patients 9.62%. In CKM patients, the average age was 49.08 years, with males constituting 52.08% of the sample. The average BMI was 29.51 kg/m², and the incidence rates of hypertension, diabetes, CKD, and hyperlipidemia were 42.57%, 16.81%, 14.92%, and 72.11%, respectively. Compared with the normal bone mineral density (BMD) population, patients with osteopenia and OS were older, had lower eGFR and BMI, and had a higher proportion of females, as well as higher incidence rates of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and CKD (All P < 0.05) ( Figure 1 , Table 1 ) . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Inclusion flowchart. View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. Baseline clinical features of enrolled individuals 3.2 Incidence of OS in patients with CKM In Non-CKM (stage 0) patients, the proportions of normal BMD, osteopenia, and OS were 63,56%, 32.95%, and 3.49%, respectively. However, among the 6129 CKM patients included, individuals with normal BMD accounted for 61.19%, those with osteopenia accounted for 33.70%, and those with OS accounted for 5.12%. Specifically, in CKM stage 1 patients, the proportions of normal BMD, osteopenia, and OS were 70.24%, 27.52%, and 2.25%, respectively; in CKM stage 2 patients, the proportions were 62.08%, 32.95%, and 4.97%; in CKM stage 3 patients, the proportions were 39.73%, 46.75%, and 13.52%; and in CKM stage 4 patients, the proportions were 49.98%, 41.64%, and 8.39% ( Supplementary table 2 ). Among all CKM patients, the incidence of osteopenia in male was 28.08%, and that of OS was 3.42%, while in female, the incidence of osteopenia was 38.08%, and that of OS was 6.51%. The incidence rates of both osteopenia and OS in female CKM patients were significantly higher than those in male CKM patients ( P <0.001) ( Supplementary table 2 ). For age of CKM patients < 65 years, the proportions of osteopenia and OS were 28.68% and 3.68%, respectively, while for age of CKM patients ≥ 65 years, the proportions were 49.54% and 9.74%, indicating a higher risk of bone-related issues in elderly CKM patients ( P < 0.001) ( Supplementary table 2 ). Among CKM patients over 65 years of age, the incidence of osteopenia in female was 58.97%, and that of OS was 15,16%; for male, the incidence of osteopenia was 38.54%, and that of OS was 3.42%. The prevalence of both osteopenia and OS was higher in female (All P < 0.001) ( Supplementary table 2 ). When investigating the prevalence of OS among CKM patients from different ethnicities, we found that the osteopenia and OS in non-Hispanic black individuals were significantly lower than in other ethnicities (All P < 0.001) ( Supplementary table 2 ). 3.3 Primary outcome: risk of all-cause mortality 3.3.1 Kaplan-Meier survival analysis By performing Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the relationship between bone status and the risk of all-cause mortality in CKM patients was assessed after adjusting for age (‘< 60’ years, ‘≥ 60’ years), gender (‘Female’, ‘Male’), race (‘Mexican American’, ‘Non-Hispanic Black’, ‘Non-Hispanic White’, ‘Other Hispanic’, ‘Other Race - Including Multi-Racial’), BMI ( 3’), anemia (‘yes’ or ‘no’), hyperlipidemia (‘yes’ or ‘no’), hypertension (‘yes’ or ‘no’), DM (‘yes’ or ‘no’), RAASi use (‘yes’ or ‘no’) and other factors, the results indicate that patients with normal BMD group in the CKM had better survival outcomes compared to those in the osteopenia group, whereas patients in the OS group exhibited the poorest survival outcomes (Log-rank P < 0.001) ( Figure 2A ) . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. The relationship between osteoporosis and the prognosis of patients with CKM through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. (A) all-cause mortality; (B) cardiovascular mortality. CKM, Cardiovascular-kidney-Metabolic. 3.3.2 Multivariate Cox regression analysis Through a multifactorial Cox regression model, after adjusting for multiple variables, the results indicated that, compared to the normal BMD group, CKM patients with osteopenia had a 55% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.22-1.98, P = 0.001), while CKM patients with OS exhibited a 1.99-fold increase in all-cause mortality risk (HR = 2.99; 95% CI, 1.86-4.82, P = 0.001) ( Supplementary -table 3, Figure 3 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Association between osteoporosis and all-cause mortality. Model 1 adjusted for baseline age (‘<60’ years, ‘≥60’ years), gender (‘Female’, ‘Male’), race (‘Mexican American’, ‘Non-Hispanic Black’, ‘Non-Hispanic White’, ‘Other Hispanic’, ‘Other Race - Including Multi-Racial’), BMI (<30kg/m 2 , ≥30 kg/m 2 ); Model 2 adjusted for covariates in model 1 plus smoke (‘yes’ or ‘no’), alcohol use (‘yes’ or ‘no’), education (‘College or above’, ‘High school or equivalent’, ‘Less than high school’), poverty (‘0-1’, ‘1.1-3’, ‘>3’). Model 3 adjusted for covariates in model 2 plus hyperlipidemia (‘yes’ or ‘no’), hypertension (‘yes’ or ‘no’), DM (‘yes’ or ‘no’). HR, Hazard ratio; CI, Confidence interval; BMI, Body Mass Index; RAASi, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; CKM, Cardiovascular-kidney-Metabolic. Figure 4. Association between osteoporosis and cardiovascular mortality. Model 1 adjusted for baseline age (‘<60’ years, ‘≥60’ years), gender (‘Female’, ‘Male’), race (‘Mexican American’, ‘Non-Hispanic Black’, ‘Non-Hispanic White’, ‘Other Hispanic’, ‘Other Race - Including Multi-Racial’), BMI (<30kg/m 2 , ≥30 kg/m 2 ); Model 2 adjusted for covariates in model 1 plus smoke (‘yes’ or ‘no’), alcohol use (‘yes’ or ‘no’), education (‘College or above’, ‘High school or equivalent’, ‘Less than high school’), poverty (‘0-1’, ‘1.1-3’, ‘>3’). Model 3 adjusted for covariates in model 2 plus hyperlipidemia (‘yes’ or ‘no’), hypertension (‘yes’ or ‘no’), DM (‘yes’ or ‘no’). HR, Hazard ratio; CI, Confidence interval; BMI, Body Mass Index; RAASi, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; CKM, Cardiovascular-kidney-Metabolic. 3.3.3 Stratified analysis In stratified analysis, we assessed whether the relationship between all-cause mortality risk in CKM patients was influenced by factors such as age (’<60’ years, ‘≥ 60’ years), gender (’Female’, ‘Male’), race (’Mexican American’, ‘Non-Hispanic Black’, ‘Non-Hispanic White’, ‘Other Hispanic’, ‘Other Race - Including Multi-Racial’), BMI (< 30 kg/m², ≥ 30 kg/m²), hypertension (’yes’ or ‘no’), diabetes (’yes’ or ‘no’), CKD (’yes’ or ‘no’), and stages of CKM (Stage 1, 2, 3, and 4). The results indicated that, except for age ( P for interaction 0.05) ( Table 2 ). View this table: View inline View popup Table 2. Stratified analysis of osteoporosis and the risk of CKM in individuals 3.3.4 Sensitivity analysis In order to mitigate the impact of missing values on the results, we performed multiple imputation on the data and re-evaluated the relationship between OS and the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with CKM. After multivariable adjustment, the results of the Cox regression analysis indicated that, using individuals with normal BMD as the reference, the risk of all-cause mortality in the osteopenia group was 1.55 times that of the normal BMD group (HR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.22-1.98, P < 0.001), while the risk of all-cause mortality in the OS group was 1.99 times that of the normal BMD group (HR = 2.99; 95% CI, 1.86-4.82, P < 0.001) ( Supplementary table 4 ). 3.4 Secondary outcome: cardiovascular mortality 3.4.1 The KM survival analysis evaluates the relationship between OS and cardiovascular mortality prognosis in CKM patients By performing Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to assess the relationship between bone status and the risk of cardiovascular mortality in CKM patients, after adjusting for factors such as age (’< 60’ years, ‘≥ 60’ years), gender (’Female’, ‘Male’), race (’Mexican American’, ‘Non-Hispanic Black’, ‘Non-Hispanic White’, ‘Other Hispanic’, ‘Other Race - Including Multi-Racial’), BMI ( 3’), anemia (’yes’ or ‘no’), hyperlipidemia (’yes’ or ‘no’), hypertension (’yes’ or ‘no’), diabetes (’yes’ or ‘no’), and RAAS inhibitor use (’yes’ or ‘no’), the results showed that CKM patients in the normal BMD group had better survival than those in the osteopenia group, while patients in the OS group had the worst survival outcomes (Log-rank P < 0.001) ( Figure 2B ). 3.4.2 Multivariate Cox regression analysis Using a multivariate Cox regression model to evaluate the relationship between OS and cardiovascular mortality risk in CKM patients, the results showed that after adjusting for multiple variables, compared to the normal BMD group, the cardiovascular mortality risk in CKM patients with osteopenia increased by 120% (HR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.39-3.46, P < 0.001), while patients with OS had a 2.14-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality risk (HR = 3.14; 95% CI, 1.09-9.02, P = 0.03) ( Supplementary - table 5 , Figure 3 ). 3.4.3 Sensitivity analysis Multiple imputation was performed on the data, and the relationship between OS and the risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with CKM was reassessed. After multivariable adjustment, the results of the Cox regression analysis showed that, taking the group with normal BMD as the reference, the risk of cardiovascular mortality in the osteopenia group was 1.20 times higher than that of the normal BMD group (HR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.39-3.46, P < 0.001), and the risk of cardiovascular mortality in the OS group was 2.14 times higher than that of the normal BMD group (HR = 3.14; 95% CI, 1.09-9.02, P = 0.03) ( Supplementary table 6 ). 4. Discussion Our study findings indicate that among the 602 Non-CKM individual and 6129 patients with CKM included in the study, the proportion of individuals with osteopenia is 32.87%, while the proportion with OS is 4.90%. Compared to non-CKM individuals, patients with CKM exhibit a higher incidence of osteopenia and OS, particularly those in CKM stage 3, which is the most pronounced. Furthermore, the occurrence of either osteopenia or OS significantly increases the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in CKM patients. OS is defined as a systemic skeletal disease characterized by a reduction in bone mass and alterations in the microstructure of bone tissue, leading to increased bone fragility and an elevated risk of fractures [ 3 ] . The World Health Organization (WHO) defines OS based on BMD measurements obtained through DXA, which is currently employed worldwide [ 17 ] . Salari N et al. [ 18 ] conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 86 studies according to PRISMA standards, revealing that the global prevalence of OS stands at 18.3%, with a prevalence of 23.1% in women and 11.7% in men worldwide. Xiao PL et al. [ 19 ] estimated the global and regional prevalence of OS by analyzing 57,933 citations, 108 individual studies, and 343,704 participants. Their results indicated significant variability in prevalence rates among countries (ranging from 4.1% in the Netherlands to 52.0% in Turkey) and continents (ranging from 8.0% in Oceania to 26.9% in Africa). As of 2022, the global prevalence of OS and osteopenia was estimated to be 19.7% and 40.4%, respectively. In the cohort of CKM patients from the United States that we included, the proportion of individuals with osteopenia is 32.87%, while the proportion with OS is 4.90%. However, compared to Non-CKM patients of the same period, the proportions of osteopenia and OS are 32.95% and 3.49%, respectively. Overall, compared to the prevalence rates reported in most literature, the prevalence of OS in the population included in NHANES from 2009 to 2018 shows a relatively lower level. In addition, the prevalence of osteopenia in CKM stages 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 32.95%, 27.52%, 32.95%, 46.75%, and 41.64% respectively, while the prevalence of OS in CKM stages 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 3.49%, 2.25%, 4.97%, 13.52%, and 8.39% respectively. Therefore, we can observe that during CKM stages 1 the prevalence of osteopenia and OS is lower compared to that of the healthy population in the United States; however, in CKM stage 2, 3 and 4, the prevalence of osteopenia and OS significantly increases compared to the Non-CKM (CKM stages 0). The overall osteopenia and OS prevalence were the highest in patients with stage CKM stage 3. However, we also observe that although CKM patients have a higher prevalence of OS, CKM stage 1 patients have a lower prevalence of OS compared to Non-CKM individuals. This suggests that patients with weight gain may have relatively higher intake of calcium or vitamin D, which helps reduce the risk of OS prevalence. However, as the disease progresses, this benefit might be offset by factors such as the gradual onset of CKD, DM, or CVD in the patients, resulting in higher OS prevalence in CKM stages 2, 3, and 4. Furthermore, we find that in CKM stage 4 patients, the prevalence of OS decreases compared to CKM stage 3, which may be due to increased attention to these individuals and a higher occurrence of mortality. However, why is the prevalence of OS significantly increased in CKM patients? Its possibly due to multiple functional disturbances in the cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic systems, with the pathophysiological changes likely promoting the formation of OS. In terms of metabolism, the abnormal glucose metabolism and dyslipidemia in CKM patients may contribute to the risk of OS [ 20 ] . Hyperglycemia is exacerbated in diabetes and aging, leading to the excessive accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs/AGOEs) within the bone. These products disrupt bone remodeling and reduce bone quality by altering the organic matrix, mineral content, and water content of the bone, ultimately resulting in OS [ 21 ] . The role of osteoblasts is crucial for investigating the regulatory mechanisms of various types of OS, as they are derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) [ 22 , 23 ] . BM-MSCs are multipotent stem cells with the ability to differentiate into multiple lineages, serving as precursor cells for osteoblasts and adipocytes. Adipogenic differentiation represents another primary differentiation pathway that balances with osteogenic activity [ 24 ] . Therefore, changes in lipid metabolism in the body may trigger alterations in bone metabolism. Dysregulation of lipid metabolism in certain disease states can result in a cascade of effects on bone metabolism, ultimately leading to OS. In terms of cardiovascular implications, abnormal vascular function and hemodynamic changes in CKM patients may promote the development of OS. Blood vessels play a crucial role in bone homeostasis and repair; compromised blood flow dynamics can lead to deficiencies in angiogenesis and osteogenesis [ 25 ] , thus accelerating the progression of OS. In terms of the kidneys, patients with CKD due to CKM may experience renal osteodystrophy (ROD) as a result of comorbid CKD, which subsequently promotes the development of OS [ 26 ] . Furthermore, patients with CKD may experience abnormalities in calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and vitamin D due to CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD), resulting in abnormalities in bone turnover, mineralization, volume, linear growth, or strength. These changes can promote the occurrence of OS [ 27 ] . However, with the increase in CKM stages, on the basis of metabolic abnormalities, the prevalence of cardio - renal - related diseases in patients also increases significantly. This may lead to a lower prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in CKM stage 1 compared to CKM stage 0. However, in CKM stages 2 - 4, the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis increases significantly. Therefore, this result also indicates that we particularly need to strengthen the screening related to bone health in patients with CKM stages 2 - 4. Therefore, we speculate that in CKM stages 1, the intake of proteins, calcium, and vitamin D by patients may counterbalance the bone changes aggravated by metabolic factors. However, in CKM stage 2-4, such intake is insufficient to compensate for the bone damage caused by metabolic factors, CKD and diabetes. OS significantly increases the risk of mortality. Current studies have shown that untreated OS can lead to a vicious cycle of recurrent fractures, which typically results in disability and premature death [ 28 ] [ 29 ] . Data from observational studies have reported that osteoporotic fractures are associated with an increased risk of mortality, and the incidence of osteoporotic fractures increases exponentially in later life, paralleling the progression of frailty and the associated risk of mortality [ 30 ] . Our research results further indicate that in patients with CKM, the occurrence of OS and bone loss significantly increases the risks of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Various comorbidities may also be potential factors influencing the association between the exacerbation of OS and the elevated mortality risk in CKM patients. Chen X et al. [ 31 ] found that the coexistence of a history of fractures and hypertension increases the all-cause mortality risk associated with OS. Li W et al. [ 32 ] analyzed 18,658 subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and discovered an additive effect between diabetes and OS, which may exert a synergistic effect on all-cause mortality. Patients suffering from both conditions exhibit a higher risk of death, indicating that the onset of OS increases the mortality risk for diabetic patients.The study conducted by Nakano Y et al [ 33 ] shows that OS is closely related to the decline in kidney function, which is associated with adverse survival outcomes and increased mortality risk in patients with CKD. Baldini V et al. [ 5 ] found that the incidence of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular mortality is related to a decrease in BMD and fractures.This may be due to the limited mobility of patients after fractures and increased bed rest time, which can subsequently lead to a series of complications such as pulmonary infections [ 34 ] and thrombosis [ 35 ] . Therefore, various comorbidities, such as the coexistence of a history of fractures with hypertension, the synergistic effects of diabetes and OS, and the associations of OS with declining renal function and cardiovascular diseases, are likely to be potential factors behind the increased mortality risk in CKM patients following the onset of OS. This further highlights the importance of comprehensive management of comorbidities in CKM patients, which may contribute to improving patient prognosis. Additionally, in the stratified analysis, we found that abnormal bone mass can increase the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in CKM patients across different CKM stages. However, we also observed that this relationship exhibits heterogeneity across different age stratifications, being more prominent in elderly patients. This may be related to the higher incidence of OS in older patients, the presence of more comorbidities, and their reduced resilience to stressors. Based on the results of this study, it is necessary to optimize current clinical treatment strategies to effectively reduce the mortality risk of CKM patients. Firstly, the presence of multiple comorbidities and their interactions must be fully considered during the treatment process. For CKM patients who also suffer from comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, a comprehensive treatment plan should be devised to manage various conditions in a coordinated manner [ 1 , 36 ] . Secondly, regarding OS as a critical factor, in addition to the aforementioned screening and intervention measures, it is essential to strengthen health education for patients to enhance their awareness of the dangers posed by OS. This will encourage them to actively cooperate with treatment and take proactive preventive measures, such as maintaining moderate exercise and avoiding falls, to reduce the likelihood of fractures. In particular, the screening frequency for patients with CKM stage 2-4 needs to be increased, along with a heightened focus on their condition. Finally, an effective patient follow-up mechanism should be established to closely monitor changes in patients’ conditions, timely adjust treatment regimens, and ensure the efficacy and sustainability of treatment, thereby minimizing the mortality risk for CKM patients to the greatest extent possible. Although this study has made efforts to explore the related topics, it still has certain limitations. Firstly, from the perspective of the sample, the relatively small sample size poses challenges to the precision and representativeness of the results, making it difficult to comprehensively reflect the overall characteristics. Furthermore, during the research process, some potential confounding factors, such as details of patients’ lifestyles (including exercise habits, dietary structure, etc.) and various medication use, may not have been fully controlled, thereby affecting the results to some extent. Lastly, the inability to comprehensively assess CKM diagnostic-related indicators in the NHANSE may introduce some bias in the morbidity rates. To overcome the design flaws of the study, subsequent research could adopt a longitudinal design to conduct long-term follow-up observations of the subjects to clearly determine the causal relationships among the variables. In summary, CKM has emerged as a syndrome for evaluating the heart, kidneys, and metabolic status, with its incidence and importance increasingly highlighted. OS has a high incidence among CKM patients, particularly in those with CKM stage 3-4. Furthermore, OS is closely associated with the risks of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, a relationship that does not change with the CKM stages. Clinical decision-makers need to provide different monitoring frequencies for bone metabolism status according to the various CKM stages, with the aim of formulating comprehensive intervention programs to reduce the risk of mortality. Although this study has certain limitations, it provides important insights and directions for further research. Funding The Science and technology fund of Chengdu Medical College (CYZYB22-02). The research fund of Sichuan Medical and Health Care Promotion institute (KY2022QN0309). Sichuan Provincial Medical Association Youth Innovation Project (Q23021). Health Commission of Sichuan Province Medical Science and Technology Program (24QNMP100). Sichuan Provincial Geriatric Clinical Medicine Research Center (24LHLNYX1-48). Author Contributions Conception and design of the study: Xi Du, Qianyu Yang, Zhiqiang Duan, Ming Zhao, Xiang Xiao; Acquisition and analysis of data: Xi Du, Qianyu Yang, Zhiqiang Duan; Drafting the manuscript or figures: Xi Du, Qianyu Yang, Zhiqiang Duan, Ming Zhao, Xiang Xiao. Data Availability Some or all datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available. However, they can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Ethical Approval The study protocol adhered to the ethical standards set forth in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. Approval was obtained from the National Committee for Ethical Review of Health Statistics Research, and all participants provided signed informed consent. Declarations The authors state that there are no known financial conflicts of interest or personal relationships that could have influenced the research presented in this paper. Acknowledgments The authors express their gratitude to all participants of this study for their significant contributions. References 1. ↵ Ndumele CE , Neeland IJ , Tuttle KR , et al. A Synopsis of the Evidence for the Science and Clinical Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association . Circulation 2023 ; 148 ( 20 ): 1636 – 64 . doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001186 [published Online First: 2023/10/09] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Ndumele CE , Rangaswami J , Chow SL , et al. Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Health: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association . Circulation 2023 ; 148 ( 20 ): 1606 – 35 . doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001184 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Ivanova S , Vasileva L , Ivanova S , et al. Osteoporosis: Therapeutic Options . Folia medica 2015 ; 57 ( 3-4 ): 181 – 90 . doi: 10.1515/folmed-2015-0037 [published Online First: 2016/05/18] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Lane NE . Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis . American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006 ; 194 ( 2 ): S3 – S11 . doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.047 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 5. ↵ Baldini V , Mastropasqua M , Francucci CM , et al. Cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis . Journal of endocrinological investigation 2005 ; 28 ( 10 Suppl ): 69 – 72 . [published Online First: 2006/03/23] OpenUrl PubMed 6. ↵ Nowicka G , Panczenko-Kresowska B . [Coronary heart disease and osteoporosis: factors related to development of both diseases] . Przeglad lekarski 2007 ; 64 ( 3 ): 153 – 8 . [published Online First: 2007/10/19] OpenUrl PubMed 7. ↵ Montalcini T , Romeo S , Ferro Y , et al. Osteoporosis in chronic inflammatory disease: the role of malnutrition . Endocrine 2013 ; 43 ( 1 ): 59 – 64 . doi: 10.1007/s12020-012-9813-x [published Online First: 2012/10/12] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 8. ↵ Polyzos SA , Anastasilakis AD , Efstathiadou ZA , et al. Postmenopausal osteoporosis coexisting with other metabolic diseases: Treatment considerations . Maturitas 2021 ; 147 : 19 – 25 . doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.02.007 [published Online First: 2021/04/10] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ Pazianas M , Miller PD . Osteoporosis and Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD): Back to Basics . American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 2021 ; 78 ( 4 ): 582 – 89 . doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.12.024 [published Online First: 2021/03/29] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. Mazzuoli GF , D’Erasmo E , Pisani D. Primary hyperparathyroidism and osteoporosis . Aging (Milan, Italy) 1998 ; 10 ( 3 ): 225 – 31 . doi: 10.1007/bf03339656 [published Online First: 1998/11/05] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Rajzbaum G , Bézie Y. Postmenopausal osteoporosis and atheroma . Joint bone spine 2006 ; 73 ( 6 ): 661 – 6 . doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.02.009 [published Online First: 2006/10/27] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Archer E , Pavela G , Lavie CJ . The Inadmissibility of What We Eat in America and NHANES Dietary Data in Nutrition and Obesity Research and the Scientific Formulation of National Dietary Guidelines . Mayo Clin Proc 2015 ; 90 ( 7 ): 911 – 26 . doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.009 [published Online First: 2015/06/14] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Lewiecki EM , Watts NB , McClung MR , et al. Official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry . The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2004 ; 89 ( 8 ): 3651 – 5 . doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0124 [published Online First: 2004/08/05] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 14. ↵ Wright NC , Saag KG , Dawson-Hughes B , et al. The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the USA . Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2017 ; 28 ( 4 ): 1225 – 32 . doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3865-3 [published Online First: 2016/12/15] OpenUrl CrossRef 15. ↵ Okamura K , Tanaka S , Kitamura H , et al. Relationships of Weight Change from 20 Years of Age with the Risks of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease . Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis 2024 ; 31 ( 7 ): 1072 – 86 . doi: 10.5551/jat.64571 [published Online First: 2024/01/25] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. ↵ Ma R , Xie C , Wang S , et al. Retinol intake is associated with the risk of chronic kidney disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from NHANES . Scientific Reports 2023 ; 13 ( 1 ): 11567 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38582-z OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. ↵ Curtis EM , Moon RJ , Harvey NC , et al. The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide . Bone 2017 ; 104 : 29 – 38 . doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.024 [published Online First: 2017/01/26] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Salari N , Ghasemi H , Mohammadi L , et al. The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis . Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2021 ; 16 ( 1 ): 609 . doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02772-0 [published Online First: 2021/10/19] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Xiao PL , Cui AY , Hsu CJ , et al. Global, regional prevalence, and risk factors of osteoporosis according to the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2022 ; 33 ( 10 ): 2137 – 53 . doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06454-3 [published Online First: 2022/06/11] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. ↵ Wan H , Yao N , Yang J , et al. Cohort Profile: the prospective cohort study on the incidence of metabolic diseases and risk factors in Shunde, China (Speed-Shunde Cohort) . European heart journal Quality of care & clinical outcomes 2024 doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae077 [published Online First: 2024/09/14] OpenUrl CrossRef 21. ↵ Wang B , Vashishth D . Advanced glycation and glycoxidation end products in bone . Bone 2023 ; 176 : 116880 . doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116880 [published Online First: 2023/08/15] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Wang X , Zhang C , Zhao G , et al. Obesity and lipid metabolism in the development of osteoporosis (Review) . International journal of molecular medicine 2024 ; 54 ( 1 ) doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2024.5385 [published Online First: 2024/05/31] OpenUrl CrossRef 23. ↵ Dey D , Jingar P , Agrawal S , et al. Symphytum officinale augments osteogenesis in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro as they differentiate into osteoblasts . Journal of ethnopharmacology 2020 ; 248 : 112329 . doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112329 [published Online First: 2019/11/02] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 24. ↵ Zuo R , Liu M , Wang Y , et al. BM-MSC-derived exosomes alleviate radiation-induced bone loss by restoring the function of recipient BM-MSCs and activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling . Stem cell research & therapy 2019 ; 10 ( 1 ): 30 . doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-1121-9 [published Online First: 2019/01/17] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. ↵ Ramasamy SK , Kusumbe AP , Schiller M , et al. Blood flow controls bone vascular function and osteogenesis . Nature communications 2016 ; 7 : 13601 . doi: 10.1038/ncomms13601 [published Online First: 2016/12/07] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 26. ↵ Moe S , Drüeke T , Cunningham J , et al. Definition, evaluation, and classification of renal osteodystrophy: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) . Kidney Int 2006 ; 69 ( 11 ): 1945 – 53 . doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000414 [published Online First: 2006/04/28] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 27. ↵ Hsu CY , Chen LR , Chen KH . Osteoporosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseases: A Systemic Review . International journal of molecular sciences 2020 ; 21 ( 18 ) doi: 10.3390/ijms21186846 [published Online First: 2020/09/24] OpenUrl CrossRef 28. ↵ LeBoff MS , Greenspan SL , Insogna KL , et al. The clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis . Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2022 ; 33 ( 10 ): 2049 – 102 . doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y [published Online First: 2022/04/29] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 29. ↵ Jiang N , An J , Yang K , et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome: A New Target for Prevention and Control of Osteoporosis? Frontiers in endocrinology 2021 ; 12 : 752546 . doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.752546 [published Online First: 2021/10/15] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Grey A , Bolland MJ . The effect of treatments for osteoporosis on mortality . Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2013 ; 24 ( 1 ): 1 – 6 . doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2176-6 [published Online First: 2012/10/19] OpenUrl CrossRef 31. ↵ Chen X , He B , Zhou Y , et al. Investigating the effect of history of fractures and hypertension on the risk of all-cause death from osteoporosis: A retrospective cohort study . Medicine 2023 ; 102 ( 13 ): e33342 . doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000033342 [published Online First: 2023/04/01] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Li W , Xie S , Zhong S , et al. The synergistic effect of diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis on the all-cause mortality: a cohort study of an American population . Frontiers in endocrinology 2023 ; 14 : 1308574 . doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1308574 [published Online First: 2024/02/08] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 33. ↵ Nakano Y , Mandai S , Naito S , et al. Effect of osteosarcopenia on longitudinal mortality risk and chronic kidney disease progression in older adults . Bone 2024 ; 179 : 116975 . doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116975 [published Online First: 2023/11/23] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 34. ↵ Lo IL , Siu CW , Tse HF , et al. Pre-operative pulmonary assessment for patients with hip fracture . Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2010 ; 21 ( Suppl 4 ): S579 – 86 . doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1427-7 [published Online First: 2010/11/26] OpenUrl CrossRef 35. ↵ O’Toole RV , Stein DM , O’Hara NN , et al. Aspirin or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Thromboprophylaxis after a Fracture . The New England journal of medicine 2023 ; 388 ( 3 ): 203 – 13 . doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2205973 [published Online First: 2023/01/19] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Petramala L , Gigante A , Sarlo F , et al. Relevance of obesity-related organ damage and metabolic syndrome classification in cardiovascular and renal risk stratification in patients with essential hypertension . Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 2024 ; 11 : 1369090 . doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1369090 [published Online First: 2024/04/12] OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 12, 2025. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Osteoporosis Prevalence in Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic Syndrome: Implications for Mortality Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Osteoporosis Prevalence in Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic Syndrome: Implications for Mortality Xi Du , Qianyu Yang , Zhiqiang Duan , Hui Gu , Xue Zhang , Hao Liu , Mao Xiao , Zhuoxing Li , Ming Zhao , Xiang Xiao medRxiv 2025.02.10.25322036; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.10.25322036 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Osteoporosis Prevalence in Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic Syndrome: Implications for Mortality Xi Du , Qianyu Yang , Zhiqiang Duan , Hui Gu , Xue Zhang , Hao Liu , Mao Xiao , Zhuoxing Li , Ming Zhao , Xiang Xiao medRxiv 2025.02.10.25322036; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.10.25322036 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Cardiovascular Medicine Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (297) Cardiovascular Medicine (4421) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (443) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (606) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1507) Epidemiology (15212) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1121) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6581) Geriatric Medicine (667) Health Economics (996) Health Informatics (4520) Health Policy (1366) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1611) Hematology (539) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15906) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (620) Medical Ethics (144) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6580) Nursing (345) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1141) Occupational and Environmental Health (956) Oncology (3324) Ophthalmology (970) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (435) Palliative Medicine (129) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1689) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (710) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5432) Public and Global Health (9212) Radiology and Imaging (2193) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1368) Respiratory Medicine (1194) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (709) Sports Medicine (529) Surgery (709) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (288) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9ff4b89cde771b23',t:'MTc3OTM3ODQ2Mg=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00