Optimizing nucleic acid extraction and transcriptome evaluation from low-input, fixed clinical samples
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Tumor biopsies are commonly formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) for long-term and efficient storage. However, FFPE preservation can greatly compromise the quality of samples, the extraction of nucleic acids, and feasibility of downstream studies, including RNA sequencing. These challenges are especially evident in the studies of clinical trial samples, where the sizes of biopsies often limit the amount of material available for study. Here, we evaluate two nucleic acid extraction kits (Covaris truXTRAC FFPE tNA Plus, QIAGEN miRNeasy FFPE) and three hybridized-capture-based RNA sequencing library preparations (Agilent SureSelect XT RNA Direct, Agilent SureSelect XT HS, and Illumina TruSeq RNA Exome) to evaluate the impact of these sample processing steps on transcriptome evaluation in a melanoma biopsy procured in a clinical setting and preserved by FFPE. While there exist many options for extraction and library preparation that are appropriate for RNA sequencing from FFPE samples, we observed that combinations of experimental approaches may have subtle impacts on downstream analysis, including gene expression quantification and fusion detection.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00