Temporal Dynamics of Recovery Latency Reveal Early Warning Signals of Loss of Physiological Resilience: A Multi-Dataset Analysis | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Temporal Dynamics of Recovery Latency Reveal Early Warning Signals of Loss of Physiological Resilience: A Multi-Dataset Analysis Alvaro Alaor Silva This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9108092/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Recovery Latency (RL) is a longitudinal metric capturing the time required for physiological variables to return to baseline following training or competitive loads. Prior work in this series demonstrated that RL reflects adaptive states across large longitudinal athletic datasets. However, whether the temporal dynamics of RL carry information about the stability of the underlying physiological system — beyond mean recovery levels — remains unknown. Theory from complex adaptive systems predicts that systems approaching a critical transition exhibit statistical precursors, notably increasing variance and lag-1 autocorrelation, collectively referred to as Early Warning Signals (EWS). Objective To determine whether temporal dynamics of Recovery Latency — specifically rolling variance and rolling autocorrelation — exhibit patterns consistent with Early Warning Signals of declining physiological resilience in longitudinal athlete datasets. Methods We analysed 28,472 recovery events from 649 athletes across three independent datasets within the RL series dataset (recuperação_VFC_100k, athlete_physiological, lesões_multimodal). For each athlete, rolling variance (EWS₁) and rolling lag-1 autocorrelation (EWS₂) of RL were computed using a 14-event window. Trend analysis was performed using Kendall τ statistics, complemented by sliding-window Kendall τ (window=20), flickering dynamics (state-transition rate), surrogate testing (n=100 permutations), and a Composite Early Warning Index (CEWI). Athletes were stratified into Declining (RL slope > 0.015 d/event, n=155) and Stable (RL slope < −0.010 d/event, n=131) adaptive states. An independent screen-time dataset (N=400) was analysed to examine environmental circadian perturbation as a potential driver of resilience loss. Results Rolling variance of RL increased significantly in athletes with declining adaptive capacity compared with stable athletes across all datasets (VFC_100k: Δτ=+0.516, p<0.001; Athlete Physiol.: Δτ=+0.556, p=0.001; Lesões Multimodal: Δτ=+0.281, p<0.001). Sliding-window Kendall τ confirmed temporal divergence between groups in the final observation window (τ_last combined: Declining=−0.009 vs Stable=−0.284, p=0.005). Rolling autocorrelation (p=0.052–0.922) and flickering dynamics (p=0.261–0.985) did not significantly differentiate groups. Screen exposure was strongly associated with a RL proxy index (ρ=+0.620, p<0.001), mediated through sleep quality degradation and stress elevation, supporting a circadian disruption pathway to resilience loss. Conclusions Temporal dynamics of Recovery Latency contain detectable Early Warning Signals of physiological resilience loss, primarily expressed as increasing rolling variance in athletes with deteriorating adaptive capacity. Replication across three independent datasets supports RL variability as a scalable marker of adaptive instability. Associations with screen exposure further suggest that environmental circadian perturbations may contribute to resilience decline, linking chronobiology, behavioral factors, and recovery physiology. Physical Medicine & Rehab Physiology Sports Medicine and Kinesiology Recovery Latency Early Warning Signals Physiological Resilience Critical Slowing Down Rolling Variance Allostatic Load Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9108092","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":605285275,"identity":"1e467f3e-d3d7-4af5-a134-38122a4aa915","order_by":0,"name":"Alvaro Alaor Silva","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8288-9476","institution":"Independent","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Alvaro","middleName":"Alaor","lastName":"Silva","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-03-12 20:13:48","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9108092/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9108092/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":104782711,"identity":"fd7fb42a-f59f-4415-873c-1abbb293b407","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-17 07:57:43","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1148239,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Paper4ultimopreprint.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9108092/v1_covered_8b98183c-ed6c-43ac-b333-18384ec2ea2a.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTemporal Dynamics of Recovery Latency Reveal Early Warning Signals of Loss of Physiological Resilience: A Multi-Dataset Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Recovery Latency, Early Warning Signals, Physiological Resilience, Critical Slowing Down, Rolling Variance, Allostatic Load","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9108092/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9108092/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRecovery Latency (RL) is a longitudinal metric capturing the time required for physiological variables to return to baseline following training or competitive loads. Prior work in this series demonstrated that RL reflects adaptive states across large longitudinal athletic datasets. However, whether the temporal dynamics of RL carry information about the stability of the underlying physiological system — beyond mean recovery levels — remains unknown. Theory from complex adaptive systems predicts that systems approaching a critical transition exhibit statistical precursors, notably increasing variance and lag-1 autocorrelation, collectively referred to as Early Warning Signals (EWS).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObjective\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo determine whether temporal dynamics of Recovery Latency — specifically rolling variance and rolling autocorrelation — exhibit patterns consistent with Early Warning Signals of declining physiological resilience in longitudinal athlete datasets.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe analysed 28,472 recovery events from 649 athletes across three independent datasets within the RL series dataset (recuperação_VFC_100k, athlete_physiological, lesões_multimodal). For each athlete, rolling variance (EWS₁) and rolling lag-1 autocorrelation (EWS₂) of RL were computed using a 14-event window. Trend analysis was performed using Kendall τ statistics, complemented by sliding-window Kendall τ (window=20), flickering dynamics (state-transition rate), surrogate testing (n=100 permutations), and a Composite Early Warning Index (CEWI). Athletes were stratified into Declining (RL slope \u0026gt; 0.015 d/event, n=155) and Stable (RL slope \u0026lt; −0.010 d/event, n=131) adaptive states. An independent screen-time dataset (N=400) was analysed to examine environmental circadian perturbation as a potential driver of resilience loss.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRolling variance of RL increased significantly in athletes with declining adaptive capacity compared with stable athletes across all datasets (VFC_100k: Δτ=+0.516, p\u0026lt;0.001; Athlete Physiol.: Δτ=+0.556, p=0.001; Lesões Multimodal: Δτ=+0.281, p\u0026lt;0.001). Sliding-window Kendall τ confirmed temporal divergence between groups in the final observation window (τ_last combined: Declining=−0.009 vs Stable=−0.284, p=0.005). Rolling autocorrelation (p=0.052–0.922) and flickering dynamics (p=0.261–0.985) did not significantly differentiate groups. Screen exposure was strongly associated with a RL proxy index (ρ=+0.620, p\u0026lt;0.001), mediated through sleep quality degradation and stress elevation, supporting a circadian disruption pathway to resilience loss.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTemporal dynamics of Recovery Latency contain detectable Early Warning Signals of physiological resilience loss, primarily expressed as increasing rolling variance in athletes with deteriorating adaptive capacity. Replication across three independent datasets supports RL variability as a scalable marker of adaptive instability. Associations with screen exposure further suggest that environmental circadian perturbations may contribute to resilience decline, linking chronobiology, behavioral factors, and recovery physiology.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Temporal Dynamics of Recovery Latency Reveal Early Warning Signals of Loss of Physiological Resilience: A Multi-Dataset Analysis","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-03-16 06:18:30","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9108092/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"1e66fe7d-7d90-4038-ad05-c55952e24af4","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 16th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":64419378,"name":"Physical Medicine \u0026 Rehab"},{"id":64419379,"name":"Physiology"},{"id":64419380,"name":"Sports Medicine and Kinesiology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-16T06:18:30+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-03-16 06:18:30","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9108092","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9108092","identity":"rs-9108092","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.