Full text
2,020 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Understanding the structural complexity of coral reefs is essential for assessing their condition, biodiversity, and resilience. Traditional methods commonly use a rugosity index, based on the chain method, that overlooks the underlaying structure of coral reefs. However, digital underwater photogrammetry allows to build models of coral structures which can then be used to decompose reef topography across multiple layers. This study introduces a wavelet-based method for the multiscale analysis of reef rugosity, considering reef’s surface and underlying characteristics. Data were collected from six reefs within the Cozumel Reefs National Marine Park (CRNP) at depths ranging from 6 to 14 m. High-resolution Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) and orthomosaics were constructed using digital underwater photogrammetry (UWP). The elevation profiles extracted from the DEMs were analyzed using a Maximum Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform (MODWT), with a Daubechies mother wavelet to decompose the reef topography into local rugosity (related to live coral coverage) and underlying rugosity (related to the historical context of the formation of the reef matrix). The wavelet-based method effectively decomposed the DEMs into components representing rugosity at different scales, with the reconstructed DEMs being statistically equivalent to the data source (p> 0.05). Underlying reef characteristics contributed the most to the rugosity estimates. Significant differences in rugosity were observed between reefs (p< 0.05), where interpretations differed based on the contribution of surface and underlying characteristics. For the CRNP, Agariciid and branching corals are the primary drivers of surface rugosity (p < 0.05), rather than the mound & boulder, and meandroid corals. Our results highlight that traditional methods to estimate rugosity can underestimate the importance of local rugosity in maintaining rugosity over time.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.