Higher order repeat caesarean sections: how safe are five or more?
This retrospective study compared maternal morbidity and mortality between patients undergoing five to nine versus three or four repeat caesarean sections, finding no significant additional risks for mothers or babies in the higher-order group despite increased operative time and severe adhesions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (13)
- W161520537 via openalex
- W2026335058 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/01443619209029911 via openalex
- doi:10.5144/0256-4947.1995.317 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0020-7292(95)02561-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07906.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00003081-198606000-00013 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90032-e via openalex
- W2409122836 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06552.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48430-x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-199406000-00005 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(96)02750-6 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:09:40.812857+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-22T06:12:16.469521+00:00