Hysteroscopic resection of uterus septus versus abdominal metroplasty.
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
Hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum presents advantages over abdominal metroplasty, requiring guidance, postoperative monitoring, and potentially antibiotics, with expectant management of IUDs and hormonal therapy being optional.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The new hysteroscopic approach toward pregnancy loss associated with uterine septum offers several advantages over abdominal metroplasty. However, several safeguards should be taken: laparoscopic or sonographic guidance should accompany hysteroscopic metroplasty; postoperative HSG or hysteroscopy is recommended; there is no advantage of IUD insertion postoperatively; sequential estrogen-progesterone therapy postoperatively is optional, but of no proved benefit; a hysteroscopic approach toward uterine septum is the preferred procedure, even when laparotomy for treatment of pelvic endometriosis or intrapelvic adhesions is indicated, and, although its value is not established, a short perioperative cause of prophylactic antibiotics seems to be warranted.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-18T06:15:08.409253+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:24.284338+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK