Disordered and Partially Structured Models in Community Ecology: What are they? And how do we use them?

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,548 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Community ecology describes how species interact with each other and with their environment. In nature, processes can be very complex because they involve hundreds to thousands of species interacting with each other in complex environmental landscapes. Classical approaches that have provided key insights have largely focused on the study of tractable subsets of species and patches, but these do not always adequately address the wider scope of natural complexity. Alternate approaches that use specific parameters and/or that use simulations to study such highly diverse systems are problematic because they can become very detailed, system-specific, and easily divorced from general principles. Finally, ’minimal’ models to explain data exist (e.g. null models, ’neutral theory’ and ’entropy based’ models), but they often do not provide adequate connections to experimental or mechanistic studies and results. Here we describe and discuss an alternate approach that seeks to link basic processes of community assembly (environmental heterogeneity, species interactions, dispersal, and stochasticity) with each other using ‘disordered systems models’ to make robust predictions about community structure, albeit without the detail of more system-specific approaches. We describe the logic of the approach, outline the methods involved, and identify important limitations. We also describe how this approach can be expanded to better incorporate additional nonrandom structure (such as intercorrelated parameters) in these basic processes and leading to ’partially structured models’, and we introduce the idea that this could also be applied to metacommunities. Although implementing this approach in empirical studies will still be quite challenging, these approaches reduce the complexity of the overall problem by orders of magnitude, making it a promising approach to improve the study of biodiversity in realistic landscapes https://doi.org/10.32942/X2RH10 Life Sciences, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Published: 2025-05-15 15:08 Last Updated: 2025-06-23 10:44 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00