Fluorescence Anisotropy Analysis of the Interaction between Doxorubicin and DNA Origami Nanostructures

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,698 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Owing to doxorubicin’s high DNA binding affinity, doxorubicin-loaded DNA origami nanostructures (DOX-DONs) are promising nanocarriers against cancer. However, understanding the interactions between doxorubicin (DOX) and DNA origami nanostructures (DONs) is important to ensure the quality of DOX-DONs. This interaction is often taken for granted and the influence of DOX loading conditions is poorly characterized. Exploiting the inherent fluorescence of DOX, steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy spectroscopy techniques are used for characterizing non-destructively the binding between DOX and DONs, and the purity of formed complexes. The difference in fluorescence anisotropy between free DOX and DOX-DONs confirms the DOX-DON complex formation. Further, at loading ratios of DOX to DNA base pairs > 0.5, homo-Förster resonance energy transfer (homo-FRET) between closely packed DOX molecules is observed. Moreover, time-resolved anisotropy reveals DOX aggregation on DONs at high loading ratios > 1. For loading ratios > 0.1, spin-filtration to remove excess free DOX is efficient and necessary, though at loading ratios > 1 some DOX aggregates remain attached to the DONs. In summary, fluorescence anisotropy analysis provides more detailed information and insight into DOX-DONs compared to regularly used fluorescence intensity-based characterization methods, and these results can help designing more efficient and safer DNA intercalator-based nanocarriers. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* E-mail: ekaterina.lisitsyna{at}tuni.fi, E-mail: timo.laaksonen{at}helsinki.fi, E-mail: veikko.pentti.linko{at}ut.ee

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00