Abstract
Objective: The synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer is a rare phenomenon with incidence of 1.4 to
3.8%. Mostly in SEOC , the ovarian endometroid carcinoma arises in background of endometriosis with
endometrial carcinoma with lower stage and lower grade in premenopausal age group.
Case report: We are reporting a case report of Synchronous type 2 endometrial and ovarian cancer \ with
an unusual presentation at later age of 70 , in postmenopausal lady with higher grade of endometrial
carcinoma and higher stage of ovarian cancer and patient was treated with adjuvant chemotherapy followed
by vault brachytherapy in view of Stage II B ovarian cancer and IA grade 3 endometrial cancer.
Conclusion
The SEOC being a rare phenomenon with different therapeutic and prognostic considerations,
and hence can be managed with multidisciplinary approach and regular follow up.
Keywords
Synchronous endometrial ovarian cancer, endometrioid, endometriosis
Introduction
The carcinoma in the uterus and ovary concurrently are found in 10% of ovarian cancer and in
5% cases of endometrial cancer. The synchronous presence of two independent primaries i.e
endometrial and ovarian cancer in a patient at the time of diagnosis is known as
Seoc(Synchronous Endometrial Ovarian Cancer ). In the present case report. we report a case of
synchronous type II endometrial and ovarian carcinoma.
Case Presentation
A 70 year old postmenopausal lady with diabetes and systemic hypertension presented to our
OPD with complaints of spotting per vaginum on and off since 8 months . She gave history of
undergoing a laparotomy for removing uterus 11 years ago which was abandoned as she had
dense adhesions in the pelvis and uterus and ovaries were not visible. After the unsuccessful
laparotomy she achieved symptom control of her AUB through medical management (Danazol)
and was asymptomatic till the present episode.
On clinical examination there was soft cystic mass of 8x 8 cm in the lower abdomen with same
mass felt on vaginal examination. Ult rasonography showed endometrial thickness 29mm with
normal sized uterus with 8x 7 cm right adnexal cyst . Her tumor markers were within normal
limits {CA125 was 19.3 and CEA 3.1). Endometrial biopsy showed endometrioid carcinoma
and Magnetic resonance imagi ng showed normal sized uterus with seedling fibroids and small
hyperintense lesion in lower endometrium infiltrating inner myometrium. MRI also showed a
left adnexal cyst of 9x9x7 cm with internal hemorrhage She underwent staging surgery and
intraoperatively, dense adhesions were found in the pelvis. There was a 9x 10 cm left ovarian
mass adherent to rectosigmoid and left pelvic wall . Uterus was buried under the adhesions. After
careful adhesiolysis, uterus and normal looking right ovary and tube was visual ized. A 2 x 2 cm
tumor deposit was seen in the pouch of douglas. Complete staging including hysterectomy,
bilateral salpingo oophorectomy, lymphadenectomy and omentectomy was done.
Histopathology examination showed an irregular growth in the endometrium me asuring
1.3x1x0.2cm and a polyp measuring 1cm. Right ovary showed a cyst 1.9cm in greatest
dimension. Left ovary was cystically enlarged, with solid and haemorrhagic areas.
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology http://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 97 ~
Microscopy showed endometrium with a neoplasm composed of
cells arranged in glandul ar, cribriform and papillary pattern. The
cells had moderate cytoplasm and vesicular nuclei with
prominent nucleoli. Many cells with clear cytoplasm were also
noted. Mitosis noted,1 -2/HPF. Luminal necrosis noted. The
neoplasm was seen to infiltarte the inne r myometrium. No
LVE/MELF pattern were seen. Endometrium also showed a
benign polyp. Fig.1
Sections from right ovary showed a neoplasm composed of cells
arranged in papillae, fused glandular, cribriform and focal solid
areas (<5%). Lining cells are composed of stratified, columnar
to cuboidal cells with smooth luminal border, moderate
eosinophilic cytoplasm and mildly pleomorphic vesicular
nucleus with small nucleoli. Numerous apoptotic bodies seen.
Luminal necrosis and squamous morules were seen. Fig.2
Left Ovary showed an endometriotic cyst.
Bilateral Fallopian tubes and omentum were free of tumour.
Lymph nodes were free of tumour, whereas POD Deposit was
positive for tumour. Endometrial carcinoma showed
morphological features of papillary carcinoma with hig h nuclear
grade and clear cells, which suggested a type 2 carcinoma,
which was confirmed with the immunohistochemical positivity
with p53.ER was positive in 90% of tumour cells and PR in 70%
of cells.
Right ovarian carcinoma showed the typical morphology of
endometrioid carcinoma with squamous morules and left ovary
showed an endometriotic cyst.
Ovarian carcinoma also showed p53 positivity with WT1
negativity and intense ER and PR positivity, suggesting a high
grade endometrioid carcinoma (type 2).
As the end ometrial carcinoma was confined to inner
myometrium with no LV emboli and ovarian carcinoma was
seen to be associated with endometrioisis, they were considered
as synchronous primary carcinomas.
Case was discussed in multiple disciplinary tumor board and
was decided for adjuvant chemotherapy followed by vault
brachytherapy in view of Stage II B ovarian cancer and IA grade
3 endometrial cancer.
Fig 1: Histopathological appearance of carcinoma endometrium
Fig 2: Histopathological appearance of Carcinoma ovary
Discussion
The incidence of synchronous endometrioid cancer of both
ovaries and endometrium is 1.4 to 3.8%. This being a rare
phenomenon with different therapeutic and prognostic
considerations, makes it important to distinguish from the
metastatic carcinoma. Endometrial cancer with synchronous
ovarian cancer were more likely to be stage I -II disease,
endometrioid or serous histology types, grade 1 -2 tumors, and
small tumor size in Matsou et al. study [1].
In most of the reports SEOC, the ovarian endometroid
carcinoma arises in background of endometriosis with
endometrial carcinoma with lower stage and lower grade [2].
Three case series of the women diagnosed with SEOC published
by Markis et al. in 2017 had endometrioid subtype, grade 1, both
in the ovarian and endometrial component [2].
Askin et al. in their case report have reviewed that 63 citations
were identified reporting on young women with SEOC, defined
for the purpose of this review as <50 years of age or
premenopausal. and most cases of EC and ovarian cancer were
early stage tumors with 72% of EC cases classified as FIGO
stage I disease and 70% of ovarian cancer cases cla ssified as
FIGO stage I disease [3].
A population-based retrospective a nalysis of SEOCs by Matsuo
et al. showed that among the endometrial cancer cohorts,
synchronous primary endometrioid endometrial and ovarian
tumors accounted for majority of the cases with 21.8%
accounted for the high-grade (grades 2 and 3) tumors [1].
This case report has unusual presentation of SEOC at later age
of 70, in postmenopausal lady with higher grade of endometrial
carcinoma and higher stage of ovarian cancer when compared
with the above mentioned review of literature.
PTEN and CTNBB1 mutations are found more frequently in
SEOC than p53. In the study by ishikawa et al. the frequencies
of somatic mutations in TP53, PTEN, CTNNB1, KRAS,
and POLE were 3 (37.5%), 2 (25.0%), 3 (37.5%), 0 (0.0%), and
5 (62.5%) of 8 cases in ovarian tumors and 3 (37.5%), 2
(25.0%), 3 (37.5%), 1 (12.5%), and 5 (62.5%) of 8 cases in
endometrial tumors, respectively [4].
In this case report both ovarian and endometrial tumors were
p53 positive on Immunohistochemistry and P53 positivity is rare
in SEOC. The histological grade is important because tumor
with higher grade can be more aggressive with higher chance of
recurrence.
Present report is to highlight a synchronous ovarian and
endometrioid carcinoma with aggressive Type II features
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology http://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 98 ~
presenting at an older age and higher s tage than previously
reported.
Conclusion
Synchronous ovarian and endometrioid carcinoma usually
presents at premenopausal age group with lower grade and
stage. But in case of an unusual presentation as in this case, it
can be managed with multidisciplin ary approach and regular
follow up.
Conflict of interest disclosure: All authors declare no conflict
of interest.
References
1. Matsuo K, Machida H, Blake EA , Holman LL, Rimel BJ,
Roman LD et al . Trends and outcomes of women with
synchronous endometrial an d ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 9,
2018, 28757-28771.
2. Makris GM, Manousopoulou G, Battista MJ, Salloum I,
Chrelias G, Chrelias C et al. Synchronous Endometrial and
Ovarian Carcinoma: A Case Series. Case Rep Oncol . 2017;
10(2):732-736. Published 201 7 Aug 9.
doi:10.1159/000479501
3. Dogan A, Schultheis B, Rezniczek GA, Hilal Z, Cetin C,
Haeusler G et al . Synchronous endometrial and ovarian
cancer in young women: case report and review of the
literature. Anticancer research. 2017; 37(3):969-78.
4. Ishikawa M, Nakayama K, Nakamura K, Ono R, Yamashita
H, Ishibashi T et al. High frequency of POLE mutations in
synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcin oma. Human
pathology. 2019; 85:92-100.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.