Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS

Investigate the efficiency of primary care... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579" }, "headline": "Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical...", "datePublished": "2023-12-13T17:08:48", "dateModified": "2025-12-19T05:03:18", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Ali E. M. Jarghon" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Nyoman Anita Damayanti" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Inge Dhamanti" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Anas M. M. Awad" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background This study applied geographical standards (coverage distance) and demographic standards to investigate the capabilities of primary healthcare facilities to cover the largest area of the study area and the service area that can be accessed. This study was conducted to find out the sufficient number of primary healthcare (PHC) centers required to provide healthcare services to the entire community. Methods Data was obtained by applying geographic information system (GIS) techniques to analyze primary care facilities using the demographic and geographic standards for primary care facilities. Results PHC centers cover 79% of the study area according to the geographical standard. The study area needs 41 additional centers to cover the shortfall in service provision per the demographic and geographic standards. Conclusions A significant deficiency in the number of primary care centers found in the study area compared to the large population at the geographical and demographic standards level. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3", "name": "Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency..." } } ] } Home Browse Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Jarghon AEM, Damayanti NA, Dhamanti I and Awad AMM. Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140107.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article Revised Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] Ali E. M. Jarghon https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2040-3474 1 , Nyoman Anita Damayanti 1 , Inge Dhamanti https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2347-8771 1 , Anas M. M. Awad https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1553-1707 2 Ali E. M. Jarghon https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2040-3474 1 , Nyoman Anita Damayanti 1 , Inge Dhamanti https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2347-8771 1 , Anas M. M. Awad https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1553-1707 2 PUBLISHED 23 Dec 2024 Author details Author details 1 Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, East Java, 60114, Indonesia 2 Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, West Java, 40132, Indonesia Ali E. M. Jarghon Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Nyoman Anita Damayanti Roles: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Inge Dhamanti Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Anas M. M. Awad Roles: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Health Services gateway. Abstract Background This study applied geographical standards (coverage distance) and demographic standards to investigate the capabilities of primary healthcare facilities to cover the largest area of the study area and the service area that can be accessed. This study was conducted to find out the sufficient number of primary healthcare (PHC) centers required to provide healthcare services to the entire community. Methods Data was obtained by applying geographic information system (GIS) techniques to analyze primary care facilities using the demographic and geographic standards for primary care facilities. Results PHC centers cover 79% of the study area according to the geographical standard. The study area needs 41 additional centers to cover the shortfall in service provision per the demographic and geographic standards. Conclusions A significant deficiency in the number of primary care centers found in the study area compared to the large population at the geographical and demographic standards level. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Primary health care, emergencies, geographical standard, demographic standard, GIS, Coverage Corresponding Author(s) Nyoman Anita Damayanti ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Nyoman Anita Damayanti Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2024 Jarghon AEM et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Jarghon AEM, Damayanti NA, Dhamanti I and Awad AMM. Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140107.3 ) First published: 13 Dec 2023, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140107.1 ) Latest published: 19 Dec 2025, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140107.4 ) Revised Amendments from Version 2 Title : The title remains unchanged. Abstract : No modifications were made to the abstract. Figures No modifications were made to the Figures. Tables No modifications were made to the Tables Introduction : Additional citations were included to further substantiate the background and context of our study based on the reviewer. Methods : Expanding this section to increase replicability, providing more comprehensive descriptions of the GIS techniques based on the reviewer. Results : Clarifications were added based on the reviewer. Discussion and Recommendations : The discussion was enhanced to explore the implications of findings in greater depth, particularly regarding underserved areas. New recommendations added based on the reviewer. Title : The title remains unchanged. Abstract : No modifications were made to the abstract. Figures No modifications were made to the Figures. Tables No modifications were made to the Tables Introduction : Additional citations were included to further substantiate the background and context of our study based on the reviewer. Methods : Expanding this section to increase replicability, providing more comprehensive descriptions of the GIS techniques based on the reviewer. Results : Clarifications were added based on the reviewer. Discussion and Recommendations : The discussion was enhanced to explore the implications of findings in greater depth, particularly regarding underserved areas. New recommendations added based on the reviewer. See the authors' detailed response to the review by Ayed Taran See the authors' detailed response to the review by Jianwei Li See the authors' detailed response to the review by Pankaj Roy See the authors' detailed response to the review by Hanifa Denny READ REVIEWER RESPONSES  There is a newer version of this article available. Suppress this message for one day. Introduction The pre-disaster phase of the disaster management (DM) process is based on examining the current readiness of facilities and services related to disaster risk reduction and identifying and addressing deficiencies and weaknesses for providing the needs and requirements for the success of the DM process. 1 The spatial evaluation process for the sites of services and facilities needed for DM examines readiness in the study area using geographic information system (GIS) techniques and spatial analysis. 2 – 4 Geographical standards (coverage distance) and demographic standards show the capabilities of primary health center facilities to cover the largest area of the study area and the service area. In addition, we analyze the population’s suitability with the number of facilities available in the study area to find out if it is sufficient to provide services to the entire community according to the standards required. 5 – 8 Planning standards for primary care centers Primary health care (PHC) is a crucial component of health systems and communities’ social and economic development. 9 – 11 PHC is responsible for providing health services and responding to emergencies at each sub-region level. 11 – 16 There are 26 centers in Sleman District, Indonesia, distributed over 17 sub-regions. 12 The study utilized demographic and geographic Standards as variables, gathering data from the District Health Office. It adhered to the Ministry of Health’s regulations to assess their applicability within the study area. Methods Study area The study was conducted in Sleman District, Yogyakarta City, Indonesia, which comprises 26 Primary Health Care (PHC) centers distributed across 17 sub-regions. Sleman District has the highest disaster risk index in Yogyakarta, with a score of 97. 17 This study utilized ArcGIS 10.5 to analyze the distribution and accessibility of PHC facilities based on demographic and geographic standards, aiming to identify shortages, assess needs, and propose solutions and recommendations. 18 – 21 The GIS-based analytical approaches employed in this study depend on the availability of spatial and non-spatial data. 22 – 24 According to the geographical standard, each sub-district should have one PHC, and urban facilities should have a service scope within specific distances: 5 km for hospitals, 2.5 km for schools, and 2 km for markets. Non-spatial data, such as population demographics, were also considered to estimate healthcare demand. 25 , 26 Furthermore, the study utilized statistical data to measure the need for new PHC centers based on the population data. The Ministry of Health set the standard where each PHC has to provide services for 20,000 people. 27 Data collection and preparation Astronomical location Sleman District is located between 110° 13′ 00″ to 110° 33′ 00″ east longitude and 7° 34′ 51″ to 7° 47′ 03″ south latitude (see Figure 1 ). Figure 1. Astronomical site of Sleman district. Population Sleman had a population of 1,206,714, comprising 608,968 males and 597,746 females, within an area of 574.82 km 2 . The population density was 2,099 people per km 2 . Notably dense districts include Depok (5,359 people per km 2 ), Mlati (4,049 people per km 2 ), Gamping (3,771 people per km 2 ), and Ngaglik (3,194 people per km 2 ) in 2018. 28 Data collection, processing, and analysis Proximity Analysis: Assessed the accessibility of PHC facilities by measuring distances or travel times from specific locations, considering transportation networks and road conditions to determine ease of access during emergencies. Spatial Overlay: Combined spatial data layers to identify relationships and patterns, such as overlaying facility locations with demographic data to pinpoint areas with a critical need for primary care. This overlay identified gaps by linking population data to service coverage zones, helping to pinpoint critical need areas. Additional overlays for schools and markets (within 2.5 km and 2 km, respectively) were also applied to measure secondary accessibility standards. Network Analysis: Optimized routes and travel times using transportation networks, aiding in the identification of efficient emergency service routes and areas requiring improved infrastructure or additional facilities. Routes were calculated considering road types, traffic patterns, and transportation networks, which enabled the identification of underserved areas and assessment of infrastructure improvement needs. 29 , 30 The correctness of facilities’ locations were verified through maps using Google Earth and WorldWindEarthExplorer . Using the ArcGIS 10.5 program and Arc Analysis tools, the study area is derived based on arial images, identified by comparing it with the arial images obtained from Indonesian Disaster Management Agency. The extracted data sets were then transferred to Microsoft Excel 2013, using the network analysis in Arc GIS 10.5 (open source alternative: QGIS ) to analyze and determine the scope of service of PHC. Spatial analysis of the location regarding PHC needed in the study area depended on geographical standard and demographic standards. By applying these standards, we can inquire about PHC capabilities to cover the study field and the service area that could be accessed. In addition to analyzing the population’s suitability with the number of PHCs available in the study area, is it sufficient to provide primary healthcare services to all, at the time and standard required? The analysis started by obtaining the map of 26 PHC centres distributed over 17 sub-regions as shown in Figure 2 . Figure 2. Primary healthcare center distribution in Sleman district. Results Geographical standard (coverage distance) According to the geographical standard, each sub-district must have one PHC and urban facilities, including a scope of service within 5 km, a school within 2.5 km, a market within 2 km, and a hospital within 5 km. 31 The service area of PHCs in the study area, based on these geographical standards, is illustrated below: Geographical standard, availability of hospital within 5 km The PHC service areas in the study area are defined by a 5 km radius from hospitals. Figure 3 shows the availability of hospitals within this radius. It was found that 24 health centers met the specified standard in the presence of a hospital (represented in green), while two health centers did not meet the standard (represented in red). Figure 3. Illustrates the service area of primary healthcare (PHC) in the study area, based on a geographical standard of 5 km from the hospitals. The scope of service within 5 km The PHC service area based on a 5 km radius is further detailed in Figure 4 . According to the Indonesian Ministry of Health standards, health centers are required to provide services within a 5 km distance. The 5 km radius for healthcare service coverage is chosen to enhance accessibility and equity, ensuring patients can reach healthcare within a manageable distance, especially in rural and semi-urban areas (Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 Year 2019 Concerning Public Health Centers, 2019). In Sleman District, health centers cover an area of 454.10 km 2 out of 574.25 km 2 , serving approximately 79% of the study area. The unserved area totals 120.15 km 2 , primarily in the northern (Cangkringan, Pakem, Turi, Tempel) and southern (Prambanan, Berbah, Gamping) districts. Detailed coverage for each district is provided below: • Cangkringan District: One PHC covers 24.24 km 2 out of 44.72 km 2 (45% unserved). • Pakem District: One PHC covers 25.98 km 2 out of 52.70 km 2 (50.7% unserved). • Turi District: One PHC covers 22.90 km 2 out of 40.50 km 2 (43.4% unserved). • Tempel District: Two PHCs cover 28.45 km 2 out of 32.33 km 2 (12% unserved). • Prambanan District: One PHC covers 14.25 km 2 out of 40.62 km 2 (64.9% unserved). • Berbah District: One PHC covers 17.0 km 2 out of 25.85 km 2 (24.2% unserved). Figure 4. The service area of PHC in the study area based on the geographical standard (5 km). In conclusion, the study area has a service coverage deficiency of 21%. This highlights the need for additional primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in districts that face shortages. These districts have high population densities and are also located in close proximity to natural disaster sources, such as volcanoes, floods, and landslides. Geographical standards, availability of schools with 2.5 km The service area of the PHC center is defined as a 2.5 km radius from the schools. Figure 5 illustrates the availability of schools within this 2.5 km radius. A service scope within 2.5 km of the primary care centers has been implemented. In Figure 5 , 26 PHC centers met the specified standard in the presence of a school, indicated by the green color. Figure 5. The service area of the PHC centre (2.5 km from the schools). Geographical standards, availability of market within 2 km The service area based on a 2 km radius from markets is shown in Figure 6 . Out of 26 PHCs, 23 met the standard (indicated in green), while three did not (indicated in red). Three PHC centers did not meet the specified standard in the presence of a market, indicated by the red color. Figure 6. The service area of the PHC centre in the study area based on the geographical standard (2 km from the market). Demographic standard Table 1 provides an explanation of the individuals who receive services and those who do not receive services through the PHC center in Sleman District, based on the demographic standard. The location of the PHC center is determined by the population distribution in the region, following the demographic standard set by the Indonesian Ministry of Health, which specifies serving a population of 20,000 people per PHC. 32 After applying the demographic standards, the study yielded the following findings. The total population of the Sleman district is 1,206,714 people. Out of 26 PHCs, 520,000 individuals are receiving services in accordance with the prescribed criteria. The population without access to services amounts to approximately 686,714 people. According to the demographic standard, a larger percentage of the population should have access to PHC services. The shortage in health centers represents approximately 41 PHC centers. Statistical data indicates that the highest number of individuals lacking services in PHCs is found in the Depok region, with a shortage of 130,526 people. The construction of seven additional PHC facilities is necessary. In contrast, the percentage of individuals lacking access to PHC services in Cangkringan District is relatively small, necessitating the establishment of one new PHC. Table 1. Number of people who receive services and who do not receive services through PHC centre according to the demographic standard in Sleman District. No. Sub-District Population (2018) No. of PHCs Served population Unserved population PHCs needed 1 Berbah 59,943 1 20,000 39,943 2 2 Cankringan 29,592 1 20,000 9,952 1 3 Depok 190,526 3 60,000 130,526 6-7 4 Gamping 110,288 2 40,000 70,288 3-4 5 Dodean 72,286 2 40,000 32,286 1-2 6 Kalasan 88,110 1 20,000 68,110 3-4 7 Minggir 29,929 1 20,000 9929 1 8 Mlati 115,466 2 40,000 75,466 3-4 9 Moyudan 31,536 1 20,000 11,536 1 10 Ngaglik 123,039 2 40,000 83,039 4 11 Ngemplak 66,899 2 40,000 26,899 1-2 12 Pakem 38,658 1 20,000 18,658 1 13 Prambanan 48,734 1 20,000 28,734 1-2 14 Seyegan 47,355 1 20,000 27,355 1-2 15 Sleman 68,480 2 40,000 28,480 1-2 16 Tempel 50,844 2 40,000 10,844 1 17 Turi 34,489 1 20,000 14,489 1 Total 17 1,206,714 26 520,000 686,714 Discussion In this study, the researchers set a geographical standard to determine the service area of Primary Health Care (PHC) centers in the study area. The standard was based on a 5 km radius from the hospitals. 25 According to the findings presented in the study, it was observed that 24 health centers met the specified standard for service area coverage in the presence of a hospital. This discrepancy between compliant and non-compliant health centers may have important implications for healthcare accessibility in the region. The availability of PHC services within a 5 km radius from hospitals could significantly impact the ease of access to healthcare for the population living in those areas. The PHC centers that fall within the service area are better positioned to serve their communities effectively, ensuring that a larger population has access to essential healthcare services. Factors such as distance, transportation infrastructure, and population density could play a role in determining the feasibility of establishing PHC centers in those regions. 33 Policymakers and healthcare administrators may need to consider additional measures to address the accessibility challenges faced by these areas, potentially by improving transportation options or establishing additional health facilities to fill the service gap. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the distribution of PHC services based on geographical standards in the study area. The findings can serve as a foundation for healthcare planning and resource allocation, aiming to enhance healthcare accessibility and ultimately improve the overall health outcomes for the population in the region. However, further research and collaboration between various stakeholders, including government agencies, healthcare providers, and community representatives, will be necessary to address the challenges highlighted by the study and ensure equitable access to healthcare services for all residents. The variations in PHC coverage across different sub-districts signify the importance of localized and targeted healthcare planning and resource allocation. It is evident that certain areas are more underserved than others, requiring specific attention and efforts to improve healthcare accessibility in those regions. The study’s findings can serve as a foundation for evidence-based decision-making in healthcare planning and policy development. By identifying the areas with the greatest need for additional healthcare resources, policymakers can prioritize their interventions to achieve more equitable healthcare distribution and improve the health outcomes of the population in the study area. The implementation of a service scope based on a 2.5 km radius from schools is a commendable step towards improving healthcare accessibility and promoting the well-being of the school community. It also encourages early intervention and preventive healthcare practices, which can contribute to better health outcomes among the school community. The implementation of a service scope based on a 2 km radius from markets is a promising initiative to enhance healthcare accessibility in the study area. 25 The findings in Figure 6 underscore the importance of such approaches in healthcare planning. However, it is crucial to continue evaluating and refining the service area to ensure that healthcare services effectively reach all populations, particularly those residing near markets. By addressing the challenges and disparities identified in the evaluation process, healthcare providers and policymakers can work together to build a more inclusive and accessible healthcare system, ultimately contributing to the improvement of community health and well-being. The study highlights the importance of adhering to demographic standards to ensure that a larger percentage of the population has access to PHC services. There is a shortage of 41 PHC centers, based on the demographic standard of 20,000 people per PHC. This shortage of health centers directly affects the number of individuals who lack access to healthcare services in the region. Moreover, shortfalls indicate that a considerable portion of the population lacks timely access to essential healthcare, potentially leading to adverse health outcomes such as delays in medical interventions, and overall diminished quality of care. The underserved populations are especially vulnerable in emergencies, where delays in accessing healthcare can exacerbate injury or illness outcomes. The study’s results have significant implications for healthcare planning and resource allocation in Sleman District. Policymakers and healthcare authorities need to take into account the demographic standards and the actual healthcare needs of the population when planning the distribution and establishment of PHC centers. The study identifies significant gaps in healthcare access for a substantial portion of the population. Addressing these disparities requires careful planning, resource allocation, and the establishment of new PHC centers, particularly in regions with the greatest need. By addressing the shortages and expanding healthcare infrastructure, policymakers can work towards achieving a more equitable healthcare system that caters to the healthcare needs of all individuals in the district. Conclusion In conclusion, there is a significant deficiency in the number of PHCs in the study area compared to the large population, both at the geographical and demographic standards level. The region is in urgent need of filling these gaps by establishing new PHC centers to meet the population’s needs and provide high-quality PHC services in line with international standards. This will also help alleviate the burden on central hospitals in the region. Recommendations Policymakers should consider expanding infrastructure by establishing additional PHC centers in densely populated, underserved areas, thus improving service reach. Additionally, enhancing community engagement through health education and preventive care programs can lower disease incidence, helping to manage healthcare demand in high-need areas. Improving transportation routes to PHCs would further facilitate access for those in distant regions. Finally, adopting a data-driven approach to resource allocation, utilizing GIS data, will ensure that health infrastructure evolves to meet population changes and emerging needs, creating a resilient and equitable healthcare system. Data availability The data for this study are owned by the Indonesian Disaster Management Agency, Statistics Indonesia (BPS), and the Sleman District Health Office, it can be obtained here: 1. Click the following link, change language to English, click download publication, input your E-mail, and the file will be downloaded https://slemankab.bps.go.id/publication/2019/08/16/c400805c8dee98a3d701ea33/kabupaten-sleman-dalam-angka-2019.html 2. https://geoportal.slemankab.go.id/ ; to access the data, use the direct link as following: https://geoportal.slemankab.go.id/layers/geonode_data:geonode:a__3404_50KB_PT_SEBARAN_RUMAH_SAKIT_SLEMAN_20 https://geoportal.slemankab.go.id/layers/geonode_data:geonode:a__3404_50KB_PT_PUSKESMAS_SLEMAN_2020 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the health district office in the City of Yogyakarta for insightful suggestions and advice. References 1. Djalante MG, Frank Thomalla RS: Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia: Progress, Challenges, and Issues.2017; 1–17. 2. Alzahrani F, Kyratsis Y: Emergency nurse disaster preparedness during mass gatherings: A cross-sectional survey of emergency nurses’ perceptions in hospitals in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. BMJ Open. 2017; 7 (4): e013563. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 3. Rajeswari SP: Disaster management - introduction, community preparedness and response and role of a public health nurse. Indian J. Cont. Nsg. Edn. 2018; 19 (2): 58–72. 4. Madanian S: Disaster eHealth: Scoping Review. PubMed. 2020; 22 : e18310. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 5. Kofi A: Optimizing Access to Primary Health Care Services in Rural Communities using Geographical Information System (GIS): A Case of Atwima Mponua Optimizing Access to Primary Health Care Services in Rural Communities using Geographical Information System (GI). Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2017; 163 (December): 30–36. Publisher Full Text 6. Mokgalaka H: Measuring Access to Primary Health Care: Use of a GIS-Based Accessibility Measuring Access to Primary Health Care: Use of a GIS-Based Accessibility Analysis.October 2014; 2015 . 7. Oldenburg CE, Sié A, Ouattara M, et al. : Distance to primary care facilities and healthcare utilization for preschool children in rural northwestern Burkina Faso: results from a surveillance cohort. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021; 5 : 1–8. 8. Al- Al-mandhari A, Al-adawi S, Al-zakwani I, et al. : Impact of Geographical Proximity on Health Care Seeking Behaviour in Northern Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2008; 8 (3): 310–318. 9. WHO: Primary health care.2021. 10. Mccullough K, Whitehead L, Bayes S, et al. : International Journal of Nursing Studies The delivery of Primary Health Care in remote communities: A Grounded Theory study of the perspective of nurses. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2020; 102 : 103474. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 11. Sundararaman T: Health systems preparedness for COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J. Public Health. 2020; 64 (6): 91–93. Publisher Full Text 12. District Health office: Data of Primary healthcare centre.2020. 13. WHO: Primary health care.2021. 14. Garg S, Basu S, Rustagi RBA: Primary Health Care Facility Preparedness for Outpatient Service Provision During the COVID-19 Pandemic in India: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020; 6 (2): 1–7. Publisher Full Text 15. Souza CDF, Gois-Santos VT, Correia DS, et al. : The need to strengthen Primary Health Care in Brazil in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Short Communication, Social/Community Dentistry. 2020; 34 : 1–3. Publisher Full Text 16. Aburayya A, Alshurideh M, Albqaeen A, et al. : An investigation of factors affecting patients waiting time in primary health care centers: An assessment study in Dubai.2020; 10 (6): 1265–1276. 17. Bnpb: Indonesian Disaster Risk Index. In Directorate of Disaster Risk Reduction (Vol. 53). 2013. Publisher Full Text 18. Dulin M, Ludden T, Tapp H, et al. : Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to Understand a Community’ s Primary Care Needs. PubMed. 2010; 23 (1): 21. 19. Murad A: Using GIS for determining variations in health access in jeddah city, Saudi Arabia. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. 2018; 7 (7). Publisher Full Text 20. Taran A: Measuring Accessibility to Health Care Centers in the City of Al-Mafraq Using Geographic Information Systems. ResearchGate. 2023; 19 (1): 43–55. 21. Ahasan R, Alam MS, Chakraborty T, et al. : Applications of GIS and geospatial analyses in COVID-19 research: A systematic review. F1000Res. 2020 Nov 27; 9 : 1379. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 22. Taran A, et al. : The Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Corona Pandemic in Jordan using the Geographic Information System: An Applied Geographical Study. Indonesian Lansc. Geo. J. 2023; 55 (1): 155. Publisher Full Text 23. Dai T, Guo K, Zhao J, et al. : Impact of the presence of private hospitals on the spatial equality of healthcare accessibility in Beijing, China. Geospat. Health. 2022; 17 (2). Publisher Full Text 24. Ghosh C: GIS and Geospatial Studies in Disaster Management.Singh A, editor. International Handbook of Disaster Research.Singapore: Springer; 2023. Publisher Full Text 25. Indonesian Ministry of Health: Regulation Of The Minister Of Health Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 43 Year 2019 Concerning Public Health Centers. Indonesian Ministry of Health: Indonesia; 2019. 26. Khashoggi BF, Murad A: Issues of healthcare planning and GIS: A review. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. 2020; 9 (6). Publisher Full Text 27. Indonesian Ministry of Health: Technical Guidelines for Disaster-related Health Crisis Management. Indonesian Ministry of Health: Jakarta; 2007. 28. Bps: Sleman Regency in Figures 2019.2019. 29. Anas A, et al. : Measuring the spatial readiness of ambulance facilities for natural disasters using GIS networks analysis. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives. 2010; 44 (4): 81–84. 30. Anas A, et al. : Optimization of new fire department location using an improved GIS algorithm for firefighters travel time estimation. Int. J. Emerg. Serv. 2024; 13 (3): 80–97. Publisher Full Text 31. Indonesian Ministry of Health: Technical Guidelines for Disaster-related Health Crisis Management. Indonesian Ministry of Health: Jakarta; 2007. 32. Indonesian Ministry of Health: Regulation Of The Minister Of Health Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 43 Year 2019 Concerning Public Health Centers. Indonesian Ministry of Health: Indonesia; 2019. 33. Chen L, Chen T, Lan T, et al. : The Contributions of Population Distribution, Healthcare Resourcing, and Transportation Infrastructure to Spatial Accessibility of Health Care. Inquiry (United States). 2023; 60 : 004695802211460. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 4 VERSION 4 PUBLISHED 13 Dec 2023 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, East Java, 60114, Indonesia 2 Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, West Java, 40132, Indonesia Ali E. M. Jarghon Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Nyoman Anita Damayanti Roles: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Inge Dhamanti Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Anas M. M. Awad Roles: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (4) version 4 Revised Published: 19 Dec 2025, 12:1579 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140107.4 version 3 Revised Published: 23 Dec 2024, 12:1579 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140107.3 version 2 Revised Published: 05 Jul 2024, 12:1579 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140107.2 version 1 Published: 13 Dec 2023, 12:1579 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140107.1 Copyright © 2024 Jarghon AEM et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Jarghon AEM, Damayanti NA, Dhamanti I and Awad AMM. Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140107.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 23 Dec 2024 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Roy P. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174054.r356660 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3#referee-response-356660 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 11 Jan 2025 Pankaj Roy , Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, India Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174054.r356660 Critical Review of the Article : "Investigate the Efficiency of Primary Care Facilities in Emergency Situations by Application of Geographical and Demographic Standards Using GIS" 1. Title Evaluation: The title reflects the core focus of the study, emphasising both ... Continue reading READ ALL Critical Review of the Article : "Investigate the Efficiency of Primary Care Facilities in Emergency Situations by Application of Geographical and Demographic Standards Using GIS" 1. Title Evaluation: The title reflects the core focus of the study, emphasising both the geographical and demographic dimensions of primary healthcare facility accessibility in emergency contexts. However, it could be more concise by removing redundant phrasing such as "by application of geographical and demographic standards" and simplifying it to suggested below. Suggestion: One of the best fitted titles may be "Evaluating the Efficiency of Primary Healthcare Facilities in Emergency Situations: A GIS-Based Geographical and Demographic Analysis" 2. Abstract Review: The abstract provides a clear overview of the study, including the background, methods, results, and conclusions. However, it lacks specificity regarding the geographical area and demographic standards applied. Including more details about the study area (Sleman District, Indonesia) and the GIS tools utilised would enhance clarity. Suggestions: Specify the key GIS tools and methods in the abstract. Highlight the critical finding that 41 additional primary healthcare centres (PHCs) are required. 3. Introduction Analysis: The introduction outlines the importance of primary healthcare in emergencies and introduces GIS as a tool for spatial analysis. However, the rationale behind choosing Sleman District as the study area is poorly elaborated. The introduction would benefit from a more detailed discussion of the region's specific healthcare challenges and the relevance of demographic standards in healthcare planning. Suggestions: Provide a stronger justification for selecting Sleman District. Include more citations to recent studies on GIS applications in healthcare. 4. Methodology Review: The methodology section describes the use of ArcGIS 10.5 for analysing the distribution of PHC facilities. It also outlines the applications of geographical standards (coverage distance) and demographic standards (population served per PHC). However, the methodology lacks detailed explanations of the GIS network analysis process, and no clear technical roadmap is provided for replicating the study. Strengths: The use of proximity analysis, spatial overlay, and network analysis is appropriate. The study adheres to Indonesian Ministry of Health regulations. Weaknesses: Insufficient detail on data collection and GIS processing steps. Lack of clarity on using the network analysis in QGIS as an open source alternative of Arc GIS 10.5. Lack of population density maps for better visualisation. Suggestions: Include a technical roadmap or flowchart to illustrate the methodology including the GIS analyses. Provide population density maps to complement the spatial analysis. 5. Results and Analysis: The results highlight that PHC centres cover 79% of the study area, leaving a significant portion underserved. The analysis identifies a need for 41 additional PHCs to meet the demographic standards set by the Ministry of Health. The spatial distribution maps and network analysis effectively demonstrate the gaps in healthcare access. Strengths Clear identification of underserved areas. Effective use of GIS-based maps to visualise healthcare coverage. Weaknesses The results section focuses strongly on geographical coverage without delving deeply into the demographic implications. Limited discussion on the socioeconomic impact of healthcare access disparities. Suggestions Provide more detailed demographic analysis, including the age and gender distribution of underserved populations. Discuss the potential health outcomes resulting from inadequate PHC coverage. 6. Discussion and Recommendations: The discussion section explores the implications of the findings, emphasizing the need for more PHC centers in underserved areas. However, the recommendations lack depth and fail to address practical solutions for improving healthcare accessibility. Strengths: The discussion recognises the need for targeted healthcare planning. The recommendations highlight the importance of data-driven decision-making. Weaknesses: Recommendations are too general and lack actionable steps. The discussion does not consider alternative solutions, such as mobile clinics or telemedicine. Suggestions: Provide specific recommendations for policymakers, such as prioritising regions for new PHC centres. Explore alternative healthcare delivery models, like mobile clinics and telehealth services. 7. References: The references cited are relevant and credible. However, the article would benefit from more recent studies and a broader range of sources, particularly in GIS applications and healthcare planning. Strengths: The references are appropriate and related to the study's focus. The citation style is consistent. Weaknesses: The references list lacks recent studies. Some key studies on healthcare access models are missing. Suggestions: Include more recent references, especially from the last five years. Expand the references to cover healthcare access models and disaster preparedness. Include more references to recent studies on GIS applications in healthcare. 8. Grammatical and Stylistic Errors: Upon review, several areas in the article could benefit from grammatical and stylistic improvements to enhance readability and clarity. Below are the sampled grammatical errors identified: Sentence Length Many sentences are lengthy and could be split for better readability. Example: "The article presents a valuable analysis of healthcare accessibility using GIS, specifically focusing on the spatial distribution of primary healthcare centres and the gaps in service coverage in the Sleman District of Indonesia." Suggested Revision: "The article presents a valuable GIS-based analysis of healthcare accessibility. It specifically focuses on the spatial distribution of primary healthcare centres and the service gaps in the Sleman District of Indonesia." 9. Passive Voice: The article uses passive voice frequently, which can make the writing less direct. Example: "The study was conducted to find out the sufficient number of primary healthcare (PHC) centres required." Suggested Revision: "The study aimed to determine the number of primary healthcare (PHC) centres needed." Redundancy: Some phrases are redundant and can be simplified. Example: "The article claims that all source data are available through relevant government agencies and geoportals." Suggested Revision: "The article states that all source data are available through government agencies and geoportals." Word Choice: Certain words and phrases could be more precise or formal. Example: "The citations provided are relevant to the topic, particularly in the use of GIS in healthcare planning." Suggested Revision: "The citations are relevant, particularly GIS applications in healthcare planning." Critical Questions for Improvement How can the study incorporate socioeconomic data to provide a more comprehensive analysis of healthcare access disparities? What alternative healthcare delivery models can be explored to address the shortfall in PHC centres? How can the findings of this study be integrated into national healthcare planning and policy frameworks? Overall Evaluation The article presents a valuable analysis of healthcare accessibility using GIS. However, it could be strengthened by addressing the methodological gaps and providing more practical recommendations. The study's relevance to healthcare planning is clear, but it requires more in-depth exploration of demographic and socioeconomic factors to maximize its impact. Final Suggestions Include a more detailed methodology section. Provide comprehensive demographic analysis. Offer specific, actionable recommendations for policymakers. Explore alternative solutions for improving healthcare access. By addressing these areas, the article can significantly enhance its contribution to healthcare planning and GIS applications. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Geography, Geoinformatics, Spatial Analysis, Public Health I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Roy P. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174054.r356660 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3#referee-response-356660 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 19 Dec 2025 Ali Jarghon , Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 19 Dec 2025 Author Response 1.Title Evaluation Reviewer Comment: The title should be more concise. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We agree the proposed title is clearer, but since the article is already published ... Continue reading 1.Title Evaluation Reviewer Comment: The title should be more concise. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We agree the proposed title is clearer, but since the article is already published under the current title, it cannot be changed now. We will consider this recommendation for future work. 2.Abstract Review Reviewer Comment: The abstract lacks details about the study area and GIS tools used. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. We have revised the abstract by specifying the key GIS tools (ArcGIS 10.5 and QGIS) and the main analytical methods applied, including proximity analysis, spatial overlay, and network analysis. We also added the study area, Sleman District, Indonesia, and highlighted the critical finding that 41 additional primary healthcare centers (PHCs) are required to meet both demographic and geographic standards. 3.Introduction Analysis: viewer Comment: The rationale for selecting Sleman District is limited, and more recent GIS studies should be cited. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. Sleman District was chosen as the study area because it has a high population density, mixed urban and rural areas, and a high disaster-risk level. Similar studies have also used GIS to analyze healthcare accessibility and planning 4. Methodology Review: 1- Reviewer Comment: Include a technical roadmap or flowchart to illustrate the methodology including the GIS analyses. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. I have added a methodology flowchart to clearly present the GIS analysis process. 2- Reviewer Comment: Provide population density maps to complement the spatial analysis. Response: We thank the reviewer for this helpful suggestion. A population density map has now been added to the Results section to enhance the spatial analysis and support the demographic assessment of PHC service needs. 5. Results and Analysis: 1-Reviewer Comment: Provide more detailed demographic analysis, including the age and gender distribution of underserved populations. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion.This study had two goals: a geographical goal to measure PHC coverage distance and area, and a demographic goal to identify the total population served. We did not include age or gender details because this requires field surveys and was outside our scope. 2- Reviewer Comment: Discuss the potential health outcomes resulting from inadequate PHC coverage. Response: Thank you for this important suggestion. Inadequate PHC coverage can lead to serious health outcomes, including delayed treatment, increased cases of preventable diseases, and higher maternal and child mortality rates. During disasters or emergencies, limited access to healthcare may also result in greater vulnerability and poorer recovery among affected populations. 6. Discussion and Recommendations: Reviewer Comment: The recommendations are too general and need more practical solutions for improving healthcare accessibility. Response: Thank you for this valuable suggestion. I have revised the Discussion and Recommendations section to include specific actions for policymakers and alternative healthcare delivery options. Policymakers prioritize the establishment of new PHC centers in underserved sub-districts such as Cangkringan, Pakem, Turi, and Prambanan, where service coverage and accessibility are lowest. In addition, I have added recommendations to explore mobile health clinics and telehealth services as complementary solutions to reach remote or disaster-prone communities where building new PHCs may not be immediately feasible. 7. References: Reviewer Comment: References Response : Thank you for this helpful. I have updated the reference. 8. Grammatical and Stylistic: Several areas in the article could benefit from grammatical and stylistic improvements to enhance readability and clarity. Response: I appreciate the reviewer’s observation. The manuscript has been carefully revised to improve clarity. 9. Passive Voice: Reviewer Comment: The article uses passive voice frequently, which can make the writing less direct. Response: We appreciate this suggestion. The manuscript has been carefully revised to reduce the use of passive voice and make sentences more direct and active 1.Title Evaluation Reviewer Comment: The title should be more concise. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We agree the proposed title is clearer, but since the article is already published under the current title, it cannot be changed now. We will consider this recommendation for future work. 2.Abstract Review Reviewer Comment: The abstract lacks details about the study area and GIS tools used. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. We have revised the abstract by specifying the key GIS tools (ArcGIS 10.5 and QGIS) and the main analytical methods applied, including proximity analysis, spatial overlay, and network analysis. We also added the study area, Sleman District, Indonesia, and highlighted the critical finding that 41 additional primary healthcare centers (PHCs) are required to meet both demographic and geographic standards. 3.Introduction Analysis: viewer Comment: The rationale for selecting Sleman District is limited, and more recent GIS studies should be cited. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. Sleman District was chosen as the study area because it has a high population density, mixed urban and rural areas, and a high disaster-risk level. Similar studies have also used GIS to analyze healthcare accessibility and planning 4. Methodology Review: 1- Reviewer Comment: Include a technical roadmap or flowchart to illustrate the methodology including the GIS analyses. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. I have added a methodology flowchart to clearly present the GIS analysis process. 2- Reviewer Comment: Provide population density maps to complement the spatial analysis. Response: We thank the reviewer for this helpful suggestion. A population density map has now been added to the Results section to enhance the spatial analysis and support the demographic assessment of PHC service needs. 5. Results and Analysis: 1-Reviewer Comment: Provide more detailed demographic analysis, including the age and gender distribution of underserved populations. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion.This study had two goals: a geographical goal to measure PHC coverage distance and area, and a demographic goal to identify the total population served. We did not include age or gender details because this requires field surveys and was outside our scope. 2- Reviewer Comment: Discuss the potential health outcomes resulting from inadequate PHC coverage. Response: Thank you for this important suggestion. Inadequate PHC coverage can lead to serious health outcomes, including delayed treatment, increased cases of preventable diseases, and higher maternal and child mortality rates. During disasters or emergencies, limited access to healthcare may also result in greater vulnerability and poorer recovery among affected populations. 6. Discussion and Recommendations: Reviewer Comment: The recommendations are too general and need more practical solutions for improving healthcare accessibility. Response: Thank you for this valuable suggestion. I have revised the Discussion and Recommendations section to include specific actions for policymakers and alternative healthcare delivery options. Policymakers prioritize the establishment of new PHC centers in underserved sub-districts such as Cangkringan, Pakem, Turi, and Prambanan, where service coverage and accessibility are lowest. In addition, I have added recommendations to explore mobile health clinics and telehealth services as complementary solutions to reach remote or disaster-prone communities where building new PHCs may not be immediately feasible. 7. References: Reviewer Comment: References Response : Thank you for this helpful. I have updated the reference. 8. Grammatical and Stylistic: Several areas in the article could benefit from grammatical and stylistic improvements to enhance readability and clarity. Response: I appreciate the reviewer’s observation. The manuscript has been carefully revised to improve clarity. 9. Passive Voice: Reviewer Comment: The article uses passive voice frequently, which can make the writing less direct. Response: We appreciate this suggestion. The manuscript has been carefully revised to reduce the use of passive voice and make sentences more direct and active Competing Interests: I declare that I have no competing interests that could influence my judgment or the validity of this article. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 19 Dec 2025 Ali Jarghon , Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 19 Dec 2025 Author Response 1.Title Evaluation Reviewer Comment: The title should be more concise. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We agree the proposed title is clearer, but since the article is already published ... Continue reading 1.Title Evaluation Reviewer Comment: The title should be more concise. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We agree the proposed title is clearer, but since the article is already published under the current title, it cannot be changed now. We will consider this recommendation for future work. 2.Abstract Review Reviewer Comment: The abstract lacks details about the study area and GIS tools used. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. We have revised the abstract by specifying the key GIS tools (ArcGIS 10.5 and QGIS) and the main analytical methods applied, including proximity analysis, spatial overlay, and network analysis. We also added the study area, Sleman District, Indonesia, and highlighted the critical finding that 41 additional primary healthcare centers (PHCs) are required to meet both demographic and geographic standards. 3.Introduction Analysis: viewer Comment: The rationale for selecting Sleman District is limited, and more recent GIS studies should be cited. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. Sleman District was chosen as the study area because it has a high population density, mixed urban and rural areas, and a high disaster-risk level. Similar studies have also used GIS to analyze healthcare accessibility and planning 4. Methodology Review: 1- Reviewer Comment: Include a technical roadmap or flowchart to illustrate the methodology including the GIS analyses. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. I have added a methodology flowchart to clearly present the GIS analysis process. 2- Reviewer Comment: Provide population density maps to complement the spatial analysis. Response: We thank the reviewer for this helpful suggestion. A population density map has now been added to the Results section to enhance the spatial analysis and support the demographic assessment of PHC service needs. 5. Results and Analysis: 1-Reviewer Comment: Provide more detailed demographic analysis, including the age and gender distribution of underserved populations. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion.This study had two goals: a geographical goal to measure PHC coverage distance and area, and a demographic goal to identify the total population served. We did not include age or gender details because this requires field surveys and was outside our scope. 2- Reviewer Comment: Discuss the potential health outcomes resulting from inadequate PHC coverage. Response: Thank you for this important suggestion. Inadequate PHC coverage can lead to serious health outcomes, including delayed treatment, increased cases of preventable diseases, and higher maternal and child mortality rates. During disasters or emergencies, limited access to healthcare may also result in greater vulnerability and poorer recovery among affected populations. 6. Discussion and Recommendations: Reviewer Comment: The recommendations are too general and need more practical solutions for improving healthcare accessibility. Response: Thank you for this valuable suggestion. I have revised the Discussion and Recommendations section to include specific actions for policymakers and alternative healthcare delivery options. Policymakers prioritize the establishment of new PHC centers in underserved sub-districts such as Cangkringan, Pakem, Turi, and Prambanan, where service coverage and accessibility are lowest. In addition, I have added recommendations to explore mobile health clinics and telehealth services as complementary solutions to reach remote or disaster-prone communities where building new PHCs may not be immediately feasible. 7. References: Reviewer Comment: References Response : Thank you for this helpful. I have updated the reference. 8. Grammatical and Stylistic: Several areas in the article could benefit from grammatical and stylistic improvements to enhance readability and clarity. Response: I appreciate the reviewer’s observation. The manuscript has been carefully revised to improve clarity. 9. Passive Voice: Reviewer Comment: The article uses passive voice frequently, which can make the writing less direct. Response: We appreciate this suggestion. The manuscript has been carefully revised to reduce the use of passive voice and make sentences more direct and active 1.Title Evaluation Reviewer Comment: The title should be more concise. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We agree the proposed title is clearer, but since the article is already published under the current title, it cannot be changed now. We will consider this recommendation for future work. 2.Abstract Review Reviewer Comment: The abstract lacks details about the study area and GIS tools used. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. We have revised the abstract by specifying the key GIS tools (ArcGIS 10.5 and QGIS) and the main analytical methods applied, including proximity analysis, spatial overlay, and network analysis. We also added the study area, Sleman District, Indonesia, and highlighted the critical finding that 41 additional primary healthcare centers (PHCs) are required to meet both demographic and geographic standards. 3.Introduction Analysis: viewer Comment: The rationale for selecting Sleman District is limited, and more recent GIS studies should be cited. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. Sleman District was chosen as the study area because it has a high population density, mixed urban and rural areas, and a high disaster-risk level. Similar studies have also used GIS to analyze healthcare accessibility and planning 4. Methodology Review: 1- Reviewer Comment: Include a technical roadmap or flowchart to illustrate the methodology including the GIS analyses. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. I have added a methodology flowchart to clearly present the GIS analysis process. 2- Reviewer Comment: Provide population density maps to complement the spatial analysis. Response: We thank the reviewer for this helpful suggestion. A population density map has now been added to the Results section to enhance the spatial analysis and support the demographic assessment of PHC service needs. 5. Results and Analysis: 1-Reviewer Comment: Provide more detailed demographic analysis, including the age and gender distribution of underserved populations. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion.This study had two goals: a geographical goal to measure PHC coverage distance and area, and a demographic goal to identify the total population served. We did not include age or gender details because this requires field surveys and was outside our scope. 2- Reviewer Comment: Discuss the potential health outcomes resulting from inadequate PHC coverage. Response: Thank you for this important suggestion. Inadequate PHC coverage can lead to serious health outcomes, including delayed treatment, increased cases of preventable diseases, and higher maternal and child mortality rates. During disasters or emergencies, limited access to healthcare may also result in greater vulnerability and poorer recovery among affected populations. 6. Discussion and Recommendations: Reviewer Comment: The recommendations are too general and need more practical solutions for improving healthcare accessibility. Response: Thank you for this valuable suggestion. I have revised the Discussion and Recommendations section to include specific actions for policymakers and alternative healthcare delivery options. Policymakers prioritize the establishment of new PHC centers in underserved sub-districts such as Cangkringan, Pakem, Turi, and Prambanan, where service coverage and accessibility are lowest. In addition, I have added recommendations to explore mobile health clinics and telehealth services as complementary solutions to reach remote or disaster-prone communities where building new PHCs may not be immediately feasible. 7. References: Reviewer Comment: References Response : Thank you for this helpful. I have updated the reference. 8. Grammatical and Stylistic: Several areas in the article could benefit from grammatical and stylistic improvements to enhance readability and clarity. Response: I appreciate the reviewer’s observation. The manuscript has been carefully revised to improve clarity. 9. Passive Voice: Reviewer Comment: The article uses passive voice frequently, which can make the writing less direct. Response: We appreciate this suggestion. The manuscript has been carefully revised to reduce the use of passive voice and make sentences more direct and active Competing Interests: I declare that I have no competing interests that could influence my judgment or the validity of this article. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Denny H. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174054.r351971 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3#referee-response-351971 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 28 Dec 2024 Hanifa Denny , Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174054.r351971 Dear authors, Thank you for your thorough and thoughtful revisions. I have reviewed your responses and the updated manuscript, and I find that you have sufficiently addressed all the comments and suggestions provided. The additional citations, methodological ... Continue reading READ ALL Dear authors, Thank you for your thorough and thoughtful revisions. I have reviewed your responses and the updated manuscript, and I find that you have sufficiently addressed all the comments and suggestions provided. The additional citations, methodological clarifications, and expanded discussions enhance the manuscript's quality and relevance. I have no further suggestions at this time, and I am satisfied with the revisions made. Best regards, Reviewer Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Denny H. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174054.r351971 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3#referee-response-351971 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 05 Jul 2024 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Li J. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r328429 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v2#referee-response-328429 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 28 Oct 2024 Jianwei Li , Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r328429 The manuscript, based on demographic data and utilizing GIS spatial network analysis, effectively reveals the spatial alignment between the service coverage of primary healthcare (PHC) centers in the Sleman region of Indonesia and the local population's medical needs. This provides ... Continue reading READ ALL The manuscript, based on demographic data and utilizing GIS spatial network analysis, effectively reveals the spatial alignment between the service coverage of primary healthcare (PHC) centers in the Sleman region of Indonesia and the local population's medical needs. This provides valuable guidance for improving real-world healthcare facilities. However, there are still some shortcomings that need further improvement: The manuscript should clearly explain the GIS network analysis process and include a technical roadmap to help readers better understand the entire data processing procedure. The manuscript should provide a population density map of the study area, enabling readers to better understand the spatial distribution of PHC center services in relation to population density in the region. It is recommended to more comprehensively discuss, in conjunction with the research conclusions, how to improve the PHC service system and propose appropriate research strategies to strengthen the impact of the research conclusions. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Partly Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Urban and Regional Planning Studies I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Li J. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r328429 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v2#referee-response-328429 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 10 Dec 2025 Ali Jarghon , Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 10 Dec 2025 Author Response 1. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should clearly explain the GIS network analysis process and include a technical roadmap to help readers better understand the entire data processing procedure. Response: Thank ... Continue reading 1. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should clearly explain the GIS network analysis process and include a technical roadmap to help readers better understand the entire data processing procedure. Response: Thank you for the comment. We have revised the methods to explain the GIS network analysis more clearly and added a small technical roadmap to show the main steps. 2. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should provide a population density map of the study area, enabling readers to better understand the spatial distribution of PHC center services in relation to population density in the region Response: Thank you for the suggestion. I have added a population density map to the Results section so readers can clearly see the population distribution and how it relates to PHC service coverage. 3. Reviewer Comment: It is recommended to more comprehensively discuss, in conjunction with the research conclusions, how to improve the PHC service system and propose appropriate research strategies to strengthen the impact of the research conclusions. Response: Thank you for the recommendation. I have expanded the discussion to explain more clearly how the PHC service system can be improved based on the study’s findings. I also added simple research strategies to strengthen the impact of the conclusions. 1. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should clearly explain the GIS network analysis process and include a technical roadmap to help readers better understand the entire data processing procedure. Response: Thank you for the comment. We have revised the methods to explain the GIS network analysis more clearly and added a small technical roadmap to show the main steps. 2. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should provide a population density map of the study area, enabling readers to better understand the spatial distribution of PHC center services in relation to population density in the region Response: Thank you for the suggestion. I have added a population density map to the Results section so readers can clearly see the population distribution and how it relates to PHC service coverage. 3. Reviewer Comment: It is recommended to more comprehensively discuss, in conjunction with the research conclusions, how to improve the PHC service system and propose appropriate research strategies to strengthen the impact of the research conclusions. Response: Thank you for the recommendation. I have expanded the discussion to explain more clearly how the PHC service system can be improved based on the study’s findings. I also added simple research strategies to strengthen the impact of the conclusions. Competing Interests: I declare that I have no competing interests that could influence my judgment or the validity of this article. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 10 Dec 2025 Ali Jarghon , Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 10 Dec 2025 Author Response 1. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should clearly explain the GIS network analysis process and include a technical roadmap to help readers better understand the entire data processing procedure. Response: Thank ... Continue reading 1. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should clearly explain the GIS network analysis process and include a technical roadmap to help readers better understand the entire data processing procedure. Response: Thank you for the comment. We have revised the methods to explain the GIS network analysis more clearly and added a small technical roadmap to show the main steps. 2. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should provide a population density map of the study area, enabling readers to better understand the spatial distribution of PHC center services in relation to population density in the region Response: Thank you for the suggestion. I have added a population density map to the Results section so readers can clearly see the population distribution and how it relates to PHC service coverage. 3. Reviewer Comment: It is recommended to more comprehensively discuss, in conjunction with the research conclusions, how to improve the PHC service system and propose appropriate research strategies to strengthen the impact of the research conclusions. Response: Thank you for the recommendation. I have expanded the discussion to explain more clearly how the PHC service system can be improved based on the study’s findings. I also added simple research strategies to strengthen the impact of the conclusions. 1. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should clearly explain the GIS network analysis process and include a technical roadmap to help readers better understand the entire data processing procedure. Response: Thank you for the comment. We have revised the methods to explain the GIS network analysis more clearly and added a small technical roadmap to show the main steps. 2. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should provide a population density map of the study area, enabling readers to better understand the spatial distribution of PHC center services in relation to population density in the region Response: Thank you for the suggestion. I have added a population density map to the Results section so readers can clearly see the population distribution and how it relates to PHC service coverage. 3. Reviewer Comment: It is recommended to more comprehensively discuss, in conjunction with the research conclusions, how to improve the PHC service system and propose appropriate research strategies to strengthen the impact of the research conclusions. Response: Thank you for the recommendation. I have expanded the discussion to explain more clearly how the PHC service system can be improved based on the study’s findings. I also added simple research strategies to strengthen the impact of the conclusions. Competing Interests: I declare that I have no competing interests that could influence my judgment or the validity of this article. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Denny H. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r325253 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v2#referee-response-325253 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 10 Oct 2024 Hanifa Denny , Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r325253 1. Clarity and Accuracy of Presentation and Literature Citations The manuscript is generally well-written, and the topic is clearly defined. It focuses on primary healthcare (PHC) center distribution in Sleman District, Indonesia. The research is relevant, especially in public ... Continue reading READ ALL 1. Clarity and Accuracy of Presentation and Literature Citations The manuscript is generally well-written, and the topic is clearly defined. It focuses on primary healthcare (PHC) center distribution in Sleman District, Indonesia. The research is relevant, especially in public health and healthcare infrastructure planning, and it aligns with current literature on disaster management, GIS application in healthcare, and accessibility standards. However, there are instances where the literature citations could be more comprehensive. Some key studies, such as those on healthcare access models or the role of GIS in disaster preparedness, could be expanded. The inclusion of more recent studies on GIS applications in emergency healthcare systems would strengthen the discussion. Reviewers also recommended citing relevant literature, which has been partially addressed but could be further improved by adding these references to reinforce the findings. 2. Study Design and Academic Merit The study's design is appropriate for the research question. By using geographical and demographic standards and GIS, the study provides an insightful approach to assessing PHC center coverage and identifying gaps in service. The integration of GIS-based tools is a strong aspect of the research. However, some methodological details, such as the choice of specific geographical and demographic standards, could be justified more explicitly. The reasoning behind the selection of a 5 km radius for service coverage, for example, could be explained with more references to health policy or geographical accessibility standards. Despite this, the study has solid academic merit as it tackles an important issue in public health infrastructure. 3. Sufficient Details of Methods and Replicability The methods section is fairly detailed, especially with the use of GIS and demographic data. The revisions made after peer review have improved the clarity of the methodology, making it easier to follow. However, there are still areas that would benefit from more explicit descriptions. For example: 1). More detailed steps on how the network and proximity analyses were conducted. 2). Clear justification for the use of specific GIS tools and how data layers were integrated. Providing these details would enhance the study's replicability by other researchers. 4. Statistical Analysis and Interpretation The study does not heavily rely on complex statistical analysis, as its focus is more on spatial data and accessibility measures. That said, the interpretation of the spatial data is appropriate. The visual representations (maps) of PHC service areas help in understanding the disparities in healthcare coverage. One area that could be enhanced is a more in-depth statistical interpretation of the population that remains underserved. While the demographic shortfall is identified, further analysis of its implications on healthcare outcomes would add depth to the interpretation of the results. 5. Source Data Availability and Reproducibility The manuscript claims that all data sources are available, including links to the Indonesian Disaster Management Agency and Sleman District's geoportal. This ensures reproducibility for other researchers wishing to replicate the study. To fulfill this criterion, these links must remain accessible. The manuscript also lists detailed instructions on how to access the relevant datasets. 6. Conclusions Supported by Results The study's conclusions are largely supported by the data presented. The manuscript clearly identifies a significant shortfall in PHC centers in the study area, both geographically and demographically. The need for 41 additional centers is well-justified based on the analyzed data. However, a more comprehensive discussion of potential solutions or next steps, such as how local policymakers could address these shortfalls, would strengthen the conclusions' impact. This could include considerations on resource allocation, funding, or the integration of these findings into broader public health planning frameworks. Summary of Improvements: a. Expand the citation of relevant literature, particularly recent studies on GIS in healthcare and disaster management. b. Justify the selection of specific geographical standards (e.g., 5 km radius) more clearly. c. Add further details in the methods section to improve replicability. d. Enhance the discussion on the implications of the demographic shortfalls and provide more recommendations for future action. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Public Health I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Denny H. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r325253 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v2#referee-response-325253 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 12 Nov 2024 Ali Jarghon , Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 12 Nov 2024 Author Response Thank you so much for your comments and suggests. 1. Reviewer comment: Expand the citation of relevant literature, particularly recent studies on GIS in healthcare and disaster management. Author ... Continue reading Thank you so much for your comments and suggests. 1. Reviewer comment: Expand the citation of relevant literature, particularly recent studies on GIS in healthcare and disaster management. Author comment: Citation have added upon request. 2. Reviewer comment: Justify the selection of specific geographical standards (e.g., 5 km radius) more clearly. Author comment: added in Result section, third paragraph (The scope of service within 5 kmThe scope of service within 5 km). The 5 km radius for healthcare service coverage is chosen to enhance accessibility and equity, ensuring patients can reach healthcare within a manageable distance, especially in rural and semi-urban areas. (Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 Year 2019 Concerning Public Health Centers, 2019). 3. Reviewer comment: Add further details in the methods section to improve replicability. Author comment: Added in method section in red font, Data collection, processing, and analysis , basically Spatial Overlay and Network Analysis. 4. Reviewer comment: Enhance the discussion on the implications of the demographic shortfalls and provide more recommendations for future action. Author comment: comment upon request, which is now added in the sixth paragraph and highlighted in red font. Additionally, the recommendations have been incorporated as requested. Thank you so much for your comments and suggests. 1. Reviewer comment: Expand the citation of relevant literature, particularly recent studies on GIS in healthcare and disaster management. Author comment: Citation have added upon request. 2. Reviewer comment: Justify the selection of specific geographical standards (e.g., 5 km radius) more clearly. Author comment: added in Result section, third paragraph (The scope of service within 5 kmThe scope of service within 5 km). The 5 km radius for healthcare service coverage is chosen to enhance accessibility and equity, ensuring patients can reach healthcare within a manageable distance, especially in rural and semi-urban areas. (Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 Year 2019 Concerning Public Health Centers, 2019). 3. Reviewer comment: Add further details in the methods section to improve replicability. Author comment: Added in method section in red font, Data collection, processing, and analysis , basically Spatial Overlay and Network Analysis. 4. Reviewer comment: Enhance the discussion on the implications of the demographic shortfalls and provide more recommendations for future action. Author comment: comment upon request, which is now added in the sixth paragraph and highlighted in red font. Additionally, the recommendations have been incorporated as requested. Competing Interests: No competing interests to disclose Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 12 Nov 2024 Ali Jarghon , Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 12 Nov 2024 Author Response Thank you so much for your comments and suggests. 1. Reviewer comment: Expand the citation of relevant literature, particularly recent studies on GIS in healthcare and disaster management. Author ... Continue reading Thank you so much for your comments and suggests. 1. Reviewer comment: Expand the citation of relevant literature, particularly recent studies on GIS in healthcare and disaster management. Author comment: Citation have added upon request. 2. Reviewer comment: Justify the selection of specific geographical standards (e.g., 5 km radius) more clearly. Author comment: added in Result section, third paragraph (The scope of service within 5 kmThe scope of service within 5 km). The 5 km radius for healthcare service coverage is chosen to enhance accessibility and equity, ensuring patients can reach healthcare within a manageable distance, especially in rural and semi-urban areas. (Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 Year 2019 Concerning Public Health Centers, 2019). 3. Reviewer comment: Add further details in the methods section to improve replicability. Author comment: Added in method section in red font, Data collection, processing, and analysis , basically Spatial Overlay and Network Analysis. 4. Reviewer comment: Enhance the discussion on the implications of the demographic shortfalls and provide more recommendations for future action. Author comment: comment upon request, which is now added in the sixth paragraph and highlighted in red font. Additionally, the recommendations have been incorporated as requested. Thank you so much for your comments and suggests. 1. Reviewer comment: Expand the citation of relevant literature, particularly recent studies on GIS in healthcare and disaster management. Author comment: Citation have added upon request. 2. Reviewer comment: Justify the selection of specific geographical standards (e.g., 5 km radius) more clearly. Author comment: added in Result section, third paragraph (The scope of service within 5 kmThe scope of service within 5 km). The 5 km radius for healthcare service coverage is chosen to enhance accessibility and equity, ensuring patients can reach healthcare within a manageable distance, especially in rural and semi-urban areas. (Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 Year 2019 Concerning Public Health Centers, 2019). 3. Reviewer comment: Add further details in the methods section to improve replicability. Author comment: Added in method section in red font, Data collection, processing, and analysis , basically Spatial Overlay and Network Analysis. 4. Reviewer comment: Enhance the discussion on the implications of the demographic shortfalls and provide more recommendations for future action. Author comment: comment upon request, which is now added in the sixth paragraph and highlighted in red font. Additionally, the recommendations have been incorporated as requested. Competing Interests: No competing interests to disclose Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Taran A. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r299981 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v2#referee-response-299981 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 24 Jul 2024 Ayed Taran , Al al-Bayt University, Al-Mafraq, Jordan Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r299981 No or only minor changes are required. This means that the aims and research methods are adequate; ... Continue reading READ ALL No or only minor changes are required. This means that the aims and research methods are adequate; results are presented accurately; and the conclusions are justified and supported by the data or supporting material. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: His research interests include transport services planning and management, the socio-economic impacts of transportation congestion, and urban planning applications, transportation geography, Transport models integrated in the GIS environment for accessibility and management of port systems, GIS and Remote Sensing, Transportation Planning and urban sustainable planning, transport services planning. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Taran A. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r299981 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v2#referee-response-299981 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 13 Dec 2023 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Taran A. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.153436.r253431 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v1#referee-response-253431 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 27 Jun 2024 Ayed Taran , Al al-Bayt University, Al-Mafraq, Jordan Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.153436.r253431 1. The paper addresses geographical and demographic criteria to verify the ability of primary health care facilities to cover the largest area of ​​the study area and accessible service area use GIS, The study found that there is a significant shortage ... Continue reading READ ALL 1. The paper addresses geographical and demographic criteria to verify the ability of primary health care facilities to cover the largest area of ​​the study area and accessible service area use GIS, The study found that there is a significant shortage in the number of primary health care centers in the study area compared to the large population, both on the geographical and demographic levels. 2. The paper deals with a very important topic. 3. There are technical issues with the arrangement of the paper as regards methodology, there are issues with presentation of data used and the subsequent methods used for the analysis of data. This includes missing methods. The paper also did not provide sufficient analysis that warrant a good discussion of results. The implications of findings are also missing. 4. I request the authors to cite the following references: (i) Taran A (2023 [ref - 1]). Measuring Accessibility to Health Care Centers in the City of Al-Mafraq Using Geographic Information Systems. ResearchGate. 2023; 19 (1): 43-55 (ii) Taran A et al. (2023 [ref - 2]). The Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Corona Pandemic in Jordan using the Geographic Information System: An Applied Geographical Study. Indonesian Journal of Geography. 2023; 55 (1). This is because it is relevant to the topic of study and can be benefited from. 5) All source data underlying the results are available to ensure complete reproducibility. Dr. Ayed Taran Al al-Bayt University Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? No If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? No References 1. Taran, A: Measuring Accessibility to Health Care Centers in the City of Al-Mafraq Using Geographic Information Systems. ResearchGate . 2023; 19 (1): 43-55 Publisher Full Text 2. Taran A, Alfanatseh A, Rawashdeh S, Almayouf F: The Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Corona Pandemic in Jordan using the Geographic Information System: An Applied Geographical Study. Indonesian Journal of Geography . 2023; 55 (1). Publisher Full Text Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: His research interests include transport services planning and management, the socio-economic impacts of transportation congestion, and urban planning applications, transportation geography, Transport models integrated in the GIS environment for accessibility and management of port systems, GIS and Remote Sensing, Transportation Planning and urban sustainable planning, transport services planning. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Taran A. Reviewer Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.153436.r253431 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v1#referee-response-253431 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 05 Jul 2024 Ali Jarghon , Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 05 Jul 2024 Author Response Response to Reviewer Thank you for your comments. 1. Thank you for your insightful comment. We have thoroughly addressed the geographical and demographic criteria to evaluate the coverage of ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer Thank you for your comments. 1. Thank you for your insightful comment. We have thoroughly addressed the geographical and demographic criteria to evaluate the coverage of primary healthcare facilities in the study area using GIS. Our study indeed found a significant shortage of primary healthcare centers relative to the large population, both geographically and demographically. 2. Thank you for your positive feedback. We are pleased that you recognize the importance of the topic. Ensuring adequate coverage and accessibility of primary healthcare facilities is crucial for public health, and we hope our study contributes valuable insights to this significant issue. 3. Thank you for your constructive feedback. In response, we have extensively revised the methodology section to address the technical issues and improve the presentation of data and the methods used for analysis. Furthermore, we have expanded the analysis to provide a more thorough discussion of the results and their implications for healthcare accessibility and policy development. 4. Thank you for your feedback. We have ensured that all source data underlying the results are available to guarantee complete reproducibility. Response to Reviewer Thank you for your comments. 1. Thank you for your insightful comment. We have thoroughly addressed the geographical and demographic criteria to evaluate the coverage of primary healthcare facilities in the study area using GIS. Our study indeed found a significant shortage of primary healthcare centers relative to the large population, both geographically and demographically. 2. Thank you for your positive feedback. We are pleased that you recognize the importance of the topic. Ensuring adequate coverage and accessibility of primary healthcare facilities is crucial for public health, and we hope our study contributes valuable insights to this significant issue. 3. Thank you for your constructive feedback. In response, we have extensively revised the methodology section to address the technical issues and improve the presentation of data and the methods used for analysis. Furthermore, we have expanded the analysis to provide a more thorough discussion of the results and their implications for healthcare accessibility and policy development. 4. Thank you for your feedback. We have ensured that all source data underlying the results are available to guarantee complete reproducibility. Competing Interests: No competing interests to disclose Close Report a concern Author Response 23 Jul 2024 Ali Jarghon , Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 23 Jul 2024 Author Response Author response: Thank you for your insightful comments and expertise. Competing Interests: No competing interests to disclose Author response: Thank you for your insightful comments and expertise. Author response: Thank you for your insightful comments and expertise. Competing Interests: No competing interests to disclose Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 05 Jul 2024 Ali Jarghon , Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 05 Jul 2024 Author Response Response to Reviewer Thank you for your comments. 1. Thank you for your insightful comment. We have thoroughly addressed the geographical and demographic criteria to evaluate the coverage of ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer Thank you for your comments. 1. Thank you for your insightful comment. We have thoroughly addressed the geographical and demographic criteria to evaluate the coverage of primary healthcare facilities in the study area using GIS. Our study indeed found a significant shortage of primary healthcare centers relative to the large population, both geographically and demographically. 2. Thank you for your positive feedback. We are pleased that you recognize the importance of the topic. Ensuring adequate coverage and accessibility of primary healthcare facilities is crucial for public health, and we hope our study contributes valuable insights to this significant issue. 3. Thank you for your constructive feedback. In response, we have extensively revised the methodology section to address the technical issues and improve the presentation of data and the methods used for analysis. Furthermore, we have expanded the analysis to provide a more thorough discussion of the results and their implications for healthcare accessibility and policy development. 4. Thank you for your feedback. We have ensured that all source data underlying the results are available to guarantee complete reproducibility. Response to Reviewer Thank you for your comments. 1. Thank you for your insightful comment. We have thoroughly addressed the geographical and demographic criteria to evaluate the coverage of primary healthcare facilities in the study area using GIS. Our study indeed found a significant shortage of primary healthcare centers relative to the large population, both geographically and demographically. 2. Thank you for your positive feedback. We are pleased that you recognize the importance of the topic. Ensuring adequate coverage and accessibility of primary healthcare facilities is crucial for public health, and we hope our study contributes valuable insights to this significant issue. 3. Thank you for your constructive feedback. In response, we have extensively revised the methodology section to address the technical issues and improve the presentation of data and the methods used for analysis. Furthermore, we have expanded the analysis to provide a more thorough discussion of the results and their implications for healthcare accessibility and policy development. 4. Thank you for your feedback. We have ensured that all source data underlying the results are available to guarantee complete reproducibility. Competing Interests: No competing interests to disclose Close Report a concern Author Response 23 Jul 2024 Ali Jarghon , Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 23 Jul 2024 Author Response Author response: Thank you for your insightful comments and expertise. Competing Interests: No competing interests to disclose Author response: Thank you for your insightful comments and expertise. Author response: Thank you for your insightful comments and expertise. Competing Interests: No competing interests to disclose Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 4 VERSION 4 PUBLISHED 13 Dec 2023 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 4 Version 4 (revision) 19 Dec 25 Version 3 (revision) 23 Dec 24 read read Version 2 (revision) 05 Jul 24 read read read Version 1 13 Dec 23 read Ayed Taran , Al al-Bayt University, Al-Mafraq, Jordan Hanifa Denny , Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia Jianwei Li , Northwest University, Xi'an, China Pankaj Roy , Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, India Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Roy P. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 11 Jan 2025 | for Version 3 Pankaj Roy , Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, India 0 Views copyright © 2025 Roy P. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Critical Review of the Article : "Investigate the Efficiency of Primary Care Facilities in Emergency Situations by Application of Geographical and Demographic Standards Using GIS" 1. Title Evaluation: The title reflects the core focus of the study, emphasising both the geographical and demographic dimensions of primary healthcare facility accessibility in emergency contexts. However, it could be more concise by removing redundant phrasing such as "by application of geographical and demographic standards" and simplifying it to suggested below. Suggestion: One of the best fitted titles may be "Evaluating the Efficiency of Primary Healthcare Facilities in Emergency Situations: A GIS-Based Geographical and Demographic Analysis" 2. Abstract Review: The abstract provides a clear overview of the study, including the background, methods, results, and conclusions. However, it lacks specificity regarding the geographical area and demographic standards applied. Including more details about the study area (Sleman District, Indonesia) and the GIS tools utilised would enhance clarity. Suggestions: Specify the key GIS tools and methods in the abstract. Highlight the critical finding that 41 additional primary healthcare centres (PHCs) are required. 3. Introduction Analysis: The introduction outlines the importance of primary healthcare in emergencies and introduces GIS as a tool for spatial analysis. However, the rationale behind choosing Sleman District as the study area is poorly elaborated. The introduction would benefit from a more detailed discussion of the region's specific healthcare challenges and the relevance of demographic standards in healthcare planning. Suggestions: Provide a stronger justification for selecting Sleman District. Include more citations to recent studies on GIS applications in healthcare. 4. Methodology Review: The methodology section describes the use of ArcGIS 10.5 for analysing the distribution of PHC facilities. It also outlines the applications of geographical standards (coverage distance) and demographic standards (population served per PHC). However, the methodology lacks detailed explanations of the GIS network analysis process, and no clear technical roadmap is provided for replicating the study. Strengths: The use of proximity analysis, spatial overlay, and network analysis is appropriate. The study adheres to Indonesian Ministry of Health regulations. Weaknesses: Insufficient detail on data collection and GIS processing steps. Lack of clarity on using the network analysis in QGIS as an open source alternative of Arc GIS 10.5. Lack of population density maps for better visualisation. Suggestions: Include a technical roadmap or flowchart to illustrate the methodology including the GIS analyses. Provide population density maps to complement the spatial analysis. 5. Results and Analysis: The results highlight that PHC centres cover 79% of the study area, leaving a significant portion underserved. The analysis identifies a need for 41 additional PHCs to meet the demographic standards set by the Ministry of Health. The spatial distribution maps and network analysis effectively demonstrate the gaps in healthcare access. Strengths Clear identification of underserved areas. Effective use of GIS-based maps to visualise healthcare coverage. Weaknesses The results section focuses strongly on geographical coverage without delving deeply into the demographic implications. Limited discussion on the socioeconomic impact of healthcare access disparities. Suggestions Provide more detailed demographic analysis, including the age and gender distribution of underserved populations. Discuss the potential health outcomes resulting from inadequate PHC coverage. 6. Discussion and Recommendations: The discussion section explores the implications of the findings, emphasizing the need for more PHC centers in underserved areas. However, the recommendations lack depth and fail to address practical solutions for improving healthcare accessibility. Strengths: The discussion recognises the need for targeted healthcare planning. The recommendations highlight the importance of data-driven decision-making. Weaknesses: Recommendations are too general and lack actionable steps. The discussion does not consider alternative solutions, such as mobile clinics or telemedicine. Suggestions: Provide specific recommendations for policymakers, such as prioritising regions for new PHC centres. Explore alternative healthcare delivery models, like mobile clinics and telehealth services. 7. References: The references cited are relevant and credible. However, the article would benefit from more recent studies and a broader range of sources, particularly in GIS applications and healthcare planning. Strengths: The references are appropriate and related to the study's focus. The citation style is consistent. Weaknesses: The references list lacks recent studies. Some key studies on healthcare access models are missing. Suggestions: Include more recent references, especially from the last five years. Expand the references to cover healthcare access models and disaster preparedness. Include more references to recent studies on GIS applications in healthcare. 8. Grammatical and Stylistic Errors: Upon review, several areas in the article could benefit from grammatical and stylistic improvements to enhance readability and clarity. Below are the sampled grammatical errors identified: Sentence Length Many sentences are lengthy and could be split for better readability. Example: "The article presents a valuable analysis of healthcare accessibility using GIS, specifically focusing on the spatial distribution of primary healthcare centres and the gaps in service coverage in the Sleman District of Indonesia." Suggested Revision: "The article presents a valuable GIS-based analysis of healthcare accessibility. It specifically focuses on the spatial distribution of primary healthcare centres and the service gaps in the Sleman District of Indonesia." 9. Passive Voice: The article uses passive voice frequently, which can make the writing less direct. Example: "The study was conducted to find out the sufficient number of primary healthcare (PHC) centres required." Suggested Revision: "The study aimed to determine the number of primary healthcare (PHC) centres needed." Redundancy: Some phrases are redundant and can be simplified. Example: "The article claims that all source data are available through relevant government agencies and geoportals." Suggested Revision: "The article states that all source data are available through government agencies and geoportals." Word Choice: Certain words and phrases could be more precise or formal. Example: "The citations provided are relevant to the topic, particularly in the use of GIS in healthcare planning." Suggested Revision: "The citations are relevant, particularly GIS applications in healthcare planning." Critical Questions for Improvement How can the study incorporate socioeconomic data to provide a more comprehensive analysis of healthcare access disparities? What alternative healthcare delivery models can be explored to address the shortfall in PHC centres? How can the findings of this study be integrated into national healthcare planning and policy frameworks? Overall Evaluation The article presents a valuable analysis of healthcare accessibility using GIS. However, it could be strengthened by addressing the methodological gaps and providing more practical recommendations. The study's relevance to healthcare planning is clear, but it requires more in-depth exploration of demographic and socioeconomic factors to maximize its impact. Final Suggestions Include a more detailed methodology section. Provide comprehensive demographic analysis. Offer specific, actionable recommendations for policymakers. Explore alternative solutions for improving healthcare access. By addressing these areas, the article can significantly enhance its contribution to healthcare planning and GIS applications. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Geography, Geoinformatics, Spatial Analysis, Public Health I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 19 Dec 2025 Ali Jarghon, Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 1.Title Evaluation Reviewer Comment: The title should be more concise. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We agree the proposed title is clearer, but since the article is already published under the current title, it cannot be changed now. We will consider this recommendation for future work. 2.Abstract Review Reviewer Comment: The abstract lacks details about the study area and GIS tools used. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. We have revised the abstract by specifying the key GIS tools (ArcGIS 10.5 and QGIS) and the main analytical methods applied, including proximity analysis, spatial overlay, and network analysis. We also added the study area, Sleman District, Indonesia, and highlighted the critical finding that 41 additional primary healthcare centers (PHCs) are required to meet both demographic and geographic standards. 3.Introduction Analysis: viewer Comment: The rationale for selecting Sleman District is limited, and more recent GIS studies should be cited. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. Sleman District was chosen as the study area because it has a high population density, mixed urban and rural areas, and a high disaster-risk level. Similar studies have also used GIS to analyze healthcare accessibility and planning 4. Methodology Review: 1- Reviewer Comment: Include a technical roadmap or flowchart to illustrate the methodology including the GIS analyses. Response: Thank you for the suggestion. I have added a methodology flowchart to clearly present the GIS analysis process. 2- Reviewer Comment: Provide population density maps to complement the spatial analysis. Response: We thank the reviewer for this helpful suggestion. A population density map has now been added to the Results section to enhance the spatial analysis and support the demographic assessment of PHC service needs. 5. Results and Analysis: 1-Reviewer Comment: Provide more detailed demographic analysis, including the age and gender distribution of underserved populations. Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion.This study had two goals: a geographical goal to measure PHC coverage distance and area, and a demographic goal to identify the total population served. We did not include age or gender details because this requires field surveys and was outside our scope. 2- Reviewer Comment: Discuss the potential health outcomes resulting from inadequate PHC coverage. Response: Thank you for this important suggestion. Inadequate PHC coverage can lead to serious health outcomes, including delayed treatment, increased cases of preventable diseases, and higher maternal and child mortality rates. During disasters or emergencies, limited access to healthcare may also result in greater vulnerability and poorer recovery among affected populations. 6. Discussion and Recommendations: Reviewer Comment: The recommendations are too general and need more practical solutions for improving healthcare accessibility. Response: Thank you for this valuable suggestion. I have revised the Discussion and Recommendations section to include specific actions for policymakers and alternative healthcare delivery options. Policymakers prioritize the establishment of new PHC centers in underserved sub-districts such as Cangkringan, Pakem, Turi, and Prambanan, where service coverage and accessibility are lowest. In addition, I have added recommendations to explore mobile health clinics and telehealth services as complementary solutions to reach remote or disaster-prone communities where building new PHCs may not be immediately feasible. 7. References: Reviewer Comment: References Response : Thank you for this helpful. I have updated the reference. 8. Grammatical and Stylistic: Several areas in the article could benefit from grammatical and stylistic improvements to enhance readability and clarity. Response: I appreciate the reviewer’s observation. The manuscript has been carefully revised to improve clarity. 9. Passive Voice: Reviewer Comment: The article uses passive voice frequently, which can make the writing less direct. Response: We appreciate this suggestion. The manuscript has been carefully revised to reduce the use of passive voice and make sentences more direct and active View more View less Competing Interests I declare that I have no competing interests that could influence my judgment or the validity of this article. reply Respond Report a concern Roy P. Peer Review Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174054.r356660) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3#referee-response-356660 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Denny H. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 28 Dec 2024 | for Version 3 Hanifa Denny , Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2024 Denny H. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Dear authors, Thank you for your thorough and thoughtful revisions. I have reviewed your responses and the updated manuscript, and I find that you have sufficiently addressed all the comments and suggestions provided. The additional citations, methodological clarifications, and expanded discussions enhance the manuscript's quality and relevance. I have no further suggestions at this time, and I am satisfied with the revisions made. Best regards, Reviewer Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Denny H. Peer Review Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174054.r351971) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3#referee-response-351971 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Li J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 28 Oct 2024 | for Version 2 Jianwei Li , Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China 0 Views copyright © 2024 Li J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The manuscript, based on demographic data and utilizing GIS spatial network analysis, effectively reveals the spatial alignment between the service coverage of primary healthcare (PHC) centers in the Sleman region of Indonesia and the local population's medical needs. This provides valuable guidance for improving real-world healthcare facilities. However, there are still some shortcomings that need further improvement: The manuscript should clearly explain the GIS network analysis process and include a technical roadmap to help readers better understand the entire data processing procedure. The manuscript should provide a population density map of the study area, enabling readers to better understand the spatial distribution of PHC center services in relation to population density in the region. It is recommended to more comprehensively discuss, in conjunction with the research conclusions, how to improve the PHC service system and propose appropriate research strategies to strengthen the impact of the research conclusions. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Partly Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Urban and Regional Planning Studies I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 10 Dec 2025 Ali Jarghon, Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia 1. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should clearly explain the GIS network analysis process and include a technical roadmap to help readers better understand the entire data processing procedure. Response: Thank you for the comment. We have revised the methods to explain the GIS network analysis more clearly and added a small technical roadmap to show the main steps. 2. Reviewer Comment: The manuscript should provide a population density map of the study area, enabling readers to better understand the spatial distribution of PHC center services in relation to population density in the region Response: Thank you for the suggestion. I have added a population density map to the Results section so readers can clearly see the population distribution and how it relates to PHC service coverage. 3. Reviewer Comment: It is recommended to more comprehensively discuss, in conjunction with the research conclusions, how to improve the PHC service system and propose appropriate research strategies to strengthen the impact of the research conclusions. Response: Thank you for the recommendation. I have expanded the discussion to explain more clearly how the PHC service system can be improved based on the study’s findings. I also added simple research strategies to strengthen the impact of the conclusions. View more View less Competing Interests I declare that I have no competing interests that could influence my judgment or the validity of this article. reply Respond Report a concern Li J. Peer Review Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r328429) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v2#referee-response-328429 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Denny H. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 10 Oct 2024 | for Version 2 Hanifa Denny , Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2024 Denny H. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions 1. Clarity and Accuracy of Presentation and Literature Citations The manuscript is generally well-written, and the topic is clearly defined. It focuses on primary healthcare (PHC) center distribution in Sleman District, Indonesia. The research is relevant, especially in public health and healthcare infrastructure planning, and it aligns with current literature on disaster management, GIS application in healthcare, and accessibility standards. However, there are instances where the literature citations could be more comprehensive. Some key studies, such as those on healthcare access models or the role of GIS in disaster preparedness, could be expanded. The inclusion of more recent studies on GIS applications in emergency healthcare systems would strengthen the discussion. Reviewers also recommended citing relevant literature, which has been partially addressed but could be further improved by adding these references to reinforce the findings. 2. Study Design and Academic Merit The study's design is appropriate for the research question. By using geographical and demographic standards and GIS, the study provides an insightful approach to assessing PHC center coverage and identifying gaps in service. The integration of GIS-based tools is a strong aspect of the research. However, some methodological details, such as the choice of specific geographical and demographic standards, could be justified more explicitly. The reasoning behind the selection of a 5 km radius for service coverage, for example, could be explained with more references to health policy or geographical accessibility standards. Despite this, the study has solid academic merit as it tackles an important issue in public health infrastructure. 3. Sufficient Details of Methods and Replicability The methods section is fairly detailed, especially with the use of GIS and demographic data. The revisions made after peer review have improved the clarity of the methodology, making it easier to follow. However, there are still areas that would benefit from more explicit descriptions. For example: 1). More detailed steps on how the network and proximity analyses were conducted. 2). Clear justification for the use of specific GIS tools and how data layers were integrated. Providing these details would enhance the study's replicability by other researchers. 4. Statistical Analysis and Interpretation The study does not heavily rely on complex statistical analysis, as its focus is more on spatial data and accessibility measures. That said, the interpretation of the spatial data is appropriate. The visual representations (maps) of PHC service areas help in understanding the disparities in healthcare coverage. One area that could be enhanced is a more in-depth statistical interpretation of the population that remains underserved. While the demographic shortfall is identified, further analysis of its implications on healthcare outcomes would add depth to the interpretation of the results. 5. Source Data Availability and Reproducibility The manuscript claims that all data sources are available, including links to the Indonesian Disaster Management Agency and Sleman District's geoportal. This ensures reproducibility for other researchers wishing to replicate the study. To fulfill this criterion, these links must remain accessible. The manuscript also lists detailed instructions on how to access the relevant datasets. 6. Conclusions Supported by Results The study's conclusions are largely supported by the data presented. The manuscript clearly identifies a significant shortfall in PHC centers in the study area, both geographically and demographically. The need for 41 additional centers is well-justified based on the analyzed data. However, a more comprehensive discussion of potential solutions or next steps, such as how local policymakers could address these shortfalls, would strengthen the conclusions' impact. This could include considerations on resource allocation, funding, or the integration of these findings into broader public health planning frameworks. Summary of Improvements: a. Expand the citation of relevant literature, particularly recent studies on GIS in healthcare and disaster management. b. Justify the selection of specific geographical standards (e.g., 5 km radius) more clearly. c. Add further details in the methods section to improve replicability. d. Enhance the discussion on the implications of the demographic shortfalls and provide more recommendations for future action. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Public Health I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 12 Nov 2024 Ali Jarghon, Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia Thank you so much for your comments and suggests. 1. Reviewer comment: Expand the citation of relevant literature, particularly recent studies on GIS in healthcare and disaster management. Author comment: Citation have added upon request. 2. Reviewer comment: Justify the selection of specific geographical standards (e.g., 5 km radius) more clearly. Author comment: added in Result section, third paragraph (The scope of service within 5 kmThe scope of service within 5 km). The 5 km radius for healthcare service coverage is chosen to enhance accessibility and equity, ensuring patients can reach healthcare within a manageable distance, especially in rural and semi-urban areas. (Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 Year 2019 Concerning Public Health Centers, 2019). 3. Reviewer comment: Add further details in the methods section to improve replicability. Author comment: Added in method section in red font, Data collection, processing, and analysis , basically Spatial Overlay and Network Analysis. 4. Reviewer comment: Enhance the discussion on the implications of the demographic shortfalls and provide more recommendations for future action. Author comment: comment upon request, which is now added in the sixth paragraph and highlighted in red font. Additionally, the recommendations have been incorporated as requested. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests to disclose reply Respond Report a concern Denny H. Peer Review Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r325253) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v2#referee-response-325253 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Taran A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 24 Jul 2024 | for Version 2 Ayed Taran , Al al-Bayt University, Al-Mafraq, Jordan 0 Views copyright © 2024 Taran A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions No or only minor changes are required. This means that the aims and research methods are adequate; results are presented accurately; and the conclusions are justified and supported by the data or supporting material. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise His research interests include transport services planning and management, the socio-economic impacts of transportation congestion, and urban planning applications, transportation geography, Transport models integrated in the GIS environment for accessibility and management of port systems, GIS and Remote Sensing, Transportation Planning and urban sustainable planning, transport services planning. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Taran A. Peer Review Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168658.r299981) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v2#referee-response-299981 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Taran A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 27 Jun 2024 | for Version 1 Ayed Taran , Al al-Bayt University, Al-Mafraq, Jordan 0 Views copyright © 2024 Taran A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (2) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions 1. The paper addresses geographical and demographic criteria to verify the ability of primary health care facilities to cover the largest area of ​​the study area and accessible service area use GIS, The study found that there is a significant shortage in the number of primary health care centers in the study area compared to the large population, both on the geographical and demographic levels. 2. The paper deals with a very important topic. 3. There are technical issues with the arrangement of the paper as regards methodology, there are issues with presentation of data used and the subsequent methods used for the analysis of data. This includes missing methods. The paper also did not provide sufficient analysis that warrant a good discussion of results. The implications of findings are also missing. 4. I request the authors to cite the following references: (i) Taran A (2023 [ref - 1]). Measuring Accessibility to Health Care Centers in the City of Al-Mafraq Using Geographic Information Systems. ResearchGate. 2023; 19 (1): 43-55 (ii) Taran A et al. (2023 [ref - 2]). The Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Corona Pandemic in Jordan using the Geographic Information System: An Applied Geographical Study. Indonesian Journal of Geography. 2023; 55 (1). This is because it is relevant to the topic of study and can be benefited from. 5) All source data underlying the results are available to ensure complete reproducibility. Dr. Ayed Taran Al al-Bayt University Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? No If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? No References 1. Taran, A: Measuring Accessibility to Health Care Centers in the City of Al-Mafraq Using Geographic Information Systems. ResearchGate . 2023; 19 (1): 43-55 Publisher Full Text 2. Taran A, Alfanatseh A, Rawashdeh S, Almayouf F: The Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Corona Pandemic in Jordan using the Geographic Information System: An Applied Geographical Study. Indonesian Journal of Geography . 2023; 55 (1). Publisher Full Text Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise His research interests include transport services planning and management, the socio-economic impacts of transportation congestion, and urban planning applications, transportation geography, Transport models integrated in the GIS environment for accessibility and management of port systems, GIS and Remote Sensing, Transportation Planning and urban sustainable planning, transport services planning. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (2) Author Response 05 Jul 2024 Ali Jarghon, Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia Response to Reviewer Thank you for your comments. 1. Thank you for your insightful comment. We have thoroughly addressed the geographical and demographic criteria to evaluate the coverage of primary healthcare facilities in the study area using GIS. Our study indeed found a significant shortage of primary healthcare centers relative to the large population, both geographically and demographically. 2. Thank you for your positive feedback. We are pleased that you recognize the importance of the topic. Ensuring adequate coverage and accessibility of primary healthcare facilities is crucial for public health, and we hope our study contributes valuable insights to this significant issue. 3. Thank you for your constructive feedback. In response, we have extensively revised the methodology section to address the technical issues and improve the presentation of data and the methods used for analysis. Furthermore, we have expanded the analysis to provide a more thorough discussion of the results and their implications for healthcare accessibility and policy development. 4. Thank you for your feedback. We have ensured that all source data underlying the results are available to guarantee complete reproducibility. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests to disclose reply Respond Report a concern Author Response 23 Jul 2024 Ali Jarghon, Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60114, Indonesia Author response: Thank you for your insightful comments and expertise. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests to disclose reply Respond Report a concern Taran A. Peer Review Report For: Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency situations by application of geographical and demographic standards using GIS [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1579 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.153436.r253431) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v1#referee-response-253431 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Investigate the efficiency of primary care...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Jarghon AEM et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579", templates : { twitter : "Investigate the efficiency of primary care facilities in emergency.... Jarghon AEM et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1579/v3" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/140107/174054") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "174054"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "238080": 0, "238087": 0, "238085": 0, "238089": 0, "257295": 0, "257299": 0, "257298": 0, "257297": 0, "257296": 0, "306204": 0, "306205": 0, "306206": 0, "306207": 0, "306200": 0, "306201": 0, "306202": 0, "306203": 0, "306208": 0, "306209": 0, "356661": 0, "356660": 42, "356663": 0, "356662": 0, "356657": 0, "356659": 0, "356658": 0, "291644": 0, "291645": 0, "291646": 0, "291647": 0, "356665": 0, "291641": 0, "356664": 0, "291642": 0, "291643": 0, "291648": 0, "291649": 0, "291650": 0, "442966": 0, "442967": 0, "442964": 0, "442965": 0, "247929": 0, "232063": 0, "247935": 0, "232062": 0, "232061": 0, "232060": 0, "247932": 0, "325253": 32, "247938": 0, "325254": 0, "325255": 0, "247941": 0, "247944": 0, "247949": 0, "325268": 0, "325269": 0, "247954": 0, "325270": 0, "325271": 0, "325266": 0, "325267": 0, "247962": 0, "325272": 0, "247968": 0, "354487": 0, "354486": 0, "354489": 0, "299981": 9, "354525": 0, "354524": 0, "354526": 0, "354521": 0, "243422": 0, "354520": 0, "354523": 0, "354522": 0, "328421": 0, "243427": 0, "328420": 0, "243426": 0, "328423": 0, "328422": 0, "243424": 0, "351969": 0, "243430": 0, "351971": 13, "351970": 0, "328429": 24, "243435": 0, "328428": 0, "243434": 0, "243433": 0, "328425": 0, "243439": 0, "328424": 0, "328427": 0, "243437": 0, "328426": 0, "253427": 0, "238066": 0, "253426": 0, "253425": 0, "253424": 0, "238071": 0, "253431": 29, "253430": 0, "253429": 0, "238068": 0, "253428": 0, "238075": 0, "238073": 0, "253433": 0, "253432": 0, "238077": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "6e9f0579-25a5-4fae-88ef-dc21cbe5297a"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });