Reasons to Reconsider Risk Associated With Power Morcellation of Uterine Fibroids
Review
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This review advocates for refined risk assessment of power morcellation by evaluating malignancy risk per tumor nodule rather than per patient, while discussing potential malignant transformation in parasitic fibroids.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Our insights into the molecular pathogenesis of uterine smooth muscle tumors have improved significantly. Accordingly, in the present review, we advocate a more refined risk assessment for patients considering surgical removal of fibroids or hysterectomy, respectively, requiring morcellation. For this procedure, the risk estimates given for the iatrogenic spread of a previously unexpected malignancy considerably vary among different studies. Nearly all previous studies conducted retrospectively refer to the risk of a patient having an unexpected malignancy at the time of surgery. We feel that, more appropriately, risk should refer to the number of tumors because, as a rule, every single nodule arises independently and, thus, carries an independent risk of being malignant or not. Furthermore, whether so-called parasitic fibroids carry an underestimated risk of stepwise malignant transformation is discussed.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:26:18.239251+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-09T06:36:44.367587+00:00