Towards harmonized spectral quantification in MRSI: Comparative analysis of Backward-Linear-Predicted and original ¹H-FID-MRSI dephased data

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,823 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Object We hypothesized that the inherent acquisition delay (AD) in ¹H-FID-MRSI can introduce systematic LCModel quantification biases due to strong spectral dephasing, and that Backward-Linear-Prediction (BLP) reconstruction toward AD = 0 ms can harmonize metabolite estimates across acquisitions with various delays.

Materials and methods

2D ¹H-FID-MRSI were acquired in rats at 14.1T with three AD values (0.71, 0.94, 1.30 ms). Hippocampal metabolites were quantified using LCModel and AD-matched basis sets. Complementary Monte-Carlo simulations (n = 1000) replicated ¹H-FID-MRSI spectra at multiple ADs under realistic SNR conditions. BLP was applied to in vivo and simulated FIDs to back-predict missing points up to AD = 0 ms, enabling quantification within a unified basis set framework.

Results

In vivo and simulated data showed clear AD-dependent variations for several metabolites (Gln, tCho, tNAA, Ins, Tau), with discrepancies frequently >10% despite AD-specific basis sets. Simulations confirmed metabolite-specific biases increasing with AD. BLP reconstruction preserved quantification consistency up to ∼0.98 ms of recovered FIDs, reducing inter-AD mismatches in vivo—particularly for Tau, tNAA and tCho—lowering the mean discrepancy from 10.5% to ∼5%.

Discussion

These findings show that AD affects ¹H-FID-MRSI quantification in LCModel, whereas BLP reconstruction can harmonize spectra across delays by enabling a virtual AD = 0 ms quantification scheme. This supports BLP as a practical strategy to improve consistency and comparability in MRSI studies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Data Availability The detailed datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00