A prospective randomized comparison between long and discontinuous-long protocols of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for in vitro fertilization
rct
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
This study found that a discontinuous-long GnRH agonist protocol for IVF resulted in higher cancellation rates and poorer oocyte retrieval and fertilization outcomes compared to the standard long protocol.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of a discontinuous-long protocol in an IVF program.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized study.
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENT(S): One hundred thirty-seven IVF cycles of 92 patients in an outpatient IVF program from April 1995 to December 1995.
INTERVENTION(S): In the discontinuous-long protocol group (n = 68), GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) was administered from the luteal phase until cycle day 7, when pure FSH administration was begun. In the long protocol group (n = 69), GnRH-a was administered until the day before hCG administration.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Serum LH and ovarian steroid hormone levels, and IVF outcome.
RESULT(S): The period and the total dosage of hMG were increased in the discontinuous-long protocol group. Although the fertilization rate was similar under both protocols, the number of embryos transferred was smaller and the cancellation rate was higher in the discontinuous-long protocol group because of the greater failure of oocyte retrieval and fertilization. Serum E2 levels in the late follicular phase were lower in the discontinuous-long protocol group.
CONCLUSION(S): Early discontinuation of GnRH-a is not beneficial because of its adverse effects on follicular development.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (6)
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56650-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137551 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55806-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138030 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54803-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57443-3 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:00:17.038797+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-06T09:34:12.023084+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:52.568893+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-12T07:21:10.926195+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine