Challenging the classical view of CSF flow: measuring CSF net velocity in the human subarachnoid space with 7T MRI

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,788 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Traditionally, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is believed to exit the brain via arachnoid villi, being absorbed into the superior sagittal sinus (SSS), with a net flow towards these exit sites driven by constant CSF turnover. However, measuring these velocities non-invasively in humans is challenging due to their slow nature and the presence of relatively large confounding factors such as physiological CSF pulsations (heartbeat and respiration) and head motion. This study presents a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method designed to measure the net velocity of CSF whilst accounting for confounding effects, which is called CSF displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (CSF-DENSE). By applying a similar model as used to study sea-level rise, different motion components of CSF were successfully disentangled. Simulations, along with phantom and in vivo experiments, demonstrate the ability of CSF-DENSE combined with time series analysis using unobserved components modeling to detect ultraslow velocities of approximately 1 μm/s, even in the presence of confounding motions that are an order of magnitude larger. If the major egress of CSF were via the SSS, the expected net velocity towards the SSS was estimated to be 4.22±0.14 µm/s, based on measured CSF net flow through the aqueduct into the subarachnoid space (SAS). However, no significant net velocity toward the SSS was observed (v = -0.18±0.15 µm/s, with positive velocity directed towards the SSS), thereby challenging the classical view of CSF outflow. These findings suggest the need to reconsider traditional models of CSF outflow pathways, with potential implications for understanding and treating neurological disorders. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00