Salivary flow rate and prevalence of subjective halitosis in major depressive disorder patients

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,615 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The global incidence of major depressive disorder (MDD) is steadily increasing, leading to a concomitant surge in the need for oral medication in developed nations. The field of oral medicine serves as an intermediary between the disciplines of medicine and dentistry, with a focus on the study and treatment of various disorders and orofacial pain. Previous research has established a connection between these conditions and psychiatric disorders. The study sample comprised 49 individuals who had been diagnosed with major depressive disorder and had been receiving treatment for a minimum of two weeks. The control group consisted of 34 healthy participants who exhibited no indications or symptoms of systemic disease. The patients received diagnoses in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Reporting of subjective halitosis was highly significant (p< 0.000) in MDD patients than in control subjects, as for unstimulated salivary flow rate the mean of salivary flow rate in MDD patients was 0.39 ml/mints, with range of 0.03-1 ml/min, while for control subjects was 0.64 ml/mints with range of 0.03-0.6 ml/mint. The results of this study showed that, there was a highly significant difference of salivary flow rate between control and study groups (p value <0.05 at p=0.000) In conclusion, we found that major depressive disorder patients have low unstimulated salivary flow rate and the subjective halitosis is more prevalent in this group than in control group. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00