Quantifying human adaptation to a novel split-belt walking condition after broad experience at different belt speeds

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,483 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Humans can adapt their gait to minimize energy cost when given sufficient exposure to novel energy landscapes. However, it remains unclear whether broad experience in one energy landscape is sufficient to initiate continuous optimization when encountering similar but distinct conditions. In this study, we used visual biofeedback to guide 15 participants to broadly explore walking gaits with different step length asymmetries (SLAs) while walking on a split-belt treadmill with a large split-belt ratio. We subsequently tested how participants adapted their walking patterns during free exploration trials at the large split-belt ratio and at a new, smaller split-belt ratio. Our results showed that during guided exploration, participants were exposed to energetically favorable conditions. However, participants did not self-select walking patterns that minimized their metabolic cost during either free exploration trial. When first exposed to the smaller split-belt ratio, participants immediately adjusted their leg swing distances and belt contact times while maintaining similar step lengths. Throughout this trial, they continued adapting by significantly increasing step lengths on the fast belt. Taken together, our results suggest that participants actively modified their gait strategy when exposed to an energy landscape distinct from the one in which they gained broad experience. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00