Quality of life and sexual function of women operated on reproductive system organs
Planned gynecological operations improved quality of life and sexual function, particularly with FTS for vaginal hysterectomy and with FTS/without FTS for uterine appendage surgeries, though vaginal hysterectomy showed no significant sexual function change.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study evaluated how planned gynecologic operations affected quality of life and sexual function in 165 women, assessed preoperatively and at 3 months after surgery using the SF-36 (physical, psychological/emotional/social domains) and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI; desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and dyspareunia). Participants were divided into six procedure groups (vaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic operations on reproductive organs and uterine appendages) with or without a multimodal postoperative care strategy labeled FTS, and key outcomes were compared across time and groups. Quality-of-life physical and mental health indicators improved significantly across groups after 3 months, with the study reporting increased pain intensity and finding higher health physical component scores in some FTS groups, while psychological improvement was noted after abdominal hysterectomy with FTS; sexual function increased after abdominal hysterectomy with FTS and after uterine-appendage procedures both with and without FTS, but not significantly after vaginal hysterectomy (attributed to menopausal age). The paper does not explicitly detail long-term follow-up beyond 3 months as a limitation. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
6,441 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Materials
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
References (4)
- W2208123493 via openalex
- W2549435389 via openalex
- W2790216671 via openalex
- W4246062211 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00