Beneficial effects of dienogest on uterine myoma volume: a retrospective controlled study comparing with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist
Dienogest significantly reduced uterine myoma volume by 59.7%, comparable to GnRH agonist treatment, indicating its efficacy for myoma management.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective controlled study analyzed medical records of 55 premenopausal patients with endometriosis who received dienogest 2 mg daily for 6 months to assess the effect on coexisting uterine myoma volume, compared with 12 matched patients treated with the GnRH agonist leuprolide acetate for the same duration. Total myoma volume significantly decreased in both groups, to 59.7 ± 7.0% of baseline with dienogest and to 51.9 ± 5.5% with GnRHa, with similar reduction rates between treatments. The authors’ main caveat is the retrospective, nonrandomized design with a small control group, which limits certainty about comparative efficacy. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it studies dienogest treatment in patients with endometriosis while evaluating its beneficial effects on uterine myoma volume.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,926 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:00.782903+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine