Response to McKee et al. re: “Diagnosis of Endometriosis: The Surgeon's Eye Compared to Histopathology”
article
OA: closed
CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed
this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is
available through Endo Lab. The
publisher's page (linked below)
is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional
access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary
This paper discusses the diagnosis of endometriosis, comparing the surgeon's visual assessment to histopathological findings.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (5)
- Diagnosis of Endometriosis: The Surgeon's Eye Compared to Histopathology via openalex
- Fallopian tube endometriosis in women undergoing operative video laparoscopy and its clinical implications via openalex
- Increased Histologic Confirmation of Endometriosis via openalex
- Mapping the source and character of pain due to endometriosis by patient-assisted laparoscopy via openalex
- Nonvisualized palpable bowel endometriotic satellites via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK