Neurogynaecology and Women’s Reproductive Health: A PRISMA Based Systematic Review of Neuroendocrine Regulation, Autonomic Dysfunction, Psychosomatic Stress, and Integrative Therapeutic Outcomes

In: Research Square · 2026 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9181695/v1 · W7140219620
preprint OA: green CC0
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07

This systematic review identified four neuro-gynaecological pathogenic domains—HPA–HPO axis dysregulation, autonomic nervous system imbalance, psychosomatic stress, and neuro-immune crosstalk—driving women's reproductive disorders.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This PRISMA-guided systematic review examined neuro-gynaecological mechanisms linking the nervous system to female reproductive health, drawing on peer-reviewed clinical, observational, experimental, neuroimaging, and psychosomatic studies (primarily 2000–2026) across multiple gynaecological conditions such as PCOS, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and endometriosis. Across 89 included studies, the authors identify four pathogenic domains: HPA–HPO axis dysregulation related to stress-induced reproductive suppression, autonomic imbalance characterized by sympathetic hyperactivity and reduced vagal tone measured by heart rate variability, psychosomatic stress promoting central sensitisation and disproportionate pain perception, and neuro-immune crosstalk sustaining neurogenic inflammation in chronic pelvic conditions. A stated caveat is that the review is broad in scope across differing study types and focuses on consolidating evidence rather than establishing causal efficacy of specific interventions. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it frames endometriosis within a biopsychoneuroimmune, neuroendocrine/autonomic/psychosomatic and neuro-immune crosstalk model alongside other chronic pelvic pain conditions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (48)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:45:00.660873+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK