Best Practices for Interpretable Machine Learning in Computational Biology
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Advances in machine learning (ML) have enabled the development of next-generation prediction models for complex computational biology problems. These developments have spurred the use of interpretable machine learning (IML) to unveil fundamental biological insights through data-driven knowledge discovery. However, in general, standards and guidelines for IML usage in computational biology have not been well-characterized, representing a major gap toward fully realizing the potential of IML. Here, we introduce a workflow on the best practices for using IML methods to perform knowledge discovery which covers verification strategies that bridge data, prediction model, and explanation. We outline a workflow incorporating these verification strategies to increase an IML method’s accountability, reliability, and generalizability. We contextualize our proposed workflow in a series of widely applicable computational biology problems. Together, we provide an extensive workflow with important principles for the appropriate use of IML in computational biology, paving the way for a better mechanistic understanding of ML models and advancing the ability to discover novel biological phenomena.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00