Intro
Infertility affects millions of couples worldwide and is considered a major public
health concern. Its increasing prevalence is attributed to factors, such as delayed
childbearing, modern lifestyles, and adverse environmental conditions ( Vander Borght & Wyns, 2018 ). Assisted
reproductive technology (ART), including in vitro fertilization
(IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), constitute a pivotal strategy in
managing infertility. A central step in optimizing oocyte production and increasing
the success rates of these treatments is controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)
( Ovarian Stimulation TEGGO et
al. , 2020 ). Despite advances in reproductive medicine, the
success rates for a single IVF cycle remain modest, ranging from approximately 30%
to 50% in women under 35 years of age, with a significant decline in older age
groups ( Gleicher et al. ,
2019 ; Sunkara et al. ,
2023 ). Multiple IVF attempts are often required due to the inherent
limitations of this technique. Other factors, such as the woman’s age, embryo
quality, and underlying reproductive health conditions, also contribute to this
requirement ( Sunkara et al. ,
2023 ). Thus, repeated IVF cycles are often necessary to maximize the
chances of successful conception, particularly in patients facing
infertility-related challenges or poor prognosis.
Briefly, COH protocols use urinary or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and
luteinizing hormone to stimulate the development of multiple ovarian follicles,
aiming to maximize the number of mature eggs obtained for subsequent fertilization
and embryo transfer ( Ovarian Stimulation TEGGO
et al ., 2020 ). As a result, while undergoing
treatment with these drugs, serum estradiol concentrations reach supraphysiological
levels, increasing from 150 to 400 pg/mL in a physiological menstrual cycle to
between 1,000 and 6,000 pg/mL in a COH cycle, depending on the number of follicles
recruited ( Siddhartha et al. ,
2016 ; Helmer et al. ,
2022 ). The short- and long-term systemic effects of repeated COH are not
yet fully elucidated, and they continue to evoke significant scientific interest.
This is particularly true regarding the interactions between sex hormones and
emotional, immunological, and metabolic abnormalities ( Miyamoto et al. , 2010 ; Marschalek et al. , 2019 ; Hu et al. , 2021 ; Ma et al. , 2021 ; Guo et al. , 2023 ; Sampaio et al. , 2024 ). Sex steroids,
particularly estrogen, play a crucial role in female reproductive physiology and
interact intimately with the gut microbiota. Growing evidence suggests that
fluctuations in estrogen levels can alter the composition and functionality of the
gut microbiota ( Yang et al. ,
2022 ; Schieren et al. ,
2024 ). Additionally, the gut microbiota plays a crucial role in
regulating systemic estrogen levels by mediating its metabolism through the
gut-liver axis ( Baker et al. ,
2017 ; Siddiqui et al. ,
2022 ). These bidirectional interactions not only affect hormonal balance
but may also influence susceptibility to immune disorders, metabolic alterations,
and estrogen-dependent gynecological diseases, such as endometriosis, polycystic
ovary syndrome, and endometrial cancer ( Siddiqui
et al. , 2022 ).
Animal models can be used to investigate the impact of estrogens on the gut
microbiota. Mice and rats are among the most frequently studied species, often
subjected to surgical induction (ovariectomized [OVX]) or chemical induction
(treatment with 4-vinyl cyclohexene diepoxide [VCD]) of a hypoestrogenic state to
evaluate the effects of hormonal supplementation on the gut microbiota ( Song et al. , 2020 ). Transgenic
mice are also employed to explore the specific role of estrogen receptors
(ERα, ERβ) ( Cook et
al. , 2014 ). The zebrafish model ( Danio
rerio ) offers an innovative alternative, with studies using estradiol
exposure to investigate in vivo intestinal changes ( Cornuault et al. , 2022 ).
Non-human primates are typically reserved for more complex research due to their
physiological similarity to humans, despite ethical and financial limitations ( Yan et al. , 2022 ). Rabbit
models are utilized in studies examining the interaction between estrogens and
intestinal fermentation ( Ericsson, 2019 ).
These models are evaluated using techniques, such as 16S rRNA sequencing and
metabolomics, to elucidate the estrogen’s effects on microbiota diversity and
composition, particularly through bile acid and secondary metabolite modulation
( Guo et al. , 2023 ).
Repeated COH, which clinically refers to multiple cycles of COH used in ART, has not
been directly associated with alterations in gut microbiota composition or diversity
in humans. Despite the established significance of the gut microbiota-hormone axis,
research on the impact of repeated COH protocols on the gut microbiota remains
limited. It is imperative to evaluate how these interventions may affect gut
microbiota and potentially influence pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, estrogen and
its fluctuations are vital for both overall and reproductive health, making it
essential to understand their role in the onset and progression of diseases in both
the short- and long-term. The present study aimed to investigate whether COH induces
alterations in the gut microbiota composition of female mice. Given the known
interactions between sex hormones and microbial communities, we hypothesized that
supraphysiological estrogen fluctuations resulting from repeated COH protocols could
modulate gut microbial diversity and structure. By employing a well-established
animal model subjected to weekly COH for ten consecutive weeks, this study seeks to
provide novel insights into the potential impact of sustained hormonal stimulation
on gut microbiota dynamics, contributing to a better understanding of the systemic
effects of ART.
Results
Body weights were collected weekly from both experimental groups: control (n=10) and
treatment (n=10). Longitudinal analysis of weight change revealed that both groups
experienced progressive weight gain. However, the treated group showed significantly
greater weight gain starting from the fourth week of COH ( Figure 1B ).
The results of the alpha and beta diversity analyses are summarized in Figure 2 . The boxplots compare the
alpha-diversity metrics between the control (blue) and treatment (red) groups. The
alpha diversity of the samples was assessed by counting the number of OTUs and
calculating the Shannon, Simpson, and Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) indices.
Overall, the findings suggest that the repeated COH protocol did not significantly
affect the richness or PD of the microbial community in the studied groups ( Figures 2A-D ). There was no significant
difference in species richness, as measured by observed OTUs, between the control
group (430.5±93.8) and the treatment group (418.7±45.3)
(mean±SD; p =0.7294, η 2 =0.0068) ( Figure 2A ). The Shannon diversity index, which
accounts for both species richness and evenness, did not differ significantly
between the treatment group (6.27±0.67) and the control group
(6.02±0.98) (mean±SD; p =0.5252,
η 2 =0.0227), indicating similarly high levels of microbial
diversity in both groups ( Figure 2B ). The
Simpson diversity index, which reflects species dominance within the microbial
community, did not differ significantly between the treatment group
(0.97±0.01) and the control group (0.96±0.02) (mean±SD;
p =0.3260, η 2 =0.0536). The high Simpson values
observed in both groups indicate a community structure characterized by strong
dominance of a few taxa, consistent with low overall evenness ( Figure 2C ). Faith’s PD did not differ significantly between the
treatment group (18.19±1.29) and the control group (17.41±1.73)
(mean±SD; p =0.2702, η 2 =0.0670) ( Figure 2D ), indicating comparable levels of
evolutionary diversity across the microbial communities in both groups.
Figure 2 Impact of Repeated Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH) on Alpha and
Beta Diversity of the Gut Microbiota in Female Mice. Female Swiss mice
(n=10 per group) were assigned to a treatment group receiving repeated
COH for 10 weeks or a placebo-treated control group. (A-D) Alpha
diversity was assessed using four metrics: (A) Observed OTUs (Control:
430.5±29.7; Treatment: 418.7±15.6;
p =0.7294), (B) Shannon diversity index (Control:
6.02±0.98; Treatment: 6.27±0.67;
p =0.5252), (C) Simpson diversity index (Control:
0.96±0.02; Treatment: 0.97±0.01;
p =0.3260), and (D) Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity
(Control: 17.41±1.73; Treatment: 18.19±1.29;
p =0.2702). Data are presented as
mean±standard deviation (SD). No significant differences were
observed between groups for any of the alpha diversity metrics (unpaired
two-tailed t-test). (E) Beta diversity was evaluated using weighted
UniFrac distances, and visualized via principal coordinates analysis
(PCoA). Each dot represents a fecal sample; ellipses denote 95%
confidence intervals for each group. No clear clustering by group was
observed (PERMANOVA; p >0.05).
Impact of Repeated Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH) on Alpha and
Beta Diversity of the Gut Microbiota in Female Mice. Female Swiss mice
(n=10 per group) were assigned to a treatment group receiving repeated
COH for 10 weeks or a placebo-treated control group. (A-D) Alpha
diversity was assessed using four metrics: (A) Observed OTUs (Control:
430.5±29.7; Treatment: 418.7±15.6;
p =0.7294), (B) Shannon diversity index (Control:
6.02±0.98; Treatment: 6.27±0.67;
p =0.5252), (C) Simpson diversity index (Control:
0.96±0.02; Treatment: 0.97±0.01;
p =0.3260), and (D) Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity
(Control: 17.41±1.73; Treatment: 18.19±1.29;
p =0.2702). Data are presented as
mean±standard deviation (SD). No significant differences were
observed between groups for any of the alpha diversity metrics (unpaired
two-tailed t-test). (E) Beta diversity was evaluated using weighted
UniFrac distances, and visualized via principal coordinates analysis
(PCoA). Each dot represents a fecal sample; ellipses denote 95%
confidence intervals for each group. No clear clustering by group was
observed (PERMANOVA; p >0.05).
Beta diversity analysis was conducted using the weighted UniFrac index, which
accounts for the phylogenetic distance between microbial communities, weighted by
the relative abundance of species. A PCoA plot revealed overlapping ellipses for the
control and treatment groups, indicating no substantial differences in the overall
composition of microbial communities. The first principal axis (PC1) accounted for
80.8% of the total variation, while the second principal axis (PC2) contributed
9.4%. Beta diversity analysis did not reveal distinct clusters between groups,
indicating no major changes in the microbial pattern due to treatment ( Figure 2E ). However, this may be attributed to
the smaller sample size.
The gut microbiota’s taxonomic composition was evaluated across five levels: phylum,
class, order, family, and genus. Phylum-level analysis revealed that the treatment
group had a higher relative abundance of Bacteroidetes (23.1% in
the treated group vs . 19.2% in the control group) and a lower
percentage of Firmicutes (74.9% in the treated group
vs . 78.9% in the control group) as compared to the control
group ( Figure 3A ). The Firmicutes:
Bacteroidetes (F: B) ratio was reduced by the COH protocol, decreasing
to 3.24 in the treatment group compared to 4.11 in the control group.
Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria , and
Deferribacteres constituted a minor fraction of the total
community and maintained consistent proportions across both groups ( Figure 3A ). The gut microbiota composition at the
class level was primarily dominated by Clostridia, Bacilli, and
Bacteroidia. We observed a reduction in
Clostridia and Bacilli , while
Bacteroidia was elevated in the treatment group compared to the
control group. Minor classes, including Coriobacteriia, Deferribacteres,
Epsilonproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria,
Erysipelotrichi, and Mollicutes , showed no significant
differences between the groups, indicating that the COH protocol did not notably
alter class-level microbial distributions ( Figure
3B ).
Figure 3 Taxonomic Composition of Gut Microbiota at Multiple Levels Following
Repeated Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH) in Female Mice. This
figure presents the relative abundance (%) of bacterial taxa at the
phylum (A), class (B), order (C), family (D), and genus (E) levels in
control mice (n=10) and mice subjected to 10 weeks of COH (n=10). At the
phylum level (A), Firmicutes and
Bacteroidetes dominated both groups, with a modest
reduction in the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment group.
At the class level (B), Clostridia and
Bacteroidia remained predominant, while minor
increases in Erysipelotrichi and
Coriobacteriia were observed after COH. At the
order level (C), Bacteroidales showed a slight increase
in treated mice, whereas Clostridiales were more
abundant in controls. At the family level (D), Lactobacillaceae,
Lachnospiraceae , and Ruminococcaceae were
the major families across groups, with Rikenellaceae
showing a small decrease in the COH group. At the genus level (E),
Lactobacillus was the dominant genus in both
groups, followed by Bacteroides and
Parabacteroides , which were slightly more abundant
in treated animals, while genera such as
Rikenellaceae_RC9 and Clostridium
were relatively enriched in controls. These patterns indicate largely
conserved community structure, with subtle COH-associated shifts in
specific taxa.
Taxonomic Composition of Gut Microbiota at Multiple Levels Following
Repeated Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH) in Female Mice. This
figure presents the relative abundance (%) of bacterial taxa at the
phylum (A), class (B), order (C), family (D), and genus (E) levels in
control mice (n=10) and mice subjected to 10 weeks of COH (n=10). At the
phylum level (A), Firmicutes and
Bacteroidetes dominated both groups, with a modest
reduction in the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment group.
At the class level (B), Clostridia and
Bacteroidia remained predominant, while minor
increases in Erysipelotrichi and
Coriobacteriia were observed after COH. At the
order level (C), Bacteroidales showed a slight increase
in treated mice, whereas Clostridiales were more
abundant in controls. At the family level (D), Lactobacillaceae,
Lachnospiraceae , and Ruminococcaceae were
the major families across groups, with Rikenellaceae
showing a small decrease in the COH group. At the genus level (E),
Lactobacillus was the dominant genus in both
groups, followed by Bacteroides and
Parabacteroides , which were slightly more abundant
in treated animals, while genera such as
Rikenellaceae_RC9 and Clostridium
were relatively enriched in controls. These patterns indicate largely
conserved community structure, with subtle COH-associated shifts in
specific taxa.
At the order level, the control group exhibited an increase in abundance of
Clostridiales and Lactobacillales , while the
treatment group exhibited a higher abundance of Bacteroidales .
Other orders, including Coriobacteriales, Deferribacterales,
Burkholderiales, Campylobacterales, Turicibacterales,
Desulfovibrionales , and Erysipelotrichales , showed
comparable relative abundances, indicating that the treatment protocol did not
substantially affect these microbial taxa ( Figure
3C ). At the family level, the Lactobacillaceae,
Ruminococcaceae, and Rikenellaceae showed increased
abundance in the control group, while the treatment group exhibited higher abundance
for Lachnospiraceae, Muribaculaceae, and
Bacteroidaceae ( Figure
3D ). At the genus level, Lactobacillus and
Oscillospira were more abundant in the control group, while
Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Turicibacter , and
Parabacteroides were more abundant in the treatment group
( Figure 3E ).
Two taxa were statistically significant: Mogibacteriaceae
( p =0.049) and Clostridiaceae
( p =0.038) at the family level. At the genus level, four genera
were significant: Parabacteroides ( p =0.034),
Anaeroplasma ( p =0.041), Candidatus
Arthromitus ( p =0.029), and
Clostridium ( p =0.031). Furthermore, the random
forest analysis indicated that Bacteroidales was the most abundant
in the treatment group, serving as a discriminating biomarker between the two
groups. We also observed that one bacterial family,
Erysipelotrichaceae , and three genera, Parabacteroides,
Odoribacter , and Rikenellaceae , could serve as
biomarkers. Erysipelotrichaceae and
Parabacteroides were more abundant in the treatment group,
while Odoribacter and Rikenellaceae were more
abundant in the control group ( Figure 4 ).
Figure 4 Random Forest Analysis Identifies Key Microbial Biomarkers Associated
with Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH). Random forest
classification was performed to identify bacterial taxa that most
accurately distinguish fecal microbiota profiles of COH-treated mice
(n=10) from control mice (n=10). The x-axis shows the Mean Decrease
Accuracy, reflecting the contribution of each taxon to model
performance. The y-axis lists the most discriminative taxa, with
Bacteroidales, Erysipelotrichaceae , and
Parabacteroides emerging as top predictors. The
heatmap on the right illustrates the relative abundance of each taxon
across groups, with the color scale ranging from red (high abundance) to
blue (low abundance). Notably, Bacteroidales was more
abundant in the COH group and ranked as the most informative biomarker,
suggesting its relevance in microbial shifts associated with ovarian
hyperstimulation.
Random Forest Analysis Identifies Key Microbial Biomarkers Associated
with Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH). Random forest
classification was performed to identify bacterial taxa that most
accurately distinguish fecal microbiota profiles of COH-treated mice
(n=10) from control mice (n=10). The x-axis shows the Mean Decrease
Accuracy, reflecting the contribution of each taxon to model
performance. The y-axis lists the most discriminative taxa, with
Bacteroidales, Erysipelotrichaceae , and
Parabacteroides emerging as top predictors. The
heatmap on the right illustrates the relative abundance of each taxon
across groups, with the color scale ranging from red (high abundance) to
blue (low abundance). Notably, Bacteroidales was more
abundant in the COH group and ranked as the most informative biomarker,
suggesting its relevance in microbial shifts associated with ovarian
hyperstimulation.
Discussion
This study investigated whether repeated COH, a condition that raises endogenous
estrogen concentrations to supraphysiological levels, can induce changes in the gut
microbiota of female mice. The biological plausibility for the link between hormonal
fluctuations (estrogen and progesterone) and microbial changes is supported by data
showing that estrogen promotes proliferation of the vaginal epithelium and increased
glycogen, favoring the growth of Lactobacillus , while progesterone
modulates glycogen release and vaginal pH. Furthermore, hormonal variations
throughout the menstrual cycle and in states such as hyperestrogenism induced by
controlled ovarian stimulation alter the diversity and composition of the vaginal
microbiota, with Lactobacillus predominating during periods of
higher estrogen levels ( Collins et
al ., 2022 ).
The results of this study revealed that prolonged COH treatment in female mice does
not significantly affect the diversity (alpha or beta) of the gut microbiota, as
assessed by the metrics presented. The results also suggested that the 10-week COH
protocol does not induce notable changes in the taxonomic structure of the gut
microbiota in female mice. The stability observed at several taxonomic levels
reinforces the notion that the COH protocol has a limited impact on the microbial
community structure. However, the study identified biomarkers of gut microbiota,
including one order, one family, and three genera. The most distinguishing factor
between the groups was the abundance of bacteria from the order
Bacteroidales in the group subjected to repeated COH.
Furthermore, the presence of one family ( Rikenellaceae ) and two
genera ( Parabacterioides and Odoribacter ) within
the order Bacteriodales was identified as potential biomarkers of
gut microbiota. The only biomarker not belonging to the order
Bacteroidales was the family
Erysipelotrichaceae .
Alterations in the gut microbiota were observed at different phases of the menstrual
cycle and during the menopausal transition in healthy women. These findings suggest
that fluctuations in physiological levels of endogenous estrogen significantly
influence the composition of the gut microbiota ( Krog et al. , 2022 ; Schieren et al. , 2024 ). Higher estrogen levels were
associated with a higher abundance of Bacteroidetes , a lower
abundance of Firmicutes and the Ruminococcaceae
family, as well as greater diversity ( Zhao
et al. , 2019 ; Krog
et al. , 2022 ; Schieren et al. , 2024 ). Studies in animal models have
demonstrated that estrogen supplementation can significantly influence the diversity
and composition of the gut microbiota ( Kaliannan
et al. , 2018 ; Acharya
et al. , 2019 ; Song
et al. , 2020 ). However, studies are limited to
estrogen supplementation via oral gavage, i.p. injection, or subcutaneous implants,
with no studies evaluating supraphysiological fluctuations of endogenous
estrogen.
Song et al . (2020) observed
that 7β-estradiol (E2, 10 mg/kg, i.p. injection) increased alpha diversity,
as measured by the number of OTUs observed, in male mice. Interestingly, alpha
diversity, measured by the Shannon index, increased in female mice after OVX, a
condition that induces low levels of endogenous estrogens. The authors also observed
that estrogen levels influenced the composition of the gut microbiota across all
taxonomic levels. At the phylum level, the abundance ratio of
Cyanobacteria significantly decreased in male mice receiving
E2, whereas the abundance ratio of Verrucomicrobia significantly
increased in the absence of estrogen (OVX). E2 supplementation or ovariectomy did
not affect the F: B ratio. In male mice, E2 supplementation increased the commensal
bacteria/ opportunistic pathogens ratio (control male=1.5 vs . E2
male=5) ( Song et al. , 2020 ).
Acharya et al . (2019)
also reported that E2 supplementation (via subcutaneous implants) in female OVX mice
alters the gut microbial composition, altering alpha diversity (observed number of
OTUs) and beta diversity (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity). This supplementation reduced
the relative abundance of Firmicutes and
Actinobacteria while increasing the presence of
Bacteroidetes ( Acharya
et al. , 2019 ).
Studies have shown that menopause is associated with significant changes in the
composition of the gut microbiota, probably influenced by estrogen levels ( Baker et al. , 2017 ; Yang et al. , 2022 ; Huang et al. , 2024 ). Yang et al . (2022) observed a
higher relative abundance of the genera Odoribacter and
Bilophila in postmenopausal women. In contrast, Zhao et al. (2019) identified
a depletion of Firmicutes and Roseburia spp.,
along with an overrepresentation of Bacteroidetes and
Tolumonas in the same population ( Zhao et al. , 2019 ; Yang et al. , 2022 ). Santos-Marcos et al. (2018) corroborated these
findings, reporting a higher F: B ratio and increased abundance of
Lachnospira and Roseburia in premenopausal
women, highlighting the influence of hormonal status on the microbiota ( Santos-Marcos et al. , 2018 ).
In animal models, Dai et al .
(2023) identified microbial and metabolic changes during the menopausal
transition, associated with neuroendocrine aging. However, there is a gap in
understanding microbiota changes at earlier stages, such as premenarche and
menarche.
The interaction between estrogen levels and the gut microbiota is complex, involving
both the modulation of microbial composition by estrogens and the influence of the
microbiota on estrogen metabolism through the estrobolome ( Baker et al. , 2017 ; Siddiqui et al. , 2022 ; Huang et al. , 2024 ). Studies suggest that
estrogen may indirectly modulate the microbiota through interactions with the immune
system and bile, both of which play a role in selecting microorganisms in the
intestinal tract ( Salliss et al. ,
2021 ; Huang et al. ,
2024 ). Many bacterial genera and species in the intestine contain genes
encoding β-glucuronidase and β-galactosidase ( Markowitz et al. , 2012 ). Our results observed
that Parabacteroides and Odoribacter , genera
expressing β-galactosidase and indirectly involved in the estrobolome, were
markers of gut microbiota composition.
The changes in the gut microbiota observed in our study differed from those reported
in other studies, especially because they did not affect alpha or beta diversity.
However, most studies published previously have examined the effect of E2
supplementation on the gut microbiota composition in animal models of menopause,
comparing a low estrogen condition with sex hormone replacement. Our study compared
animals with normal estrogen levels to a group experiencing supraphysiological
estrogen fluctuations for ten consecutive weeks. This study is pioneering in
exploring the effects of repeated COH on gut microbiota composition, providing
important insights into the interplay between reproductive interventions and gut
health. A key strength of this study is the identification of a potential link
between supraphysiological estrogen levels and changes in the gut microbiota, a
novel finding that underscores the systemic effects of hormonal manipulation. By
highlighting estrogen’s role in modulating gut microbial composition, the study
opens new avenues for understanding how reproductive technologies, such as ovarian
hyperstimulation, may have broader implications for women’s health. These
implications are particularly relevant in terms of metabolism, immunity, and overall
well-being.
Changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota observed in our study may
have significant implications for reproductive health through immune and metabolic
pathways. Bacteroidales are known to enhance the production of
short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which play a crucial role in maintaining intestinal
integrity and modulating systemic inflammation. Their ability to influence cytokine
production and reduce lipopolysaccharide levels may contribute to a lower systemic
inflammatory state, which is particularly relevant in reproductive disorders where
chronic inflammation can impair implantation and pregnancy maintenance ( Fabersani et al. , 2021 ).
Erysipelotrichaceae , associated with reduced intestinal
inflammation, may further support reproductive health by promoting a balanced immune
environment, potentially decreasing the risk of immune-mediated pregnancy
complications such as implantation failure or recurrent pregnancy loss ( Zhuang et al ., 2022 ).
Similarly, Parabacteroides have been linked to anti-inflammatory
and metabolic benefits, improving glucose homeostasis and reducing obesity-related
inflammation-factors that are critical in conditions such as polycystic ovary
syndrome and infertility associated with metabolic dysfunction ( Cui et al ., 2022 ).
The decrease of Rikenellaceae and Odoribacter in
the gut microbiota may also have significant immune and metabolic implications.
These bacterial genera are important producers of SCFAs, particularly butyrate,
which serves as an energy source for colonocytes and has anti-inflammatory
properties that regulate both intestinal and systemic immune responses ( Zarrinpar et al ., 2018 ; Amabebe et al ., 2020 ). A
reduction in Rikenellaceae may lead to a decrease in butyrate
production, compromising intestinal barrier integrity, increasing permeability and
promoting bacterial translocation and endotoxemia, which are associated with chronic
low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance and obesity ( Zarrinpar et al ., 2018 ; Amabebe et al ., 2020 ). Similarly, reduction of
Odoribacter further decreases SCFA production and disrupts
metabolic and immune homeostasis ( Zarrinpar
et al ., 2018 ; Amabebe
et al ., 2020 ). Overall, the loss of these bacterial
taxa may contribute to gut inflammation, metabolic dysregulation and impaired immune
function, highlighting their critical role in maintaining gut health.
The pattern of changes in gut microbiota composition in our study may promote
beneficial or detrimental effects on gut health and may have implications for
reproductive health. Further research is needed to clarify the long-term
consequences, considering that host-microbiota interactions are influenced by
multiple factors, such as diet, hormonal fluctuations, and individual metabolic
profiles.
Despite these strengths, the study has limitations that affect the interpretation of
its results. Most importantly, the absence of estrogen monitoring throughout the
protocol prevents a detailed understanding of the relationship between hormonal
fluctuations and microbial changes. In addition, the study does not identify the
specific timing of microbiota changes during the 10-week ovarian stimulation
protocol. Additionally, the study is limited by its single timepoint analysis of
fecal samples and absence of functional data (e.g., metagenomics or host immune
markers). This leaves a gap in our understanding of when and how these changes
occur. These weaknesses limit the ability to establish causality and the precise
mechanisms underlying the observed microbiota shifts. They highlight the need for
future studies with more comprehensive temporal and hormonal monitoring to better
elucidate these interactions.
Future research should aim to elucidate the long-term effects of repeated COH on gut
microbiota composition and its potential systemic and reproductive implications. A
key area of investigation is determining whether the observed microbial shifts
persist beyond the treatment period or if the microbiota gradually returns to its
baseline state. Additionally, exploring the role of probiotics supplementation prior
to COH presents an exciting avenue for mitigating potential microbial disturbances.
Probiotics have been shown to influence gut microbiota composition, immune
regulation, and metabolic homeostasis, all of which are relevant to reproductive
health. Future studies should evaluate whether probiotic interventions can prevent
or attenuate COH-induced microbial alterations and, in turn, improve metabolic and
reproductive outcomes. These investigations would not only enhance our understanding
of the gut-reproductive axis but also contribute to optimizing strategies in ART to
promote better clinical outcomes.
Conclusions
This study investigated the impact of repeated COH on the gut microbiota in female
mice. The results demonstrated that COH did not significantly alter microbial
diversity (alpha and beta diversity); however, it induced notable changes in the
taxonomic composition of the gut microbiota. Specifically, COH was associated with a
reduced F: B ratio and an increased abundance of microbial taxa. Biomarker analyses
further identified potential discriminatory taxa, including Bacteroidales,
Erysipelotrichaceae, Parabacteroides, Odoribacter , and
Rikenellaceae , as markers of microbial shifts in response to
COH. These findings highlight the potential systemic implications of repeated COH
exposure on gut microbial composition, which may contribute to broader physiological
changes associated with hormonal modulation. The study emphasizes the need for
further research to investigate the long-term effects of COH on gut health, immune
regulation, and metabolic outcomes, particularly in the context of ART. By
elucidating these interactions, future studies could help develop strategies to
mitigate the unintended consequences of COH on overall health.
Materials|Methods
For this study, we used 8-week-old sexually mature female Swiss mice, weighing
between 20 and 30 g. The animals were sourced from the Vivarium at the
Experimental Biology Center, University of Fortaleza. A total of 20 animals were
used, and they were randomly assigned to two experimental groups (n=10 per
group)-control and treatment-using a computer-generated randomization sequence
to ensure unbiased allocation. The animals were housed in individually
ventilated cages (Techniplast IVC), with autoclaved pine shavings used as
bedding. The mice were maintained under pathogen-free conditions, with an
average ambient temperature of 26°C, 15-20 air changes per hour, and a 12-hour
light/ dark cycle. They were provided ad libitum access to
filtered water and commercial chow, both sterilized prior to use to maintain
microbiological safety. All experimental procedures followed international
guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the
Animal Use Ethics Committee of the University of Fortaleza (CEUA protocol number
3828200123). Furthermore, this study adhered to the principles outlined in the
Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE 2.0) guidelines, to
ensure transparency and reproducibility in animal research ( Percie du Sert et al. ,
2020 ).
The mice (n=10 per group) were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental
groups: placebo (control) or treatment. The treatment group underwent ovarian
hyperstimulation following established protocols described in the literature
( Van Blerkom & Davis, 2001 ; Zhang et al. , 2018 ).
Specifically, mice in the treatment group received an intraperitoneal (i.p.)
injection of 7.5 IU of human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG, Menopur™,
FERRING Pharmaceuticals), a gonadotropin preparation containing both FSH and LH,
to stimulate follicular development. After 48 hours, mice received a second i.p.
injection of 5 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, Choriomon™, IBSA
Institut Biochimique), a hormone that mimics the LH surge and induces ovulation.
In contrast, mice in the control group were administered an equivalent volume of
saline solution (i.p.) at the same time points. Ovulation was induced ten times,
with intervals of one week between each induction ( Figure 1A ).
Figure 1 Effects of Repeated Ovarian Hyperstimulation on Body Weight in Female
Mice. (A) Experimental design of repeated ovarian hyperstimulation
in female mice. The treated group received 7.5 IU of human
menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) once per week (on Tuesdays) followed
by 5.0 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 48 hours later (on
Thursdays) for 10 weeks. The placebo group received saline solution
at equivalent time points. (B) Body weight progression of treated
and control groups during the 10-week protocol. Data are presented
as mean±SEM, with significant differences between groups
marked as follows: * p <0.05,
** p <0.01, *** p <0.001, and ns
for not significant. Treated mice exhibited a significant increase
in body weight compared to controls starting from the second
week.
Effects of Repeated Ovarian Hyperstimulation on Body Weight in Female
Mice. (A) Experimental design of repeated ovarian hyperstimulation
in female mice. The treated group received 7.5 IU of human
menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) once per week (on Tuesdays) followed
by 5.0 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 48 hours later (on
Thursdays) for 10 weeks. The placebo group received saline solution
at equivalent time points. (B) Body weight progression of treated
and control groups during the 10-week protocol. Data are presented
as mean±SEM, with significant differences between groups
marked as follows: * p <0.05,
** p <0.01, *** p <0.001, and ns
for not significant. Treated mice exhibited a significant increase
in body weight compared to controls starting from the second
week.
Mice were weighed one week prior to the beginning of the experimental protocol,
weekly throughout the ten-week COH treatment, and again one week after the final
administration of either ovulation-inducing agents or saline placebo. Fecal
samples were collected from each animal one week after the conclusion of the
treatment phase and were immediately frozen at -80°C for subsequent analysis.
Genomic DNA was extracted from approximately 100 mg of murine fecal material
using the QIAamp® PowerFecal® Pro DNA kit (Qiagen, CA, USA),
following the manufacturer’s instructions. The composition of the gut microbiota
was assessed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform,
employing bioinformatics methodologies as previously described ( Nagpal et al. , 2020a ; b ; Mishra
et al. , 2023 ). The V4 hypervariable region of
the bacterial 16S rDNA gene was amplified using universal primer pairs 515F
(5’-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3’) and 806R (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’) ( Caporaso et al. , 2012 ).
Barcoded amplicons were then purified with AMPure® magnetic beads
(Agencourt, Beckman Coulter, CA, USA), quantified using the dsDNA HS assay kit
(Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) on a Qubit-3 fluorometer (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA, USA), and normalized for constructing an amplicon library ( Caporaso et al. , 2012 ).
Each amplicon was standardized to a final concentration of 8 pM before
sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq system (MiSeq reagent kit v3).
We then used the QIIME2 (Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology) software
to process the generated fastq files from the sequencing. The quality control,
clustering, and demultiplexing of the sequences were performed using the unique
barcodes assigned to each sample. Subsequently, quality control evaluations were
conducted using the DADA2 pipeline ( Nagpal
et al. , 2019 ; 2020b ; Mishra et
al. , 2024 ). High-quality sequences were obtained by
removing adapters and non-chimeric amplicons using the default parameters of
DADA2. The filtered sequences were then used for the taxonomy classification
using the Greengenes-trained Naive Bayes classifier ( Bokulich et al. , 2018 ).
Alpha-diversity indices for community richness included the observed operational
taxonomic units (OTUs), Shannon index, Simpson index, and Faith’s phylogenetic
diversity index. Community dissimilarities (beta diversity) were quantitatively
assessed using unweighted UniFrac, weighted UniFrac, Jaccard index, and
Bray-Curtis distances within QIIME2, and these were visualized with a principal
coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot. To obtain relative abundances, raw read counts
were divided by the total number of reads per sample. Subsequently, OTUs were
aggregated to taxonomic levels by summing their respective relative
abundances.
GraphPad Prism 10.2.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was
used for statistical analysis. Body weight was described as the mean and
standard error of the mean (mean±SEM). For analysis of the alpha
diversity indices (Observed OTUs, Shannon, Simpson, and Faith’s Phylogenetic
Diversity), comparisons between the control and COH-treated groups were
conducted using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t -test,
assuming equal variance unless otherwise specified. Statistical significance was
defined as p 2.0 and a significance
level of p <0.01, as previously described by Segata et al . (2011) . In
addition, a Random Forest classification algorithm was used to evaluate taxa
importance and identify microbial features that best distinguished between the
two experimental groups. Beta diversity distances (Jaccard, Bray-Curtis,
unweighted and weighted UniFrac) were statistically compared using PERMANOVA
(permutational multivariate analysis of variance) within the QIIME2
framework.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
is the canonical version.