Aqueous two-phase bioinks for discrete packing and compartmentalisation of 3D bioprinted cells

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The unparalleled ability of aqueous two-phase systems (ATPS) to reproduce microscale cellular and biomaterial compartmentalisation to selectively modulate cell behaviour and functionality is ideal for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) purposes. Herein, we introduce new ATPS biomaterial inks for 3D bioprinting of water-in-water (W/W) emulsions, enabling precise cellular crowding for tissue regeneration in vitro and ex vivo . Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) was hierarchically dispersed in an alginic acid phase depending on sodium chloride (NaCl) concentration (0-36 g/L). Emulsion droplet size (12.8±2.6 µm to 52.4±11.4 µm) influenced degradation and spatial cell localisation (A549, C2C12, MG63). A microfluidic-assisted 3D bioprinting approach allowed fine-tuning of fibre structure adjusting ATPS deposition by modulating flow rates and printing speed. Rheological properties supported the findings of the two-phase partitioning, aiding the selection of the ATPS ink formulation for functional cell-laden construct fabrication. Encapsulation of C2C12 cells revealed enhanced cytoskeletal remodelling at higher salt concentrations. Increased GelMA phase promoted human bone marrow stromal cells (HBMSCs) crowding, mineral deposition and skeletal differentiation. In ovo studies demonstrated degradation control and vascular infiltration via salt modulation. Altogether, ATPS bioinks offer a versatile platform for the assembling of complex, hierarchical tissues with microscale precision, expanding biofabrication strategies for TERM applications.
Full text 1,654 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The unparalleled ability of aqueous two-phase systems (ATPS) to reproduce microscale cellular and biomaterial compartmentalisation to selectively modulate cell behaviour and functionality is ideal for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) purposes. Herein, we introduce new ATPS biomaterial inks for 3D bioprinting of water-in-water (W/W) emulsions, enabling precise cellular crowding for tissue regeneration in vitro and ex vivo. Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) was hierarchically dispersed in an alginic acid phase depending on sodium chloride (NaCl) concentration (0-36 g/L). Emulsion droplet size (12.8±2.6 µm to 52.4±11.4 µm) influenced degradation and spatial cell localisation (A549, C2C12, MG63). A microfluidic-assisted 3D bioprinting approach allowed fine-tuning of fibre structure adjusting ATPS deposition by modulating flow rates and printing speed. Rheological properties supported the findings of the two-phase partitioning, aiding the selection of the ATPS ink formulation for functional cell-laden construct fabrication. Encapsulation of C2C12 cells revealed enhanced cytoskeletal remodelling at higher salt concentrations. Increased GelMA phase promoted human bone marrow stromal cells (HBMSCs) crowding, mineral deposition and skeletal differentiation. In ovo studies demonstrated degradation control and vascular infiltration via salt modulation. Altogether, ATPS bioinks offer a versatile platform for the assembling of complex, hierarchical tissues with microscale precision, expanding biofabrication strategies for TERM applications. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00