Male factor infertility may be associated with a low risk for tubal abnormalities

Jacob Farhi, Roy Homburg, Avi Ben‐Haroush
In: Reproductive BioMedicine Online · 2011 · vol. 22(4) , pp. 335–340 · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.01.003 · PMID:21324744 · W2014066730
article OA: bronze CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-29 ⓘ

This study found that male factor infertility was associated with a decreased risk of tubal abnormalities in women undergoing hysterosalpingography.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This study assessed the association of an abnormal hysterosalpingography (HSG) with clinical characteristics and infertility investigation results in 1359 women who underwent HSG as part of their infertility work-up. A normal HSG result was found in 1031 tests (75.9% of all HSG tests). Significantly positive predictors of tubal occlusion on multivariate analysis were longer duration of infertility (OR 1.072, 95% CI 1.006-1.143), previous pelvic inflammatory disease (PID; OR 2.172, 95% CI 1.176-4.008), extrauterine pregnancy (EUP; OR 15.74, 95% CI 6.66-37.16) and any abdominal surgery (except Caesarean section; OR 1.503, 95% CI 1.120-2.017) and negative predictor was male factor infertility (OR 0.543, 95% CI 0.401-0.735). The presence of male factor decreased the risk of tubal abnormality from 32.4% to 15.6% (P<0.001) in women with known risk factors for tubal abnormalities (previous PID, EUP or abdominal surgery) and from 17.8% to 11.5% (P=0.01) in women at low risk for tubal abnormalities. As the risk for tubal factor is approximately 1:10 in patients with male factor infertility without other risk factors, the practice of postponing HSG until after one or two treatment cycles may be considered.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (24)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK