Evolving on two fronts: Bill Burger on the nature of oak species

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,099 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 3 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 3 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. William ‘Bill’ Burger wrote in 1975, “I believe that the classical species-concept in Quercus defines a very real population system and that it evolves on two fronts. One is that of continuing to adapt to a niche that differs slightly from its close relations. The second is in sharing the broader evolutionary advances of these same close relations that together comprise the genetically isolated biological species.” Burger’s view of oak species reflected morphological study going back at least to 1947, but since Burger’s time, ecological and genomic data have accrued to further support his hypothesis: oak species are distinctive ecologically, morphologically, and genomically, but interspecific gene flow moves alleles (gene copies) between species. This movement of alleles between species is called introgression. Introgression increases genetic variation within species and shuffles alleles into new ecological contexts, where they may shape the evolution of the species they enter. Thus natural selection working on a single population does so by grabbing hold of innovations (alleles) that evolved in many species—the suite of interbreeding species that constitute an oak syngameon. In this essay, I discuss Bill Burger’s species concept and ask how it aligns with what we know about oak species today. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2M64S Botany, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Evolution, Life Sciences, Plant Sciences adaptation, Genomics, hybridization, Introgression, species concepts Published: 2025-12-16 10:56 Last Updated: 2025-12-23 04:11 CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: n/a Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00