Risk factors for failed reactivation of a labor epidural for postpartum tubal ligation: a prospective, observational study
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
Poor epidural satisfaction, longer time to reactivation, and need for labor top-ups were significant risk factors for failed epidural reactivation for postpartum tubal ligation.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Study objectiveTo determine specific risk factors that increase the failure rate of labor epidurals reactivated for use as a surgical block for postpartum tubal ligation.DesignProspective, observational study.SettingLabor and delivery suite and operating rooms at the Women and Infants Center.PatientsOne hundred patients undergoing postpartum tubal ligation with an existing labor epidural that is documented to be within 2 cm of initial placement.MeasurementsBody mass index, patient satisfaction with her epidural during labor and delivery, time from delivery to reactivation for tubal ligation, depth to loss of resistance, and the need for top-ups during labor were recorded preoperatively. Failure to reactivate was recorded and defined as any patient that (1) did not achieve a T6 level to pinprick, (2) had perceived pain (pain score >3) that required administration of an intravenous opioid or local anesthetic infiltration, or (3) required conversion to general anesthesia.Main resultsThe overall success rate of reactivation was 78%. Significant risk factors for failure to reactivate were (1) poor patient satisfaction (P = .016), (2) increased time from delivery to reactivation (P = .044), and (3) the need for top-ups during labor and delivery (P = .032).ConclusionPoor satisfaction score of the epidural during labor and delivery, increasing time from delivery to epidural reactivation for tubal ligation, and the need for top-ups during labor and delivery increase the incidence of reactivation failure. No correlation was found with body mass index or loss of resistance and failure to reactivate.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (20)
- doi:10.1016/0952-8180(95)00050-r via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00000539-199508000-00016 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.05.007 via openalex
- W2289852612 via openalex
- W3096282994 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00000542-200502000-00008 via openalex
- W6644925079 via openalex
- W6671265804 via openalex
- W6676172437 via openalex
- W6696384565 via openalex
- doi:10.1213/00000539-199911000-00036 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0952-8180(93)90120-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00132586-199606000-00049 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00132586-199804000-00029 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90051-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02393.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00000542-199704000-00007 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1978.tb08509.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000264744.63275.10 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00000539-199703000-00010 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:18:49.075943+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK