Barriers to contraceptive utilization among Reproductive Age Women of Eritrean Refugee in North West Tigray, Ethiopia: a mixed study

Barriers to contraceptive utilization among Reproductive Age Women of Eritrean Refugee in North West Tigray, Ethiopia: a mixed study | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Barriers to contraceptive utilization among Reproductive Age Women of Eritrean Refugee in North West Tigray, Ethiopia: a mixed study Solomon Weldemariam Gebrehiwot, Gedamu Abera, Almaz Berhe, Kahsay Zenebe This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3815580/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Universal access to family planning could prevent nearly one-third of the estimated 300,000 maternal deaths. Contraceptive utilization is low in humanitarian settings. Currently, there is a dearth of information on the use of contraceptives among refugee women in many low-income countries including the study area. A community based cross sectional study with qualitative data was employed from January 1 to February 1, 2017. Systematic and purposive sampling techniques were applied. Data was entered to Epi Info version 3.3.2 and transported to SPSS version 20.0 software for analysis. Significance was declared at p-value of < 0.05. Odds ratio along with 95% confidence interval was computed to ascertain the strength of the association. Among the 532 respondents who experienced sex, 192(36.1%) were using contraceptive method. Exposure to media (AOR = 2.207, 95% CI = 1.244, 3.917), residence (AOR = 2.593, 95% CI = 1.513, 4.444), discussion on reproductive goals (AOR = 2.817, 95% CI = 1.681, 4.721) and longer duration stay in camp (AOR = .4.065, 95% CI = 1.845, 8.956, AOR = 2.200, 95% CI = 1.084, 4.466) were significant factors. Prevalence of contraceptive utilization in refugees was low. A lot of obstructing factors to access the service were identified in this study. This gap will intensify the existing maternal and child mortality dire in refugee settings. Health sciences/Health care Health sciences/Risk factors Figures Figure 1 Introduction Background An estimated 103 million population have been forcibly displaced worldwide by the middle of 2022 as a result of persecution, conflict and violence [ 1 ]. Eritrea contributed around 507,300 of refugees to the world in 2018 and most of (57%) these refugees were hosted by Ethiopia (174,000) [ 2 ]. Women and girls accounted for 48% of these refugees [ 2 ]. Access to information and high-quality family planning (FP) service are fundamental to realize the rights and well-being of women, men and adolescents. Universal access to effective contraception safeguards a sustaining sexual life and can avoid the adverse health and socioeconomic aftermaths of unintended pregnancy [ 3 ]. Similarly, People living in humanitarian settings are entitled to this right. FP is the most proven and cost-effective strategy in reducing maternal and child morbidity and mortality and improves schooling and economic outcomes among women [ 4 , 5 ]. Universal access to FP could prevent nearly one-third of the estimated 300,000 maternal deaths yearly [ 6 ] and reduce an unintended pregnancy, abortion and newborn deaths by 70%, 67% and 77% respectively [ 7 ]. The return on investment in family planning estimated to be US $ 120 for every US $ 1 spent [ 7 ]. Many initiatives and interventions on FP promotion have been launched and implemented globally as well as nationally. The 1994 ICPD programmes which advocates on the basic right of all couples to decide freely and responsibly on the number of children they would have and the means to do so [ 6 ]. The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 targeted to reduce maternal mortality ration to less than 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030 through universal access to sexual and reproductive health care services, including for FP[ 8 ]. The FP2020 also aimed to address 120 million additional contraceptive users by 2020 [ 9 ] Likewise, Ethiopia produced essential strategic planning documents in FP over the past decade. The Health Sector Transformation Plan (HSTP II) which aimed at scaling up FP to reach an additional 6.2 million users and to increase contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) to 55% and reduced fertility to 3 by 2020 [ 10 ]. The country has also developed a FP Costed Implementation Plan in 2015 which serves as a blueprint for the implementation of the FP goal outlined in the HSTP [ 11 ]. Ethiopia has been made a significant progress in improving the access to quality FP in the past two decades through a right-based approach [ 11 ]. As a result, maternal mortality has declined from 871 in 2000 to 412 per 100,000 live births in 2016 [ 12 ] and CPR increased from 14% in 2005 to 41% in 2019 [ 13 ]. Despite encouraging progress has been made in FP coverage; women found in developing countries, especially in humanitarian settings, encountered many challenges in accessing and utilizing FP services. Occasionally, national strategies and programs failed to address effectively the refugees reproductive health needs [ 14 ]. Early or forced sex, sexual exploitation, transactional sex, risk-taking behaviors and exposure to high-risk situations are characterstics of refugees due to loss social structure and protective mechanisms [ 15 ]. Over 220 million women, most of who are from developing countries, have unmet need for modern contraceptive methods [ 7 , 16 ]. CPR is reported at averagely 42% in Sub-Saharan Africa [ 16 ] where as in Ethiopia, it is reported at 47.7% [ 17 ] and 17.8% [ 18 ] from refugee settings. Low CPR is associated with religion, distance to health facilities, knowledge on FP, lack of information, mistrust in the safety of contraceptives, prior negative experience, age, educational status, poor quality service, decision making status, number of live children, residence, marital status, occupational status, misconceptions and language barriers in many studies [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Currently, there is a dearth of information on the use of contraceptives and factors actassociated with utilization in refugee women, particularly in the study area. The unique situation of refugee women compounded with the existed poor health system in the country, most likely results in high an unmet need for FP. A scarcity of information in such a marginalized population leads to ineffective FP service provision at place. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the barriers and challenges that are associated with the uptake of contraceptive use among refugee women. Methods Study setting There were four Eritrean refugee camps namely: Hitsats, Shimelba, Adi-Harush and Mai-Aini in Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia [ 21 ]. This study took place at the two refugee camps (Mai-Aini and Adi-Harush) located in Tselemti district, the North West zone of Tigray. These refugee camps were opened in May 2008 and March 2010 respectively [ 22 , 23 ]. These camps located at 367 and 384 Kms North-West of Mekelle the capital city of Tigray region respectively. The Government of Ethiopia manages all the refugee camps through the Administration for Refugee and Returnee Affairs (ARRA) [ 24 ]. Along with ARRA, United Nation Higher Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Rescue Committee (IRC) supported the health service system entirely [ 23 ]. According to ARRA 2016 report, these camps were homes to an estimated 80,422 (Mai-Aini = 31,091and Adi-Harush = 49331) registered refugees from Eritrea [ 24 ]. Women were accounted 40%-45% of this population [ 22 , 23 ]. The health centers found in these camps provide Basic Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (BEmONC) services, including FP services. However, mothers referred to the nearby district primary hospital, Mytsebre, for Comprehensive EmONC service and surgical contraceptive methods. Sometimes women may refer to General/specialized hospital found in Shire and Mekelle for further obstetrical complications diagnosis and management. Each health centers had 1 general practitioner, 12–13 Nurses, 4 midwives, 2 lab technicians, 1 health officer and 1 pharmacist. Although there has been an influx of refugee from Eritrea to these camps, 75% of these refugees engaged in secondary migration to other countries [ 25 ]. Study design and period This study used multi-pronged approach methods and data to insure triangulation. A community-based cross sectional (additional file 1) for quantitative and a phenomenological design for the qualitative data (additional file 2) were employed from January 1 to February 1, 2017. Triangulation of methods and data has been accepted as valid and robust ways to expand the understanding of a particular topic and enhance validity and maximizes richness of the findings [ 26 ]. Study population Reproductive age group women, midwives/Nurses and a director from health center were participated in this study. Being a reproductive age, living in a specific camp at least for 3 months + and having residency ID were taken as inclusion criteria for participation. Adolescents below 18 years old without family/guardian were excluded from the study. Sample size and sampling process For cross sectional survey The sample size estimated using a single population proportion formula considering the following assumptions: 47.7% proportion of women used contraceptive methods in refugee camp found in Ethiopia [ 17 ], level of precision 4% and a 95% Confidence interval (z/2 1.96). The final sample size was 646, considering an 8% of non-response rate. A systematic sampling technique used to recruit study participants. First, census was done in each camp to identify households with eligible women. The total number of households with eligible women was registered and a corresponding house identification number was given to develop a sampling frame. A total of 646 eligible women recruited using this technique. The probability size allocation (PPS) technique was used to distribute the total sample size to each camp based on their population size (Adi-harush, 333/1860 and Mai-Aini 313/1750). For the focus group discussions (FGDs) and in depth interview (IDIs) Purposive sampling technique was used to select two FGD participants composed of 8–11 from each camp at community level. A total of 5 key informants composed of health center director, midwives, Nurses and health officers from the health centers were included. Saturation level was considered to limit the sample sized needed. Data collection tool and procedures For the cross sectional survey A structured closed-ended questionnaire in English (Additional file 1) were developed and translated to Tigrigna (local language). The questionnaire was containing the following parts: socio-demographic variables, reproductive and sexual health variables and source of information, and FP knowledge variables. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews. Eight data collectors and 4 supervisors whose professions were nurses and midwives were participated in data collection. For FGDs and IDIs A series of open-ended (Additional file 2) guiding questions; 16 questions under 5 sections and 15 questions under 4 sections were used in the FGDs and IDIs respectively. FGDs were conducted with reproductive age group women and IDIs with health care service providers at the health centers in a private setting. Homogeneity in terms of age, educational status and experience of RHS utilization was considered in the FGDs composition. Moreover, heterogeneity in religion was also considered for participation. The interviews were facilitated by the principal investigator with note takers from the research team and recorded through digital audio using tape. Key notes were taken during the discussion time by both facilitator and note taker and elaborated into more complete narratives in the debriefing cession after completion of each interview. The qualitative and quantitative data were collected side by side and participants might be participated in both interviews. Transcripts were prepared following the FGDs and IDIs data collection was completed. The FGDs and IDIs sessions lasted 1–2 hours. Study variables and measurement Dependent variable Contraceptive utilization was defined as when the women were utilizing any type of contraceptive during the data collection period. It was dichotomized in to “yes = 1 and no = 0”. Independent variables Socio-demographic variables : age, educational status, occupation, marital status, ethnicity, residence in country of origin, religion, source of income, husband education, migration status, and duration of stay in camp. Reproductive and sexual variables including decision making status : parity, number of living children, history of pregnancy, status of sexual intercourse, history of obstetrics complication, number of sexual partners, history of FP utilization in original country and decision maker status. Knowledge and practice on FP : level of awareness, source of information for FP, knowledge on the types of methods, knowledge on purpose of contraceptive and where to access the methods and the reasons why did not women use contraceptives and level of use. Quality of data was ensured through the following measurements: questionnaire was translated into local language and back to English for its consistency. Data collectors and supervisors were nurses and midwives by profession, fluent in local language and trained for two days. The questionnaire was pre-tested among 5% of the calculated sample size in Shimelba refugee camp. Supervision and checking of filled questionnaire were made by the research team daily. Qualitative data were digital audio recorded and notes were taken to serve as backup document. Rigor of the qualitative data ware maintained through credibility, transferability, dependability and conformability measurements. Data analysis and management Hard copy data was rechecked for completeness and consistency. Data were entered and screened for errors and cleaned using SPSS version 20 software. The data were checked for some assumptions prior to analysis. Descriptive analysis resulted in frequency, percent, mean/median and standard deviation and presented in the form of text, tables and figures. Variables with a p-value of < 0.25 in bivariate analysis were transported for multivariable logistic regression analysis to control confounders. The goodness of fit was tested by Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics and variables with a p-value > 0.05 were fitted to the multivariable model. The odds ratio along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed to ascertain the strength of association. Tests at a p-value of < 0.05 were considered as cut off points to limit the significance of the association. The audio taped qualitative data were transcribed using a verbatim method and translated in to English for analysis. The transcripts were read several times to identify key themes and developed a coding framework and the cods were grouped into similar categories. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis using ATLAS.ti software. Ethical Issue Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board (IERB) of Mekelle University, College of Health Sciences with a reference number of ERC 0894/2016. Letter of permission was obtained from Tigray regional Agency for refugees and returnees affairs (ARRA) office found in Shire Endaslasie for respective camps. Informed written consent was obtained from each study participants , after explaining the objectives, procedures, risk and benefit of participating in this study. For those whose age was less than 18 years and illiterate participants’ informed written consent was taken from legally authorized representative/guardians. Study participants were assured that all their information provided would be kept confidential and the result of the research would be published in aggregated form. Interviews were conducted in private setting. Participants also assured that participation in this study was completely voluntary. Results Socio-demographic characteristics Among the 646 sampled eligible women, 638 of them responded to the questionnaire completely, giving a response rate of 98.8%. The mean age of the respondents was 26.7 (SD + 7.2) years. More than half (54.5%) of the study participants were from Mayayni camp. The majority of the women, 528 (82.8%) were Tigrian, followed by Saho 87 (13.6%) and Tigre 23 (3.6) ethnicity. Orthodox Christianity was the predominant religion, 480(75.2%) followed by Muslim 84(13.2%), Catholic 49(7.7%) and Protestant 25(3.9%). About 366 (57.4%) of women were urban residents in their original country. All the refugees have monthly aid from UNCHR and other stakeholders. In addition to this, 145 (22.7%) have support from abroad relatives, 124 (19.4%) engaged in trade and 69 (10.8%) daily laborer ( Table 1 ). Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants in the Eritrean Refugee camps in Tselemti district, Tigray, Ethiopia, March 2017 Variables Frequency (N=638) Percent (%) Age 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 123 152 152 111 61 27 12 19.3 23.8 23.8 17.4 9.6 4.2 1.9 Marital status Married Single Divorced Separated Cohabitated widowed 336 184 44 40 21 13 52.7 28.8 6.9 6.3 3.3 2.0 Women Education Illiterate Able to write and read Elementary(1-8) Secondary(9-10) Diploma + 45 152 296 120 25 7.1 23.8 46.4 18.8 5.8 Husband Education (n=388) Illiterate Able to write and read Elementary(1-8) Secondary(9-10) Diploma and above 13 75 135 112 53 3.4 19.3 34.8 28.8 13.7 Migration status With husband and children With children only With husband only Only herself With family 184 127 68 256 3 28.8 19.9 10.7 40.1 .5 Time duration in camps( in months) 61 97 85 158 113 102 83 15.2 13.3 24.8 17.7 16 13 Having TV/Radio at home Yes No 143 496 22.4 77.6 Reproductive characteristics and decision making status Among the total study participants, 532 of them had history of sexual intercourse. Of these, 59 (11.1%), 159 (29.9%) and 314 (59%) participants had started sex at the age of less than 15, 15 - 17 and 18+ years old respectively. About 242 (37.9%) of respondents had history of reproductive health service utilization in their original country. Two-thirds, 424(66.5%) of participants had history of pregnancy. Among these, 245 (57.8%) of them were multiparous (2-4), 139(32.8%) primiparous, 30 (7.1%) grand multipara (5+) and 10 (2.4%) nulliparous. Around half, 315(49.4%) of the respondents decided themselves to use FPS, 90(14.1%) dependent on their spouse, 214(33.5%) jointly with their husbands and 19(3%) decided their family on behalf of them. About 246 (46.2%) of participants had discussion with their husbands about their reproductive goals. Knowledge of respondents on family planning The majority of the respondents, 569 (89.2%) have awareness on FPS. Source of information for participants was: 278 (48.8%) health professionals, 51(8.9%) media, 90 (15.7%) friends/neighbors and 150(26.5%) had multiple sources. The majority, 501(88%) of respondents know injection among the contraceptive methods ( Table 2 ). About 461 (81.0%) and 138(24.3%) of respondents reported that the purpose of contraceptive methods are to space and limit births respectively. About 518 (90%), 172 (30.2%), 93 (16.3%) and 90 (15.8%) of respondents know that contraceptive methods are available in public health facilities, community pharmacies, supermarkets and private clinics respectively. Table 2: Family planning knowledge characteristics of the participants among the refugee women in Tselemti district, Tigray, Ethiopia, March 2017 Variables Frequency(n=569) Percent (%) Know pill Yes No 360 209 63.3 36.7 Know injection Yes No 501 68 88.0 12.0 Know surgical method Yes No 21 548 3.7 96.3 Know emergency contraceptive Yes No 139 430 24.4 75.6 Know condom Yes No 260 309 45.7 54.3 Know Intra uterine contraceptive Device (IUCD) Yes No 113 456 19.9 80.1 Know implant Yes No 150 419 26.4 73.6 Know natural method Yes No 41 528 7.2 92.8 Contraceptive use About 344 (64.7%) of participants had ever used any contraceptive methods: 66(19.2%) in their original country and 278(80.8%) in the current refugee camps. In this study, Only 192(36.1%) of participants were using contraceptive methods: 140 (72.9%) for spacing and 52(27.1%) to limit birth at all. Injection type of contraceptive was the prevalent method utilized 115(59.9%), followed by implant 31(16.1%), IUCD 5(2.6%), condom 15(7.8%), pill 14(7.3%), EC 6(3.1%), surgical 2(1.1%) and natural methods 4(2.1%). About 150 (78.1%), 13 (6.8%), 5 (2.6%), 8(4.2%) and 16(8.3%) of respondents obtain contraceptive methods from health centers of the camps, public health facilities of the host community, private clinics, pharmacies and supermarkets respectively. The dominant reported reason for not using contraceptive methods was fertility desire 71(20.9%) (Figure1 ) and more than half 174(51.8%) of these had intention to use contraceptive methods in the future. Figure 1: Reasons given by the respondents why they did not use contraceptive methods in refugee camps 2017. Barriers associated with contraceptive use Cross tabulation and logistic regression analysis were carried out. Hence, age, residence, educational status, husband education, had discussion with their husbands, having Radio/TV at home, awareness on family planning and time duration in camps were made significance association on bivariate analysis at a p-value of <0. 25. These variables were exported into multivariable analysis. Therefore, having Radio/TV at home, place of residence at original country, having discussion with spouse focused on reproductive goals and time of duration in camps were significantly associated with contraceptive use at a p-value <0.05 . The odds of having Radio/TV at home were about 2.2 (AOR=2.207, 95% CI=1.244, 3.917) and living in urban areas in their original country were 2.6 more likely to use contraceptive methods when compared to their counterparts (AOR=2.593, 95% CI=1.513, 4.444). The odds of discussion with husbands on reproductive goals were 2.8 (AOR=2.817, 95% CI=1.681, 4.721). Living in camps about 2-3 and 3 + years were 4.1 and 2.2 times more likely to use contraceptive methods when compared to respondents lived in these camps for less than 1 year respectively (AOR=.4.065, 95% CI=1.845, 8.956, AOR=2.200, 95% CI=1.084, 4.466) ( Table 3 ). Table 3: Factors associated with contraceptive use among the Eritrean refugee women in Tselemti district, Tigray, Ethiopia, 2017. Variables (N=638) Contraceptive utilization Crude OR (CI= 95%) Adjusted OR (CI=95%) No n (%) Yes n (%) Age at interview 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45+ 33(58.9) 86(68.8) 92(62.6) 61(57.0) 36(61.0) 22(84.6) 10(83.3) 23(41.1) 39(31.2) 55(37.4) 46(43.0) 23(39.0) 4(15.4) 2(16.7) 1 .651(.339, 1.250) .858(.458, 1.608) 1.082(.562, 2.084) .917(.435, 1.934) .261(.079, .858) .287(.057, 1.434) 1 1.102(.336, 3.610) 1.073(.337, 3.420) 1.534(.474, 4.962) 1.821(.522, 6.359) .789(.132, 4.719) .301(.040, 2.237) Residence Urban Rural 178(59.1) 162(70.1) 123(40.9) 69(29.90 1.622(1.128, 2.334) 1 2.593(1.513, 4.444)** 1 Educational status Illiterate Elementary(1-8) Secondary(9-10) Diploma + 134(74.40 145(60.4) 49(53.8) 12(57.1) 46(25.6) 95(39.6) 42(46.2) 9(42.9) 1 1.909(1.250, 2.914) 2.497(1.468, 4.247) 2.185(.865, 5.520) 1 1.576(.860, 2.887) 1.972(.834, 4.664) 1.991(.389, 10.191) Husband Education Illiterate Elementary(1-8) Secondary(9-10) Diploma and above 69(79.3) 85(63.4) 63(56.2) 28(53.8) 18(20.7) 49(36.6) 49(43.8) 24(46.2) 1 2.210(1.181, 4.135) 2.981(1.574, 5.649) 3.286 (1.548, 6.974) 1 1.742(.815, 3.725) 1.753(.761, 4.038) 1.366(.487, 3.827) Back to home without getting service Yes No 6(37.5) 334(64.7) 10(62.5) 182(35.3) 1 .327(.117, .914) 1 .303(.090, 1.024) Had discussion on reproductive goals with spouse Yes No 131(53.3) 209(73.1) 115(46.7) 77(26.9) 2.383(1.659, 3.422) 1 2.817(1.681, 4.721)** 1 Had Radio/TV at home Yes No 58(50.4) 282(67.6) 57(49.6) 135(32.4) 2.053(1.350, 3.122) 1 2.207(1.244, 3.917)* 1 Awareness on family planning service Yes No 304(61.5) 36(94.7) 190(38.5) 2(5.3) 11.250(2.678,47.264) 1 10.039(1.267, 79.558) 1 Time duration in camps (in months ) <12 12-24 25-36 37+ 107(72.3) 41(68.4) 46(49.5) 107(61.5) 41(27.7) 37(31.6) 47(50.5) 67(38.5) 1 1.207(.710,2.052) 2.666(1.549, 4.589) 1.634(1.019, 2.620) 1 1.698(.784, 3.677) 4.065(1.845, 8.956)** 2.200(1.084, 4.466)* ** Significantly associated at p-value <0.001 and * significantly associated at p-value<.029 COR=crude odds ratio, AOR=Adjusted odds ratio, CI=Confidence interval Focus Group Discussions result Two FGDs from each camp were conducted with a total of 41 participants using local language. Belifes, Accessibility of FP services and source of information for FP Most of discussants believed that a woman/girl can start using contraceptive methods since the age of 15-18 years old, especially if she is married. They also highlighted the importance of especial counseling for underage girls about contraceptives use. All discussants from both camps revealed that availability of certain contraceptive methods like; Depo-Provera and progesterone only pills (POP) were inturupted occasionally. FPS were available from Monday to Friday however sometimes interuptued due to meeting. All the participants confirmed that adolescents were get FPS in the same room with adult clients. The sources of information for RHS were community health workers (CHW) and health facilities and the education was supported with mini-media. The CHWs teach the community about RH issues by moving from block to block at community level. They have a coffee ceremony program and select family models for recognition among the community based on their RHS seeking behavior. Decision making status Almost all the women agreed that a joint decision made with their husbands to use contraceptives. However, they did not close that there were some husbands who are autocratic toward their wives in using contraceptive methods. ‘‘In fact, in marriage joint decision is important; especially husband should understand the problem of their wives. There are some women who couldn’t use family planning services. Because their husbands consider that the whole purpose of marriage is to produce children and most of these husbands are illiterate” (Para- 5, 38 years old). Contraceptives use and challenges Majority of the women reported that contraceptive methods were more utilized by married women or who had history of delivery as compared to underage and unmarried girls. Participants disclosed that most of under age (<18) girls were not using the FPS due to embracement and the community stigma; rather they preferred to use services in private clinics and pharmacies found in the district. “For example, of course there is no restriction based on age and marital status to access and use the RHS, but the attitude of the community is not the same for me and if a 15 years old lady comes to health center looking FPS” (A 30 years old woman, para-3). The other woman also said “How can underage girls use contraceptive methods since community health workers taught them to avoid sex at early age?” [Para 2, 36 years old] Few women underlined that there were infidelity women who used contraceptive methods secretly from pharmacy and private clinics due to fear of stigma from the community. “There are women whom I know use contraceptive methods from pharmacy in the host district and I asked them why they do not use from the health center found in the camp, but they told me that some of them are married but their husband lives in abroad. And some of them were unmarried and live with their family. Therefore, they preferred private pharmacies to avoid stigma from the community“(Para-1 a 31 years old woman ). Some women stated that injection and oral pills were the predominately used contraceptive methods. However, when these methods were unavailable, health care providers insisted users to use long-acting contraceptive methods even though women are usually not convenient due to side effect like; wasting of hair, weight change; head lightness and fertility desire as reasons. “When a woman uses implant, there is an instruction from the service providers that implants are expensive and it has to be used for 3-5 years effectively. However, the woman may want to remove this implant due to some reasons. Then what she can do? If she goes for removal, health care providers are not cooperative and they insist her to continue the method” (Para_2, a 36 years old). All participants were explained that religion was the predominately mentioned reason followed by myths and side effects for non-use of contraceptive methods. In-depth interview with care providers We had conducted in-depth interview with a total of 5 key informants (3 from Adi-Harush and the rest from Mai-Aini) focusing on 4 themes similarly to FGD: believes, accessibility, use of contraceptives and challenges. Beliefs and Accessibility of contraceptives All key informants believed that all age groups of refugee women can use FPS because they are vulnerable for unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion. They also affirmed that the interruption of certain methods and closure of services during meeting hours that was reported by the FGDs participants. In addition, lack of effective counseling, negligence, shortage of midwives and lack of duty payment for extra hours were mentioned as reasons for inaccessibility. Family planning use and challenges Women found in the age between 18-30 years old were the most users of contraceptive methods. Depo-Provera was the most preferred type of contraceptive method followed by implants whereas FGD participants rank oral contraceptive method was the second. Some of the women use natural type of methods due to religion and side effect reasons. All key informants acknowledged that contraceptive utilization was not to the expected among refugees. Three of the key informants pointed out that rate of contraceptive utilization were unpredictable in refugee camps. When the refugees have a plan to migrate to other secondary country, a large proportion of women visit the health center for use of contraceptive methods especially implants to avoid unwanted pregnancy along the journey. On the other side, some refugees consider these camps as the right place for child delivery since they are idle. In addition, they assumed that if they would go to Europe, they would be busy as well to replace their generation in case one of the couple dies along the journey. Two key informants suggested that the low utilization could be due to the effect of pronatal policy in Eritrea. Husband influence, religion particularly Muslim and Saho and to some extent Christian followers were nominated as factors for non-utilization of contraceptives. “For example, there was a Muslim woman whom I know she gave 3 births within 5 years of duration” (a 38 years old midwife). Saho ethnic was the most known for non-use of contraceptive methods due to their husband’s opposition. “I know one Muslim woman from ethnic Saho. She was using contraceptive methods anonymously and one day her husband came and told us why you had given it to my wife without my permission and told us that he would accuse us” They also confirmed that adolescent girls and unmarried ladies were low utilizers of contraceptive methods which were mentioned by the FGDs with similar reasons. Resistance for use of contraceptive observed among the age group of >30 years. Discussion This study is a part of a large study which was conducted on utilization of reproductive health services and barriers among Eritrean refugees. On this topic we discuss the utilization of contraceptive methods and associated factors, including the qualitative findings, especially about the hindering factors. We also discuss the implications of the findings for FP program improvement. This study showed that more than one-third of the respondents were used contraceptive methods during the interview time and large proportion of respondents had awareness on contraceptive methods. Adolescents were limited to access FP services. Use of contraceptive was varied by the following factors: having Radio/TV at home, residence, discussion with spouse and duration of stay in camps. Limited availability of certain contraceptive methods, staff meeting in working hours, religion, myths and side effects, lack of effective counseling, shortage of staffs and community stigma for adolescents and unmarried girls were mentioned as barriers to access FPS by the FGDs and IDIs participants. The current prevalence of contraceptive use(CPU) is similar with the findings from Amman and Syrian refugees, where 31.9% and 34.5% of women were using contraceptive methods respectively [ 27 , 28 ]. It was also similar with the host country’s CPR, (41%) mini EDHS 2019 [ 13 ]. However, the current finding was higher when compared to findings from a study conducted in six countries of Africa and Asia and a study conducted in Kenya, where only 19.9% and 19.2% of respondents were used contraceptives respectively [ 29 , 30 ]. It was also higher when compared to their origin country, where only 8.4% of all Eritrean women use contraceptive methods. Moreover, 27.4% of Eritrean women had unmet need for contraceptive methods [ 31 ]. This difference might be due to the intervention that has been taking place by ARRA, IRC and other stockholders on this community. There were about 42 community health workers in each camp whose main task was to mobilize the community and promote RH service utilization in the community. In addition to this, the host country’s strong policy on FP promotion and the intervention taken might also influence these refugees. On the other side, CPR in refugee camps of Shimelba, Ethiopia and Jordan were 47.7% and 43% respectively, which was higher in prevalence than this study [ 17 , 32 ]. This could be as a result of difference in setting and the health care workers commitment. In general, the level of contraceptive utilization in this community was far away from the global and national aspirations. Moreover, both the FGDs and IDIs participants also affirmed that contraceptive use in respective camps was low. This indicates that coverage of FP utilization is not on track to achieve the goals outlined in the universal and local documents, like the goals of ICPD advocacy for universal access to FP, FP2020, SDGs and the Ethiopian health sector transformation plan [ 6 , 9 , 8 , 10 ]. The limited availability of certain contraceptive methods reported in this study similarly observed in other studies conducted elsewhere within similar refugee settings [ 14 , 29 , 33 , 34 ]. The combination of this low utilization and limited availability of contraception increases the risk of unintended pregnancy, unsafe abortion and its morbidity. Improving the access to contraception and effective use of contraceptive methods in humanitarian setting could avert about 90% of unsafe abortion-related morbidity and 29% of maternal deaths [ 15 ]. By method, Injection was the most utilized contraceptive method followed by implants. This finding is consistent with the EDHS, 2019 of the host country and other local studies conducted in refugee camps [ 13 , 17 , 35 , 36 ]. About 88% of participants in this study know injection contraceptive method; this in turn may trigger women to use this contraceptive method. However, injection was the second most utilized contraceptive method in Shedder refugee camp in Ethiopia [ 18 ]. In another refugee camp, it also revealed that IUCD was the most popular method followed by oral contraceptive pills [ 37 ]. This difference could be as a result of health workers' counseling skills and availability of the methods across the health facilities. Around 90% of women had awareness about contraceptive methods in this study. A study conducted in the same refugee camps (79%) supports this finding [ 33 ]. Other reports from shedder camp 94.5% [ 18 ], Shimelba camp 95.4% [ 17 ] and a multicounty study 74% [ 29 ] affirm this evidence. Having TV/Radio at home was a significant factor for contraceptive use in this study. In fact, we could not get similar finding from a similar setting however in the general population, media is a significant factor [ 38 , 39 ]. Obviously, we know that media is a key strategy in changing community behavior. Discussion with husbands about reproductive goals was a significant factor. Similar findings from Somali regional state of Ethiopia and Pakistan support this current study [ 18 , 19 ]. Discussion regarding reproductive goals among couples might create mutual understanding between the parties; this in turn may lead them to use contraceptive methods. Living for longer duration in camps was another significant factor of this study. Even though there was no similar study in refugee setting, one study from the general population illustrated this fact. This might be justified as living for longer duration in a specific camp could provide an opportunity to be familiar with the health care system [ 40 ]. This study was also revealed that urban residency in their original country was a significant factor. This evidence is reported in many studies of the general population [ 41 , 42 ]. The population and health survey 2010 of Eritrea reported that use of contraceptive were high among urban residents [ 43 ]. This could be the attributions of awareness and knowledge difference in seeking contraceptive methods. Better access to service is also expected in urban areas. Participants of FGDs and IDIs were mentioned many barriers for use of FPS. Both groups underlined the husbands’ oppositions to access FPS because of desire to have many children and religious reasons. Qualitative studies conducted in refugee camps illustrated this finding [ 16 , 20 , 34 , 44 ]. They also reported poor uptake of contraceptive methods was observed among Muslim and ethnic Saho. Many studies ascertained this fact even though there is no conclusive answer why this phenomenon happened [ 16 , 20 , 44 ]. Another essential deterring factors to contraceptive use were fear of side effects, misinformation and misconceptions which could be anticipated or the real ones that women encounter every day. A number of qualitative studies from different corner of the world in refugee settings have reported these findings [ 16 , 20 , 34 , 44 ]. Erroneous information associated with contraception use could be the result of users and providers attempting to understand the contraceptive mechanism of action or sometimes the potential side effects could be the bases for a wide range of misconceptions. This could be propagated through unofficial social networks in the community. Side effects are the major reasons for discontinuation of contraceptive use, which can lead to unintended pregnancy and its consequences [ 45 , 46 ]. Many studies from community and health facilities confirmed that contraceptive uptake among Adolescents and unmarried women were poor due to community stigma and norms, which are also the findings of this study [ 14 , 29 , 47 ]. Strengths and Limitation This study assessed the status of FP among the vulnerable group using a triangulation method. This in turn can incite stakeholders and FP program managers to look on the existed strategies and to improve access of the service. In any study, it is natural to have risk of bias. However, we have tried to curtail these problems through triangulation of methodologies and data. Inherently, qualitative studies have limitations to generalize for the population in target. Nonetheless, we have tried to curtail this limitation through quantitative measurement at large. Among the limitations of this study, adolescents below 18 years old without family/guardian did not included in this study due to ethical issue, but they could be sexually active at the time of data collection and the may suffer the aftermath of the an unwanted pregnancy. Therefore the findings of this study may not be generalized to this group. Moreover, since the data were self-reported bias might be introduced by participants due to memory loss. Conclusion Our findings showed that the contraceptive utilization in the refugee camps was unacceptable when compared to the global and national plan. This study also demonstrates the effect of media, place of residence, discussion with spouse on reproductive goals and duration of residence in camps for contraceptive use. Limited availability of certain contraceptives, lack of separate service for adolescents, fertility desire, misconceptions, side effects, husband’s opposition, resettlement, religion, community stigma towards adolescents and unmarried girls were stated as the reasons for non-use of contraceptives by FGDs and IDIs participants. This implies that many of the refugees are at risk of unwanted pregnancy with its complication and increased maternal mortality. Recommendations ARRA should increase the number of midwives and adjust meeting hours other than the working days in health facilities. ARRA, UNHCR and other stakeholders should strengthen contraceptives and other logistics provision to the health centers. Health care providers should reinforce the health education system focusing on both gender empowerments, involvement of husbands during FPS provisions, counseling to couples about myths and side effects and community stigma on FP use through media as well in person. Especial attention should be given for adolescent reproductive health service provision separately by UNHCR, ARRA and other stakeholders should involve in this program. They should also emphasis on religion leaders to involve in health education and should focus on fertility issue and its impact on the health of mothers. Abbreviations ARRA – Administration for Refugee and Returnee Affaires AOR- Adjusted odd ratio CHW- Community Health Workers EDHS -Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey FGD- Focus group discussion FP- Family planning FPS -Family Planning Service HSTP -Health Sector Transformation Plan ICPD- International conference on population and development IUCD -Intra Uterine Contraceptive Device NGO- Non-governmental organization RH- Reproductive health RSH- Reproductive and sexual health SDG -Sustainable Development Goal UNHCR- United Nation Higher Commission for Refugee UN- United Nation Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board (IERB) of Mekelle University, College of Health Sciences with a reference number of ERC 0894/2016 and all methods were carried out in accordance with the principles of protocols and guidelines recommended by the Declaration of Helsinki. Letter of permission was obtained from Tigray regional Agency for refugees and returnees affairs (ARRA) office found in Shire Endaslasie for respective camps. Informed written consent was obtained from the study participants after explaining the objectives, procedures, risk and benefit of participating in this study. Informed written consent was obtained from legally authorized representative/guardians for those whose age was less than 18 years and illiterate participants’. Study participants were assured that all their information provided would be kept confidential and the result of the research would be published in aggregated form. Interviews were conducted in private setting. Participants also assured that participation in this study was completely voluntary. Consent for publication Not applicable Availability of data and materials The data that supports the findings of this study are not included in this publication as additional file because this study was assessed/includes utilization of multiple reproductive health services which are large datasets and under process for journal submission. Therefore, we consider it is not worthy publicly available. But it is available annexed with the large dataset from the corresponding author if it is necessary and timely. Competing interests The authors declared that they have no competing interests. Funding This research was funded by Mekelle University as recurrent budget for small scale grant research with a grant number of CRPO/CHS/SM/006/09. College of Health Sciences under Mekelle University was responsible in monitoring and evaluation of the project but it was not involved in any work of this study. The fund was not including for publication process. Author contributions The corresponding author (SWG), participated in selection of topic, development of the entire proposal, monitoring data collection; analysis, manuscript preparation and funding acquisition. GA, and AB involved in the conception of the study, data collection and analysis. KZ involved in analysis and manuscript preparation All authors read, edited and approved the manuscript draft. Acknowledgement We thank Mekelle University for the opportunity and sponsorship to conduct this study. We thank ARRA office for their support in providing information and letter of permission. We would like also to thank all respondents and participants of this study for their precious time invested in sharing their experience. Authors’ details 1 Mekelle University, College of Health Sciences Department of Midwifery, Tigray, Ethiopia 2 Mekelle University, College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, department of pediatrics, Tigray Ethiopia References UNHCR. Mid-year trends. https://www.unhcr.org/statistics/unhcrstats/635a578f4/mid-year-trends-2022.html (2022). UNHCR. Trends at a Glance, 2018 review. Equus [Internet]. (265), 68 (2018). WHO Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (WHO/SRH) and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/ Center for Communication Programs (CCP), Knowledge success. Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers (2022 update). Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO (2022). WHO. Family planning / contraception, fact sheet [Internet]. World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception (2018). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs PD (2017). World Family Planning 2017-highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/414) (2017). ICPD. ICPD beyond 2014 high-level global commitments implementing the population and development agenda. ICPD beyond (2014) Every woman every child 2015. The global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health (2016–2030). United Nations Secretary-General. Inter-Agency Working Group(2015). Johnston R.B. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Arsen Res Glob Sustain - Proc 6th Int Congr Arsen Environ AS. 12–4 (2016) Foundation M.G. London Summit on Family Planning- Accountability Annex Taking forward FP2020 Summit commitments. 1–2: http://ec2-54-210-230-186.compute-1.amazonaws.com/wp content/uploads/2014/10/ Accountability_Annex_Final_8_July.pdf (2012) EFoMH. Health Sector Transformation Plan (2015/16-2019/20). 20, 1–118 (2015). EMoH. Costed implementation plan for family planning in ethiopia, 2015/16–2020. Minist Heal [Internet]. file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/2021–2030_EthiopiaCIPNov.pdf (2016). Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF. 2016. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: CSA and ICF (2016). Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) [Ethiopia] and ICF. 2021. Ethiopia mini demographic and health survey 2019: Final Report. Rockville, Maryland, USA: EPHI and ICF. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR363/FR363.pdf (2019). Women’s Refugee Commission. A clear case for need and demand: Accessing contraceptive services for Rohingya women and girls in Cox ’ s Bazar case study: https://www.womensrefugeecommission.org/srh2016/resources/document/download/1802 (2019). Inter Agency Working Group(IAWG). Inter-Agency Field Manual on reproductive health in humanitarian setting. (2018). Ackerson K., Zielinski R. Factors influencing use of family planning in women living in crisis affected areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of the literature. Midwifery. 54, 35–60 (2017). Seyife A., Fisseha G., Yebyo H., Gidey G., Gerensea H. Utilization of modern contraceptives and predictors among women in Shimelba refugee camp, Northern Ethiopia. PLoS One. 14, 1–11(2019). Tadesse K., Seifu W. Why refugee women didn’t use modern contraceptives? Lesson from women in Shedder refugee camp, Ethiopian Somali Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia. 2014. Gynecol Obstet. 07(03), 3–8 (2017). Raheel H., Karim M.S., Saleem S., Bharwani S. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of contraception among Afghan refugee women in Pakistan: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 7(11), 1–7(2012). Kiur A.W. Constrained agency : Perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Somali refugee women on family planning [Internet]. %0A%0A%0Awww.semanticscholar.org › paper › constrained-agenc...%0A%0A (2012). Prawira Y. Challenges and opportunities of hosting Eritrean refugees in Northern Ethiopia: From the local community perspective. MU-JPSSS. 1(1), 1–23(2019). UNHCR Ethiopia A. Adi-Harush refuee camp profile. [Internet]. Data2.unhcr.org › documents › details%0A(2018). UNHCR Ethiopia A. Mai-aini refugee camp profile. Reliefweb.int › report › ethiopia › mai-ai (2018). ARRA. Administration for Refugees and Returnees Affairs [Internet]. 9,. arra.et › wp-content › uploads › 2014/05%0A (2016). Immigrants USC for R. Forgotten refugees: Eritrean children in Northern Ethiopia. Can fam Physician [Internet]. 1–20. Reliefweb.int › report › forgotten-refuge (2015). Yeasmin S., Rahman.K.F. Triangulation, research method as the tool of social science research. Bup J [Internet]. 1(1), 154–63. http://www.bup.edu.bd/journal/154-163.pdf (2012). UNHCR, women’s refugee commission. Refocusing family planning in refugee settings: Findings and recommendations from a multi-country baseline study [Internet]. www.womensrefugeecommission.org › r (2011). Reese M. A., Usta J., Gupta J., Ettinger A.S. Assessment of reproductive health and violence against women. BMC Womens Health. 14(1), 25. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/14/25 (2014). Tanabe M., et al. Family planning in refugee settings: findings and actions from a multi-country study. Confl Health. 11(1), 1–12 (2017). Choge M.C. Contraceptive uptake among women of reproductive age in Kakuma refugee camp in Turkana county, Kenya. 84(2012). UNFPA. Assessment of the government of the state of eritrea (gose) - unfpa fifth country programme (2017–2021). https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/board-documents/Eritrea%20-%20CPE%20-%20Country%20Programme%20Evaluation_%20Aug%202020.pdf (2020). Pierce H. Reproductive health care utilization among refugees in Jordan: Provisional support and domestic violence. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 15, (2019). Gebrecherkos K., et.al. Unmet need for modern contraception and associated factors among reproductive age group women in Eritrean refugee camps, Tigray, north Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes [Internet]. 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3956-7 (2018). Cherri Z., Cuesta J.G., Rodriguez-Llanes J.M., Guha-Sapir D. Early marriage and barriers to contraception among syrian refugee women in lebanon: A qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 14(8), (2017). Casey S.E., et.al. Availability of long-acting and permanent family-planning methods leads to increase in use in conflict-affected northern Uganda: Evidence from cross-sectional baseline and endline cluster surveys. Glob Public Health. 8(3), 284–97 (2013). Srikanok S., et al. Empirical lessons regarding contraception in a protracted refugee setting: A descriptive study from Maela camp on the Thai-Myanmar border 1996–2015. PLoS One. 12(2), 1–15(2017). USAID. Family planning among Syrian refugees in Jordan [Internet]. http://www.tawasol-jo.org/sites/default/files/family_planning_among_syrian_refugees_in_jordan_0.pdf (2016). Ajaero C.K., Odimegwu C., Ajaero I.D, Nwachukwu C.A. Access to mass media messages, and use of family planning in Nigeria: A spatio-demographic analysis from the 2013 DHS. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 16(1), 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2979-z (2016). Bajoga U.A., Atagame K.L., Okigbo C.C. Media influence on sexual activity and contraceptive use: A cross sectional survey among young women in urban Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 19(3), 100–10 (2015). Komasawa M, et.al. Demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods and its associated factors among married women of reproductive age in rural Jordan: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One [Internet]. 15(3), 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.023042 (2020). Yarger J., Decker M.J., Campa M.I., Brindis C.D. Rural–Urban differences in awareness and use of family planning services among adolescent women in california. J Adolesc Heal. 60(4), 395–401 (2017). International Rescue Committee (IRC). Impossible nowhere family planning for women and girls in crises. NEW YORK. https://www.rescue.org/report/impossible-nowhere-family-planning-women-and-girls-crises (2015). National Statistics Office (NSO) [Eritrea] and Fafo AIS.. Eritrea population and health survey 2010. Asmara, Eritrea: National Statistics Office and Fafo Institute for Appled International Studies (2013). Davidson A.S., Fabiyi C., Demissie S., Getachew H., Gilliam M.L. Is LARC for everyone? A qualitative study of sociocultural perceptions of family planning and contraception among refugees in Ethiopia. Matern Child Health J. 21(9), 1699–705 (2017). Alvergne A., Stevens R., Gurmu E. Side effects and the need for secrecy: characterising discontinuation of modern contraception and its causes in Ethiopia using mixed methods. Contracept Reprod Med. 2(1), 1–16 (2017). Jain A.K., Winfrey W. Contribution of contraceptive discontinuation to unintended births in 36 developing countries. Stud Fam Plann. 48(3), 269–78 (2017). Casey S.E., Chynoweth S.K., Cornier N., Gallagher M.C., Wheeler E.E. Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: mixed-methods case studies. 9(1), 1–13(2015). Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files Additionalfile1forCrosssectionalQuestionnairepdf.pdf Additionalfile2forFGDsandIDIsquestionnaire2pdf.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3815580","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":264283827,"identity":"23310438-7e7f-4ab3-9ad5-0146de9d3c56","order_by":0,"name":"Solomon Weldemariam Gebrehiwot","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Mekelle University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Solomon","middleName":"Weldemariam","lastName":"Gebrehiwot","suffix":""},{"id":264283828,"identity":"ac79918c-8e20-466f-9859-4b315ba9ca63","order_by":1,"name":"Gedamu Abera","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Mekelle University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gedamu","middleName":"","lastName":"Abera","suffix":""},{"id":264283829,"identity":"41595456-7291-469c-83c5-e6d0014c2e4f","order_by":2,"name":"Almaz Berhe","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Mekelle University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Almaz","middleName":"","lastName":"Berhe","suffix":""},{"id":264283830,"identity":"468346f1-6bdf-4332-9016-6654cf26b8db","order_by":3,"name":"Kahsay Zenebe","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Mekelle University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kahsay","middleName":"","lastName":"Zenebe","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2023-12-28 08:29:25","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3815580/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3815580/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":49126749,"identity":"d32850da-6a39-43a3-9dc1-c1644cd77ca9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-03 14:57:51","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":11127,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eReasons given by the respondents why they did not use contraceptive methods in refugee camps 2017.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Onlinedrawingimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3815580/v1/033c0448f79f5ab5f2bd2523.png"},{"id":55264916,"identity":"9a9a6d4b-2494-48ca-b963-667d02fad133","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-04-25 01:50:52","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1104810,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3815580/v1/2a2bd637-97a5-40c3-8dbc-3fc305376228.pdf"},{"id":49128328,"identity":"8d4ad2c5-c5e1-471c-81a9-d55f79ed5cb2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-03 15:05:51","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":614660,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Additionalfile1forCrosssectionalQuestionnairepdf.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3815580/v1/0aa292e30bdbbc287dc1a6f7.pdf"},{"id":49126750,"identity":"14464330-8257-4adb-b1f3-d691ba0d33b6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-03 14:57:51","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":438275,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Additionalfile2forFGDsandIDIsquestionnaire2pdf.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3815580/v1/742e67fe7103931e125b60ea.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Barriers to contraceptive utilization among Reproductive Age Women of Eritrean Refugee in North West Tigray, Ethiopia: a mixed study","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAn estimated 103\u0026nbsp;million population have been forcibly displaced worldwide by the middle of 2022 as a result of persecution, conflict and violence [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. Eritrea contributed around 507,300 of refugees to the world in 2018 and most of (57%) these refugees were hosted by Ethiopia (174,000) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. Women and girls accounted for 48% of these refugees [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccess to information and high-quality family planning (FP) service are fundamental to realize the rights and well-being of women, men and adolescents. Universal access to effective contraception safeguards a sustaining sexual life and can avoid the adverse health and socioeconomic aftermaths of unintended pregnancy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. Similarly, People living in humanitarian settings are entitled to this right. FP is the most proven and cost-effective strategy in reducing maternal and child morbidity and mortality and improves schooling and economic outcomes among women [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. Universal access to FP could prevent nearly one-third of the estimated 300,000 maternal deaths yearly [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e] and reduce an unintended pregnancy, abortion and newborn deaths by 70%, 67% and 77% respectively [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]. The return on investment in family planning estimated to be US\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e120 for every US\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e1 spent [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMany initiatives and interventions on FP promotion have been launched and implemented globally as well as nationally. The 1994 ICPD programmes which advocates on the basic right of all couples to decide freely and responsibly on the number of children they would have and the means to do so [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 targeted to reduce maternal mortality ration to less than 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030 through universal access to sexual and reproductive health care services, including for FP[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. The FP2020 also aimed to address 120\u0026nbsp;million additional contraceptive users by 2020 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e] Likewise, Ethiopia produced essential strategic planning documents in FP over the past decade. The Health Sector Transformation Plan (HSTP II) which aimed at scaling up FP to reach an additional 6.2\u0026nbsp;million users and to increase contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) to 55% and reduced fertility to 3 by 2020 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. The country has also developed a FP Costed Implementation Plan in 2015 which serves as a blueprint for the implementation of the FP goal outlined in the HSTP [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEthiopia has been made a significant progress in improving the access to quality FP in the past two decades through a right-based approach [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. As a result, maternal mortality has declined from 871 in 2000 to 412 per 100,000 live births in 2016 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e] and CPR increased from 14% in 2005 to 41% in 2019 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite encouraging progress has been made in FP coverage; women found in developing countries, especially in humanitarian settings, encountered many challenges in accessing and utilizing FP services. Occasionally, national strategies and programs failed to address effectively the refugees reproductive health needs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. Early or forced sex, sexual exploitation, transactional sex, risk-taking behaviors and exposure to high-risk situations are characterstics of refugees due to loss social structure and protective mechanisms [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. Over 220\u0026nbsp;million women, most of who are from developing countries, have unmet need for modern contraceptive methods [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. CPR is reported at averagely 42% in Sub-Saharan Africa [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e] where as in Ethiopia, it is reported at 47.7% [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e] and 17.8% [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e] from refugee settings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLow CPR is associated with religion, distance to health facilities, knowledge on FP, lack of information, mistrust in the safety of contraceptives, prior negative experience, age, educational status, poor quality service, decision making status, number of live children, residence, marital status, occupational status, misconceptions and language barriers in many studies [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCurrently, there is a dearth of information on the use of contraceptives and factors actassociated with utilization in refugee women, particularly in the study area. The unique situation of refugee women compounded with the existed poor health system in the country, most likely results in high an unmet need for FP. A scarcity of information in such a marginalized population leads to ineffective FP service provision at place. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the barriers and challenges that are associated with the uptake of contraceptive use among refugee women.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStudy setting\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere were four Eritrean refugee camps namely: Hitsats, Shimelba, Adi-Harush and Mai-Aini in Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. This study took place at the two refugee camps (Mai-Aini and Adi-Harush) located in Tselemti district, the North West zone of Tigray. These refugee camps were opened in May 2008 and March 2010 respectively [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. These camps located at 367 and 384 Kms North-West of Mekelle the capital city of Tigray region respectively. The Government of Ethiopia manages all the refugee camps through the Administration for Refugee and Returnee Affairs (ARRA) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. Along with ARRA, United Nation Higher Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Rescue Committee (IRC) supported the health service system entirely [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. According to ARRA 2016 report, these camps were homes to an estimated 80,422 (Mai-Aini\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;31,091and Adi-Harush\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;49331) registered refugees from Eritrea [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. Women were accounted 40%-45% of this population [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. The health centers found in these camps provide Basic Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (BEmONC) services, including FP services. However, mothers referred to the nearby district primary hospital, Mytsebre, for Comprehensive EmONC service and surgical contraceptive methods. Sometimes women may refer to General/specialized hospital found in Shire and Mekelle for further obstetrical complications diagnosis and management. Each health centers had 1 general practitioner, 12\u0026ndash;13 Nurses, 4 midwives, 2 lab technicians, 1 health officer and 1 pharmacist. Although there has been an influx of refugee from Eritrea to these camps, 75% of these refugees engaged in secondary migration to other countries [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStudy design and period\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study used multi-pronged approach methods and data to insure triangulation. A community-based cross sectional (additional file 1) for quantitative and a phenomenological design for the qualitative data (additional file 2) were employed from January 1 to February 1, 2017. Triangulation of methods and data has been accepted as valid and robust ways to expand the understanding of a particular topic and enhance validity and maximizes richness of the findings [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStudy population\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eReproductive age group women, midwives/Nurses and a director from health center were participated in this study. Being a reproductive age, living in a specific camp at least for 3 months\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;and having residency ID were taken as inclusion criteria for participation. Adolescents below 18 years old without family/guardian were excluded from the study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSample size and sampling process\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFor cross sectional survey\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe sample size estimated using a single population proportion formula considering the following assumptions: 47.7% proportion of women used contraceptive methods in refugee camp found in Ethiopia [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e], level of precision 4% and a 95% Confidence interval (z/2 1.96). The final sample size was 646, considering an 8% of non-response rate. A systematic sampling technique used to recruit study participants. First, census was done in each camp to identify households with eligible women. The total number of households with eligible women was registered and a corresponding house identification number was given to develop a sampling frame. A total of 646 eligible women recruited using this technique. The probability size allocation (PPS) technique was used to distribute the total sample size to each camp based on their population size (Adi-harush, 333/1860 and Mai-Aini 313/1750).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFor the focus group discussions (FGDs) and in depth interview (IDIs)\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePurposive sampling technique was used to select two FGD participants composed of 8\u0026ndash;11 from each camp at community level. A total of 5 key informants composed of health center director, midwives, Nurses and health officers from the health centers were included. Saturation level was considered to limit the sample sized needed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eData collection tool and procedures\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFor the cross sectional survey\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA structured closed-ended questionnaire in English (Additional file 1) were developed and translated to Tigrigna (local language). The questionnaire was containing the following parts: socio-demographic variables, reproductive and sexual health variables and source of information, and FP knowledge variables. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews. Eight data collectors and 4 supervisors whose professions were nurses and midwives were participated in data collection.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFor FGDs and IDIs\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA series of open-ended (Additional file 2) guiding questions; 16 questions under 5 sections and 15 questions under 4 sections were used in the FGDs and IDIs respectively. FGDs were conducted with reproductive age group women and IDIs with health care service providers at the health centers in a private setting. Homogeneity in terms of age, educational status and experience of RHS utilization was considered in the FGDs composition. Moreover, heterogeneity in religion was also considered for participation. The interviews were facilitated by the principal investigator with note takers from the research team and recorded through digital audio using tape. Key notes were taken during the discussion time by both facilitator and note taker and elaborated into more complete narratives in the debriefing cession after completion of each interview. The qualitative and quantitative data were collected side by side and participants might be participated in both interviews. Transcripts were prepared following the FGDs and IDIs data collection was completed. The FGDs and IDIs sessions lasted 1\u0026ndash;2 hours.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStudy variables and measurement\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDependent variable\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eContraceptive utilization was defined as when the women were utilizing any type of contraceptive during the data collection period. It was dichotomized in to \u0026ldquo;yes\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1 and no\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eIndependent variables\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eSocio-demographic variables\u003c/b\u003e: age, educational status, occupation, marital status, ethnicity, residence in country of origin, religion, source of income, husband education, migration status, and duration of stay in camp. \u003cb\u003eReproductive and sexual variables including decision making status\u003c/b\u003e: parity, number of living children, history of pregnancy, status of sexual intercourse, history of obstetrics complication, number of sexual partners, history of FP utilization in original country and decision maker status. \u003cb\u003eKnowledge and practice on FP\u003c/b\u003e: level of awareness, source of information for FP, knowledge on the types of methods, knowledge on purpose of contraceptive and where to access the methods and the reasons why did not women use contraceptives and level of use.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuality of data was ensured through the following measurements: questionnaire was translated into local language and back to English for its consistency. Data collectors and supervisors were nurses and midwives by profession, fluent in local language and trained for two days. The questionnaire was pre-tested among 5% of the calculated sample size in Shimelba refugee camp. Supervision and checking of filled questionnaire were made by the research team daily. Qualitative data were digital audio recorded and notes were taken to serve as backup document. Rigor of the qualitative data ware maintained through credibility, transferability, dependability and conformability measurements.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eData analysis and management\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHard copy data was rechecked for completeness and consistency. Data were entered and screened for errors and cleaned using SPSS version 20 software. The data were checked for some assumptions prior to analysis. Descriptive analysis resulted in frequency, percent, mean/median and standard deviation and presented in the form of text, tables and figures. Variables with a p-value of \u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.25 in bivariate analysis were transported for multivariable logistic regression analysis to control confounders. The goodness of fit was tested by Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics and variables with a p-value\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 were fitted to the multivariable model. The odds ratio along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed to ascertain the strength of association. Tests at a p-value of \u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 were considered as cut off points to limit the significance of the association. The audio taped qualitative data were transcribed using a verbatim method and translated in to English for analysis. The transcripts were read several times to identify key themes and developed a coding framework and the cods were grouped into similar categories. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis using ATLAS.ti software.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEthical Issue\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board (IERB) of Mekelle University, College of Health Sciences with a reference number of ERC 0894/2016. Letter of permission was obtained from Tigray regional Agency for refugees and returnees affairs (ARRA) office found in Shire Endaslasie for respective camps. Informed written consent was obtained from each study participants\u003csup\u003e,\u003c/sup\u003e after explaining the objectives, procedures, risk and benefit of participating in this study. For those whose age was less than 18 years and illiterate participants\u0026rsquo; informed written consent was taken from legally authorized representative/guardians. Study participants were assured that all their information provided would be kept confidential and the result of the research would be published in aggregated form. Interviews were conducted in private setting. Participants also assured that participation in this study was completely voluntary.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSocio-demographic characteristics\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmong the 646 sampled eligible women, 638 of them responded to the questionnaire completely, giving a response rate of 98.8%. The mean age of the respondents was 26.7 (SD \u003cu\u003e+\u003c/u\u003e 7.2) years. More than half (54.5%) of the study participants were from Mayayni camp. The majority of the women, 528 (82.8%) were Tigrian, followed by Saho 87 (13.6%) and Tigre 23 (3.6) ethnicity. Orthodox Christianity was the predominant religion, 480(75.2%) followed by Muslim 84(13.2%), Catholic 49(7.7%) and Protestant 25(3.9%). About 366 (57.4%) of women were urban residents in their original country. All the refugees have monthly aid from UNCHR and other stakeholders. In addition to this, 145 (22.7%) have support from abroad relatives, 124 (19.4%) engaged in trade and 69 (10.8%) daily laborer (\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1\u003c/strong\u003e).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants in the Eritrean Refugee camps in Tselemti district, Tigray, Ethiopia, March 2017\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVariables\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFrequency (N=638)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePercent (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAge\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;15-19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;20-24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;25-29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;30-34\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;35-39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 40-44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 45-49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e123\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e152\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e152\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e111\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMarital status\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Married\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Single\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Divorced\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Separated\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Cohabitated\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; widowed\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e336\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e184\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e52.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWomen Education\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Illiterate\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Able to write and read\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Elementary(1-8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Secondary(9-10)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Diploma\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e152\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e296\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e120\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e46.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHusband Education (n=388)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Illiterate\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Able to write and read\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Elementary(1-8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Secondary(9-10)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Diploma and above\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e135\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e112\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e53\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e34.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMigration status\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; With husband and children\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; With children only\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; With husband only\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Only herself\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; With family\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e184\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e127\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e256\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e40.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTime duration in camps( in months)\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026lt;6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 6-12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 13-24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 25-36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 37-60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026gt;61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e97\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e158\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e113\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e102\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHaving TV/Radio at home\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e143\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e496\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e77.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eReproductive characteristics and decision making status\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmong the total study participants, 532 of them had history of sexual intercourse. Of these, 59 (11.1%), 159 (29.9%) and 314 (59%) participants had started sex at the age of less than 15, 15 - 17 and 18+ years old respectively. About 242 (37.9%) of respondents had history of reproductive health service utilization in their original country. Two-thirds, 424(66.5%) of participants had history of pregnancy. Among these, 245 (57.8%) of them were multiparous (2-4), 139(32.8%) primiparous, 30 (7.1%) grand multipara (5+) and 10 (2.4%) nulliparous. Around half, 315(49.4%) of the respondents decided themselves to use FPS, 90(14.1%) dependent on their spouse, 214(33.5%) jointly with their husbands and 19(3%) decided their family on behalf of them. About 246 (46.2%) of participants had discussion with their husbands about their reproductive goals.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnowledge of respondents on family planning\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe majority of the respondents, 569 (89.2%) have awareness on FPS. Source of information for participants was: 278 (48.8%) health professionals, 51(8.9%) media, 90 (15.7%) friends/neighbors and 150(26.5%) had multiple sources. \u0026nbsp;The majority, 501(88%) of respondents know injection among the contraceptive methods (\u003cstrong\u003eTable 2\u003c/strong\u003e). About 461 (81.0%) and 138(24.3%) of respondents reported that the purpose of contraceptive methods are to space and limit births respectively. About 518 (90%), 172 (30.2%), 93 (16.3%) and 90 (15.8%) of respondents know that contraceptive methods are available in public health facilities, community pharmacies, supermarkets and private clinics respectively.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 2: Family planning knowledge characteristics of the participants among the refugee women in Tselemti district, Tigray, Ethiopia, March 2017\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVariables\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFrequency(n=569)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePercent (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnow pill\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e360\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e209\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e63.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnow injection\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e501\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e88.0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnow surgical method\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e548\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e96.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnow emergency contraceptive\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e139\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e430\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnow condom\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e260\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e309\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e45.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e54.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnow Intra uterine contraceptive Device (IUCD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e113\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e456\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e80.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnow implant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e150\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e419\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.75346687211094%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eKnow natural method\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Yes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; No\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.426810477657934%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e528\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.81972265023113%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e92.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eContraceptive use\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAbout 344 (64.7%) of participants had ever used any contraceptive methods: 66(19.2%) in their original country and 278(80.8%) in the current refugee camps. In this study, Only 192(36.1%) of participants were using contraceptive methods: 140 (72.9%) for spacing and 52(27.1%) to limit birth at all. Injection type of contraceptive was the prevalent method utilized 115(59.9%), followed by implant 31(16.1%), IUCD 5(2.6%), condom 15(7.8%), pill 14(7.3%), EC 6(3.1%), surgical 2(1.1%) and natural methods 4(2.1%). About 150 (78.1%), 13 (6.8%), 5 (2.6%), 8(4.2%) and 16(8.3%) of respondents obtain contraceptive methods from health centers of the camps, public health facilities of the host community, private clinics, pharmacies and supermarkets respectively. The dominant reported reason for not using contraceptive methods was fertility desire 71(20.9%) \u003cstrong\u003e(Figure1\u003c/strong\u003e) and more than half 174(51.8%) of these had intention to use contraceptive methods in the future.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 1: Reasons given by the respondents why they did not use contraceptive methods in refugee camps 2017.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBarriers associated with contraceptive use\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCross tabulation and logistic regression analysis were carried out. Hence, age, residence, educational status, husband education, had discussion with their husbands, having Radio/TV at home, awareness on family planning and time duration in camps were made significance association on bivariate analysis at a p-value of \u0026lt;0. 25. These variables were exported into multivariable analysis. Therefore, having Radio/TV at home, place of residence at original country, having discussion with spouse focused on reproductive goals and time of duration in camps were significantly associated with contraceptive use at a \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ep-value \u0026lt;0.05\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe odds of having Radio/TV at home were about 2.2\u0026nbsp;(AOR=2.207, 95% CI=1.244, 3.917) and living in urban areas in their original country were 2.6 more likely to use contraceptive methods when compared to their counterparts (AOR=2.593, 95% CI=1.513, 4.444).\u0026nbsp;The odds of discussion with husbands on reproductive goals were 2.8 (AOR=2.817, 95% CI=1.681, 4.721). Living in camps about 2-3 and 3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e years were 4.1 and 2.2 times more likely to use contraceptive methods when compared to respondents lived in these camps for less than 1 year respectively (AOR=.4.065, 95% CI=1.845, 8.956, AOR=2.200, 95% CI=1.084, 4.466) (\u003cstrong\u003eTable 3\u003c/strong\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 3: Factors associated with contraceptive use among the Eritrean refugee women in Tselemti district, Tigray, Ethiopia, 2017.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"703\" style=\"margin-right: calc(-1%); width: 101%;\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.428165007112376%\" rowspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVariables (N=638)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"24.751066856330013%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 27.1053%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eContraceptive utilization\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.337126600284495%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCrude OR\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(CI= 95%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.483641536273115%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAdjusted OR (CI=95%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.94871794871795%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.23076923076923%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.3651%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.05128205128205%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"30.76923076923077%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.428165007112376%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAge at interview\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;15-19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;20-24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;25-29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;30-34\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;35-39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;40-44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;45+\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.948790896159316%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33(58.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e86(68.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e92(62.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e61(57.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36(61.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22(84.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10(83.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.802275960170697%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.3651%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23(41.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e39(31.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e55(37.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e46(43.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23(39.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4(15.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2(16.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.337126600284495%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.651(.339, 1.250)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.858(.458, 1.608)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.082(.562, 2.084)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.917(.435, 1.934)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.261(.079, .858)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.287(.057, 1.434)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.483641536273115%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.102(.336, 3.610)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.073(.337, 3.420)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.534(.474, 4.962)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.821(.522, 6.359)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.789(.132, 4.719)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.301(.040, 2.237)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.428165007112376%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResidence\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Urban\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Rural\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.948790896159316%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e178(59.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e162(70.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.802275960170697%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.3651%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e123(40.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e69(29.90\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.337126600284495%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.622(1.128, 2.334)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.483641536273115%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.593(1.513, 4.444)**\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.428165007112376%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEducational status\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Illiterate\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Elementary(1-8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Secondary(9-10)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Diploma\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.948790896159316%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e134(74.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e145(60.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e49(53.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12(57.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.802275960170697%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.3651%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e46(25.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e95(39.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e42(46.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9(42.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.337126600284495%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.909(1.250, 2.914)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.497(1.468, 4.247)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.185(.865, 5.520)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.483641536273115%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.576(.860, 2.887)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.972(.834, 4.664)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.991(.389, 10.191)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.428165007112376%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHusband Education\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Illiterate\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Elementary(1-8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Secondary(9-10)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Diploma and above\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.948790896159316%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e69(79.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e85(63.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e63(56.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28(53.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.802275960170697%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.3651%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18(20.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e49(36.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e49(43.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24(46.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.337126600284495%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.210(1.181, 4.135)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.981(1.574, 5.649)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.286 (1.548, 6.974)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.483641536273115%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.742(.815, 3.725)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.753(.761, 4.038)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.366(.487, 3.827)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.428165007112376%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBack to home without getting service\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.948790896159316%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6(37.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e334(64.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.802275960170697%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.3651%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10(62.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e182(35.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.337126600284495%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.327(.117, .914)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.483641536273115%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.303(.090, 1.024)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.428165007112376%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHad discussion on reproductive goals with spouse\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.948790896159316%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e131(53.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e209(73.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.802275960170697%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.3651%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e115(46.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e77(26.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.337126600284495%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.383(1.659, 3.422)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.483641536273115%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.817(1.681, 4.721)**\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.428165007112376%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHad Radio/TV at home\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.948790896159316%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e58(50.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e282(67.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.802275960170697%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.3651%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e57(49.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e135(32.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.337126600284495%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.053(1.350, 3.122)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.483641536273115%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.207(1.244, 3.917)*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.428165007112376%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAwareness on family planning service\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Yes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; No\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.948790896159316%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e304(61.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36(94.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.802275960170697%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.3651%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e190(38.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2(5.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.337126600284495%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.250(2.678,47.264)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.483641536273115%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.039(1.267, 79.558)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"33.428165007112376%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTime duration in camps (in months )\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026lt;12\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 12-24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 25-36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; 37+\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.948790896159316%\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e107(72.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e41(68.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e46(49.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e107(61.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.802275960170697%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.3651%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e41(27.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e37(31.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e47(50.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e67(38.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.337126600284495%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 16.5699%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.207(.710,2.052)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.666(1.549, 4.589)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.634(1.019, 2.620)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.483641536273115%\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 22.6064%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.698(.784, 3.677)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.065(1.845, 8.956)**\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.200(1.084, 4.466)*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e** Significantly associated at p-value \u0026lt;0.001 and * significantly associated at p-value\u0026lt;.029\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCOR=crude odds ratio, AOR=Adjusted odds ratio, CI=Confidence interval\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFocus Group Discussions result \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTwo FGDs from each camp were conducted with a total of 41 participants using local language. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBelifes, Accessibility of FP services and source of information for \u0026nbsp;FP\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMost of discussants believed that a woman/girl can start using contraceptive methods since the age of 15-18 years old, especially if she is married. They also highlighted the importance of especial counseling for underage girls about contraceptives use. All discussants from both camps revealed that availability of certain contraceptive methods like; Depo-Provera and progesterone only pills (POP) were inturupted occasionally.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eFPS were available from Monday to Friday however sometimes interuptued due to meeting. All the participants confirmed that adolescents were get FPS in the same room with adult clients. The sources of information for RHS were community health workers (CHW) and health facilities and the education was supported with mini-media. The CHWs teach the community about RH issues by moving from block to block at community level. They have a coffee ceremony program and select family models for recognition among the community based on their RHS seeking behavior.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDecision making status\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlmost all the women agreed that a joint decision made with their husbands to use contraceptives. However, they did not close that there were some husbands who are autocratic toward their wives in using contraceptive methods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026lsquo;\u0026lsquo;In fact, in marriage joint decision is important; especially husband should understand the problem of their wives. There are some women who couldn\u0026rsquo;t use family planning services. Because their husbands consider that the whole purpose of marriage is to produce children and most of these husbands are illiterate\u0026rdquo; (Para- 5, 38 years old).\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eContraceptives use and challenges \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMajority of the women reported that contraceptive methods were more utilized by married women or who had history of delivery as compared to underage and unmarried girls. Participants disclosed that most of under age (\u0026lt;18) girls were not using the FPS due to embracement and the community stigma; rather they preferred to use services in private clinics and pharmacies found in the district.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;For example, of course there is no restriction based on age and marital status to access and use the RHS, but the attitude of the community is not the same for me and if a 15 years old lady comes to health center looking FPS\u0026rdquo; (A 30 years old woman, para-3). The other woman also said \u0026ldquo;How can underage girls use contraceptive methods since community health workers taught them to avoid sex at early age?\u0026rdquo; [Para 2, 36 years old]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFew women underlined that there were infidelity women who used contraceptive methods secretly from pharmacy and private clinics due to fear of stigma from the community.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026ldquo;There are women whom I know use contraceptive methods from pharmacy in the host district and I asked them why they do not use from the health center found in the camp, but they told me that some of them are married but their husband lives in abroad. And some of them were unmarried and live with their family. Therefore, they preferred private pharmacies to avoid stigma from the community\u0026ldquo;(Para-1 a 31 years old woman\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSome women stated that injection and oral pills were the predominately used contraceptive methods. However, when these methods were unavailable, health care providers insisted users to use long-acting contraceptive methods even though women are usually not convenient due to side effect like; wasting of hair, weight change; head lightness and fertility desire as reasons.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;When a woman uses implant, there is an instruction from the service providers that implants are expensive and it has to be used for 3-5 years effectively. However, the woman may want to remove this implant due to some reasons. Then what she can do? If she goes for removal, health care providers are not cooperative and they insist her to continue the method\u0026rdquo; (Para_2, a 36 years old). \u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll participants were explained that religion was the predominately mentioned reason followed by myths and side effects for non-use of contraceptive methods.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIn-depth interview with care providers\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe had conducted in-depth interview with a total of 5 key informants (3 from Adi-Harush and the rest from Mai-Aini) focusing on 4 themes similarly to FGD: believes, accessibility, use of contraceptives and challenges.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBeliefs and Accessibility of contraceptives\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll key informants believed that all age groups of refugee women can use FPS because they are vulnerable for unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion. They also affirmed that the interruption of certain methods and closure of services during meeting hours that was reported by the FGDs participants. In addition, lack of effective counseling, negligence, shortage of midwives and lack of duty payment for extra hours were mentioned as reasons for inaccessibility.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFamily planning use and challenges\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWomen found in the age between 18-30 years old were the most users of contraceptive methods. Depo-Provera was the most preferred type of contraceptive method followed by implants whereas FGD participants rank oral contraceptive method was the second. Some of the women use natural type of methods due to religion and side effect reasons. All key informants acknowledged that contraceptive utilization was not to the expected among refugees. Three of the key informants pointed out that rate of contraceptive utilization were unpredictable in refugee camps. When the refugees have a plan to migrate to other secondary country, a large proportion of women visit the health center for use of contraceptive methods especially implants to avoid unwanted pregnancy along the journey. On the other side, some refugees consider these camps as the right place for child delivery since they are idle. In addition, they assumed that if they would go to Europe, they would be busy as well to replace their generation in case one of the couple dies along the journey. Two key informants suggested that the low utilization could be due to the effect of pronatal policy in Eritrea. Husband influence, religion particularly Muslim and Saho and to some extent Christian followers were nominated as factors for non-utilization of contraceptives.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;For example, there was a Muslim woman whom I know she gave 3 births within 5 years of duration\u0026rdquo; (a 38 years old midwife).\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSaho ethnic was the most known for non-use of contraceptive methods due to their husband\u0026rsquo;s opposition.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;I know one Muslim woman from ethnic Saho. She was using contraceptive methods anonymously and one day her husband came and told us why you had given it to my wife without my permission and told us that he would accuse us\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThey also confirmed that adolescent girls and unmarried ladies were low utilizers of contraceptive methods which were mentioned by the FGDs with similar reasons. Resistance for use of contraceptive observed among the age group of \u0026gt;30 years.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study is a part of a large study which was conducted on utilization of reproductive health services and barriers among Eritrean refugees. On this topic we discuss the utilization of contraceptive methods and associated factors, including the qualitative findings, especially about the hindering factors. We also discuss the implications of the findings for FP program improvement. This study showed that more than one-third of the respondents were used contraceptive methods during the interview time and large proportion of respondents had awareness on contraceptive methods. Adolescents were limited to access FP services. Use of contraceptive was varied by the following factors: having Radio/TV at home, residence, discussion with spouse and duration of stay in camps. Limited availability of certain contraceptive methods, staff meeting in working hours, religion, myths and side effects, lack of effective counseling, shortage of staffs and community stigma for adolescents and unmarried girls were mentioned as barriers to access FPS by the FGDs and IDIs participants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe current prevalence of contraceptive use(CPU) is similar with the findings from Amman and Syrian refugees, where 31.9% and 34.5% of women were using contraceptive methods respectively [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. It was also similar with the host country\u0026rsquo;s CPR, (41%) mini EDHS 2019 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. However, the current finding was higher when compared to findings from a study conducted in six countries of Africa and Asia and a study conducted in Kenya, where only 19.9% and 19.2% of respondents were used contraceptives respectively [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. It was also higher when compared to their origin country, where only 8.4% of all Eritrean women use contraceptive methods. Moreover, 27.4% of Eritrean women had unmet need for contraceptive methods [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. This difference might be due to the intervention that has been taking place by ARRA, IRC and other stockholders on this community. There were about 42 community health workers in each camp whose main task was to mobilize the community and promote RH service utilization in the community. In addition to this, the host country\u0026rsquo;s strong policy on FP promotion and the intervention taken might also influence these refugees. On the other side, CPR in refugee camps of Shimelba, Ethiopia and Jordan were 47.7% and 43% respectively, which was higher in prevalence than this study [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e]. This could be as a result of difference in setting and the health care workers commitment. In general, the level of contraceptive utilization in this community was far away from the global and national aspirations. Moreover, both the FGDs and IDIs participants also affirmed that contraceptive use in respective camps was low. This indicates that coverage of FP utilization is not on track to achieve the goals outlined in the universal and local documents, like the goals of ICPD advocacy for universal access to FP, FP2020, SDGs and the Ethiopian health sector transformation plan [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. The limited availability of certain contraceptive methods reported in this study similarly observed in other studies conducted elsewhere within similar refugee settings [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. The combination of this low utilization and limited availability of contraception increases the risk of unintended pregnancy, unsafe abortion and its morbidity. Improving the access to contraception and effective use of contraceptive methods in humanitarian setting could avert about 90% of unsafe abortion-related morbidity and 29% of maternal deaths [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy method, Injection was the most utilized contraceptive method followed by implants. This finding is consistent with the EDHS, 2019 of the host country and other local studies conducted in refugee camps [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e]. About 88% of participants in this study know injection contraceptive method; this in turn may trigger women to use this contraceptive method. However, injection was the second most utilized contraceptive method in Shedder refugee camp in Ethiopia [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. In another refugee camp, it also revealed that IUCD was the most popular method followed by oral contraceptive pills [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e]. This difference could be as a result of health workers' counseling skills and availability of the methods across the health facilities. Around 90% of women had awareness about contraceptive methods in this study. A study conducted in the same refugee camps (79%) supports this finding [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. Other reports from shedder camp 94.5% [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e], Shimelba camp 95.4% [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e] and a multicounty study 74% [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e] affirm this evidence.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHaving TV/Radio at home was a significant factor for contraceptive use in this study. In fact, we could not get similar finding from a similar setting however in the general population, media is a significant factor [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e]. Obviously, we know that media is a key strategy in changing community behavior. Discussion with husbands about reproductive goals was a significant factor. Similar findings from Somali regional state of Ethiopia and Pakistan support this current study [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. Discussion regarding reproductive goals among couples might create mutual understanding between the parties; this in turn may lead them to use contraceptive methods. Living for longer duration in camps was another significant factor of this study. Even though there was no similar study in refugee setting, one study from the general population illustrated this fact. This might be justified as living for longer duration in a specific camp could provide an opportunity to be familiar with the health care system [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e]. This study was also revealed that urban residency in their original country was a significant factor. This evidence is reported in many studies of the general population [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e]. The population and health survey 2010 of Eritrea reported that use of contraceptive were high among urban residents [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e]. This could be the attributions of awareness and knowledge difference in seeking contraceptive methods. Better access to service is also expected in urban areas. Participants of FGDs and IDIs were mentioned many barriers for use of FPS. Both groups underlined the husbands\u0026rsquo; oppositions to access FPS because of desire to have many children and religious reasons. Qualitative studies conducted in refugee camps illustrated this finding [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. They also reported poor uptake of contraceptive methods was observed among Muslim and ethnic Saho. Many studies ascertained this fact even though there is no conclusive answer why this phenomenon happened [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother essential deterring factors to contraceptive use were fear of side effects, misinformation and misconceptions which could be anticipated or the real ones that women encounter every day. A number of qualitative studies from different corner of the world in refugee settings have reported these findings [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. Erroneous information associated with contraception use could be the result of users and providers attempting to understand the contraceptive mechanism of action or sometimes the potential side effects could be the bases for a wide range of misconceptions. This could be propagated through unofficial social networks in the community. Side effects are the major reasons for discontinuation of contraceptive use, which can lead to unintended pregnancy and its consequences [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMany studies from community and health facilities confirmed that contraceptive uptake among Adolescents and unmarried women were poor due to community stigma and norms, which are also the findings of this study [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec31\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStrengths and Limitation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study assessed the status of FP among the vulnerable group using a triangulation method. This in turn can incite stakeholders and FP program managers to look on the existed strategies and to improve access of the service. In any study, it is natural to have risk of bias. However, we have tried to curtail these problems through triangulation of methodologies and data. Inherently, qualitative studies have limitations to generalize for the population in target. Nonetheless, we have tried to curtail this limitation through quantitative measurement at large. Among the limitations of this study, adolescents below 18 years old without family/guardian did not included in this study due to ethical issue, but they could be sexually active at the time of data collection and the may suffer the aftermath of the an unwanted pregnancy. Therefore the findings of this study may not be generalized to this group. Moreover, since the data were self-reported bias might be introduced by participants due to memory loss.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur findings showed that the contraceptive utilization in the refugee camps was unacceptable when compared to the global and national plan. This study also demonstrates the effect of media, place of residence, discussion with spouse on reproductive goals and duration of residence in camps for contraceptive use. Limited availability of certain contraceptives, lack of separate service for adolescents, fertility desire, misconceptions, side effects, husband’s opposition, resettlement, religion, community stigma towards adolescents and unmarried girls were stated as the reasons for non-use of contraceptives by FGDs and IDIs participants. This implies that many of the refugees are at risk of unwanted pregnancy with its complication and increased maternal mortality.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec33\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eRecommendations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eARRA should increase the number of midwives and adjust meeting hours other than the working days in health facilities. ARRA, UNHCR and other stakeholders should strengthen contraceptives and other logistics provision to the health centers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHealth care providers should reinforce the health education system focusing on both gender empowerments, involvement of husbands during FPS provisions, counseling to couples about myths and side effects and community stigma on FP use through media as well in person.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEspecial attention should be given for adolescent reproductive health service provision separately by UNHCR, ARRA and other stakeholders should involve in this program.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThey should also emphasis on religion leaders to involve in health education and should focus on fertility issue and its impact on the health of mothers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e "},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eARRA –\u003c/b\u003eAdministration for Refugee and Returnee Affaires\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAOR-\u003c/b\u003eAdjusted odd ratio\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eCHW-\u003c/b\u003eCommunity Health Workers\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eEDHS\u003c/b\u003e-Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eFGD-\u003c/b\u003eFocus group discussion\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eFP-\u003c/b\u003eFamily planning\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eFPS\u003c/b\u003e-Family Planning Service\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eHSTP\u003c/b\u003e-Health Sector Transformation Plan\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eICPD-\u003c/b\u003eInternational conference on population and development\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eIUCD\u003c/b\u003e-Intra Uterine Contraceptive Device\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eNGO-\u003c/b\u003eNon-governmental organization\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eRH-\u003c/b\u003eReproductive health\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eRSH-\u003c/b\u003eReproductive and sexual health\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eSDG\u003c/b\u003e-Sustainable Development Goal\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eUNHCR-\u003c/b\u003eUnited Nation Higher Commission for Refugee\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eUN-\u003c/b\u003eUnited Nation\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEthical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board (IERB) of Mekelle University, College of Health Sciences with a reference number of ERC 0894/2016 and all methods were carried out in accordance with the principles of protocols and guidelines recommended by the Declaration of Helsinki. Letter of permission was obtained from Tigray regional Agency for refugees and returnees affairs (ARRA) office found in Shire Endaslasie for respective camps. Informed written consent was obtained from the study participants after explaining the objectives, procedures, risk and benefit of participating in this study. Informed written consent was obtained from legally authorized representative/guardians for those whose age was less than 18 years and illiterate participants\u0026rsquo;. Study participants were assured that all their information provided would be kept confidential and the result of the research would be published in aggregated form. Interviews were conducted in private setting. Participants also assured that participation in this study was completely voluntary. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe data that supports the findings of this study are not included in this publication as additional file because this study was assessed/includes utilization of multiple reproductive health services which are large datasets and under process for journal submission. Therefore, we consider it is not worthy publicly available. \u0026nbsp;But it is available annexed with the large dataset from the corresponding author if it is necessary and timely.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declared that they have no competing interests.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis \u0026nbsp;research \u0026nbsp; was \u0026nbsp;funded \u0026nbsp;by \u0026nbsp; Mekelle \u0026nbsp;University \u0026nbsp;as \u0026nbsp; recurrent \u0026nbsp;budget for small \u0026nbsp;scale \u0026nbsp; grant research \u0026nbsp;with \u0026nbsp;a \u0026nbsp; grant \u0026nbsp;number \u0026nbsp;of \u0026nbsp;CRPO/CHS/SM/006/09. \u0026nbsp;College of Health Sciences under Mekelle University was responsible in monitoring and evaluation of the project but it was not involved in any work of this study. The fund was not including for publication process.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contributions\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe corresponding author (SWG), participated in selection of topic, development of the entire proposal, monitoring data collection; analysis, manuscript preparation and funding acquisition. \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; GA, and AB involved in the conception of the study, data collection and analysis. KZ involved in analysis and manuscript preparation All authors read, edited and approved the manuscript draft.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe thank Mekelle University for the opportunity and sponsorship to conduct this study. We thank ARRA office for their support in providing information and letter of permission. We would like also to thank all respondents and participants of this study for their precious time invested in sharing their experience.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026rsquo; details\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003eMekelle University, College of Health Sciences Department of Midwifery, Tigray, Ethiopia \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003eMekelle University, College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, department of pediatrics, Tigray Ethiopia \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNHCR. Mid-year trends. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.unhcr.org/statistics/unhcrstats/635a578f4/mid-year-trends-2022.html\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.unhcr.org/statistics/unhcrstats/635a578f4/mid-year-trends-2022.html\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNHCR. Trends at a Glance, 2018 review. Equus [Internet]. (265), 68 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWHO Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (WHO/SRH) and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/ Center for Communication Programs (CCP), Knowledge success. Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers (2022 update). Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWHO. Family planning / contraception, fact sheet [Internet]. World Health Organisation. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUnited Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs PD (2017). World Family Planning 2017-highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/414) (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eICPD. ICPD beyond 2014 high-level global commitments implementing the population and development agenda. ICPD beyond (2014)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEvery woman every child 2015. The global strategy for women\u0026rsquo;s, children\u0026rsquo;s and adolescents\u0026rsquo; health (2016\u0026ndash;2030). United Nations Secretary-General. Inter-Agency Working Group(2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJohnston R.B. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Arsen Res Glob Sustain - Proc 6th Int Congr Arsen Environ AS. 12\u0026ndash;4 (2016)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFoundation M.G. London Summit on Family Planning- Accountability Annex Taking forward FP2020 Summit commitments. 1\u0026ndash;2: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://ec2-54-210-230-186.compute-1.amazonaws.com/wp content/uploads/2014/10/ Accountability_Annex_Final_8_July.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://ec2-54-210-230-186.compute-1.amazonaws.com/wp content/uploads/2014/10/ Accountability_Annex_Final_8_July.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2012)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEFoMH. Health Sector Transformation Plan (2015/16-2019/20). 20, 1\u0026ndash;118 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEMoH. Costed implementation plan for family planning in ethiopia, 2015/16\u0026ndash;2020. Minist Heal [Internet]. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003efile:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/2021\u0026ndash;2030_EthiopiaCIPNov.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/2021\u0026ndash;2030_EthiopiaCIPNov.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e(2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCentral Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF. 2016. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: CSA and ICF (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEthiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) [Ethiopia] and ICF. 2021. Ethiopia mini demographic and health survey 2019: Final Report. Rockville, Maryland, USA: EPHI and ICF. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR363/FR363.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR363/FR363.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWomen\u0026rsquo;s Refugee Commission. A clear case for need and demand: Accessing contraceptive services for Rohingya women and girls in Cox \u0026rsquo; s Bazar case study: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.womensrefugeecommission.org/srh2016/resources/document/download/1802\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.womensrefugeecommission.org/srh2016/resources/document/download/1802\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e(2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eInter Agency Working Group(IAWG). Inter-Agency Field Manual on reproductive health in humanitarian setting. (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAckerson K., Zielinski R. Factors influencing use of family planning in women living in crisis affected areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of the literature. Midwifery. 54, 35\u0026ndash;60 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSeyife A., Fisseha G., Yebyo H., Gidey G., Gerensea H. Utilization of modern contraceptives and predictors among women in Shimelba refugee camp, Northern Ethiopia. PLoS One. 14, 1\u0026ndash;11(2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTadesse K., Seifu W. Why refugee women didn\u0026rsquo;t use modern contraceptives? Lesson from women in Shedder refugee camp, Ethiopian Somali Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia. 2014. Gynecol Obstet. 07(03), 3\u0026ndash;8 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRaheel H., Karim M.S., Saleem S., Bharwani S. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of contraception among Afghan refugee women in Pakistan: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 7(11), 1\u0026ndash;7(2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eKiur A.W. Constrained agency : Perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Somali refugee women on family planning [Internet]. \u0026nbsp;%0A%0A%0Awww.semanticscholar.org \u0026rsaquo; paper \u0026rsaquo; constrained-agenc...%0A%0A (2012).\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePrawira Y. Challenges and opportunities of hosting Eritrean refugees in Northern Ethiopia: From the local community perspective. MU-JPSSS. 1(1), 1\u0026ndash;23(2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNHCR Ethiopia A. Adi-Harush refuee camp profile. [Internet]. Data2.unhcr.org \u0026rsaquo; documents \u0026rsaquo; details%0A(2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNHCR Ethiopia A. Mai-aini refugee camp profile. Reliefweb.int \u0026rsaquo; report \u0026rsaquo; ethiopia \u0026rsaquo; mai-ai (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eARRA. Administration for Refugees and Returnees Affairs [Internet]. 9,. arra.et \u0026rsaquo; wp-content \u0026rsaquo; uploads \u0026rsaquo; 2014/05%0A (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eImmigrants USC for R. Forgotten refugees: Eritrean children in Northern Ethiopia. Can fam Physician [Internet]. 1\u0026ndash;20. Reliefweb.int \u0026rsaquo; report \u0026rsaquo; forgotten-refuge (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYeasmin S., Rahman.K.F. Triangulation, research method as the tool of social science research. Bup J [Internet]. 1(1), 154\u0026ndash;63. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.bup.edu.bd/journal/154-163.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.bup.edu.bd/journal/154-163.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNHCR, women\u0026rsquo;s refugee commission. Refocusing family planning in refugee settings: Findings and recommendations from a multi-country baseline study [Internet]. www.womensrefugeecommission.org \u0026rsaquo; r (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eReese M. A., Usta J., Gupta J., Ettinger A.S. Assessment of reproductive health and violence against women. BMC Womens Health. 14(1), 25. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/14/25\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/14/25\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTanabe M., et al. Family planning in refugee settings: findings and actions from a multi-country study. Confl Health. 11(1), 1\u0026ndash;12 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChoge M.C. Contraceptive uptake among women of reproductive age in Kakuma refugee camp in Turkana county, Kenya. 84(2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNFPA. Assessment of the government of the state of eritrea (gose) - unfpa fifth country programme (2017\u0026ndash;2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/board-documents/Eritrea%20-%20CPE%20-%20Country%20Programme%20Evaluation_%20Aug%202020.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/board-documents/Eritrea%20-%20CPE%20-%20Country%20Programme%20Evaluation_%20Aug%202020.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePierce H. Reproductive health care utilization among refugees in Jordan: Provisional support and domestic violence. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 15, (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGebrecherkos K., et.al. Unmet need for modern contraception and associated factors among reproductive age group women in Eritrean refugee camps, Tigray, north Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes [Internet]. 11(1), 1\u0026ndash;6. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3956-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s13104-018-3956-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCherri Z., Cuesta J.G., Rodriguez-Llanes J.M., Guha-Sapir D. Early marriage and barriers to contraception among syrian refugee women in lebanon: A qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 14(8), (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCasey S.E., et.al. Availability of long-acting and permanent family-planning methods leads to increase in use in conflict-affected northern Uganda: Evidence from cross-sectional baseline and endline cluster surveys. Glob Public Health. 8(3), 284\u0026ndash;97 (2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSrikanok S., et al. Empirical lessons regarding contraception in a protracted refugee setting: A descriptive study from Maela camp on the Thai-Myanmar border 1996\u0026ndash;2015. PLoS One. 12(2), 1\u0026ndash;15(2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUSAID. Family planning among Syrian refugees in Jordan [Internet]. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.tawasol-jo.org/sites/default/files/family_planning_among_syrian_refugees_in_jordan_0.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.tawasol-jo.org/sites/default/files/family_planning_among_syrian_refugees_in_jordan_0.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAjaero C.K., Odimegwu C., Ajaero I.D, Nwachukwu C.A. Access to mass media messages, and use of family planning in Nigeria: A spatio-demographic analysis from the 2013 DHS. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 16(1), 1\u0026ndash;10. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2979-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12889-016-2979-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBajoga U.A., Atagame K.L., Okigbo C.C. Media influence on sexual activity and contraceptive use: A cross sectional survey among young women in urban Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 19(3), 100\u0026ndash;10 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKomasawa M, et.al. Demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods and its associated factors among married women of reproductive age in rural Jordan: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One [Internet]. 15(3), 1\u0026ndash;14. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.023042\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.023042\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYarger J., Decker M.J., Campa M.I., Brindis C.D. Rural\u0026ndash;Urban differences in awareness and use of family planning services among adolescent women in california. J Adolesc Heal. 60(4), 395\u0026ndash;401 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eInternational Rescue Committee (IRC). Impossible nowhere family planning for women and girls in crises. NEW YORK. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.rescue.org/report/impossible-nowhere-family-planning-women-and-girls-crises\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.rescue.org/report/impossible-nowhere-family-planning-women-and-girls-crises\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNational Statistics Office (NSO) [Eritrea] and Fafo AIS.. Eritrea population and health survey 2010. Asmara, Eritrea: National Statistics Office and Fafo Institute for Appled International Studies (2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDavidson A.S., Fabiyi C., Demissie S., Getachew H., Gilliam M.L. Is LARC for everyone? A qualitative study of sociocultural perceptions of family planning and contraception among refugees in Ethiopia. Matern Child Health J. 21(9), 1699\u0026ndash;705 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlvergne A., Stevens R., Gurmu E. Side effects and the need for secrecy: characterising discontinuation of modern contraception and its causes in Ethiopia using mixed methods. Contracept Reprod Med. 2(1), 1\u0026ndash;16 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJain A.K., Winfrey W. Contribution of contraceptive discontinuation to unintended births in 36 developing countries. Stud Fam Plann. 48(3), 269\u0026ndash;78 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCasey S.E., Chynoweth S.K., Cornier N., Gallagher M.C., Wheeler E.E. Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: mixed-methods case studies. 9(1), 1\u0026ndash;13(2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3815580/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3815580/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eUniversal access to family planning could prevent nearly one-third of the estimated 300,000 maternal deaths. Contraceptive utilization is low in humanitarian settings. Currently, there is a dearth of information on the use of contraceptives among refugee women in many low-income countries including the study area. A community based cross sectional study with qualitative data was employed from January 1 to February 1, 2017. Systematic and purposive sampling techniques were applied. Data was entered to Epi Info version 3.3.2 and transported to SPSS version 20.0 software for analysis. Significance was declared at p-value of \u0026lt; 0.05. Odds ratio along with 95% confidence interval was computed to ascertain the strength of the association. Among the 532 respondents who experienced sex, 192(36.1%) were using contraceptive method. Exposure to media (AOR = 2.207, 95% CI = 1.244, 3.917), residence (AOR = 2.593, 95% CI = 1.513, 4.444), discussion on reproductive goals (AOR = 2.817, 95% CI = 1.681, 4.721) and longer duration stay in camp (AOR = .4.065, 95% CI = 1.845, 8.956, AOR = 2.200, 95% CI = 1.084, 4.466) were significant factors. Prevalence of contraceptive utilization in refugees was low. A lot of obstructing factors to access the service were identified in this study. This gap will intensify the existing maternal and child mortality dire in refugee settings.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Barriers to contraceptive utilization among Reproductive Age Women of Eritrean Refugee in North West Tigray, Ethiopia: a mixed study","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-01-03 14:57:46","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3815580/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"80841c53-7065-4833-8518-f27805d6d7cb","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 3rd, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":27861594,"name":"Health sciences/Health care"},{"id":27861595,"name":"Health sciences/Risk factors"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-04-23T01:31:31+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-01-03 14:57:46","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-3815580","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3815580","identity":"rs-3815580","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}