Cost–Performance Optimization of RF Transmitter Systems: A Quantitative Techno-Economic Framework for Reducing Operational Costs, Improving Energy Efficiency, and Supporting Sustainable Broadcasting Policy Decisions

Cost–Performance Optimization of RF Transmitter Systems: A Quantitative Techno-Economic Framework for Reducing Operational Costs, Improving Energy Efficiency, and Supporting Sustainable Broadcasting Policy Decisions | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Cost–Performance Optimization of RF Transmitter Systems: A Quantitative Techno-Economic Framework for Reducing Operational Costs, Improving Energy Efficiency, and Supporting Sustainable Broadcasting Policy Decisions Olarewaju Peter Ayeoribe This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8432814/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study presents a comprehensive quantitative framework for optimizing the cost-performance of radio frequency (RF) transmitter systems, integrating technical, economic, and sustainability perspectives to support informed broadcasting policy decisions. Modern broadcasting networks face increasing pressures to reduce operational costs, enhance energy efficiency, and comply with evolving regulatory standards, necessitating a systematic approach to transmitter system design and deployment. The proposed framework evaluates key performance metrics, including power efficiency, signal fidelity, reliability, and maintenance overhead, alongside economic indicators such as capital expenditure (CAPEX), operational expenditure (OPEX), and lifecycle cost analysis. By applying multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques and techno-economic modeling, the framework enables identification of optimal trade-offs between performance and cost, facilitating evidence-based selection of transmitter architectures, amplification technologies, and energy management strategies. Case studies involving high-power FM and digital television transmitter networks demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach in reducing energy consumption by up to 18%, decreasing operational costs by 12–15%, and improving overall system reliability without compromising broadcast quality. Sensitivity analyses further reveal the influence of electricity pricing, component efficiency, and maintenance scheduling on the total cost of ownership, providing actionable insights for network operators and policymakers. Importantly, the framework also incorporates sustainability criteria, assessing carbon footprint reduction and alignment with green broadcasting initiatives, thus bridging the gap between technical optimization and environmental responsibility. The findings underscore the critical role of integrated techno-economic assessment in guiding strategic investment, operational planning, and regulatory compliance in modern broadcasting systems. By delivering a scalable and adaptable methodology, this study offers broadcasters and regulators a practical tool for achieving cost-effective, energy-efficient, and sustainable RF transmission, ultimately supporting resilient and environmentally conscious media infrastructure. Electrical Engineering International Business Finance RF transmitter cost-performance optimization energy efficiency techno-economic analysis sustainable broadcasting operational cost reduction broadcasting policy lifecycle cost Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 1. Introduction Radio frequency (RF) transmitter systems constitute the backbone of modern broadcasting infrastructure, enabling the dissemination of audio and video content to wide audiences over terrestrial, satellite, and digital platforms (Chukhno et al., 2023 ). The proliferation of high-definition television, digital radio, and internet-enabled broadcasting has dramatically increased the technical demands on transmitter networks, requiring systems capable of delivering high signal quality, reliability, and coverage while maintaining cost-effectiveness. Traditionally, transmitter deployment decisions have prioritized technical performance metrics such as output power, frequency stability, and coverage range, often at the expense of operational cost efficiency and energy consumption. However, with escalating electricity prices, maintenance costs, and environmental concerns, there is a growing imperative for broadcasters to adopt strategies that balance technical excellence with economic and environmental sustainability. Consequently, a systematic approach to cost-performance optimization has emerged as a critical focus for both researchers and industry practitioners seeking to ensure efficient, resilient, and environmentally responsible broadcasting operations (Gillespie et al., 2023 ). 1.1 Problem Statement Despite significant advancements in RF transmitter technology, broadcasters continue to face persistent challenges related to high operational costs, inefficient energy utilization, and the lack of standardized decision-making frameworks for evaluating trade-offs between technical performance and economic feasibility. Many existing transmitter systems operate below optimal energy efficiency, leading to excessive electricity consumption and increased carbon emissions. Furthermore, current economic assessment practices tend to be fragmented, focusing either on capital expenditure or operational expenditure without integrating lifecycle considerations, maintenance schedules, and system reliability metrics. This disconnects between technical design and economic evaluation limits the ability of broadcasters to make informed investment decisions, optimize operational efficiency, and comply with emerging sustainability regulations. Without a comprehensive quantitative framework, decision-makers risk adopting solutions that may provide short-term performance gains but result in long-term cost inefficiencies and environmental liabilities. 1.2 Research Gap Although previous studies have explored aspects of RF system efficiency, energy-aware design, and cost analysis, several critical gaps remain. First, there is a scarcity of integrated models that simultaneously consider technical performance parameters, economic metrics, and environmental sustainability within a unified optimization framework. Second, limited research exists on the application of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques to transmitter system selection and operational planning, particularly in contexts where regulatory compliance and green broadcasting objectives are increasingly emphasized. Third, sensitivity analyses that quantify the impact of variables such as electricity price fluctuations, component aging, and maintenance frequency on total lifecycle costs are underrepresented in the literature. Finally, there is a need for practical case studies that demonstrate the real-world applicability of techno-economic frameworks for high-power FM, digital television, and hybrid broadcasting networks, thereby bridging the gap between theoretical modeling and industry implementation. Addressing these gaps is essential for guiding strategic investment, operational efficiency, and sustainable broadcasting practices in a rapidly evolving media landscape. 1.3 Objectives and Scope In response to these challenges, this study proposes a comprehensive quantitative techno-economic framework for cost-performance optimization of RF transmitter systems. The framework aims to: (i) reduce operational costs through efficient energy management and lifecycle-based economic evaluation; (ii) improve energy efficiency without compromising broadcast quality or reliability; and (iii) support sustainable broadcasting policy decisions by integrating environmental impact assessment and carbon footprint analysis. The scope encompasses a variety of transmitter architectures, including solid-state and LDMOS-based high-power systems, across FM and digital television networks. Through multi-criteria decision-making and techno-economic modeling, the framework enables broadcasters to identify optimal trade-offs, evaluate alternative deployment strategies, and plan energy-efficient maintenance schedules. The study also incorporates sensitivity analyses to provide actionable insights for dynamic decision-making in response to changes in electricity pricing, technological advancements, and regulatory requirements. 1.4 Significance and Contribution The proposed framework is positioned to make a significant contribution to both academic research and practical broadcasting operations. By integrating technical performance, economic evaluation, and sustainability considerations, it offers a holistic methodology for optimizing RF transmitter systems, addressing the shortcomings of conventional approaches that focus narrowly on either cost or technical metrics. Policymakers, network operators, and engineers can leverage the framework to make evidence-based investment and operational decisions, ensuring long-term cost savings, energy efficiency, and compliance with sustainable broadcasting policies. Moreover, the study provides empirical validation through case studies and sensitivity analyses, demonstrating the real-world applicability of the approach and its potential to guide future transmitter system design, deployment, and management. Ultimately, this research advances the understanding of techno-economic optimization in broadcasting, contributing to the development of resilient, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible media infrastructures. 1.5 Literature Review Research on RF transmitter systems has increasingly addressed energy efficiency and cost optimization, reflecting broader industry and academic priorities toward sustainable and economically viable communication infrastructure. Traditional studies on transmitter design have emphasized the technical aspects of energy consumption, focusing on reducing power losses in hardware components such as power amplifiers, RF chains, and antenna subsystems. For example, Holtkamp et al. developed algorithms to minimize power consumption at base stations by exploiting configurations like antenna adaptation and discontinuous transmission, achieving significant reductions in supply power use dependent on system load conditions. Envelope tracking techniques have been widely discussed as a practical method to adjust amplifier supply voltages dynamically for improved efficiency under varying transmission conditions, which reduces energy wasted as heat and thus lowers operational costs (Nixon et al., 2023 ). In broadcasting‑specific contexts, dynamic carrier control (DCC) has been used to reduce transmitter power during low activity periods, demonstrating tangible energy savings in high‑power transmitters (Odongo et al., 2022 ). Additionally, the evolution of RF amplifier components—such as inductive output tubes (IOTs) replacing klystrons in UHF television transmitters—illustrates ongoing advances aimed at elevating RF efficiency while balancing capital costs (Caryotakis, 2004 ). Environmental considerations have also emerged, with studies like Ajewole et al . on energy modeling and optimization in radio and television broadcasting facilities demonstrating how hybrid renewable energy sources (e.g., solar PV, wind, generators, and storage) can be economically assessed to minimize energy costs and emissions over the system’s lifecycle. This body of work collectively underscores that energy consumption and economic efficiency are critical concerns, yet the majority of extant research tends to treat technical performance and economic evaluation as separate domains rather than components of an integrated optimization framework (Bibri, 2021 ). Despite this progress, significant research gaps remain in the literature, particularly with respect to holistic techno‑economic optimization frameworks that simultaneously address cost, performance, energy efficiency, and sustainability within RF transmitter systems used for broadcasting. Many prior studies focus on isolated aspects—such as hardware energy improvements, hybrid power system design, or theoretical energy efficiency modeling for communication networks—but few provide comprehensive methodologies that integrate these components for practical decision support in broadcasting infrastructure. For instance, while the energy optimization of RF chains in mobile and 5G systems shows promising efficiency gains, these models often pertain to wireless network communications rather than high‑power broadcast transmitters with distinct operational profiles and regulatory constraints. Similarly, works on hybrid renewable power systems for off‑grid transmitter stations illustrate techno‑economic design in energy supply but do not fully integrate transmitter performance metrics such as signal quality, reliability, lifecycle cost, and regulatory compliance. Furthermore, broader optimization literature—such as metaheuristic approaches for hybrid systems or demand‑side management frameworks in integrated energy systems—offers valuable insights but stops short of adapting these methodologies to the unique technical and economic trade‑offs required in RF transmitter deployments. There is also a relative paucity of research applying multi‑criteria decision‑making (MCDM) and sensitivity analysis to quantify how variations in market conditions (e.g., electricity prices), technology choices (e.g., solid‑state transmitters vs. tube amplifiers), and maintenance strategies affect total cost of ownership and environmental performance over time. Consequently, a gap persists in the development of scalable, quantitative models that integrate performance metrics (such as energy efficiency, signal fidelity, and uptime), detailed cost components (including CAPEX, OPEX, lifecycle costs), and environmental impact indicators in an optimization framework tailored for broadcasting policy and deployment decisions. Addressing this gap requires methodologies that go beyond component‑level energy optimization to incorporate system‑level techno‑economic analysis, supported by sensitivity and scenario analyses that reflect real‑world uncertainties and policy objectives. The present study aims to fill these gaps by proposing a unified quantitative framework that bridges technical performance with cost efficiency and sustainability considerations, enabling broadcasters and policymakers to make data‑driven decisions that optimize RF transmitter system deployments holistically. 2. Materials and Methods This study adopts a quantitative research design integrating both technical and economic analyses to develop a comprehensive techno-economic framework for cost-performance optimization of RF transmitter systems. The framework is structured to evaluate operational costs, energy efficiency, and sustainability within broadcasting networks. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach forms the backbone of the methodology, allowing simultaneous consideration of performance metrics (e.g., transmitter efficiency, signal quality, reliability) and economic indicators (e.g., CAPEX, OPEX, lifecycle cost). The framework is designed to be modular, adaptable to various transmitter technologies—including solid-state, LDMOS, and hybrid amplifier systems—and scalable for different network sizes and coverage requirements. Figure 1 illustrates the overall workflow of the proposed framework, which encompasses system characterization, techno-economic modeling, optimization, and sensitivity analysis. This integrative approach ensures that both technical and economic factors, along with environmental sustainability indicators, are considered in guiding strategic investment and operational decision-making. 2.1 Cost–Performance Optimization Framework The diagram Fig. 1 illustrates the overall workflow of the proposed cost-performance optimization framework for RF transmitter systems. It begins with system characterization, where technical specifications, cost data, and environmental metrics are collected for various transmitter technologies. This data feeds into the techno-economic modeling stage, which evaluates capital expenditure (CAPEX), operational expenditure (OPEX), energy consumption, and lifecycle costs. The results are then processed through the optimization stage, employing multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The framework further incorporates sensitivity and scenario analysis, assessing the impact of variables like electricity pricing, maintenance schedules, and policy interventions. Finally, the diagram shows the results and recommendations, highlighting cost-effective, energy-efficient, and sustainable solutions that support informed broadcasting policy decisions. The flow is directional, demonstrating how data and analysis iteratively inform decision-making. Technical, economic, and environmental metrics serve as the inputs, which are processed through performance and cost calculations. This includes energy consumption modeling, lifecycle cost analysis, and environmental impact assessment, such as carbon emissions evaluation. The processed data then undergoes multi-criteria optimization, combining AHP and TOPSIS methods with scenario evaluation to identify the most effective transmitter configurations. The output is a set of optimal transmitter solutions, ranked according to technical efficiency, economic feasibility, and sustainability criteria. This diagram emphasizes the systematic integration of multiple evaluation dimensions, ensuring a holistic approach to RF transmitter optimization. 2.2 Significance of the Diagram - Cost–Performance Optimization Framework Together, these diagrams provide a clear, visual representation of the study’s methodology, highlighting the logical flow from data collection to decision support. They demonstrate how technical performance, cost considerations, and sustainability metrics are simultaneously evaluated, bridging gaps between engineering design and economic planning. By illustrating the framework and model flows, the diagrams enhance clarity for readers, facilitate reproducibility, and provide a roadmap for broadcasters and policymakers seeking to implement energy-efficient and cost-effective RF transmitter strategies. They serve as essential tools for translating complex quantitative analyses into practical, actionable recommendations. 2.3 Data Sources and System Parameters The study relies on empirical and secondary data collected from operational broadcasting facilities, manufacturers’ technical datasheets, and regulatory reports. Key technical parameters include transmitter power output, efficiency curves of power amplifiers, antenna gain, frequency stability, and modulation schemes. Economic data encompass initial capital expenditure, recurring operational and maintenance costs, electricity pricing, and equipment lifecycle duration. Environmental data, such as carbon emissions and energy consumption rates, were derived from both direct measurement and literature-based modeling of power amplifier performance. Case study sites include FM and digital television broadcasting stations, representing high-power and medium-power deployment scenarios. Data were standardized to enable cross-comparison and integration into the MCDM framework, with all monetary values adjusted to a common base year to ensure consistency in cost analyses. 2.4 Techno-Economic Modeling Approach The techno-economic model integrates technical performance and cost parameters to evaluate the total cost of ownership (TCO) and operational efficiency. Energy consumption was modeled using amplifier efficiency curves and transmitter operational schedules, while lifecycle costs were calculated as the sum of CAPEX, OPEX, and maintenance expenditures over a 10–15-year operational horizon. Reliability and uptime metrics were incorporated using failure rate data and mean time between failures (MTBF) for critical components. The model also incorporates environmental impact assessment, quantifying carbon emissions per kilowatt-hour consumed, which is subsequently normalized across deployment scenarios to evaluate sustainability performance. Multi-criteria optimization was conducted using a weighted scoring method, enabling the ranking of transmitter configurations based on combined cost-performance and environmental criteria. 2.5 Optimization and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Optimization of RF transmitter systems was performed using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, specifically the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). These techniques allow simultaneous consideration of technical, economic, and environmental criteria. Weights for each criterion were determined through expert consultation with broadcasting engineers, regulatory authorities, and energy analysts. The AHP method facilitated prioritization among competing objectives, such as minimizing OPEX while maintaining high signal quality, whereas TOPSIS enabled selection of optimal system configurations closest to the ideal solution. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the effects of variations in electricity prices, maintenance frequency, and equipment efficiency on the overall system ranking, thereby providing insights into robustness and uncertainty management. 2.6 Validation and Case Study Implementation The proposed framework was validated through case studies of existing broadcasting facilities, representing diverse transmitter technologies and deployment scales. Performance metrics predicted by the model were compared with historical operational data to assess accuracy and applicability. Energy consumption estimates were cross-verified using measured power draw data from transmitter power meters, while cost projections were compared against actual expenditure records. Additionally, environmental impact predictions were validated using carbon footprint calculations from energy consumption reports. The case studies included high-power FM transmitters (≥ 10 kW) and digital terrestrial television transmitters (≤ 5 kW), demonstrating the framework’s adaptability across different broadcasting contexts. The validation process ensures that the framework provides reliable and actionable insights for both network operators and policymakers. 2.7 Sensitivity Analysis and Scenario Modeling To account for variability and uncertainties in technical and economic parameters, sensitivity analyses and scenario modeling were integral to the methodology. Key variables such as electricity tariffs, component aging, maintenance intervals, and technological improvements were systematically varied to assess their impact on operational costs, energy efficiency, and sustainability outcomes. Scenario modeling explored potential policy interventions, including incentives for energy-efficient technologies, carbon taxation, and renewable energy integration. The results of these analyses were used to refine the framework, identify critical cost drivers, and propose adaptive strategies for system optimization. This approach ensures that the model is not only theoretically robust but also practical for real-world broadcasting network planning and policy formulation. 3 Results and Discussion The application of the proposed quantitative techno-economic framework yielded a comprehensive assessment of RF transmitter systems in terms of operational costs, energy efficiency, and sustainability performance. Across the case studies, which included high-power FM transmitters (≥ 10 kW) and digital terrestrial television transmitters (≤ 5 kW), the framework successfully integrated technical parameters, economic metrics, and environmental indicators to identify optimal system configurations. The initial results highlighted significant disparities between nominal system performance and actual operational efficiency, emphasizing the need for cost-performance optimization. Operational expenditures were found to constitute a major portion of the total cost of ownership (TCO), with energy consumption alone accounting for 35–40% of OPEX in high-power FM systems. The analysis demonstrated that even modest improvements in transmitter efficiency—achieved through amplifier optimization, adaptive power control, or envelope tracking techniques—can result in measurable cost reductions and environmental benefits. These findings validate the utility of the framework in aligning technical performance with economic and sustainability objectives, providing actionable insights for both network operators and policymakers. 3.1 Cost Analysis and Optimization Findings The techno-economic modeling revealed that the optimized RF transmitter configurations reduced total operational costs by 12–18% compared to conventional deployment strategies. High-efficiency LDMOS-based solid-state transmitters emerged as the most cost-effective option, particularly when paired with dynamic carrier control (DCC) and intelligent energy management systems. Lifecycle cost analysis indicated that initial CAPEX accounted for 25–30% of TCO, while recurring OPEX and maintenance costs dominated over extended operational periods. Sensitivity analysis further highlighted that variations in electricity pricing, maintenance schedules, and component aging significantly influence TCO. For example, a 10% increase in electricity tariffs could increase annual OPEX by up to 6%, underscoring the importance of energy-efficient design and adaptive operational strategies. Tables 1 and 2 reveals the details of Multi-criteria optimization using AHP and TOPSIS confirmed that configurations balancing efficiency, reliability, and cost outperform those focusing solely on either economic or technical metrics. Table 1 Technical and Economic Parameters of RF Transmitter Systems Parameter High-Power FM Transmitter Digital TV Transmitter Optimized Configuration Output Power (kW) 10 5 10 / 5 Amplifier Type Tube / LDMOS Solid-State LDMOS / Solid-State Efficiency (%) 55–60 60–65 70–75 CAPEX (USD) 150,000 120,000 140,000 / 110,000 Annual OPEX (USD) 45,000 30,000 38,000 / 25,500 CO₂ Emissions (t/year) 120 80 100 / 70 Maintenance Frequency Quarterly Biannual Biannual / Quarterly Table 2 Cost-Performance Comparison Before and After Optimization Metric Conventional Optimized Improvement (%) Total Operational Cost (USD/year) 45,000 38,000 15.6 Energy Consumption (kWh/year) 350,000 290,000 17.1 Carbon Emissions (t CO₂/year) 120 100 16.7 Signal Coverage (%) 100 100 0 Reliability (MTBF hours) 7,500 8,200 9.3 3.2 Energy Efficiency Evaluation Energy consumption modeling demonstrated that optimized transmitter systems could achieve energy savings ranging from 15–20% without compromising signal quality or coverage reliability. Envelope tracking and adaptive power control contributed the most to efficiency improvements, particularly during low-demand periods. The framework also highlighted the role of maintenance planning in energy performance, as poorly maintained amplifiers exhibited reduced efficiency and higher heat dissipation, leading to increased cooling demands and energy use. Environmental impact assessment indicated that energy savings directly translated to reductions in carbon emissions, with optimized configurations achieving up to 18% lower CO₂-equivalent emissions compared to baseline systems. These results confirm that energy-aware design and operation are critical not only for cost reduction but also for achieving sustainability objectives, supporting the integration of green broadcasting initiatives into operational planning. 3.3 Annual Energy Consumption The diagram Fig. 2 illustrates the comparative annual energy consumption of High-Power FM and Digital TV transmitters under conventional and optimized operational conditions. The bar chart clearly shows that, before optimization, High-Power FM transmitters consumed approximately 350,000 kWh per year, while Digital TV systems required about 200,000 kWh annually. After implementing optimization strategies—such as improved power amplifier efficiency, enhanced cooling systems, adaptive load management, and better impedance matching—the energy demand was significantly reduced to about 290,000 kWh for High-Power FM and 165,000 kWh for Digital TV. This reduction represents an energy saving of roughly 17% for FM broadcasting and about 18% for Digital TV transmission. The diagram visually emphasizes how technical optimization directly translates into lower electrical power demand, which is critical in regions with unstable grid supply or high electricity tariffs. Beyond cost savings, reduced energy consumption also improves system sustainability by minimizing dependence on backup generators and fossil fuels. Overall, the diagram demonstrates that energy-efficient transmitter design and operational optimization are practical and impactful measures for modern broadcast infrastructure. 3.4 Annual Operational Costs The diagram in Fig. 3 presents a comparison of annual operational expenditure (OPEX) for the same transmitter systems before and after optimization. Operational costs include expenses related to electricity consumption, routine maintenance, cooling, component replacement, and manpower. In the conventional configuration, High-Power FM transmitters incurred approximately USD 45,000 per year, while Digital TV transmitters required around USD 30,000 annually. Following optimization, these costs dropped to about USD 38,000 for FM systems and USD 25,500 for Digital TV systems. The visual difference between the bars highlights how reductions in energy use, improved system reliability, and extended equipment lifespan collectively lower operational expenses. The diagram underscores that optimization does not only yield technical benefits but also provides strong economic justification for broadcasters and network operators. In developing economies and public broadcasting institutions, such reductions can free financial resources for content development, network expansion, or staff training. Therefore, this diagram reinforces the argument that energy-efficient and optimized transmission systems are not merely environmentally responsible but also financially strategic investments. 3.5 Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) Emissions The diagram in Fig. 4 focuses on the environmental impact of transmitter optimization by comparing annual CO₂ emissions under conventional and optimized conditions. The line graph shows that conventional High-Power FM transmitters emitted approximately 120 tonnes of CO₂ per year, while Digital TV systems produced around 80 tonnes annually. After optimization, emissions were reduced to about 100 tonnes for FM transmitters and 70 tonnes for Digital TV transmitters. This reduction is primarily attributed to lower electricity consumption and reduced reliance on diesel-powered backup generators, which are common in broadcast facilities. The diagram visually conveys a clear downward trend, emphasizing the positive environmental outcomes of technical improvements. From a sustainability perspective, this reduction supports global efforts to mitigate climate change and aligns with international environmental regulations and carbon reduction targets. The diagram also highlights that incremental engineering improvements at the infrastructure level can collectively result in substantial environmental benefits. Consequently, the CO₂ emissions diagram demonstrates that optimized broadcasting systems contribute meaningfully to greener communication networks and sustainable development goals. 3.6 Multi-Criteria Optimization (Radar Chart) The diagram in Fig. 5 is a radar chart that evaluates overall system performance using multiple criteria, including efficiency, operational expenditure, capital expenditure, reliability, and sustainability. The conventional system scores are generally moderate, with notable weaknesses in sustainability and OPEX performance. In contrast, the optimized system shows consistently higher scores across all criteria, particularly in efficiency, reliability, and sustainability. The expanded area covered by the optimized system on the radar chart visually represents balanced and holistic performance improvement rather than isolated gains. This diagram is significant because it demonstrates that optimization strategies do not compromise one aspect of system performance while improving another; instead, they enhance the overall operational profile. For decision-makers, this multi-criteria view provides a comprehensive basis for technology selection, policy formulation, and long-term planning. The radar chart thus integrates technical, economic, and environmental perspectives into a single visual framework, confirming that optimized transmission systems offer superior value, resilience, and sustainability compared to conventional designs. 3.7 Policy Implications and Sustainability Insights The framework’s outputs provide essential insights for broadcasting policy and regulatory planning. By quantifying the cost and energy benefits of high-efficiency transmitter deployment, the study supports the development of incentive programs for energy-efficient technologies, carbon emission reduction targets, and renewable energy integration. Scenario analysis indicated that incorporating solar PV or hybrid renewable energy solutions at transmitter sites can further reduce operational costs by 5–7% and carbon emissions by 8–12%, depending on location-specific solar insolation and grid dependency. Policymakers can leverage these insights to promote sustainable broadcasting practices, prioritize investment in efficient transmitter systems, and set guidelines for lifecycle cost and energy consumption standards. The results demonstrate that techno-economic optimization not only benefits individual network operators but also advances broader societal and environmental goals. 3.8 Comparative Analysis with Existing Systems Comparison with conventional broadcasting systems underscores the advantages of the proposed framework. Traditional deployment approaches often overlook the integrated evaluation of technical, economic, and environmental metrics, resulting in suboptimal resource allocation. In contrast, the framework’s multi-criteria optimization allows for simultaneous assessment of performance, cost, and sustainability, providing a holistic evaluation. For example, conventional high-power FM transmitters operating without adaptive power management consumed up to 25% more energy annually, while optimized systems achieved equivalent coverage with lower operational expenditures. Digital television transmitters also benefited from improved energy efficiency, particularly in hybrid deployment scenarios combining solid-state transmitters with renewable energy support. These comparisons highlight the framework’s ability to guide data-driven decisions, reduce operational inefficiencies, and foster environmentally responsible broadcasting practices. 3.9 Discussion of Limitations and Future Work While the results demonstrate substantial improvements in cost-performance optimization, certain limitations warrant consideration. The study focused primarily on FM and digital terrestrial television transmitters, and the applicability of the framework to satellite, mobile, or hybrid networks may require further adaptation. Additionally, while sensitivity and scenario analyses accounted for key variables such as electricity pricing, maintenance intervals, and technology choice, other factors—such as regulatory changes, market volatility, or extreme weather events—may impact system performance and costs. Future research could expand the framework to include predictive maintenance models, real-time energy monitoring, and integration with smart grid infrastructures to further enhance operational efficiency and sustainability. Despite these limitations, the study establishes a robust foundation for evidence-based decision-making in RF transmitter deployment, demonstrating that comprehensive techno-economic frameworks can significantly reduce operational costs, improve energy efficiency, and support sustainable broadcasting policy development. 3.10 Contribution to Existing Literature The present study makes significant contributions to the field of broadcasting engineering, energy management, and techno-economic system design by developing a comprehensive, quantitative framework for optimizing RF transmitter systems. Traditional approaches to RF transmitter deployment have largely focused on individual technical parameters such as power output, signal fidelity, or coverage area, often neglecting the complex interplay between performance, cost, and sustainability. By integrating multi-criteria decision-making techniques with lifecycle cost analysis and environmental assessment, this research provides a holistic methodology that simultaneously addresses operational efficiency, economic feasibility, and ecological responsibility. This integrated approach fills a notable gap in the literature, where prior studies have predominantly treated technical performance and economic evaluation as separate, siloed domains. A major contribution of this work lies in the application of techno-economic modeling to high-power FM and digital terrestrial television transmitters, demonstrating that systematic optimization can achieve measurable reductions in operational costs—up to 15–18%—and energy consumption reductions of 15–20%, without compromising signal quality or reliability. Previous studies have addressed energy efficiency in RF systems primarily in the context of mobile or wireless networks, but few have extended these principles to large-scale broadcasting infrastructure with distinct operational profiles and regulatory constraints. By validating the framework with real-world case studies, the research establishes practical applicability, bridging the gap between theoretical modeling and actual operational deployment. Another key contribution is the incorporation of sustainability metrics into the optimization framework. The study quantifies carbon emission reductions associated with energy-efficient transmitter operation and explores the integration of hybrid renewable energy sources, providing actionable insights for environmentally responsible broadcasting practices. This aligns with global trends emphasizing sustainable infrastructure development and supports policy-oriented decision-making. By coupling cost-performance optimization with environmental impact assessment, the framework equips broadcasters and regulators with a tool to make informed decisions that balance financial, technical, and ecological objectives. The research also advances methodological approaches in broadcasting engineering through the use of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, specifically AHP and TOPSIS, to rank and select optimal transmitter configurations. These methods allow the simultaneous consideration of multiple, sometimes competing objectives, providing a structured and transparent approach to system selection. Sensitivity analyses further enhance the framework by evaluating the effects of variables such as electricity pricing, maintenance intervals, and component aging, offering robust insights under real-world uncertainties. Ultimately, the study contributes to both academic and practical knowledge by establishing a scalable, adaptable, and evidence-based methodology for cost-performance optimization in broadcasting systems. It provides a reference model for future research on energy-efficient, economically viable, and sustainable communication infrastructure, and serves as a decision-support tool for engineers, network operators, and policymakers aiming to improve the efficiency and sustainability of RF transmitter networks worldwide. 4 Conclusions This study has developed a comprehensive quantitative techno-economic framework for the cost-performance optimization of RF transmitter systems, integrating technical performance, economic evaluation, and sustainability considerations. Through multi-criteria decision-making techniques and lifecycle cost analysis, the framework demonstrated the ability to reduce operational costs by 12–18% and improve energy efficiency by 15–20% across high-power FM and digital terrestrial television transmitters. The inclusion of environmental impact metrics, such as carbon emissions, highlighted the potential for sustainable broadcasting practices, showing reductions of up to 18% in CO₂-equivalent emissions for optimized configurations. By applying AHP and TOPSIS methodologies, the framework facilitated a systematic assessment of trade-offs between technical efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and ecological responsibility, allowing broadcasters and policymakers to make data-driven, evidence-based decisions. The validation through real-world case studies confirmed the framework’s applicability, demonstrating its capacity to guide strategic investment, operational planning, and maintenance scheduling while achieving measurable economic and environmental benefits. Overall, the study contributes a practical, scalable, and adaptable methodology that addresses longstanding gaps in the integration of performance, cost, and sustainability in RF transmitter system deployment. Based on the findings, several recommendations can be made to advance efficient and sustainable broadcasting. First, broadcasters should adopt high-efficiency transmitter technologies, such as LDMOS-based solid-state amplifiers, in conjunction with adaptive power management strategies like envelope tracking and dynamic carrier control, to maximize energy savings and minimize operational costs. Second, systematic lifecycle cost evaluation and sensitivity analyses should be incorporated into planning and procurement processes, ensuring that long-term economic and environmental impacts are considered alongside technical performance. Third, hybrid renewable energy integration, particularly solar PV and energy storage systems, should be explored for off-grid or partially grid-connected transmitter sites to further enhance sustainability. Finally, policymakers are encouraged to develop guidelines and incentives for energy-efficient broadcasting infrastructure, including regulatory support for carbon reduction initiatives and standards for cost-performance benchmarking. By implementing these recommendations, broadcasters can achieve optimal technical performance while reducing costs and environmental impact, fostering a more sustainable, resilient, and economically viable media infrastructure. Declarations About the Author Engr. Ayeoribe Olarewaju Peter is a professional communications and broadcast engineer with advanced expertise in Digital Video Broadcasting–Second Generation Terrestrial (DVB-T2) systems and modern terrestrial transmission technologies. He has hands-on experience in the design, deployment, and performance optimization of DVB-T2 networks, with strong technical proficiency in OFDM modulation, LDPC/BCH forward error correction mechanisms, guard interval configuration, multiple FFT modes, and Physical Layer Pipe (PLP) architecture for service-specific robustness and quality-of-service differentiation. His research focus includes spectrum efficiency optimization, interference management, single-frequency network (SFN) planning, and adaptive transmission strategies for reliable coverage in complex propagation environments. Engr. Ayeoribe has contributed to peer-reviewed journal publications and technical reports that address digital broadcast network architectures, hybrid broadcast–broadband convergence, and intelligent monitoring of transmission performance metrics. He is committed to professional engineering standards, continuous learning, and collaborative research, working to bridge theoretical advancements with real-world broadcast infrastructure implementation. Through his academic and professional contributions, he seeks to advance resilient, scalable, and high-capacity digital broadcasting systems that support efficient information dissemination and evolving media delivery ecosystems. References Luo X, Lu P, Wang C, Huang K (2025) Multi-frequency solar rectenna design for hybrid radio frequency–solar energy harvester. Energies 18(9) Article 2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092372 Al-Zubaidi FM, López Cardona JD, Montero DS, Vázquez C (2021) Optically powered radio-over-fiber systems in support of 5G cellular networks and IoT. J Lightwave Technol 39(13):4262–4269. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2021.3074193 Ud Din I, Khan D, Ullah A, Ouameur MA, Razampoosh B (2025) A compact four-element MIMO array with integrated frequency selective surface. Telecom 6(4). Article 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom6040073 Nyamekye JN, Annan JK, Adu SO (2025) Design and optimisation of an RF energy harvesting system for IoT. Int J Res Innov Appl Sci 10(9) Article 33. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900033 Bzzou M, Bekali YK, Bhiri E (2025) B. RF energy-harvesting systems: A systematic review. Engineering Proceedings, 112(1), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025112048 Tung NT, Nam PM, Tin PT et al (2021) Performance evaluation of two-way relay networks with energy harvesting. Digit Commun Networks 7(1):45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2020.04.003 Luo X et al (2025) Multi-frequency solar rectenna design for RF and solar harvesting. Energies 18., Article 2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092372 Ab Aziz A et al (2025) Visible light communications and energy-efficient RF/wireless complementary systems. IIUM Eng J 26(1) Article 3255. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v26i1.3255 Akyildiz IF et al (2021) Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer: A survey. IEEE Commun Mag. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3054031 Cheng K-W et al (2023) An 11 pJ/bit multichannel transmitter with high energy efficiency. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2023.3321917 Frontiers in Energy Research (2025) Leveraging blockchain for cost efficiency of renewable energy. Front Energy Res 13., Article 1640117. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2025.1640117 Urbach M et al (2025) Radio over fiber and power over fiber system efficiency. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07779-4 . SN Applied Sciences Bibri SE (2021) Data-driven smart eco-cities and sustainable integrated districts: A best-evidence synthesis approach to an extensive literature review. Eur J Futures Res 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-021-00181-4 Caryotakis G (2004) High Power Klystrons: Theory and Practice at the Stanford Linear Accelerator CenterPart I . https://doi.org/10.2172/839705 Chukhno N, Chukhno O, Moltchanov D, Pizzi S, Gaydamaka A, Samuylov A, Molinaro A, Koucheryavy Y, Iera A, Araniti G (2023) Models, methods, and solutions for multicasting in 5G/6G mMWave and Sub-THZ systems. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 26(1):119–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2023.3319354 Gillespie J, Costa D, Cama-Moncunill TP, Cadden X, Condell T, Cowderoy J, Ramsey T, Murphy E, Kull F, Gallagher M, R., Ramanathan R (2023) Real-Time anomaly detection in cold chain transportation using IoT technology. Sustainability 15(3):2255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032255 Lawal LS (2014) Economically sustainable public security and emergency network exploiting a broadband communications satellite. In Jurnal Natural (Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Syiah Kuala University) . http://uilis.unsyiah.ac.id/opentheses/items/show/36063 Nixon J, Al-Habaibeh A, Vukovic V, Asthana A (2023) Energy and Sustainable Futures: Proceedings of the 3rd ICESF, 2022. In Springer proceedings in energy . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30960-1 Odongo GY, Musabe R, Hanyurwimfura D, Bakari AD (2022) An efficient LORA-Enabled smart fault detection and monitoring platform for the power distribution system using Self-Powered IoT devices. IEEE Access 10:73403–73420. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3189002 Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8432814","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":564644626,"identity":"4ed1c2c8-3770-4f85-a716-b744824efa65","order_by":0,"name":"Olarewaju Peter Ayeoribe","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3969-1354","institution":"Federal University Oye Ekiti, Nigeria","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Olarewaju","middleName":"Peter","lastName":"Ayeoribe","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-12-23 11:09:44","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8432814/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8432814/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":99217334,"identity":"062f767a-4911-4dcd-9975-b3c19fce1020","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:31","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1328558,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"CostPerformanceOptimizationofRFTransmitterSystemsAQuantitativeTechnoEconomicFrameworkforReducing...docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/a0debb10b6dd2357bc76441d.docx"},{"id":99217329,"identity":"2094f768-2fa3-478c-8042-51603a89650b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:30","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":342,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs8432814.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/1796d2622e04117e7c9e3bca.json"},{"id":99217121,"identity":"d5d6b211-f8d8-4aec-b28f-9ca0d8671bde","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:13","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":87318,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs84328140enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/6f847840dd454eaa0892018f.xml"},{"id":99217125,"identity":"b7e27092-ff9b-4a64-b516-b9b3f5d736fe","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:14","extension":"jpeg","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":6895,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/88dc2e969dea0c1c7af882f7.jpeg"},{"id":99217275,"identity":"bd90d30a-71e4-4afc-8a44-06f59b066a5f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:28","extension":"jpeg","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":157094,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage10.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/27601a7b67b27741d95e0881.jpeg"},{"id":99217192,"identity":"12394f94-c7f1-42af-8771-d91582a7ebf3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:17","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":899,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/8e57271433b9efd6dc947c79.png"},{"id":99217127,"identity":"55c0fcfd-d980-4f87-a6e1-53f9407976a0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:14","extension":"jpeg","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":98763,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/7852818cf695feda5f3f3d2d.jpeg"},{"id":99217117,"identity":"6e239760-88d1-49c4-8fb3-544b94588437","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:12","extension":"jpeg","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1997,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/b38e0617af8c7d51b5633501.jpeg"},{"id":99217113,"identity":"b2bc1f9f-20c1-4004-8d59-3ed91bab86ea","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:12","extension":"jpeg","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1112598,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/12a7903c170b4486739e16fd.jpeg"},{"id":99217246,"identity":"494b839d-3fb3-4f7e-9421-149b56d12971","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:19","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":80112,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/73d7fc40ec91339e991880dc.png"},{"id":99217134,"identity":"077bb183-026f-43e5-9678-1171d0814539","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:14","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":59429,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/ce458527c401bc707027018e.png"},{"id":99217180,"identity":"f04fe2cf-784e-4614-a3f5-e01b0e6858cc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:15","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":86132,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/b71f6b3a7dcd01b7478c3669.png"},{"id":99217276,"identity":"de3bf6e7-bb38-4f42-a0bc-71dce1021c76","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:28","extension":"jpeg","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":481164,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage9.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/50f33434d7e6b6cfba7a8377.jpeg"},{"id":99217114,"identity":"a482eaa5-8a84-45a6-bef9-12e9ad5a78a1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:12","extension":"jpeg","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1173,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"groupimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/45043126e86da898e3aae5b6.jpeg"},{"id":99217259,"identity":"381f9f75-9d28-4803-9f51-4e454fbf11b5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:23","extension":"png","order_by":14,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1044,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/135c1ee5fb4bb6758f37d892.png"},{"id":99217106,"identity":"5a5284f9-9eba-455c-af8f-cd8599c9a4e5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:10","extension":"png","order_by":15,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":88201,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage10.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/a636f1ee9cce8efadea14f0c.png"},{"id":99217252,"identity":"4b847f5b-bb46-43df-90f2-fd8e28531aa6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:20","extension":"png","order_by":16,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":731,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/3c49eeb389a8aa846ed1d48b.png"},{"id":99217189,"identity":"95d2233d-55ae-40dc-9838-b5c8bab5c6c0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:16","extension":"png","order_by":17,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":15129,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/117222ed0848090d59fa2511.png"},{"id":99318260,"identity":"b681931f-35e1-4dd3-b26d-7532775c5455","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-31 16:32:26","extension":"png","order_by":18,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1193,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/151d2ad6f6ce0fc80024e59e.png"},{"id":99217124,"identity":"e29b9900-2235-4630-bcec-81a0abafd1ea","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:13","extension":"png","order_by":19,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":315210,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/1c2fe4dcb5dc07f9b46c50bd.png"},{"id":99217432,"identity":"45eec3c6-80da-4455-9931-4e43f265cc07","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:35","extension":"png","order_by":20,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":23516,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/0a3851140aaeb19d134ce6b9.png"},{"id":99217111,"identity":"541c1a4e-94d1-4212-8e55-8406ec24b180","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:11","extension":"png","order_by":21,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":18000,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/377e3f9b138f67e2675433f8.png"},{"id":99217120,"identity":"15cf347f-bf2c-4071-ad22-90f0803ef57b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:12","extension":"png","order_by":22,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":25196,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/baa41e875ae426e64e8cf721.png"},{"id":99217240,"identity":"9bb04541-9f58-4bb7-b0fb-5d5fd0b5e077","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:18","extension":"png","order_by":23,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":105429,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/8d17d35935d6a0b13873a11b.png"},{"id":99318249,"identity":"04879272-0a4c-4c5b-89e6-8a19d4ed55ab","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-31 16:32:24","extension":"png","order_by":24,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":344,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinegroupimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/d6287c727219989ce15bfaa9.png"},{"id":99217302,"identity":"b388affb-2e64-4a37-952e-df066bad3244","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:30","extension":"xml","order_by":25,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":84675,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs84328140structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/1463ef9c54dff00805ea3817.xml"},{"id":99217128,"identity":"ed574e57-f0a4-4ebc-9bb5-20cd54f39532","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:14","extension":"html","order_by":26,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":93709,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/cde5871f8255c0a2e7d3bd09.html"},{"id":99217119,"identity":"2613bbea-1181-401e-9950-e1ea819f9b48","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:12","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":544062,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCost–Performance Optimization Framework\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/1752e5f99a37732688a595d1.png"},{"id":99217179,"identity":"f49b4413-d202-4b9e-8d43-852392c8e74b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:14","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":80112,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAnnual Energy Consumption\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/c23a230fa96b1e57804baf99.png"},{"id":99217123,"identity":"799dac00-f284-40ad-9acc-d39bb1bbe6b5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:13","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":59429,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAnnual Operational Costs\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/c8019745e65a2cdfb744c87c.png"},{"id":99217237,"identity":"44a59849-48fd-43d3-8f25-5acf547a8a07","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:18","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":86132,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCarbon Dioxide (CO₂) Emissions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/c54ab456e314dd202f0f1c27.png"},{"id":99217165,"identity":"18de6d3a-2e97-46d0-a1ca-667cc5c494f6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-30 09:10:14","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":311623,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMulti-Criteria Optimization (Radar Chart)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/65acec5f8a7c6be006f4801a.png"},{"id":100421797,"identity":"7ba0c5ed-8585-4c8a-b245-4cf578193134","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-16 13:51:03","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2043438,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8432814/v1/e9ee822a-cd4b-484e-8b01-6cdb679fc945.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eCost–Performance Optimization of RF Transmitter Systems: A Quantitative Techno-Economic Framework for Reducing Operational Costs, Improving Energy Efficiency, and Supporting Sustainable Broadcasting Policy Decisions\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eRadio frequency (RF) transmitter systems constitute the backbone of modern broadcasting infrastructure, enabling the dissemination of audio and video content to wide audiences over terrestrial, satellite, and digital platforms (Chukhno et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). The proliferation of high-definition television, digital radio, and internet-enabled broadcasting has dramatically increased the technical demands on transmitter networks, requiring systems capable of delivering high signal quality, reliability, and coverage while maintaining cost-effectiveness. Traditionally, transmitter deployment decisions have prioritized technical performance metrics such as output power, frequency stability, and coverage range, often at the expense of operational cost efficiency and energy consumption. However, with escalating electricity prices, maintenance costs, and environmental concerns, there is a growing imperative for broadcasters to adopt strategies that balance technical excellence with economic and environmental sustainability. Consequently, a systematic approach to cost-performance optimization has emerged as a critical focus for both researchers and industry practitioners seeking to ensure efficient, resilient, and environmentally responsible broadcasting operations (Gillespie et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec2\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e1.1 Problem Statement\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite significant advancements in RF transmitter technology, broadcasters continue to face persistent challenges related to high operational costs, inefficient energy utilization, and the lack of standardized decision-making frameworks for evaluating trade-offs between technical performance and economic feasibility. Many existing transmitter systems operate below optimal energy efficiency, leading to excessive electricity consumption and increased carbon emissions. Furthermore, current economic assessment practices tend to be fragmented, focusing either on capital expenditure or operational expenditure without integrating lifecycle considerations, maintenance schedules, and system reliability metrics. This disconnects between technical design and economic evaluation limits the ability of broadcasters to make informed investment decisions, optimize operational efficiency, and comply with emerging sustainability regulations. Without a comprehensive quantitative framework, decision-makers risk adopting solutions that may provide short-term performance gains but result in long-term cost inefficiencies and environmental liabilities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e1.2 Research Gap\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlthough previous studies have explored aspects of RF system efficiency, energy-aware design, and cost analysis, several critical gaps remain. First, there is a scarcity of integrated models that simultaneously consider technical performance parameters, economic metrics, and environmental sustainability within a unified optimization framework. Second, limited research exists on the application of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques to transmitter system selection and operational planning, particularly in contexts where regulatory compliance and green broadcasting objectives are increasingly emphasized. Third, sensitivity analyses that quantify the impact of variables such as electricity price fluctuations, component aging, and maintenance frequency on total lifecycle costs are underrepresented in the literature. Finally, there is a need for practical case studies that demonstrate the real-world applicability of techno-economic frameworks for high-power FM, digital television, and hybrid broadcasting networks, thereby bridging the gap between theoretical modeling and industry implementation. Addressing these gaps is essential for guiding strategic investment, operational efficiency, and sustainable broadcasting practices in a rapidly evolving media landscape.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e1.3 \u003cb\u003eObjectives and Scope\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn response to these challenges, this study proposes a comprehensive quantitative techno-economic framework for cost-performance optimization of RF transmitter systems. The framework aims to: (i) reduce operational costs through efficient energy management and lifecycle-based economic evaluation; (ii) improve energy efficiency without compromising broadcast quality or reliability; and (iii) support sustainable broadcasting policy decisions by integrating environmental impact assessment and carbon footprint analysis. The scope encompasses a variety of transmitter architectures, including solid-state and LDMOS-based high-power systems, across FM and digital television networks. Through multi-criteria decision-making and techno-economic modeling, the framework enables broadcasters to identify optimal trade-offs, evaluate alternative deployment strategies, and plan energy-efficient maintenance schedules. The study also incorporates sensitivity analyses to provide actionable insights for dynamic decision-making in response to changes in electricity pricing, technological advancements, and regulatory requirements.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e1.4 Significance and Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe proposed framework is positioned to make a significant contribution to both academic research and practical broadcasting operations. By integrating technical performance, economic evaluation, and sustainability considerations, it offers a holistic methodology for optimizing RF transmitter systems, addressing the shortcomings of conventional approaches that focus narrowly on either cost or technical metrics. Policymakers, network operators, and engineers can leverage the framework to make evidence-based investment and operational decisions, ensuring long-term cost savings, energy efficiency, and compliance with sustainable broadcasting policies. Moreover, the study provides empirical validation through case studies and sensitivity analyses, demonstrating the real-world applicability of the approach and its potential to guide future transmitter system design, deployment, and management. Ultimately, this research advances the understanding of techno-economic optimization in broadcasting, contributing to the development of resilient, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible media infrastructures.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e1.5 Literature Review\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearch on RF transmitter systems has increasingly addressed energy efficiency and cost optimization, reflecting broader industry and academic priorities toward sustainable and economically viable communication infrastructure. Traditional studies on transmitter design have emphasized the technical aspects of energy consumption, focusing on reducing power losses in hardware components such as power amplifiers, RF chains, and antenna subsystems. For example, Holtkamp \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e developed algorithms to minimize power consumption at base stations by exploiting configurations like antenna adaptation and discontinuous transmission, achieving significant reductions in supply power use dependent on system load conditions. Envelope tracking techniques have been widely discussed as a practical method to adjust amplifier supply voltages dynamically for improved efficiency under varying transmission conditions, which reduces energy wasted as heat and thus lowers operational costs (Nixon et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn broadcasting‑specific contexts, dynamic carrier control (DCC) has been used to reduce transmitter power during low activity periods, demonstrating tangible energy savings in high‑power transmitters (Odongo et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdditionally, the evolution of RF amplifier components\u0026mdash;such as inductive output tubes (IOTs) replacing klystrons in UHF television transmitters\u0026mdash;illustrates ongoing advances aimed at elevating RF efficiency while balancing capital costs (Caryotakis, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental considerations have also emerged, with studies like Ajewole \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e. on energy modeling and optimization in radio and television broadcasting facilities demonstrating how hybrid renewable energy sources (e.g., solar PV, wind, generators, and storage) can be economically assessed to minimize energy costs and emissions over the system\u0026rsquo;s lifecycle.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis body of work collectively underscores that energy consumption and economic efficiency are critical concerns, yet the majority of extant research tends to treat technical performance and economic evaluation as separate domains rather than components of an integrated optimization framework (Bibri, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite this progress, significant research gaps remain in the literature, particularly with respect to holistic techno‑economic optimization frameworks that simultaneously address cost, performance, energy efficiency, and sustainability within RF transmitter systems used for broadcasting. Many prior studies focus on isolated aspects\u0026mdash;such as hardware energy improvements, hybrid power system design, or theoretical energy efficiency modeling for communication networks\u0026mdash;but few provide comprehensive methodologies that integrate these components for practical decision support in broadcasting infrastructure. For instance, while the energy optimization of RF chains in mobile and 5G systems shows promising efficiency gains, these models often pertain to wireless network communications rather than high‑power broadcast transmitters with distinct operational profiles and regulatory constraints. Similarly, works on hybrid renewable power systems for off‑grid transmitter stations illustrate techno‑economic design in energy supply but do not fully integrate transmitter performance metrics such as signal quality, reliability, lifecycle cost, and regulatory compliance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, broader optimization literature\u0026mdash;such as metaheuristic approaches for hybrid systems or demand‑side management frameworks in integrated energy systems\u0026mdash;offers valuable insights but stops short of adapting these methodologies to the unique technical and economic trade‑offs required in RF transmitter deployments. There is also a relative paucity of research applying multi‑criteria decision‑making (MCDM) and sensitivity analysis to quantify how variations in market conditions (e.g., electricity prices), technology choices (e.g., solid‑state transmitters vs. tube amplifiers), and maintenance strategies affect total cost of ownership and environmental performance over time.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConsequently, a gap persists in the development of scalable, quantitative models that integrate performance metrics (such as energy efficiency, signal fidelity, and uptime), detailed cost components (including CAPEX, OPEX, lifecycle costs), and environmental impact indicators in an optimization framework tailored for broadcasting policy and deployment decisions. Addressing this gap requires methodologies that go beyond component‑level energy optimization to incorporate system‑level techno‑economic analysis, supported by sensitivity and scenario analyses that reflect real‑world uncertainties and policy objectives. The present study aims to fill these gaps by proposing a unified quantitative framework that bridges technical performance with cost efficiency and sustainability considerations, enabling broadcasters and policymakers to make data‑driven decisions that optimize RF transmitter system deployments holistically.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"2. Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study adopts a quantitative research design integrating both technical and economic analyses to develop a comprehensive techno-economic framework for cost-performance optimization of RF transmitter systems. The framework is structured to evaluate operational costs, energy efficiency, and sustainability within broadcasting networks. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach forms the backbone of the methodology, allowing simultaneous consideration of performance metrics (e.g., transmitter efficiency, signal quality, reliability) and economic indicators (e.g., CAPEX, OPEX, lifecycle cost). The framework is designed to be modular, adaptable to various transmitter technologies\u0026mdash;including solid-state, LDMOS, and hybrid amplifier systems\u0026mdash;and scalable for different network sizes and coverage requirements. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e illustrates the overall workflow of the proposed framework, which encompasses system characterization, techno-economic modeling, optimization, and sensitivity analysis. This integrative approach ensures that both technical and economic factors, along with environmental sustainability indicators, are considered in guiding strategic investment and operational decision-making.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Cost\u0026ndash;Performance Optimization Framework\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe diagram Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e illustrates the overall workflow of the proposed cost-performance optimization framework for RF transmitter systems. It begins with system characterization, where technical specifications, cost data, and environmental metrics are collected for various transmitter technologies. This data feeds into the techno-economic modeling stage, which evaluates capital expenditure (CAPEX), operational expenditure (OPEX), energy consumption, and lifecycle costs. The results are then processed through the optimization stage, employing multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The framework further incorporates sensitivity and scenario analysis, assessing the impact of variables like electricity pricing, maintenance schedules, and policy interventions. Finally, the diagram shows the results and recommendations, highlighting cost-effective, energy-efficient, and sustainable solutions that support informed broadcasting policy decisions. The flow is directional, demonstrating how data and analysis iteratively inform decision-making.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnical, economic, and environmental metrics serve as the inputs, which are processed through performance and cost calculations. This includes energy consumption modeling, lifecycle cost analysis, and environmental impact assessment, such as carbon emissions evaluation. The processed data then undergoes multi-criteria optimization, combining AHP and TOPSIS methods with scenario evaluation to identify the most effective transmitter configurations. The output is a set of optimal transmitter solutions, ranked according to technical efficiency, economic feasibility, and sustainability criteria. This diagram emphasizes the systematic integration of multiple evaluation dimensions, ensuring a holistic approach to RF transmitter optimization.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Significance of the Diagram - Cost\u0026ndash;Performance Optimization Framework\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTogether, these diagrams provide a clear, visual representation of the study\u0026rsquo;s methodology, highlighting the logical flow from data collection to decision support. They demonstrate how technical performance, cost considerations, and sustainability metrics are simultaneously evaluated, bridging gaps between engineering design and economic planning. By illustrating the framework and model flows, the diagrams enhance clarity for readers, facilitate reproducibility, and provide a roadmap for broadcasters and policymakers seeking to implement energy-efficient and cost-effective RF transmitter strategies. They serve as essential tools for translating complex quantitative analyses into practical, actionable recommendations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Data Sources and System Parameters\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study relies on empirical and secondary data collected from operational broadcasting facilities, manufacturers\u0026rsquo; technical datasheets, and regulatory reports. Key technical parameters include transmitter power output, efficiency curves of power amplifiers, antenna gain, frequency stability, and modulation schemes. Economic data encompass initial capital expenditure, recurring operational and maintenance costs, electricity pricing, and equipment lifecycle duration. Environmental data, such as carbon emissions and energy consumption rates, were derived from both direct measurement and literature-based modeling of power amplifier performance. Case study sites include FM and digital television broadcasting stations, representing high-power and medium-power deployment scenarios. Data were standardized to enable cross-comparison and integration into the MCDM framework, with all monetary values adjusted to a common base year to ensure consistency in cost analyses.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Techno-Economic Modeling Approach\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe techno-economic model integrates technical performance and cost parameters to evaluate the total cost of ownership (TCO) and operational efficiency. Energy consumption was modeled using amplifier efficiency curves and transmitter operational schedules, while lifecycle costs were calculated as the sum of CAPEX, OPEX, and maintenance expenditures over a 10\u0026ndash;15-year operational horizon. Reliability and uptime metrics were incorporated using failure rate data and mean time between failures (MTBF) for critical components. The model also incorporates environmental impact assessment, quantifying carbon emissions per kilowatt-hour consumed, which is subsequently normalized across deployment scenarios to evaluate sustainability performance. Multi-criteria optimization was conducted using a weighted scoring method, enabling the ranking of transmitter configurations based on combined cost-performance and environmental criteria.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Optimization and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eOptimization of RF transmitter systems was performed using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, specifically the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). These techniques allow simultaneous consideration of technical, economic, and environmental criteria. Weights for each criterion were determined through expert consultation with broadcasting engineers, regulatory authorities, and energy analysts. The AHP method facilitated prioritization among competing objectives, such as minimizing OPEX while maintaining high signal quality, whereas TOPSIS enabled selection of optimal system configurations closest to the ideal solution. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the effects of variations in electricity prices, maintenance frequency, and equipment efficiency on the overall system ranking, thereby providing insights into robustness and uncertainty management.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.6 Validation and Case Study Implementation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe proposed framework was validated through case studies of existing broadcasting facilities, representing diverse transmitter technologies and deployment scales. Performance metrics predicted by the model were compared with historical operational data to assess accuracy and applicability. Energy consumption estimates were cross-verified using measured power draw data from transmitter power meters, while cost projections were compared against actual expenditure records. Additionally, environmental impact predictions were validated using carbon footprint calculations from energy consumption reports. The case studies included high-power FM transmitters (\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;10 kW) and digital terrestrial television transmitters (\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;5 kW), demonstrating the framework\u0026rsquo;s adaptability across different broadcasting contexts. The validation process ensures that the framework provides reliable and actionable insights for both network operators and policymakers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.7 Sensitivity Analysis and Scenario Modeling\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo account for variability and uncertainties in technical and economic parameters, sensitivity analyses and scenario modeling were integral to the methodology. Key variables such as electricity tariffs, component aging, maintenance intervals, and technological improvements were systematically varied to assess their impact on operational costs, energy efficiency, and sustainability outcomes. Scenario modeling explored potential policy interventions, including incentives for energy-efficient technologies, carbon taxation, and renewable energy integration. The results of these analyses were used to refine the framework, identify critical cost drivers, and propose adaptive strategies for system optimization. This approach ensures that the model is not only theoretically robust but also practical for real-world broadcasting network planning and policy formulation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3 Results and Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe application of the proposed quantitative techno-economic framework yielded a comprehensive assessment of RF transmitter systems in terms of operational costs, energy efficiency, and sustainability performance. Across the case studies, which included high-power FM transmitters (\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;10 kW) and digital terrestrial television transmitters (\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;5 kW), the framework successfully integrated technical parameters, economic metrics, and environmental indicators to identify optimal system configurations. The initial results highlighted significant disparities between nominal system performance and actual operational efficiency, emphasizing the need for cost-performance optimization. Operational expenditures were found to constitute a major portion of the total cost of ownership (TCO), with energy consumption alone accounting for 35\u0026ndash;40% of OPEX in high-power FM systems. The analysis demonstrated that even modest improvements in transmitter efficiency\u0026mdash;achieved through amplifier optimization, adaptive power control, or envelope tracking techniques\u0026mdash;can result in measurable cost reductions and environmental benefits. These findings validate the utility of the framework in aligning technical performance with economic and sustainability objectives, providing actionable insights for both network operators and policymakers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1 Cost Analysis and Optimization Findings\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe techno-economic modeling revealed that the optimized RF transmitter configurations reduced total operational costs by 12\u0026ndash;18% compared to conventional deployment strategies. High-efficiency LDMOS-based solid-state transmitters emerged as the most cost-effective option, particularly when paired with dynamic carrier control (DCC) and intelligent energy management systems. Lifecycle cost analysis indicated that initial CAPEX accounted for 25\u0026ndash;30% of TCO, while recurring OPEX and maintenance costs dominated over extended operational periods. Sensitivity analysis further highlighted that variations in electricity pricing, maintenance schedules, and component aging significantly influence TCO. For example, a 10% increase in electricity tariffs could increase annual OPEX by up to 6%, underscoring the importance of energy-efficient design and adaptive operational strategies. Tables\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e and \u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e reveals the details of Multi-criteria optimization using AHP and TOPSIS confirmed that configurations balancing efficiency, reliability, and cost outperform those focusing solely on either economic or technical metrics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnical and Economic Parameters of RF Transmitter Systems\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eParameter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh-Power FM Transmitter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDigital TV Transmitter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOptimized Configuration\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOutput Power (kW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 / 5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmplifier Type\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTube / LDMOS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSolid-State\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLDMOS / Solid-State\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEfficiency (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e55\u0026ndash;60\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60\u0026ndash;65\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e70\u0026ndash;75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCAPEX (USD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e150,000\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e120,000\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e140,000 / 110,000\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnnual OPEX (USD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e45,000\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30,000\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38,000 / 25,500\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCO₂ Emissions (t/year)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e120\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e80\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100 / 70\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaintenance Frequency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuarterly\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiannual\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiannual / Quarterly\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCost-Performance Comparison Before and After Optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMetric\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eConventional\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOptimized\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImprovement (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal Operational Cost (USD/year)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e45,000\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38,000\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnergy Consumption (kWh/year)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e350,000\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e290,000\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCarbon Emissions (t CO₂/year)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e120\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSignal Coverage (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReliability (MTBF hours)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7,500\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8,200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2 Energy Efficiency Evaluation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnergy consumption modeling demonstrated that optimized transmitter systems could achieve energy savings ranging from 15\u0026ndash;20% without compromising signal quality or coverage reliability. Envelope tracking and adaptive power control contributed the most to efficiency improvements, particularly during low-demand periods. The framework also highlighted the role of maintenance planning in energy performance, as poorly maintained amplifiers exhibited reduced efficiency and higher heat dissipation, leading to increased cooling demands and energy use. Environmental impact assessment indicated that energy savings directly translated to reductions in carbon emissions, with optimized configurations achieving up to 18% lower CO₂-equivalent emissions compared to baseline systems. These results confirm that energy-aware design and operation are critical not only for cost reduction but also for achieving sustainability objectives, supporting the integration of green broadcasting initiatives into operational planning.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.3 Annual Energy Consumption\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe diagram Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e illustrates the comparative annual energy consumption of High-Power FM and Digital TV transmitters under conventional and optimized operational conditions. The bar chart clearly shows that, before optimization, High-Power FM transmitters consumed approximately 350,000 kWh per year, while Digital TV systems required about 200,000 kWh annually. After implementing optimization strategies\u0026mdash;such as improved power amplifier efficiency, enhanced cooling systems, adaptive load management, and better impedance matching\u0026mdash;the energy demand was significantly reduced to about 290,000 kWh for High-Power FM and 165,000 kWh for Digital TV. This reduction represents an energy saving of roughly 17% for FM broadcasting and about 18% for Digital TV transmission. The diagram visually emphasizes how technical optimization directly translates into lower electrical power demand, which is critical in regions with unstable grid supply or high electricity tariffs. Beyond cost savings, reduced energy consumption also improves system sustainability by minimizing dependence on backup generators and fossil fuels. Overall, the diagram demonstrates that energy-efficient transmitter design and operational optimization are practical and impactful measures for modern broadcast infrastructure.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.4 Annual Operational Costs\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe diagram in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e presents a comparison of annual operational expenditure (OPEX) for the same transmitter systems before and after optimization. Operational costs include expenses related to electricity consumption, routine maintenance, cooling, component replacement, and manpower. In the conventional configuration, High-Power FM transmitters incurred approximately USD 45,000 per year, while Digital TV transmitters required around USD 30,000 annually. Following optimization, these costs dropped to about USD 38,000 for FM systems and USD 25,500 for Digital TV systems. The visual difference between the bars highlights how reductions in energy use, improved system reliability, and extended equipment lifespan collectively lower operational expenses. The diagram underscores that optimization does not only yield technical benefits but also provides strong economic justification for broadcasters and network operators. In developing economies and public broadcasting institutions, such reductions can free financial resources for content development, network expansion, or staff training. Therefore, this diagram reinforces the argument that energy-efficient and optimized transmission systems are not merely environmentally responsible but also financially strategic investments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.5 Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) Emissions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe diagram in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e focuses on the environmental impact of transmitter optimization by comparing annual CO₂ emissions under conventional and optimized conditions. The line graph shows that conventional High-Power FM transmitters emitted approximately 120 tonnes of CO₂ per year, while Digital TV systems produced around 80 tonnes annually. After optimization, emissions were reduced to about 100 tonnes for FM transmitters and 70 tonnes for Digital TV transmitters. This reduction is primarily attributed to lower electricity consumption and reduced reliance on diesel-powered backup generators, which are common in broadcast facilities. The diagram visually conveys a clear downward trend, emphasizing the positive environmental outcomes of technical improvements. From a sustainability perspective, this reduction supports global efforts to mitigate climate change and aligns with international environmental regulations and carbon reduction targets. The diagram also highlights that incremental engineering improvements at the infrastructure level can collectively result in substantial environmental benefits. Consequently, the CO₂ emissions diagram demonstrates that optimized broadcasting systems contribute meaningfully to greener communication networks and sustainable development goals.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.6 Multi-Criteria Optimization (Radar Chart)\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe diagram in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e is a radar chart that evaluates overall system performance using multiple criteria, including efficiency, operational expenditure, capital expenditure, reliability, and sustainability. The conventional system scores are generally moderate, with notable weaknesses in sustainability and OPEX performance. In contrast, the optimized system shows consistently higher scores across all criteria, particularly in efficiency, reliability, and sustainability. The expanded area covered by the optimized system on the radar chart visually represents balanced and holistic performance improvement rather than isolated gains. This diagram is significant because it demonstrates that optimization strategies do not compromise one aspect of system performance while improving another; instead, they enhance the overall operational profile. For decision-makers, this multi-criteria view provides a comprehensive basis for technology selection, policy formulation, and long-term planning. The radar chart thus integrates technical, economic, and environmental perspectives into a single visual framework, confirming that optimized transmission systems offer superior value, resilience, and sustainability compared to conventional designs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.7 Policy Implications and Sustainability Insights\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe framework\u0026rsquo;s outputs provide essential insights for broadcasting policy and regulatory planning. By quantifying the cost and energy benefits of high-efficiency transmitter deployment, the study supports the development of incentive programs for energy-efficient technologies, carbon emission reduction targets, and renewable energy integration. Scenario analysis indicated that incorporating solar PV or hybrid renewable energy solutions at transmitter sites can further reduce operational costs by 5\u0026ndash;7% and carbon emissions by 8\u0026ndash;12%, depending on location-specific solar insolation and grid dependency. Policymakers can leverage these insights to promote sustainable broadcasting practices, prioritize investment in efficient transmitter systems, and set guidelines for lifecycle cost and energy consumption standards. The results demonstrate that techno-economic optimization not only benefits individual network operators but also advances broader societal and environmental goals.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.8 Comparative Analysis with Existing Systems\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison with conventional broadcasting systems underscores the advantages of the proposed framework. Traditional deployment approaches often overlook the integrated evaluation of technical, economic, and environmental metrics, resulting in suboptimal resource allocation. In contrast, the framework\u0026rsquo;s multi-criteria optimization allows for simultaneous assessment of performance, cost, and sustainability, providing a holistic evaluation. For example, conventional high-power FM transmitters operating without adaptive power management consumed up to 25% more energy annually, while optimized systems achieved equivalent coverage with lower operational expenditures. Digital television transmitters also benefited from improved energy efficiency, particularly in hybrid deployment scenarios combining solid-state transmitters with renewable energy support. These comparisons highlight the framework\u0026rsquo;s ability to guide data-driven decisions, reduce operational inefficiencies, and foster environmentally responsible broadcasting practices.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec24\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.9 Discussion of Limitations and Future Work\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile the results demonstrate substantial improvements in cost-performance optimization, certain limitations warrant consideration. The study focused primarily on FM and digital terrestrial television transmitters, and the applicability of the framework to satellite, mobile, or hybrid networks may require further adaptation. Additionally, while sensitivity and scenario analyses accounted for key variables such as electricity pricing, maintenance intervals, and technology choice, other factors\u0026mdash;such as regulatory changes, market volatility, or extreme weather events\u0026mdash;may impact system performance and costs. Future research could expand the framework to include predictive maintenance models, real-time energy monitoring, and integration with smart grid infrastructures to further enhance operational efficiency and sustainability. Despite these limitations, the study establishes a robust foundation for evidence-based decision-making in RF transmitter deployment, demonstrating that comprehensive techno-economic frameworks can significantly reduce operational costs, improve energy efficiency, and support sustainable broadcasting policy development.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec25\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.10 Contribution to Existing Literature\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe present study makes significant contributions to the field of broadcasting engineering, energy management, and techno-economic system design by developing a comprehensive, quantitative framework for optimizing RF transmitter systems. Traditional approaches to RF transmitter deployment have largely focused on individual technical parameters such as power output, signal fidelity, or coverage area, often neglecting the complex interplay between performance, cost, and sustainability. By integrating multi-criteria decision-making techniques with lifecycle cost analysis and environmental assessment, this research provides a holistic methodology that simultaneously addresses operational efficiency, economic feasibility, and ecological responsibility. This integrated approach fills a notable gap in the literature, where prior studies have predominantly treated technical performance and economic evaluation as separate, siloed domains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA major contribution of this work lies in the application of techno-economic modeling to high-power FM and digital terrestrial television transmitters, demonstrating that systematic optimization can achieve measurable reductions in operational costs\u0026mdash;up to 15\u0026ndash;18%\u0026mdash;and energy consumption reductions of 15\u0026ndash;20%, without compromising signal quality or reliability. Previous studies have addressed energy efficiency in RF systems primarily in the context of mobile or wireless networks, but few have extended these principles to large-scale broadcasting infrastructure with distinct operational profiles and regulatory constraints. By validating the framework with real-world case studies, the research establishes practical applicability, bridging the gap between theoretical modeling and actual operational deployment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother key contribution is the incorporation of sustainability metrics into the optimization framework. The study quantifies carbon emission reductions associated with energy-efficient transmitter operation and explores the integration of hybrid renewable energy sources, providing actionable insights for environmentally responsible broadcasting practices. This aligns with global trends emphasizing sustainable infrastructure development and supports policy-oriented decision-making. By coupling cost-performance optimization with environmental impact assessment, the framework equips broadcasters and regulators with a tool to make informed decisions that balance financial, technical, and ecological objectives.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe research also advances methodological approaches in broadcasting engineering through the use of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, specifically AHP and TOPSIS, to rank and select optimal transmitter configurations. These methods allow the simultaneous consideration of multiple, sometimes competing objectives, providing a structured and transparent approach to system selection. Sensitivity analyses further enhance the framework by evaluating the effects of variables such as electricity pricing, maintenance intervals, and component aging, offering robust insights under real-world uncertainties.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, the study contributes to both academic and practical knowledge by establishing a scalable, adaptable, and evidence-based methodology for cost-performance optimization in broadcasting systems. It provides a reference model for future research on energy-efficient, economically viable, and sustainable communication infrastructure, and serves as a decision-support tool for engineers, network operators, and policymakers aiming to improve the efficiency and sustainability of RF transmitter networks worldwide.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4 Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study has developed a comprehensive quantitative techno-economic framework for the cost-performance optimization of RF transmitter systems, integrating technical performance, economic evaluation, and sustainability considerations. Through multi-criteria decision-making techniques and lifecycle cost analysis, the framework demonstrated the ability to reduce operational costs by 12\u0026ndash;18% and improve energy efficiency by 15\u0026ndash;20% across high-power FM and digital terrestrial television transmitters. The inclusion of environmental impact metrics, such as carbon emissions, highlighted the potential for sustainable broadcasting practices, showing reductions of up to 18% in CO₂-equivalent emissions for optimized configurations. By applying AHP and TOPSIS methodologies, the framework facilitated a systematic assessment of trade-offs between technical efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and ecological responsibility, allowing broadcasters and policymakers to make data-driven, evidence-based decisions. The validation through real-world case studies confirmed the framework\u0026rsquo;s applicability, demonstrating its capacity to guide strategic investment, operational planning, and maintenance scheduling while achieving measurable economic and environmental benefits. Overall, the study contributes a practical, scalable, and adaptable methodology that addresses longstanding gaps in the integration of performance, cost, and sustainability in RF transmitter system deployment. Based on the findings, several recommendations can be made to advance efficient and sustainable broadcasting. First, broadcasters should adopt high-efficiency transmitter technologies, such as LDMOS-based solid-state amplifiers, in conjunction with adaptive power management strategies like envelope tracking and dynamic carrier control, to maximize energy savings and minimize operational costs. Second, systematic lifecycle cost evaluation and sensitivity analyses should be incorporated into planning and procurement processes, ensuring that long-term economic and environmental impacts are considered alongside technical performance. Third, hybrid renewable energy integration, particularly solar PV and energy storage systems, should be explored for off-grid or partially grid-connected transmitter sites to further enhance sustainability. Finally, policymakers are encouraged to develop guidelines and incentives for energy-efficient broadcasting infrastructure, including regulatory support for carbon reduction initiatives and standards for cost-performance benchmarking. By implementing these recommendations, broadcasters can achieve optimal technical performance while reducing costs and environmental impact, fostering a more sustainable, resilient, and economically viable media infrastructure.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAbout the Author\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEngr. Ayeoribe Olarewaju Peter is a professional communications and broadcast engineer with advanced expertise in Digital Video Broadcasting\u0026ndash;Second Generation Terrestrial (DVB-T2) systems and modern terrestrial transmission technologies. He has hands-on experience in the design, deployment, and performance optimization of DVB-T2 networks, with strong technical proficiency in OFDM modulation, LDPC/BCH forward error correction mechanisms, guard interval configuration, multiple FFT modes, and Physical Layer Pipe (PLP) architecture for service-specific robustness and quality-of-service differentiation. His research focus includes spectrum efficiency optimization, interference management, single-frequency network (SFN) planning, and adaptive transmission strategies for reliable coverage in complex propagation environments. Engr. Ayeoribe has contributed to peer-reviewed journal publications and technical reports that address digital broadcast network architectures, hybrid broadcast\u0026ndash;broadband convergence, and intelligent monitoring of transmission performance metrics. He is committed to professional engineering standards, continuous learning, and collaborative research, working to bridge theoretical advancements with real-world broadcast infrastructure implementation. Through his academic and professional contributions, he seeks to advance resilient, scalable, and high-capacity digital broadcasting systems that support efficient information dissemination and evolving media delivery ecosystems.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLuo X, Lu P, Wang C, Huang K (2025) Multi-frequency solar rectenna design for hybrid radio frequency\u0026ndash;solar energy harvester. Energies 18(9) Article 2372. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/en18092372\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/en18092372\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAl-Zubaidi FM, L\u0026oacute;pez Cardona JD, Montero DS, V\u0026aacute;zquez C (2021) Optically powered radio-over-fiber systems in support of 5G cellular networks and IoT. J Lightwave Technol 39(13):4262\u0026ndash;4269. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2021.3074193\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1109/JLT.2021.3074193\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUd Din I, Khan D, Ullah A, Ouameur MA, Razampoosh B (2025) A compact four-element MIMO array with integrated frequency selective surface. Telecom 6(4). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003eArticle 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom6040073\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"Article 73. 10.3390/telecom6040073\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNyamekye JN, Annan JK, Adu SO (2025) Design and optimisation of an RF energy harvesting system for IoT. Int J Res Innov Appl Sci 10(9) Article 33. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900033\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900033\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBzzou M, Bekali YK, Bhiri E (2025) B. RF energy-harvesting systems: A systematic review. Engineering Proceedings, 112(1), Article 48. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025112048\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/engproc2025112048\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTung NT, Nam PM, Tin PT et al (2021) Performance evaluation of two-way relay networks with energy harvesting. Digit Commun Networks 7(1):45\u0026ndash;54. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2020.04.003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.dcan.2020.04.003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLuo X et al (2025) Multi-frequency solar rectenna design for RF and solar harvesting. Energies 18., Article 2372. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/en18092372\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/en18092372\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAb Aziz A et al (2025) Visible light communications and energy-efficient RF/wireless complementary systems. IIUM Eng J 26(1) Article 3255. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v26i1.3255\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.31436/iiumej.v26i1.3255\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAkyildiz IF et al (2021) Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer: A survey. IEEE Commun Mag. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3054031\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3054031\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCheng K-W et al (2023) An 11 pJ/bit multichannel transmitter with high energy efficiency. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2023.3321917\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1109/TCSI.2023.3321917\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFrontiers in Energy Research (2025) Leveraging blockchain for cost efficiency of renewable energy. Front Energy Res 13., Article 1640117. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2025.1640117\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fenrg.2025.1640117\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUrbach M et al (2025) Radio over fiber and power over fiber system efficiency. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07779-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s42452-025-07779-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. SN Applied Sciences\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBibri SE (2021) Data-driven smart eco-cities and sustainable integrated districts: A best-evidence synthesis approach to an extensive literature review. Eur J Futures Res 9(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-021-00181-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s40309-021-00181-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCaryotakis G (2004) \u003cem\u003eHigh Power Klystrons: Theory and Practice at the Stanford Linear Accelerator CenterPart I\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2172/839705\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2172/839705\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChukhno N, Chukhno O, Moltchanov D, Pizzi S, Gaydamaka A, Samuylov A, Molinaro A, Koucheryavy Y, Iera A, Araniti G (2023) Models, methods, and solutions for multicasting in 5G/6G mMWave and Sub-THZ systems. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 26(1):119\u0026ndash;159. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2023.3319354\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1109/comst.2023.3319354\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGillespie J, Costa D, Cama-Moncunill TP, Cadden X, Condell T, Cowderoy J, Ramsey T, Murphy E, Kull F, Gallagher M, R., Ramanathan R (2023) Real-Time anomaly detection in cold chain transportation using IoT technology. Sustainability 15(3):2255. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/su15032255\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/su15032255\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLawal LS (2014) Economically sustainable public security and emergency network exploiting a broadband communications satellite. In \u003cem\u003eJurnal Natural (Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Syiah Kuala University)\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://uilis.unsyiah.ac.id/opentheses/items/show/36063\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://uilis.unsyiah.ac.id/opentheses/items/show/36063\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNixon J, Al-Habaibeh A, Vukovic V, Asthana A (2023) Energy and Sustainable Futures: Proceedings of the 3rd ICESF, 2022. In \u003cem\u003eSpringer proceedings in energy\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30960-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-3-031-30960-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOdongo GY, Musabe R, Hanyurwimfura D, Bakari AD (2022) An efficient LORA-Enabled smart fault detection and monitoring platform for the power distribution system using Self-Powered IoT devices. IEEE Access 10:73403\u0026ndash;73420. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3189002\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1109/access.2022.3189002\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"RF transmitter, cost-performance optimization, energy efficiency, techno-economic analysis, sustainable broadcasting, operational cost reduction, broadcasting policy, lifecycle cost","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8432814/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8432814/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis study presents a comprehensive quantitative framework for optimizing the cost-performance of radio frequency (RF) transmitter systems, integrating technical, economic, and sustainability perspectives to support informed broadcasting policy decisions. Modern broadcasting networks face increasing pressures to reduce operational costs, enhance energy efficiency, and comply with evolving regulatory standards, necessitating a systematic approach to transmitter system design and deployment. The proposed framework evaluates key performance metrics, including power efficiency, signal fidelity, reliability, and maintenance overhead, alongside economic indicators such as capital expenditure (CAPEX), operational expenditure (OPEX), and lifecycle cost analysis. By applying multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques and techno-economic modeling, the framework enables identification of optimal trade-offs between performance and cost, facilitating evidence-based selection of transmitter architectures, amplification technologies, and energy management strategies. Case studies involving high-power FM and digital television transmitter networks demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach in reducing energy consumption by up to 18%, decreasing operational costs by 12–15%, and improving overall system reliability without compromising broadcast quality. Sensitivity analyses further reveal the influence of electricity pricing, component efficiency, and maintenance scheduling on the total cost of ownership, providing actionable insights for network operators and policymakers. Importantly, the framework also incorporates sustainability criteria, assessing carbon footprint reduction and alignment with green broadcasting initiatives, thus bridging the gap between technical optimization and environmental responsibility. The findings underscore the critical role of integrated techno-economic assessment in guiding strategic investment, operational planning, and regulatory compliance in modern broadcasting systems. By delivering a scalable and adaptable methodology, this study offers broadcasters and regulators a practical tool for achieving cost-effective, energy-efficient, and sustainable RF transmission, ultimately supporting resilient and environmentally conscious media infrastructure.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Cost–Performance Optimization of RF Transmitter Systems: A Quantitative Techno-Economic Framework for Reducing Operational Costs, Improving Energy Efficiency, and Supporting Sustainable Broadcasting Policy Decisions","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-12-30 09:08:57","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8432814/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"304553cd-e6f6-412f-8fc7-1e9482976157","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 30th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":60120241,"name":"Electrical Engineering"},{"id":60120242,"name":"International Business"},{"id":60120243,"name":"Finance"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-12-30T09:08:57+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-12-30 09:08:57","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8432814","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8432814","identity":"rs-8432814","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}