Characterization of ECM produced by MC3T3-E1 cellular spheroids encapsulated in alginate hydrogel

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,656 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The application of cellular spheroids in bone tissue engineering research has gained significant interest in the last decade. Compared to monolayer cell cultures, the 3D architecture allows for more physiological cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions that make cellular spheroids a suitable model system to investigate bone ECM in vitro. The use of 3D model systems requires fine-tuning of experimental methods used to study cell morphology, ECM deposition and mineralization, and cell-ECM interactions. In this study, we use MC3T3-E1 cellular spheroids encapsulated in an alginate hydrogel to study and characterize the deposited ECM. Spheroid shape and structure were evaluated using confocal microscopy. The deposited collagenous ECM was characterized using quantitative assay and microscopy, in particular Second Harmonic Imaging Microscopy (SHIM), hydroxyproline (HYP) assay and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). The use of hydrogel constructs allows easy handling and imaging of the samples and helps to preserve the spheroid’s stability by preventing cells from adhering to the culture dish surface. We use a non-modified alginate hydrogel that does not facilitate cell attachment and therefore functions as an inert encapsulating scaffold. Constructs were cultured for up to 4 weeks. SHIM, HYP assay and TEM confirmed the deposition of collagenous matrix by the spheroid, with most of it taking place between week 2 and 4. We demonstrated that alginate encapsulated bone spheroids are a promising model for studying bone ECM in vitro. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00